Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose for iron repletion following acute heart failure in patients with and without diabetes: a subgroup analysis of the randomized AFFIRM-AHF trial.

BACKGROUND: In AFFIRM-AHF, treatment of iron deficiency with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) reduced the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and improved quality of life (QoL) vs placebo in patients stabilized following an acute HF (AHF) episode, with no effect on cardiovascular (CV) death. Diabetes and iron deficiency frequently accompany AHF. This post hoc analysis explored the effects of diabetes on outcomes in AFFIRM-AHF patients. METHODS: Patients were stratified by diabetes yes/no at baseline. The effects of FCM vs placebo on primary (total HF hospitalizations and CV death) and secondary (total CV hospitalizations and CV death; CV death; total HF hospitalizations; time to first HF hospitalization or CV death; and days lost due to HF hospitalizations or CV death) endpoints at Week 52 and change vs baseline in disease-specific QoL (12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ-12]) at Week 24 were assessed by subgroup. For each endpoint, the interaction between diabetes status and treatment outcome was explored. RESULTS: Of 1108 AFFIRM-AHF patients, 475 (FCM: 231; placebo: 244) had diabetes and 633 (FCM: 327; placebo: 306) did not have diabetes. Patients with diabetes were more commonly male (61.5% vs 50.9%), with a higher frequency of ischemic HF etiology (57.9% vs 39.0%), prior HF history (77.7% vs 66.5%), and comorbidities (including previous myocardial infarction [49.3% vs 32.9%] and chronic kidney disease [51.4% vs 32.4%]) than those without diabetes. The annualized event rate/100 patient-years with FCM vs placebo for the primary endpoint was 66.9 vs 80.9 in patients with diabetes (rate ratio [RR]: 0.83, 95% CI 0.58-1.81) and 51.3 vs 66.9 in patients without diabetes (RR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.55-1.07), with no significant interaction between diabetes status and treatment effect (pinteraction = 0.76). Similar findings were observed for secondary outcomes. Change from baseline in KCCQ-12 overall summary score was numerically greater with FCM vs placebo at almost all time points in both subgroups, with no interaction between diabetes and treatment effect at Week 24. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and QoL benefits observed with intravenous FCM in patients with iron deficiency following stabilization from an AHF episode are independent of diabetes status. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02937454 (registered 10.18.2016).

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients With HFrEF and Iron Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used to measure exercise capacity; however, the magnitude of change that is clinically meaningful for individuals is not well established in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). OBJECTIVE: To calculate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for change in exercise capacity in the 6MWT in iron-deficient populations with HFrEF. METHODS: In this pooled secondary analysis of the FAIR-HF and CONFIRM-HF trials, mean changes in the 6MWT from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 were calculated and calibrated against the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) tool (clinical anchor) to derive MCIDs in improvement and deterioration. RESULTS: Of 760 patients included in the 2 trials, 6MWT and PGA data were available for 680 (89%) and 656 (86%) patients at weeks 12 and 24, respectively. The mean 6MWT distance at baseline was 281 ± 103 meters. There was a modest correlation between changes in 6MWT and PGA from baseline to week 12 (r = 0.31; P < 0.0001) and week 24 (r = 0.43; P < 0.0001). Respective estimates (95% confidence intervals) of MCID in 6MWT at weeks 12 and 24 were 14 meters (5;23) and 15 meters (3;27) for a "little improvement" (vs no change), 20 meters (10;30) and 24 meters (12;36) for moderate improvement vs a "little improvement,", -11 meters (-32;9.2) and -31 meters (-53;-8) for a "little deterioration" (vs no change), and -84 meters (-144;-24) and -69 meters (-118;-20) for "moderate deterioration" vs a "little deterioration". CONCLUSIONS: The MCID for improvement in exercise capacity in the 6MWT was 14 meters-15 meters in patients with HFrEF and iron deficiency. These MCIDs can aid clinical interpretation of study data.

Health status improvement with ferric carboxymaltose in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and iron deficiency.

