Telemedicine: what framework, what levels of proof, implementation rules.

The concept of telemedicine was formalised in France in the 2009 "Hospital, patients, health territories" (loi hôpital, patients, santé, territoire) law and the 2010 decree through which it was applied. Many experiments have been carried out and the regulatory institutions (Ministry, Regional Health Agency [Agence régionale de santé, ARS], French National Health Authority [Haute autorité de santé, HAS], etc.) have issued various guidance statements and recommendations on its organisation and on the expectations of its evaluation. With this background, the round table wanted to produce recommendations on different areas of medical telemonitoring (the role of telemonitoring, the regulatory system, the principles for assessment, methods of use and conditions for sustained and seamless deployment). Whilst many studies carried out on new medical telemonitoring approaches have led to the postulate that it offers benefit, both clinically and in terms of patient quality of life, more information is needed to demonstrate its impact on the organisation of healthcare and the associated medico-economic benefit (criteria, methods, resources). Similarly, contractual frameworks for deployment of telemonitoring do exist, although they are complicated and involve many different stakeholders (Director General fo the Care Offering [Direction générale de l'offre de soins, DGOS], ARS, HAS, Agency for Shared Health Information Systems [Agence des systèmes d'information partagés de santé, ASIP], French National Data Protection Commission [Commission nationale informatique et libertés, CNIL], French National Medical Council [Conseil national de l'Ordre des médecins, CNOM], etc.) that would benefit from a shared approach and seamless exchange between the partners involved. The current challenge is also to define the conditions required to validate a stable economic model in order to promote organisational change. One topical issue is placing the emphasis on its evaluation and operation. Access to patient data, particularly data from the health insurance funds and the use of these data, may enable the process to be more effective. In addition, the budgetary non-fungibility of the various financial envelopes for the different areas of work, restricts the consolidation of financial impact. Funding methods will need to be adapted to this new distribution of roles, both at the centre of the healthcare system and in the industrial ecosystem. All of these changes will help the leaders of our healthcare system to bring this new ambition closer to all of the people working in the health economy.

Scientific evaluation and pricing of medical devices and associated procedures in France.

Medical devices are many and various, ranging from tongue spatulas to implantable or invasive devices and imaging machines; their lifetimes are short, between 18 months and 5 years, due to incessant incremental innovation; and they are operator-dependent: in general, the clinical user performs a fitting procedure (hip implant or pacemaker), a therapeutic procedure using a non-implantable invasive device (arrhythmic site ablation probe, angioplasty balloon, extension spondyloplasty system, etc.) or follow-up of an active implanted device (long-term follow-up of an implanted cardiac defibrillator or of a deep brain stimulator in Parkinson's patients). A round-table held during the XXVIII(th) Giens Workshops meeting focused on the methodology of scientific evaluation of medical devices and the associated procedures with a view to their pricing and financing by the French National Health Insurance system. The working hypothesis was that the available data-set was sufficient for and compatible with scientific evaluation with clinical benefit. Post-registration studies, although contributing to the continuity of assessment, were not dealt with. Moreover, the focus was restricted to devices used in health establishments, where the association between devices and technical medical procedures is optimally representative. An update of the multiple regulatory protocols governing medical devices and procedures is provided. Issues more specifically related to procedures as such, to non-implantable devices and to innovative devices are then dealt with, and the proposals and discussion points raised at the round-table for each of these three areas are presented.

[Not Available]. / La mise en place des cohortes en France : pourquoi, pour qui, comment et avec quels moyens ?

A cohort is a group of individuals sharing some characteristics, followed longitudinally. Essential tools of epidemiology, these studies provide pieces of evidence of the relationship between an exposition and outcomes in order to guide public health policies. In France, many cohorts have been conducted over the past few years. Sometimes, initiated by independent research teams (e.g. E3N) but more often, either requested by health authorities in a global public health plan (e.g. MEMENTO in the Alzheimer plan) or conducted to investigate a safety issue (e.g. France Coag). Besides, post authorization studies often consist in prospective cohorts. Because of objectives, designs and governance arrangements diversity; participants questioned whether it was interesting for researchers, regulators and industrials to use this epidemiological tool. Some findings about difficulties met in cohorts' establishment have been shared by each other. In order to make cohorts more efficient, participants have made some recommendations.

