Assessment of the MANTA closure device in real-life transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A single-centre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications increase morbidity and mortality in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Data involving suture-based percutaneous vascular closure devices (VCDs) have been extensive. Although promising, data regarding the efficacy and safety of the MANTA VCD (Teleflex) are scarce. We sought to assess the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA device in a real-life unselected cohort of patients undergoing transfemoral-TAVR (TF-TAVR). METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included a cohort of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) treated by our team using TAVR between January 2020 to December 2022. The primary outcome measure was access-related major and minor vascular complications according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definition criteria. RESULTS: From January 2020 to December 2022, a total of 347 patients underwent TF-TAVR were treated using the MANTA 18 Fr VCD system for vascular closure. Mean age was 82.4 ± 6.1 years (56-98 years). There were no significant differences in preoperative and procedural characteristics between patients with and without VCD-related major vascular complications. Access site-related major and minor vascular complications occurred in 20 of 347 patients (5.7%). Overall, major vascular complications occurred in 5 patients (1.4%) and device failure was seen in 17 patients (4.9%). CONCLUSION: This French real world evaluation of large-bore arteriotomy closure in TF-TAVR indicated that MANTA VCD is a feasible alternative with an acceptable low rate of access-site-related complications.

Biodegradable-Polymer or Durable-Polymer Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the comparative efficacy and safety of different stent platforms in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent in patients at high bleeding risk receiving 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI. METHODS: The Bioflow-DAPT Study is an international, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 52 interventional cardiology hospitals in 18 countries from February 24, 2020, through September 20, 2021. Patients with a clinical indication to PCI because of acute or chronic coronary syndrome who fulfilled 1 or more criteria for high bleeding risk were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to receive either biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents or durable-polymer, slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents after successful lesion preparation, followed by 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy and thereafter single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year, and was powered for noninferiority, with an absolute margin of 4.1% at 1-sided 5% alpha. RESULTS: A total of 1948 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (969 patients) or durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (979 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 33 of 969 patients (3.6%) in the biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent group and in 32 of 979 patients (3.4%) in the durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the 1-sided 95% CI, 1.8; upper boundary of the 1-sided 97.5% CI, 2.1; P<0.0001 for noninferiority for both tests). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients at high risk for bleeding who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, the use of biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to the use of durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents with regard to the composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04137510.

Design and Rationale of the BIOFLOW-DAPT Trial: a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety of the Orsiro Mission Stent Compared to the Resolute Onyx Stent in Subjects at High Risk for Bleeding in Combination with 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with implantation of the Orsiro Mission stent remains unclear. The BIOFLOW-DAPT (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04137510) trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled study designed to assess the safety of the Orsiro Mission versus the Resolute Onyx stent in HBR patients. Patients are treated with DAPT (aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor) for 1 month, followed by a single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT). The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis at 1 year. With a final sample size of 1948 HBR patients, this study is powered to assess the noninferiority of the Orsiro Mission stent with respect to the primary study endpoint. The BIOFLOW-DAPT is the first randomized clinical trial investigating 1-month DAPT duration in HBR patients after implantation of the Orsiro Mission stent.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04137510 Study design and key features. Patient selection starts before the index PCI, when consented patients will be randomized to the Orsiro Mission or the Resolute Onyx stent with mandated 1-month DAPT. At 1 month, eligibility is reassessed and if met, patients will discontinue DAPT and continue with P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin monotherapy. PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DES, drug-eluting stent; HBR, high bleeding risk; P2Y12i, P2Y12 inhibitor; ST, stent thrombosis.

