Validation of the Italian version of interpersonal sensitivity measure (IPSM) in adolescents and young adults.

BACKGROUND: Interpersonal sensitivity is a personality trait that describes as excessive awareness of both the behaviour and feelings of others. High interpersonal sensitivity has been associated with the development and maintenance of mental health problems. This study aimed to examine whether the Italian version of the interpersonal sensitivity measure (IPSM) has good internal consistence and convergent validity. METHODS: Validity was established on a sample of 153 Italian adolescents and young adult help seekers for several psychological problems. These subjects were divided in two groups - depressive spectrum disorder group (n=42) and other diagnosis group (n=111) - according to Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-I) for DSM-IV and Kiddie-Sads-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL). For convergent validity, we studied the correlation between total and each subscale IPSM scores and the General Symptoms (included depressive and dysphoric symptoms) of Prodromal Questionnaire. RESULTS: The internal consistency were adequate and comparable to the original Boyce and Parker study. The validity was good, as indicated by both the convergent validity analysis and the depressive spectrum disorder group and other diagnosis group comparison. LIMITATIONS: The absence of another scale measuring interpersonal sensitivity to assess the construct validity of IPSM; the clinical heterogeneity of the sample; the absence of test re-test reliability of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the results of internal consistency and convergent validity of the IPSM indicates that this version translated into Italian is valid and reliable.

[Integrated therapy in panic attack disorders]. / Terapia integrata nel disturbo da attacchi di panico.

For the past years or so, studies on panic attack disorders (PAD) have accounted for a large proportion of psychiatric research. In spite of the attempts to clarify the etiopathogenesis of PAD, its characteristic psychopathological aspects and the evolutionary stages of its development, its nosographic status is still controversial (despite its inclusion in DSM III-R) and the same is true of the therapeutical approach. Using these observation as their starting point, the authors have divided the present paper into four parts. In the first they attempt to classify PAD in nosographical terms, whereas the second reviews all pharmacological therapies put forward over the past ten years. The third part consists of a short summary of the most widely used psychotherapeutic approaches, and in the last the authors suggest a model of integrated PAD therapy which is still being clinically experimented. The practice of associating pharmacological therapy with a psychotherapeutic approach has certainly been widely used for some time, but the authors underline that the two methods are only fully integrated in the presence of a therapeutic project resulting in a treatment protocol with controls during the course and at the end of treatment. In this context, the psychodiagnostic stage before therapy is particularly important since it provides as precise as possible a picture of the subject's basic personality and psychopathological state. These factors can lead to a wide varation in the choice of drug therapy, and even jeopardise therapeutic success. On the other hand, an exclusively psychotherapeutic approach to PAD does not rule out the onset of recurrent episodes during treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)