AIM: Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has been shown to improve overall quality of life in iron-deficient heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients at a trial population level. This FAIR-HF and CONFIRM-HF pooled analysis explored the likelihood of individual improvement or deterioration in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) domains with FCM versus placebo and evaluated the stability of this response over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: Changes versus baseline in KCCQ overall summary score (OSS), clinical summary score (CSS) and total symptom score (TSS) were assessed at weeks 12 and 24 in FCM and placebo groups. Mean between-group differences were estimated and individual responder analyses and analyses of response stability were performed. Overall, 760 (FCM, n = 454) patients were studied. At week 12, the mean improvement in KCCQ OSS was 10.6 points with FCM versus 4.8 points with placebo (least-square mean difference [95% confidence interval, CI] 4.36 [2.14; 6.59] points). A higher proportion of patients on FCM versus placebo experienced a KCCQ OSS improvement of ≥5 (58.3% vs. 43.5%; odds ratio [95% CI] 1.81 [1.30; 2.51]), ≥10 (42.4% vs. 29.3%; 1.73 [1.23; 2.43]) or ≥15 (32.1% vs. 22.6%; 1.46 [1.02; 2.11]) points. Differences were similar at week 24 and for CSS and TSS domains. Of FCM patients with a ≥5-, ≥10- or ≥15-point improvement in KCCQ OSS at week 12, >75% sustained this improvement at week 24. CONCLUSION: Treatment of iron-deficient HFrEF patients with intravenous FCM conveyed clinically relevant improvements in health status at an individual-patient level; benefits were sustained over time in most patients.

Responder analysis for improvement in 6-min walk test with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and iron deficiency.

AIM: Improving functional capacity is a key goal in heart failure (HF). This pooled analysis of FAIR-HF and CONFIRM-HF assessed the likelihood of improvement or deterioration in 6-min walk test (6MWT) among iron-deficient patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving ferric carboxymaltose (FCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data for 760 patients (FCM: n = 454; placebo: n = 306) were analysed. The proportions of patients receiving FCM or placebo who had ≥20, ≥30, and ≥40 m improvements or ≥10 m deterioration in 6MWT at 12 and 24 weeks were assessed. Patients receiving FCM experienced a mean (standard deviation) 31.1 (62.3) m improvement in 6MWT versus 0.1 (77.1) m improvement for placebo at week 12 (difference in mean changes 26.8 [16.6-37.0]). At week 12, the odds [95% confidence interval] of 6MWT improvements of ≥20 m (odds ratio 2.16 [1.57-2.96]; p < 0.0001), ≥30 m (2.00 [1.44-2.78]; p < 0.0001), and ≥40 m (2.29 [1.60-3.27]; p < 0.0001) were greater with FCM versus placebo, while the odds of a deterioration ≥10 m were reduced with FCM versus placebo (0.55 [0.38-0.80]; p = 0.0019). Among patients who experienced 6MWT improvements of ≥20, ≥30, or ≥40 m with FCM at week 12, more than 80% sustained this improvement at week 24. CONCLUSION: Ferric carboxymaltose resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of improvement and a reduced likelihood of deterioration in 6MWT versus placebo among iron-deficient patients with HF. Of the patients experiencing clinically significant improvements at week 12, the majority sustained this improvement at week 24. These results are supportive of FCM to improve exercise capacity in HF.

Control of moderate-to-severe asthma with randomized ciclesonide doses of 160, 320 and 640 µg/day.

BACKGROUND: The inhaled corticoteroid (ICS) ciclesonide (Cic), controls asthma symptoms in the majority of patients at the recommended dose of 160 µg/day. However, the relationship between the level of asthma control and increasing doses of Cic is unknown. This study investigated whether long-term treatment with higher doses of Cic would further improve asthma symptoms in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 367 patients were allocated to one of three treatment arms (Cic 160, 320 and 640 µg/day). After a single-blind, 3-week baseline period with Cic 160 µg/day, eligible patients were randomized to receive 52 weeks of treatment with Cic 160, 320 or 640 µg/day (double-blind period) during which forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), exacerbations and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores were measured. RESULTS: Treatment with all the three doses was associated with significant improvements in ACQ scores, FEV1 and asthma symptoms (P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the three doses. The results of the primary end point analysis showed a numerical improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day (least square [LS] mean: -0.122; two-sided P-value: 0.30). Post hoc subgroup analyses showed that the improvement in the ACQ score with Cic 640 µg/day compared with Cic 160 µg/day was statistically significant in subjects who experience at least one exacerbation per year (LS mean: -0.586; 95% confidence interval: -1.110, -0.062, P=0.0285). Adverse events were low and consistent with the known safety profile of Cic. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent, uncontrolled asthma, increasing the Cic dose from 160 to 640 µg/day provided no clear additional effect. Patients who experience more than one exacerbation per year may benefit from higher doses; however, further studies are necessary to confirm this. All Cic doses were well tolerated.