Sodium Chloride Physiological Saline Solution Versus Water Preparations Injectable in the Use of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) coronary system is a very useful new technology for de novo severely calcified coronary artery plaques before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The device uses a semi-compliant low-pressure balloon, integrated into a sterile catheter, to deliver by vaporizing fluid an expanding bubble that generates high-pressure ultrasonic energy by waves that create multiplane longitudinal micro-macro fractures in calcified plaques, which facilitate optimal stent placement and expansion, and luminal gain. Methods: The use of Shockwave IVL coronary system in our cardiac catheterization laboratory (Cath lab) at the "Clinique Saint-Hilaire" in Rouen, France, started in March 2019, with 42 procedures performed since this date: two patients in 2019, two patients in 2020, seven patients in 2021, 23 patients in 2022, and eight patients since the beginning of 2023. Results: We had experienced problems at the beginning of our activity for the first 11 patients (two patients in 2019, two patients in 2020, and seven patients in 2021): after less than five pulses, the shock therapy stopped. We used initially for Shockwave IVL semi-compliant low-pressure integrated balloons a mixture of 50% contrast and 50% water preparations injectable (PPI). After changing water PPI by sodium chloride physiological saline solution, we never encountered this problem again for the following 31 patients (23 patients in 2022, and eight patients since the beginning of 2023). In fact, the proper functioning of Shockwave IVL system requires ions in balloon mixture in addition to the contrast. It is thanks to the ions contained in sodium chloride physiological saline solution that the spark necessary for shocks delivery after balloon inflation is produced. Conclusions: Water PPI or sodium chloride physiological saline solution is used in angioplasty balloons in a lot of Cath labs worldwide. It is therefore essential to disseminate in the worldwide Cath lab the obligation to put in Shockwave IVL semi-compliant low-pressure integrated balloons sodium chloride physiological saline solution, rather than water PPI for optimal performance, and the importance of Shockwave Medical reporting this to interventional cardiologists.

A prospective study comparing short versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: design and rationale of the TARGET-FIRST trial.

Based on the latest knowledge and technological advancements, it is still debatable whether a modern revascularisation approach in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including complete revascularisation (in patients with significant non-culprit lesions) with newer-generation highly biocompatible drug-eluting stents, requires prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). TARGET-FIRST (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04753749) is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled study comparing short (one month) DAPT versus standard (12 months) DAPT in a population of patients with non-ST/ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, completely revascularised at index or staged procedure (within 7 days), using Firehawk, an abluminal in-groove biodegradable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent. The study will be conducted at approximately 50 sites in Europe. After a mandatory 30-40 days of DAPT with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors (preferably potent P2Y12 inhibitors), patients are randomised (1:1) to 1) immediate discontinuation of DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (experimental arm), or 2) continued DAPT with the same regimen (control arm), up until 12 months. With a final sample size of 2,246 patients, the study is powered to evaluate the primary endpoint (non-inferiority of short antiplatelet therapy in completely revascularised patients) for net adverse clinical and cerebral events. If the primary endpoint is met, the study is powered to assess the main secondary endpoint (superiority of short DAPT in terms of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding). TARGET-FIRST is the first randomised clinical trial to investigate the optimisation of antiplatelet therapy in patients with AMI after achieving complete revascularisation with an abluminal in-groove biodegradable polymer rapamycin-eluting stent implantation.

Prospective, single-centre evaluation of the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease (SCRAP study).

