Revisión del intervalo de referencia del recuento plaquetario: ¿son adecuados los valores que estamos utilizando? / Review of the platelet count reference range: are the values we are using appropriate?

Los intervalos de referencia (IR) dependen de la población y de las características metrológicas del procedimiento de medida utilizado. A pesar de las recomendaciones internacionales, son pocos los laboratorios que establecen sus propios IR para cada magnitud por la dificultad para conseguir voluntarios de referencia y el elevado costo económico asociado. La International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) acepta la adopción de IR bibliográficos o su cálculo por métodos indirectos dado su bajo costo y fácil obtención. Existen varias fuentes confiables de IR bibliográficos para el hemograma. No obstante, para el recuento plaquetario, es una práctica común de los laboratorios emplear el rango de valores de 150-450.109 /L independiente de la metodología utilizada y grupo etario. El objetivo de este trabajo fue revisar los IR bibliográficos disponibles para el recuento plaquetario y estimarlo empleando el método indirecto de Hoffmann a partir de nuestra población. Los métodos indirectos se basan en aplicar criterios de exclusión y cálculos matemáticos sobre los resultados de una base de datos de laboratorio. Nuestros IR para el recuento plaquetario se comparan con los bibliográficos, que han sido establecidos por técnicas de muestreo directo. Por este motivo y dado que no existen estudios poblacionales que lo avalen, sería apropiado reemplazar el rango de 150-450.109 / L. Estos límites podrían seguir empleándose como puntos de corte o niveles de decisión médica para definir, según la clínica y otros resultados de laboratorio, los pacientes que ameritan un seguimiento posterior (AU)

Reference ranges (RR) depend on the population and the metrological characteristics of the measurement procedure used. Despite international recommendations, few laboratories establish their own RRs for each magnitude because of the difficulty in obtaining reference volunteers and the associated high economic cost. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) accepts the use of literaturebased RRs or RRs calculated by indirect methods because of their low cost and easy collection. There are several reliable sources of literature-based RRs for the Cell Blood Count. However, for platelet count, it is common laboratory practice to use the range of 150-450,109 /L regardless of the methodology used and age group. The aim of this study was to review the available literature regarding RRs for platelet count and to establish it using the indirect Hoffmann method in our population. Indirect methods are based on applying exclusion criteria and mathematical calculations on the results of a laboratory database. Our RRs for platelet counts are compared with those in the literature, which have been established by direct sampling techniques. Therefore, and given that there are no population studies to support these findings, it would be appropriate to replace the 150-450,109 /L range. These limits may continue to be used as cut-off points or medical decision levels to define, according to clinical manifestations and other laboratory results, patients who warrant further follow-up (AU)

HoloTransferrin but not ApoTransferrin prevents Schwann cell de-differentiation in culture.

Schwann cells (SCs) in culture, without the presence of axons, become de-differentiated, reaching a condition similar to that of their precursor cells. The cytoplasmic accumulation of transferrin (Tf) in the myelinated peripheral nerve has been reported and data in the literature support a role for apoTf in myelination in the CNS. In the present report, we used SC cultures to evaluate the capacity of apoTf and holoTf to prevent cell de-differentiation promoted by fetal calf serum deprivation. SCs incubated in a serum-free medium showed a decrease in the expression of myelin basic protein (MBP) and P(0), markers of mature myelin-forming SCs, together with an increase in the levels of p75NTR and glial fibrillary acidic protein, markers of immature SCs. Treatment with holoTf prevented the decrease in expression of MBP and P(0) and the increase in p75NTR. ApoTf was unable to prevent these changes except when iron was added to the cultures. These results suggest a role for holoTf in the regulation of myelin formation by SCs.