Roflumilast combined with montelukast versus montelukast alone as add-on treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast, a selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has been shown to provide modest improvements in lung function in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, but its efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma has not been assessed. We hypothesized that this drug might provide benefit if combined with montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in patients whose symptoms are uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting ß-agonists. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the efficacy, safety, and mode of action of the addition of roflumilast and montelukast versus montelukast alone in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. METHODS: In a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, 2-sequence, crossover study, 64 patients were randomized to receive 500 µg of roflumilast plus montelukast followed by placebo plus 10 mg of montelukast (sequence AB) or placebo plus 10 mg of montelukast followed by 500 µg of roflumilast plus 10 mg of montelukast (sequence BA). All patients had a diagnosis of bronchial asthma inadequately controlled by at least a medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus a long-acting ß-agonist. RESULTS: The analysis of FEV1 change from baseline to week 4 showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful treatment difference of 100 mL for roflumilast plus montelukast versus placebo plus montelukast. Also, improvements in patient-reported outcomes and a reduction in urinary leukotriene E4 levels were observed during roflumilast plus montelukast treatment compared with placebo plus montelukast treatment. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of roflumilast. CONCLUSION: The combination of roflumilast with montelukast compared with montelukast alone improved lung function and asthma control in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and deserves further study for this indication.

Effect of roflumilast on exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease uncontrolled by combination therapy (REACT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast reduces exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Its effect in patients using fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and longacting ß2 agonists is unknown. We postulated that roflumilast would reduce exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk for exacerbations, even in combination with inhaled corticosteroid and longacting ß2 agonist treatment. METHODS: For this 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicentre, phase 3-4 trial, the Roflumilast and Exacerbations in patients receiving Appropriate Combination Therapy (REACT) study, we enrolled patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from 203 centres (outpatient clinics, hospitals, specialised pulmonologists, and family doctors) in 21 countries. Eligible patients were 40 years of age or older with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years and a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with severe airflow limitation, symptoms of chronic bronchitis, and at least two exacerbations in the previous year. We used a computerised central randomisation system to randomly assign patients in a 1:1 ratio to the two treatment groups: roflumilast 500 µg or placebo given orally once daily together with a fixed inhaled corticosteroid and longacting ß2 agonist combination. Background tiotropium treatment was allowed. All patients and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was the rate of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations per patient per year, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01329029. FINDINGS: Between April 3, 2011, and May 27, 2014, we enrolled 1945 eligible participants and randomly assigned 973 to the roflumilast group and 972 to the placebo group. The rate of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations was 13·2% lower in the roflumilast group than in the placebo group according to a Poisson regression analysis (roflumilast 0·805 vs placebo 0·927; rate ratio [RR] 0·868 [95% CI 0·753-1·002], p=0·0529), and 14·2% lower according to a predefined sensitivity analysis using negative binomial regression (0·823 vs 0·959; 0·858 [0·740-0·995], p=0·0424). Adverse events were reported by 648 (67%) of 968 patients receiving roflumilast and by 572 (59%) of 967 patients in the placebo group; adverse event-associated patient withdrawal from the study was also more common in the roflumilast group (104/968 [11%]) than in the placebo group (52/967 [5%]). The most frequently reported serious adverse events were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and pneumonia, and 17 (1·8%) deaths occurred in the roflumilast group compared with 18 (1·9%) in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that roflumilast reduces exacerbations and hospital admissions in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis who are at risk of frequent and severe exacerbations despite inhaled corticosteroid and longacting ß2 agonist therapy, even in combination with tiotropium. FUNDING: Takeda.