AIM: We evaluated a decision algorithm for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) based on a no-stent strategy, corresponding to a combination of scoring balloon angioplasty (SCBA) and drug-coated balloon (DCB), as a first line approach. Stents were used only in unstable patients, or in case of mandatory bailout stenting (BO-stent). METHODS: From April 2019 to March 2020, 984 consecutive patients, including 1922 lesions, underwent PCI. The 12-month primary end-point was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and target lesion revascularization. Patients were classified into conventional or no-stent strategy groups according to the PCI strategy. In the no-stent strategy group, they were further classified into BO-stent or DCB-only groups. Their metal index was calculated by stent length divided by the total lesion length. RESULTS: The no-stent strategy was applied in 85% of the patients, and it was successful for 65% of them. MACE occurred in 7.1% of the study population, including 4.2% of all-cause death. Target lesion revascularization was required in 1.4%, 3.6%, and 1.5% of patients in the conventional DES, BO-stent, and DCB-only groups, respectively. MACE occurred more often in the elderly and in those treated with at least one stent (metal index greater than 0). CONCLUSIONS: The no-stent strategy, i.e., revascularization of coronary lesions by SCBA followed by DCB and with DES bailout stenting, was effective and safe at 1 year. This PCI approach was applicable on a daily practice in our cath lab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03893396, first posted on March 28, 2019). Feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions following a decision tree proposing a no-stent strategy in stable patients with coronary artery disease. DES: drug eluting stent; SCBA: scoring balloon angioplasty; BO-stent: at least one stent; DCB: drug coated balloon; BMS: bare metal stent; Bailout (dash lines); MACE: major adverse cardiac event.

ACURATE neo™ aortic valve implantation via carotid artery access: first case report.

BACKGROUND: The ACURATE neo™ transcatheter heart valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) is predominantly implanted via femoral access. Transcarotid use of this prothesis has never been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of an 89-year-old woman referred to us for a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). After apparatus imaging of the aortic annulus and the peripheral vascular pathway, the heart team was confronted with a triple challenge: (i) The preferable choice of a self-expanding valve because of a small aortic annulus in an obese woman. (ii) Gaining favorable access to the coronary ostia, considering multiple recent coronary stenting. (iii) Utilizing an alternative arterial access because of iliac and femoral severely calcified stenosis. Implanting the ACURATE neo™ transcatheter heart valve (THV) via carotidal access allowed us to overcome these challenges. The procedure was performed successfully without any short-term complications. CONCLUSION: We report the first case of implantation of an ACURATE neo™ transcatheter heart valve (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts) via the right common carotid artery.

Optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery: the LEMON study.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI improves the prognosis of left main stem (LMS) PCI and is currently recommended by international guidelines. Although OCT resolution is greater than that of IVUS, this tool is not yet recommended in LMS angioplasty due to the absence of data. AIMS: This pilot study aimed to analyse the feasibility, safety and impact of OCT-guided LMS PCI. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre trial investigated whether patients might benefit from OCT-guided PCI for mid/distal LMS according to a pre-specified protocol. The primary endpoint was procedural success defined as follows: residual angiographic stenosis <50% + TIMI 3 flow in all branches + adequate OCT stent expansion (LEMON criteria). RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the final analysis (median age: 72 [64-81] years, 73% male). The OCT pre-specified protocol was applied in all patients. The primary endpoint was achieved in 86% of subjects. Adequate stent expansion was observed in 86%, significant edge dissection in 30% and residual significant strut malapposition in 24% of the cases. OCT guidance modified the operators' strategy in 26% of the patients. The rate of one-year survival free from major adverse clinical events was 98.6% (97.2-100). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study is the first to report the feasibility and performance of OCT-guided LMS PCI according to a pre-specified protocol.

