Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 17(9): e406-12, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27472251

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical impact of an accurate autocorrecting blood glucose monitoring system in children with severe burns. Blood glucose monitoring system accuracy is essential for providing appropriate intensive insulin therapy and achieving tight glycemic control in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, few comparison studies have been performed to evaluate the clinical impact of accurate blood glucose monitoring system monitoring in the high-risk pediatric burn population. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of an electronic health record system. SETTING: Pediatric burn ICU at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Children (aged < 18 yr) with severe burns (≥ 20% total body surface area) receiving intensive insulin therapy guided by either a noncorrecting (blood glucose monitoring system-1) or an autocorrecting blood glucose monitoring system (blood glucose monitoring system-2). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patient demographics, insulin rates, and blood glucose monitoring system measurements were collected. The frequency of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability was compared between the two blood glucose monitoring system groups. A total of 122 patient charts from 2001 to 2014 were reviewed. Sixty-three patients received intensive insulin therapy using blood glucose monitoring system-1 and 59 via blood glucose monitoring system-2. Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. Mean insulin infusion rates (5.1 ± 3.8 U/hr; n = 535 paired measurements vs 2.4 ± 1.3 U/hr; n = 511 paired measurements; p < 0.001), glycemic variability, and frequency of hypoglycemic events (90 vs 12; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in blood glucose monitoring system-1-treated patients. Compared with laboratory measurements, blood glucose monitoring system-2 yielded the most accurate results (mean ± SD bias: -1.7 ± 6.9 mg/dL [-0.09 ± 0.4 mmol/L] vs 7.4 ± 13.5 mg/dL [0.4 ± 0.7 mmol/L]). Blood glucose monitoring system-2 patients achieve glycemic control more quickly (5.7 ± 4.3 vs 13.1 ± 6.9 hr; p< 0.001) and stayed within the target glycemic control range longer compared with blood glucose monitoring system-1 patients (85.2% ± 13.9% vs 57.9% ± 29.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Accurate autocorrecting blood glucose monitoring system optimizes intensive insulin therapy, improves tight glycemic control, and reduces the risk of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability. The use of an autocorrecting blood glucose monitoring system for intensive insulin therapy may improve glycemic control in severely burned children.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Burns/complications , Hyperglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin/administration & dosage , Point-of-Care Systems , Adolescent , Biomarkers/blood , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hyperglycemia/blood , Hyperglycemia/diagnosis , Hyperglycemia/etiology , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/etiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Burn Care Res ; 35(1): 72-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23884048

ABSTRACT

Severely burned patients benefit from intensive insulin therapy (IIT) for tight glycemic control (TGC). The authors evaluated the clinical impact of automatic correction of hematocrit and ascorbic acid interference for bedside glucose monitoring performance in critically ill burn patients. The performance of two point-of-care glucose monitoring systems (GMSs): 1) GMS1, an autocorrecting device, and 2) GMS2, a noncorrecting device were compared. Sixty remnant arterial blood samples were collected in a prospective observational study to evaluate hematocrit and ascorbic acid effects on GMS1 vs GMS2 accuracy paired against a plasma glucose reference. Next, we enrolled 12 patients in a pilot randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive IIT targeting a TGC interval of 111 to 151 mg/dl and guided by either GMS1 or GMS2. GMS bias, mean insulin rate, and glycemic variability were calculated. In the prospective study, GMS1 results were similar to plasma glucose results (mean bias, -0.75 [4.0] mg/dl; n = 60; P = .214). GMS2 results significantly differed from paired plasma glucose results (mean bias, -5.66 [18.7] mg/dl; n = 60; P = .048). Ascorbic acid therapy elicited significant GMS2 performance bias (29.2 [27.2]; P < .001). Randomized controlled trial results reported lower mean bias (P < .001), glycemic variability (P < .05), mean insulin rate (P < .001), and frequency of hypoglycemia (P < .001) in the GMS1 group than in the GMS2 group. Anemia and high-dose ascorbic acid therapy negatively impact GMS accuracy and TGC in burn patients. Automatic correction of confounding factors improves glycemic control. Further studies are warranted to determine outcomes associated with accurate glucose monitoring during IIT.


Subject(s)
Burns/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Adult , Antioxidants/therapeutic use , Ascorbic Acid/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose/analysis , Critical Illness , Female , Hematocrit , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Point-of-Care Systems , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Burns ; 39(7): 1395-402, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23768708

ABSTRACT

Burn wound photography has diverse clinical applications; however, inherent technological limitations mitigate its utility. Limitations include lack of quality control, serial imaging, complexity, and expense. With the performance gap between smart devices and digital cameras rapidly narrowing, and computing performance increasing, smart devices are poised to uniquely address these limitations and enhance the field of wound photography. To this end, we developed a proof-of-concept smart device application addressing the limitations of traditional photography and meeting the needs of burn clinicians. The result was an innovative smart device application providing user-friendly serial imaging and informatics capabilities at the patient bedside. The application generated images with significantly higher brightness (2.4±1.07 vs. 3.8±1.69, n=15, p<0.05) and higher contrast (255±0.00 vs. 236.3±5.64, n=15, p<0.0001), more consistent positioning (1.22±0.03 vs. 2.08±0.61, n=15, p<0.0001) and zoom (18.14 vs. 14.29, n=15, p<0.0001) compared to those taken by a basic compact digital camera using default settings. Surveyed clinician end-users reported greater functionality (20 vs. 0, n=20, p<0.001), and a more intuitive interface (18 vs. 2, n=20, p<0.001) with the application. We report consistent serial wound imaging and informatics are both feasible on a smart device platform. These findings will pave the way for new smart device-based clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Burns/diagnosis , Cell Phone/instrumentation , Photography/methods , Analysis of Variance , Attitude of Health Personnel , Hand , Humans , Patient Simulation , Photography/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...