Pooled subpopulation analyses of the effects of roflumilast on exacerbations and lung function in COPD.

BACKGROUND: This post-hoc analysis examined the impact of roflumilast on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations and lung function in patients with COPD who received concomitant long-acting ß2-agonists (LABA) with or without prior inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and the influence of various demographic and clinical characteristics on these outcomes. METHODS: Data were pooled from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 52-week studies of once-daily roflumilast 500 µg in patients with COPD. Endpoints were mean rate of exacerbations and change from baseline in pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1. RESULTS: In this pooled analysis (N = 3091), addition of roflumilast to LABAs for 1 year in patients who discontinued ICS prior to study entry (n = 945) significantly reduced the risk of COPD exacerbations vs. placebo by 19.2% (p < 0.05) and significantly improved pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1 by 40 mL and 34 mL, respectively (both, p < 0.01). Similar improvements were observed in patients who received concomitant LABAs but were not taking ICS prior to study entry (n = 597). A significant reduction in COPD exacerbation risk with roflumilast vs. placebo was observed regardless of age or smoking status, and in patients who had severe or very severe COPD. Significantly improved lung function was observed with roflumilast in all the subgroups (p < 0.05), with the exception of patients with moderate COPD. CONCLUSIONS: Roflumilast reduced exacerbation rates and improved lung function in patients with COPD who received concomitant LABA, regardless of prior ICS use, and across various patient subgroups regardless of age and smoking status. CLINICALTRIALSGOV REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00297102 (M2-124) and NCT00297115 (M2-125).

Roflumilast for the treatment of COPD in an Asian population: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is the only oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor indicated for use in the treatment of COPD. Previous studies of roflumilast have predominantly involved European and North American populations. A large study was necessary to determine the efficacy and safety of roflumilast in a predominantly ethnic Chinese population. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study, patients of Chinese, Malay, and Indian ethnicity (N = 626) with severe to very severe COPD were randomized 1:1 to receive either roflumilast 500 µg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change in prebronchodilator FEV1 from baseline to study end. RESULTS: Three hundred thirteen patients were assigned to each treatment. Roflumilast provided a sustained increase over placebo in mean prebronchodilator FEV1 (0.071 L; 95% CI, 0.046, 0.095 L; P < .0001). Similar improvements were observed in the secondary end points of postbronchodilator FEV1 (0.068 L; 95% CI 0.044, 0.092 L; P < .0001) and prebronchodilator and postbronchodilator FVC (0.109 L; 95% CI, 0.061, 0.157 L; P < .0001 and 0.101 L; 95% CI, 0.055, 0.146 L; P < .0001, respectively). The adverse event profile was consistent with previous roflumilast studies. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (6.0% and 1.0% of patients in the roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Roflumilast plays an important role in lung function improvement and is well tolerated in an Asian population. It provides an optimal treatment choice for patients with severe to very severe COPD.

Cardiovascular safety in patients receiving roflumilast for the treatment of COPD.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of cardiovascular safety for new therapies for COPD is important because of a high prevalence of cardiac comorbidities in the COPD population. Hence, we evaluated the effects of roflumilast, a novel oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor developed for the treatment and prevention of COPD exacerbations, on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). METHODS: Intermediate- and long-term placebo-controlled clinical trials of roflumilast in COPD were pooled and assessed for potential cardiovascular events. Studies comprised 14 12- to 52-week placebo-controlled trials in patients with moderate to very severe COPD. All deaths and serious nonfatal cardiovascular events were evaluated by an independent adjudication committee blinded to study and treatment. The MACE composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke was analyzed according to treatment group. RESULTS: Of 6,563 patients receiving roflumilast, 52 experienced MACEs (14.3 per 1,000 patient-years), and of 5,491 patients receiving placebo, 76 experienced MACEs (22.3 per 1,000 patient-years). The MACE composite rate was significantly lower for roflumilast compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: A lower rate of cardiovascular events was observed with roflumilast than with placebo in patients with COPD, indicating the lack of a cardiovascular safety signal when treating patients with COPD. Potential cardiovascular benefits of roflumilast should be evaluated in future controlled clinical trials.