Incidence, delays, and outcomes of STEMI during COVID-19 outbreak: Analysis from the France PCI registry.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on incidence, delays, and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in France. Methods: We analyzed all patients undergoing PPCI <24 hours STEMI included in the prospective France PCI registry. The 2 groups were compared on mean monthly number of patients, delays in the pathway care, and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary revascularization, stroke, and major bleeding). Results: From January 15, 2019 to April 14, 2020, 2064 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were included: 1942 in the prelockdown group and 122 in the lockdown group. Only 2 cases in the lockdown group were positive for COVID-19. A significant drop (12%) in mean number of STEMI/month was observed in the lockdown group compared with prelockdown (139 vs 122, P < 0.04). A significant increase in "symptom onset to first medical contact" delay was found for patients who presented directly to the emergency department (ED) (238 minutes vs 450 minutes; P = 0.04). There were higher rates of in-hospital MACE (7.7% vs 12.3%; P = 0.06) and mortality (4.9% vs 8.2%; P = 0.11) in the lockdown group but the differences were not significant. Conclusion: According to the multicenter France PCI registry, the COVID-19 outbreak in France was associated with a significant decline in STEMI undergoing PPCI and longer transfer time for patients who presented directly to the ED. Mortality rates doubled, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Left Ventricular Rapid Pacing Via the Valve Delivery Guidewire in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether left ventricular (LV) stimulation via a guidewire-reduced procedure duration while maintaining efficacy and safety compared with standard right ventricular (RV) stimulation. BACKGROUND: Rapid ventricular pacing is necessary to ensure cardiac standstill during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, superiority, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with a SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) were allocated to LV or RV stimulation. The primary endpoint was procedure duration. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, safety, and cost at 30 days. RESULTS: Between May 2017 and May 2018, 307 patients were randomized, but 4 were excluded because they did not receive the intended treatment: 303 patients were analyzed in the LV (n = 151) or RV (n = 152) stimulation groups. Mean procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LV stimulation group (48.4 ± 16.9 min vs. 55.6 ± 26.9 min; p = 0.0013), with a difference of -0.12 (95% confidence interval: -0.20 to -0.05) in the log-transformed procedure duration (p = 0.0012). Effective stimulation was similar in the LV and RV stimulation groups: 124 (84.9%) versus 128 (87.1%) (p = 0.60). Safety of stimulation was also similar in the LV and RV stimulation groups: procedural success occurred in 151 (100%) versus 151 (99.3%) patients (p = 0.99); 30-day MACE-TAVR (major adverse cardiovascular event-transcatheter aortic valve replacement) occurred in 21 (13.9%) versus 26 (17.1%) patients (p = 0.44); fluoroscopy time (min) was lower in the LV stimulation group (13.48 ± 5.98 vs. 14.60 ± 5.59; p = 0.02), as was cost (€18,807 ± 1,318 vs. €19,437 ± 2,318; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with RV stimulation, LV stimulation during TAVR was associated with significantly reduced procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, and cost, with similar efficacy and safety. (Direct Left Ventricular Rapid Pacing Via the Valve Delivery Guide-wire in TAVR [EASY TAVI]; NCT02781896).

Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon After Bare-Metal Stent Implantation, an Alternative Treatment to Drug-Eluting Stent in High Bleeding Risk Patients (The Panelux Trial).

BACKGROUND: Prolonged dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention can be challenging. We assessed the clinical safety of bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in HBR patients for whom drug-eluting stent implantation could be problematic in maintaining low ischemic event rate without increasing hemorrhagic events. METHODS: The study included patients with at least 1 de novo lesion who were either under long-term anticoagulant treatment or required semi-urgent non-coronary intervention. The strategy consisted of PRO-Kinetic Energy BMS stent (Biotronik AG) implantation followed by Pantera Lux DCB (Biotronik AG) and patients were followed for up to 12 months in 37 French centers. RESULTS: Between October 2013 and April 2015, a total of 432 patients with 623 de novo lesions who were either under long-term anticoagulant treatment (n = 300) or required semi-urgent non-cardiac surgery (n = 132) were treated by BMS plus DCB. Mean patient age was 74.1 ± 9.1 years, 76.4% were men, and 38% were diabetic. The composite primary endpoint rate (defined as target-lesion failure at 12 months) was 5.6% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-7.9). Median duration for DAPT treatment was 33 days. Hemorrhagic events, as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, occurred in 31 patients (7.2%) and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of BMS plus DCB intervention is safe even with a short duration of DAPT. This strategy might be an alternative to DES implantation in HBR patients if future randomized trials support this approach.