[Not Available]. / La mise en place des cohortes en France : pourquoi, pour qui, comment et avec quels moyens ?

A cohort is a group of individuals sharing some characteristics, followed longitudinally. Essential tools of epidemiology, these studies provide pieces of evidence of the relationship between an exposition and outcomes in order to guide public health policies. In France, many cohorts have been conducted over the past few years. Sometimes, initiated by independent research teams (e.g. E3N) but more often, either requested by health authorities in a global public health plan (e.g. MEMENTO in the Alzheimer plan) or conducted to investigate a safety issue (e.g. France Coag). Besides, post authorization studies often consist in prospective cohorts. Because of objectives, designs and governance arrangements diversity; participants questioned whether it was interesting for researchers, regulators and industrials to use this epidemiological tool. Some findings about difficulties met in cohorts' establishment have been shared by each other. In order to make cohorts more efficient, participants have made some recommendations.

Biomarkers for the early stages of clinical development in Alzheimer's disease.

As the failure of several recent Phase III drug development programmes bears witness, the clinical development of "disease-modifying" drugs in Alzheimer's disease has been confronted with challenging methodological difficulties. Taking into account the financial stakes involved taking drug candidates to the Phase III stage of development, and the risk of investing time and resources fruitlessly in the evaluation of poor candidate drugs, the crucial decision remains whether to proceed from Phase II to Phase III (Go/Nogo). The aim of Phase II studies is to select a molecule likely to be effective in Phase III, but also to eliminate candidate-drugs with an inadequate effect. No consensus currently exists on the best possible design of Phase II studies to inform the Go/Nogo decision optimally. The challenges in choosing the best study design relate to the target population, the end-point criteria used, in particular the use of biomarkers, the experimental protocol, and the study duration. The objective of the Round Table (RT) was to gather the opinions of French experts from the academic, industrial, and regulatory world in order to arrive at a consensus recommendation for the best possible design to be used in Phase II studies in Alzheimer's disease.

Use of the foreign studies: transposition of the results, prediction of the therapeutic effects in the french population, modelling of the public health interest.

More and more frequently, the health authorities and the French assessment agencies are led to issue Marketing Authorizations (MAs), give opinions on the eligibility for reimbursement of drugs or to draft recommendations for clinical practice based on the results of foreign studies. The results of these studies are more or less difficult to transpose to French practice. These difficulties generate varying degrees of uncertainty concerning the effect to be expected of a drug. A more or less extensive loss of effect is sometimes even predictable. Some of the difficulties in transposition are discussed in this article and proposals for action are made in order to allow one, in the long term, to predict in the most precise manner possible the effects to be expected from a drug in the French population and be able to verify this prediction at an interval from its eligibility for reimbursement.

Use of the Foreign Studies: Transposition of the Results, Prediction of the Therapeutic Effects in the French Population, Modelling of the Public Health Interest.

More and more frequently, the health authorities and the French assessment agencies are led to issue Marketing Authorizations (MAs), give opinions on the eligibility for reimbursement of drugs or to draft recommendations for clinical practice based on the results of foreign studies. The results of these studies are more or less difficult to transpose to French practice. These difficulties generate varying degrees of uncertainty concerning the effect to be expected of a drug. A more or less extensive loss of effect is sometimes even predictable. Some of the difficulties in transposition are discussed in this article and proposals for action are made in order to allow one, in the long term, to predict in the most precise manner possible the effects to be expected from a drug in the French population and be able to verify this prediction at an interval from its eligibility for reimbursement.

Adaptation of the clinical trials directive: recommendations on the contents of a dossier for the request for authorisation of the first trials in human subjects.