Efficacy of roflumilast in the COPD frequent exacerbator phenotype.

BACKGROUND: COPD exacerbations are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and can accelerate disease progression. The best predictor of future exacerbations is a history of previous exacerbations, which helps identify a frequent exacerbator phenotype. This post hoc analysis evaluated the effect of roflumilast, a drug known to reduce the COPD exacerbation rate, on exacerbation status. METHODS: Pooled data from two 1-year, placebo-controlled, roflumilast (500 µg once daily) studies in patients with symptomatic COPD and severe airflow obstruction were evaluated (studies M2-124 and M2-125, ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00297102 and NCT00297115). A total of 3,091 patients were included in this analysis (62.5% with GOLD [Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease] III COPD and 29.2% with GOLD 4 COPD). Based on their exacerbation frequency status in the previous year, patients were classified as frequent (two or more events) or infrequent (fewer than two events) exacerbators. Exacerbation frequency was analyzed at baseline and at year 1. RESULTS: Among frequent exacerbators treated with roflumilast, 32.0% still had frequent exacerbations at year 1 compared with 40.8% of placebo-treated patients (risk ratio, 0.799; P = .0148). Among infrequent exacerbators, 17.5% of roflumilast-treated patients became frequent exacerbators at year 1 compared with 22.9% of those taking placebo (risk ratio, 0.768; P = .0018). The reduction in severe exacerbations leading to hospitalization/death was similar between subgroups and occurred independently of concomitant long-acting ß2-agonists or previous inhaled corticosteroid treatment. When analyzed by severity of airflow limitation, 26.4% of roflumilast-treated frequent exacerbators with GOLD III COPD remained frequent exacerbators at year 1 compared with 38.9% of those taking placebo (P = .0042). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with roflumilast shifts patients from the frequent to the more stable infrequent exacerbator state. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00297102 and NCT00297115; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Does roflumilast decrease exacerbations in severe COPD patients not controlled by inhaled combination therapy? The REACT study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to suffer exacerbations, even when treated with maximum recommended therapy (eg, inhaled combinations of long-acting ß2-agonist and high dose inhaled corticosteroids, with or without a long-acting anticholinergic [long-acting muscarinic antagonist]). Roflumilast is approved to treat severe COPD in patients with chronic bronchitis--and a history of frequent exacerbations--as an add-on to bronchodilators. PURPOSE: The REACT (Roflumilast in the Prevention of COPD Exacerbations While Taking Appropriate Combination Treatment) study (identification number RO-2455-404-RD, clinicaltrials. gov identifier NCT01329029) will investigate whether roflumilast further reduces exacerbations when added to inhaled combination therapy in patients still suffering from frequent exacerbations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: REACT is a 1-year randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III/IV study of roflumilast 500 µg once daily or placebo on top of a fixed long-acting ß2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid combination. A concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonist will be allowed at stable doses. The primary outcome is the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations. Using a Poisson regression model with a two-sided significance level of 5%, a sample size of 967 patients per treatment group is needed for 90% power. COPD patients with severe to very severe airflow limitation, symptoms of chronic bronchitis, and at least two exacerbations in the previous year will be recruited. CONCLUSION: It is hypothesized that because roflumilast (a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor) has a different mode of action to bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, it may provide additional benefits when added to these treatments in frequent exacerbators. REACT will be important to determine the role of roflumilast in COPD management. Here, the design and rationale for this important study is described.