Trends over the past 4 years in population characteristics, 30-day outcomes and 1-year survival in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is recommended in patients with severe aortic stenosis that is either inoperable or at high-risk for surgical valve replacement. AIMS: To evaluate trends in the feasibility and safety of transfemoral TAVI over the past 4 years. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2013, all consecutive patients undergoing TAVI in our institution were included in a prospective registry. Population characteristics and 30-day and 1-year outcomes were analysed. Outcomes were classified according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. RESULTS: Overall, 429 patients underwent TAVI; transfemoral access was used in 368 (85.7%). The proportion of patients treated via a transfemoral approach increased (70.1% to 89.9%; P<0.0001) and the use of prior balloon aortic valvuloplasty decreased (44.7% to 11.2%; P<0.0001). The mean logistic EuroSCORE decreased significantly from 19.4±10.9% to 15.8±8.7% (P=0.01). The 30-day mortality rate did not change significantly (6.4% vs. 5.6%; P=0.99). Similarly, rates of major vascular complications (12.8% vs. 15.4%; P=0.87) and stroke (2.1% vs. 1.4%; P=0.75) remained unchanged. Mean length of stay after TAVI decreased significantly from 8.9±11.3 days to 4.8±4.7 days (P=0.002) and 72 (50.3%) patients were discharged early in 2013. One-year survival increased significantly from 81.0% to 94.4% (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 4 years, TAVI has been increasingly performed using a transfemoral approach. Treated patients are at lower-risk with less co-morbidity. Thirty-day mortality and complications remained unchanged, but length of stay after TAVI and 1-year mortality decreased dramatically.

Feasibility and safety of early discharge after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis.

There is currently no consensus on the duration of hospitalization required after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We report the feasibility and safety of early discharge after TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis. From 2009 to 2013, 337 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis using local anesthesia and were discharged home either early (≤3 days, Early Discharge group, n = 121) or after 3 days (Late Discharge group, n = 216). The primary end point of the study combined death and rehospitalization from discharge to 30-day follow-up. Patients in the Early Discharge group were less symptomatic (New York Heart Association class ≥III: 64.5% vs 75.5%, p = 0.01) and had less renal failure (creatinine: 102.1 ± 41.0 vs 113.3 ± 58.9 µmol/L, p = 0.04), atrial fibrillation (33.1% vs 46.3%, p = 0.02), and previous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (11.6% vs 23.1%, p = 0.01) and were more likely to have a pacemaker before TAVI (16.5% vs 8.3%, p = 0.02). Pre-existing pacemaker (p = 0.05) and the absence of acute kidney injury (p = 0.02) were independent predictors of an early discharge, whereas previous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (p = 0.03) and post-TAVI blood transfusions (p = 0.002) were independent predictors of late discharge. The primary end point occurred in 4 patients (3.3%) in the Early Discharge group and in 11 patients (5.1%) in the Late Discharge group (p = 0.58). In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that early discharge after transfemoral TAVI using the Edwards SAPIEN-XT prosthesis is feasible and safe in selected patients.

Single-source dual-energy CT angiography with reduced iodine load in patients referred for aortoiliofemoral evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on image quality and radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES: To compare image quality and radiation dose of pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) aortoiliofemoral CT angiography (AICTA) provided by standard vs. dual-energy mode with reduced iodine load protocols. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-one patients underwent a two-step CTA protocol before TAVI including cardiac CTA with injection of 65 mL of iodinated contrast agent (ICA), immediately followed by AICTA. From this second acquisition, the following three different patient groups were identified: Group 1: 52 patients with standard AICTA (60 mL ICA, 100 kVp, mA automodulation); Group 2: 48 patients with dual-energy AICTA with 50 % iodine load reduction (30 mL ICA, fast kVp switching, 600 mA); Group 3: 61 patients with an identical protocol to Group 2, but exposed to 375 mA. The qualitative/subjective image quality (13-point score) and quantitative/objective image quality (contrast attenuation and image noise) were evaluated. The radiation dose was recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in non-diagnostic images between the three protocols. Contrast attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were significantly higher, whereas noise was significantly lower in the standard protocol (all P < 0.05). The radiation dose was lower in the dual-energy protocol at 375 mA (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-energy AICTA before TAVI results in a reduction of iodine load while maintaining sufficient diagnostic information despite increased noise. KEY POINTS: • Dual-energy AICTA before TAVI results in a 50 % reduction of iodine load. •The reduction of iodine load maintains sufficient image quality despite increased noise. • Using 375 mA in dual-energy mode results in a reduction of radiation dose. • A high tube current setting (600 mA) should be used in overweight patients.

