ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this paper, we add to the scant literature base on learning from failures with a particular focus on understanding educators' shifting mindset in making-centred learning environments. AIMS: The aim of Study 1 was to explore educators' beliefs about failure for learning and instructional practices within their local making-centred learning environments. The aim of Study 2 was to examine how participation in a video-based professional development cycle regarding failure moments in making-centred learning environments might have shifted museum educators' failure pedagogical mindsets. SAMPLE: In Study 1, the sample included 15 educators at either a middle school or museum. In Study 2, the sample included 39 educators across six museums. METHODS: In Study 1, educators engaged in a semi-structured interview that lasted between 45 and 75 min. In Study 2, the six museums video recorded professional development sessions. RESULTS: Results from Study 1 highlighted educators' failure pedagogical mindsets as either underdeveloped or rigid and absent of relational thinking between self- and youth-failures. One key result from Study 2 was a shift from an abstract sense of failure as youth-focused to a practical sense of failure as educator-focused and/or relational (i.e., youth educator-focused failure moments). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results from Study 1 and Study 2, our research suggests that exploring an educator's relationship with failure is important and witnessing and reflecting upon their own failure pedagogical mindset in action may facilitate a shift towards a more complex and interconnected space for growth and development of both educators and youth.
ABSTRACT
Makerspaces, workspaces where families can explore materials and tools collaboratively, can provide an opportunity for creative expression and early engineering learning in community spaces. The present study examined a cardboard-focused museum makerspace that included an assembly-style activity. Assembly-style making uses instructions to support makers. Such activities have been critiqued as limiting creativity and engineering thinking. However, makers who are less comfortable in makerspaces may benefit from assembly-style activities helping to scaffold their entry into the space. We explored these criticisms and potential benefits of assembly-style making through developing case studies of video data taken by families in a makerspace. Visitors made creative and personally meaningful creations when engaged in assembly style making. Moreover, assembly-style making mediated a family less comfortable with making to get started in the space alongside ample evidence of families following engineering design processes. Contrary to popular belief, assembly-style making offers an important support to novice makers, without eliminating creativity and engineering design processes, and should be considered in the mix of activities available in makerspaces to support makers of all levels of comfort in making.