The European Directive on clinical trials of medicinal products will fall within the scope of the legislation of Member States on 1 May 2004. In France, this adaptation will be carried out by a public health bill concerning, among other things, the reform of the current Huriet-Sérusclat law, and by means of regulations. For trials concerning the initial administration of a product to human subjects, the group suggested the following recommendations: In French texts, to include a deadline of 30 days for the initial authorisation by the competent authority (Afssaps [Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé]). To maintain an observed deadline of 20 days (35 official days) for the decision of the Ethics Committee (EC) [Committee for the Protection of Persons (CPP)]. To obtain a more specific evaluation of the pharmaceutical dossier of the investigational medicinal product (IMP) from the competent authority. To provide both bodies with nonclinical and possibly clinical data concerning the IMP information of the participants and their consent. To follow the recommendations posted on the Afssaps website for the entire IMP dossier. To submit a protocol under the International Committee on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 format adapted for phase I and, possibly as a separate document, justification of a certain number of points (a total of ten) that are more specific to this trial phase to facilitate and improve the document review while also providing the expected guarantees. To limit the 'substantial' amendments to those provided for in the European guidelines. To break the blind for every serious event reported to the sponsor by the investigator, and report to the competent authority any serious adverse event related to the IMP or to the trial or without documented cause, while keeping ECs and investigators informed. Furthermore, certain points concerning the authorisations for packaging, labelling and dispensing of the batches of medicinal products for clinical trials will need to be specified for these early studies. All these recommendations are intended to help promote the development of studies involving the initial administration of medicinal products in France.

Postmarketing evaluation of drugs. Actual efficacy, population exposed and impact on public health.

Round table no. 2 was devoted to the postmarketing evaluation of drugs. The debates involved both the questions posed by postmarketing evaluation and the methods for responding to them. The major categories of questions likely to be posed are as follows: efficacy in actual situations; safety in actual situations; prognostic factors and patients responding; place in the therapeutic strategy; impact on the healthcare care system; the 'joined' population (those who actually obtain benefit); and drug utilisation review. In addition, the methodological approaches have been divided into three categories: the experimental approach, the observational approach and the modelling approach. Each of these methodological approaches has been qualified with respect to each of the questions. The objective was neither to establish a classification of the methods according to the level of proof, nor to propose methodological formulae. Instead, the participants applied themselves to describe the strengths and the limits of the different methods for each of the questions in turn. The debates then focused on the process of identification of pertinent questions and appropriate methods. In this context, the round-table participants applied an analysis of the current system of postmarketing study projects and formulated some propositions for their improvement. Finally, the place of existing databases in the postmarketing evaluation was discussed and the participants emphasised the importance of initiating a very detailed assessment of the information that could be provided by such databases before instituting ad hoc studies.

Development of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ) for assessing quality of life in pediatric and adult patients.

UNLABELLED: To assess the impact of cystic fibrosis (CF) and treatment on quality of life (QOL) from childhood throughout adult age, two versions of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire (CFQ), were developed and validated in France: the CFQ 14+ for teenagers and adults, the CFQ Child P, a parent-proxy evaluation for children aged 8-13. They include three modules for assessing QOL, symptoms and health perception. Nine QOL dimensions were identified: physical functioning, energy/well-being, emotions, social limitations, role, embarrassment, body image, eating disturbances and treatment burden. Items were derived from 33 interviews with patients and parents. Item reduction and assessment of internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity were based on a large cross-sectional survey among 393 patients and parents. A second study was conducted among 124 patients and 85 parents to test reproducibility and responsiveness, confirm the subscale structure and assess scalar properties using Rasch analysis. All psychometric properties were successfully demonstrated and both the CFQ 14+ and the CFQ Child P French questionnaires are now well validated. German and Spanish validated adaptations are available, an English validation is in progress. CONCLUSION: The CFQ 14+ and CFQ Child P are well validated, multilingual measures which allow QoL assessment in children, teenagers and adults with CF.

[Good and bad fortunes of drugs]. / Heurs et malheurs d'un médicament.

A drug's lifetime, whether it is short or long, may go through fantastic new developments. Such is the case with beta-blockers, some of which have long been prescribed in heart failure before having made the definite proof of their efficacy, provided they are used carefully regarding the Good Product Use. On the other hand, the development of mibefradil, a calcic antagonist prescribed in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris, was stopped abruptly a few weeks before its launching because of the occurrence of serious side effects in patients suffering from heart failure. These examples, which are taken amongst others, clearly show the difficulties encountered by pharmaceutical companies that are concerned in putting forward innovative, efficacious, and ... secure drugs.