Does residual aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation increase mortality in all patients? The importance of baseline natriuretic peptides.

BACKGROUND: Aortic regurgitation (AR) is an important complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and even moderate AR is associated with increased mortality after TAVI. The association with decreased survival is unclear. We aimed to analyse the impact of AR after TAVI as a function of baseline NT-proBNP. METHODS: We included 236 consecutive patients implanted in our centre with the SAPIEN and SAPIEN XT valves, via the transfemoral route. AR was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography. NT-proBNP was measured 24h before implantation and patients were divided according to the median value. RESULTS: Median age was 85 years (80-89) and 137 (58.1%) were women. Patients with high NT-proBNP had lower left ventricular ejection fraction: 52% (35-65) vs. 63% (55-70), p<0.001, larger telediastolic diameters: 56 mm (49-61) vs. 52 mm (46-56), p=0.01, and more severe aortic stenosis: 0.62 ± 0.15 cm(2) vs. 0.70 ± 0.2 cm(2), p<0.001. Pre-procedural moderate or severe AR (42% vs. 26%, p=0.013) and mitral regurgitation (56% vs. 36%, p=0.004) were more common in the high NT-proBNP group. After TAVI, moderate or severe AR occurred in 26% of patients and was associated with increased 2-year mortality only in the low NT-proBNP group, while patients in the high NT-proBNP group were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate or severe AR after TAVI was not associated with increased 2-year mortality in patients with high baseline NT-proBNP. Our data suggest that the impact of AR after TAVI is absent in patients with significant pre-procedural AR or mitral regurgitation and more severe aortic stenosis.

Expandable sheath for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: procedural outcomes and complications.

AIMS: It is currently unknown whether the expandable sheath (e-sheath) for transfemoral Edwards transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has a lower rate of access complications than the 18/19F fixed size sheath (f-sheath). Our aim was to compare the incidence of procedural complications when using f-sheath vs. e-sheath during TAVR. METHODS: We included 162 consecutive patients, implanted with the Edwards SAPIEN XT valve in our center. Access closure was obtained with the Prostar system in all cases. E-sheath was used in 80 patients (49%). RESULTS: Minimal ilio-femoral diameter was comparable in e-sheath and f-sheath groups: 6.7 (6.1-7.7) vs. 7 (6.2-8) mm, P = 0.25, as was the frequency of peripheral artery disease: 12.5% vs. 13.4%, P = 1.0. VARC major vascular complications rate was similar in the 2 groups: e-sheath 7 (8.8%) vs. f-sheath 6 (7.3%), P = 0.74, as was the incidence of minor vascular complications: 8 (10%) vs. 14 (17.1%), P = 0.19, life-threatening bleeding: 6 (7.5%) vs. 6 (7.3%), P = 0.96, major and minor bleeding and use of covered vascular stents: 9 (11%) vs. 6 (7.5%), P = 0.59. CONCLUSIONS: The e-sheath for TAVR with the Edwards valve did not show an advantage over the f-sheath in reducing vascular and bleeding complications.