Roflumilast in Asian patients with COPD: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Roflumilast, an oral, selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, has been shown to reduce exacerbations and improve pulmonary function in patients with COPD. This study examined the efficacy, safety and tolerability of roflumilast in Asian patients with COPD. METHODS: Patients with COPD were randomized 1:1 to enter a 12-week treatment period and receive either oral roflumilast, 500 µg once daily, or placebo, following a single-blind, 4-week baseline period in which all patients received placebo. The primary end point was mean change in FEV1 from baseline to each postrandomization visit during the treatment period. Other spirometric lung function measurements were evaluated as secondary end points. COPD exacerbations were monitored. Safety was assessed from clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination (including electrocardiogram) and monitoring of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 551 patients recruited, 410 were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication (roflumilast, n = 203; placebo, n = 207). Superiority of roflumilast over placebo was demonstrated by a statistically significant difference in postbronchodilator FEV1 (79 mL, P < 0.0001). Other spirometry end points, including prebronchodilator FEV1, pre-and postbronchodilator FEV6, forced vital capacity and peak expiratory flow significantly favoured roflumilast over placebo. AEs were more common with roflumilast than with placebo, but were comparable with those reported in previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Roflumilast, 500 µg once daily, improves pulmonary function in Asian patients with COPD. The safety and tolerability of roflumilast in this population was similar to that in a Caucasian population.

Roflumilast in symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: two randomised clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor roflumilast can improve lung function and prevent exacerbations in certain patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We therefore investigated whether roflumilast would reduce the frequency of exacerbations requiring corticosteroids in patients with COPD. METHODS: In two placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trials (M2-124 and M2-125) with identical design that were done in two different populations in an outpatient setting, patients with COPD older than 40 years, with severe airflow limitation, bronchitic symptoms, and a history of exacerbations were randomly assigned to oral roflumilast (500 microg once per day) or placebo for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were change in prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and the rate of exacerbations that were moderate (glucocorticosteroid-treated) or severe. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00297102 for M2-124, and NCT00297115 for M2-125. FINDINGS: Patients were assigned to treatment, stratified according to smoking status and treatment with longacting beta(2) agonists, and given roflumilast (n=1537) or placebo (n=1554). In both studies, the prespecified primary endpoints were achieved and were similar in magnitude. In a pooled analysis, prebronchodilator FEV(1) increased by 48 mL with roflumilast compared with placebo (p<0.0001). The rate of exacerbations that were moderate or severe per patient per year was 1.14 with roflumilast and 1.37 with placebo (reduction 17% [95% CI 8-25], p<0.0003). Adverse events were more common with roflumilast (1040 [67%]) than with placebo (963 [62%]); 219 (14%) patients in the roflumilast group and 177 (12%) in the placebo group discontinued because of adverse events. In the pooled analysis, the difference in weight change during the study between the roflumilast and placebo groups was -2.17 kg. INTERPRETATION: Since different subsets of patients exist within the broad spectrum of COPD, targeted specific therapies could improve disease management. This possibility should be explored further in prospective studies. FUNDING: Nycomed.

Auto-ADP-ribosylation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exoenzyme S (ExoS) is a bifunctional type-III cytotoxin. The N terminus possesses a Rho GTPase-activating protein (GAP) activity, whereas the C terminus comprises an ADP-ribosyltransferase domain. We investigated whether the ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of ExoS influences its GAP activity. Although the ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of ExoS is dependent upon FAS, a 14-3-3 family protein, factor-activating ExoS (FAS) had no influence on the activity of the GAP domain of ExoS (ExoS-GAP). In the presence of NAD and FAS, the GAP activity of full-length ExoS was reduced about 10-fold, whereas NAD and FAS did not affect the activity of the ExoS-GAP fragment. Using [(32)P]NAD, ExoS-GAP was identified as a substrate of the ADP-ribosyltransferase activity of ExoS. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that auto-ADP-ribosylation of Arg-146 of ExoS was crucial for inhibition of GAP activity in vitro. To reveal the auto-ADP-ribosylation of ExoS in intact cells, tetanolysin was used to produce pores in the plasma membrane of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells to allow the intracellular entry of [(32)P]NAD, the substrate for ADP-ribosylation. After a 3-h infection of CHO cells with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, proteins of 50 and 25 kDa were preferentially ADP-ribosylated. The 50-kDa protein was determined to be auto-ADP-ribosylated ExoS, whereas the 25-kDa protein appeared to represent a group of proteins that included Ras.