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: acute and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The use of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has resurged since the development of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The aim of our study was to determine the procedural and long-term outcomes of patients treated by BAV in the early TAVR era. METHODS: From 2005 to 2008, 323 consecutive patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis were treated by BAV in our institution. RESULTS: Mean age and logistic EuroSCORE were 80.5 ± 9.9 years and 28.7% ± 12.5%, respectively. The effective orifice area increased from 0.68 ± 0.25 to 1.12 ± 0.39 cm(2) (P < .001) after BAV. Inhospital major complications occurred in 22 patients (6.8%), with a mortality rate of 2.5%. Eighty-five patients (26.3%) were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR, 9.6%) or TAVR (16.7%). Twenty-eight patients (8.7%) had at least 1 repeat BAV. Two hundred ten patients (65%) received only medical therapy post-BAV. Mean duration of follow-up was 20.7 ± 20.0 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that survival after single BAV was poor. Patients treated by BAV followed by SAVR or TAVR had the highest long-term survival rate (P < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed that logistic EuroSCORE, severe aortic regurgitation and stroke complications post-BAV, and medical therapy post-BAV were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that BAV is an acceptable bridge to SAVR or TAVR in a very high-risk population not immediately suitable for definitive therapy. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty remains only a brief temporizing procedure with a poor long-term outcome without subsequent definitive therapy.

Comparison of two antiplatelet therapy strategies in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Dual antiplatelet therapy is commonly used in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but the optimal antiplatelet regimen is uncertain and remains to be determined. The objective of this study was to compare 2 strategies of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing TAVI. A strategy using monoantiplatelet therapy (group A, n = 164) was prospectively compared with a strategy using dual antiplatelet therapy (group B, n = 128) in 292 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI. The primary end point was a combination of mortality, major stroke, life-threatening bleeding (LTB), myocardial infarction, and major vascular complications at 30 days. All adverse events were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium. The primary end point occurred in 22 patients (13.4%) in the group A and in 30 patients (23.4%) in the group B (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.94, p = 0.026). LTB (3.7% vs 12.5%, p = 0.005) and major bleedings (2.4% vs 13.3%, p <0.0001) occurred less frequently in the group A, whereas the incidence of stroke (1.2% vs 4.7%, p = 0.14) and myocardial infarction (1.2% vs 0.8%, p = 1.0) was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The benefit of a strategy using mono versus dual antiplatelet therapy persisted after multivariate adjustment and propensity score analysis (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.95, p = 0.033). In conclusion, a strategy using mono versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing TAVI reduces LTB and major bleedings without increasing the risk of stroke and myocardial infarction. The results of our study question the justification of dual antiplatelet therapy and require confirmation in a randomized trial.

Performance analysis of EuroSCORE II compared to the original logistic EuroSCORE and STS scores for predicting 30-day mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

The original European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) has been recently updated as EuroSCORE II to optimize its efficacy in cardiac surgery, but its performance has been poorly evaluated for predicting 30-day mortality in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Consecutive patients (n = 250) treated with TAVR were included in this analysis. Transapical access was used in 60 patients, while 190 procedures were performed using a transfemoral approach. Calibration (risk-adjusted mortality ratio) and discrimination (C-statistic and U-statistic) were calculated for the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scores for predicting 30-day mortality. Observed mortality was 7.6% in the overall population (6.3% and 11.7% for the transfemoral and transapical cohorts, respectively). Predicted mortality was 22.6 ± 12.8% by logistic EuroSCORE, 7.7 ± 5.8% by EuroSCORE II, and 7.3 ± 4.1% by STS score. The risk-adjusted mortality ratio was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10 to 0.58) for logistic EuroSCORE, 0.99 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.69) for EuroSCORE II, and 1.05 (95% CI 0.30 to 1.79) for STS score. Moderate discrimination was observed with EuroSCORE II (C-index 0.66, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.79, p = 0.02) compared to the logistic EuroSCORE (C-index 0.63, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.76, p = 0.06) and STS (C-index 0.58, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.73, p = 0.23) score, without a significant difference among the 3 risk scores. Discrimination was slightly better in the transfemoral cohort compared to the transapical cohort with the 3 risk scores. In conclusion, EuroSCORE II and the STS score are better calibrated than the logistic EuroSCORE but have moderate discrimination for predicting 30-day mortality after TAVR.