Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Matern Child Health J ; 28(7): 1210-1218, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401026

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to understand connections between pain, caregiving, physical and behavioral health treatment needs, and motivations for prescription opioid use among child caregiving women with chronic pain. METHODS: We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 12 women (average age 48 years; 58% Black) in child caregiving roles, including women who were pregnant or trying to become pregnant and were caring for children or grandchildren < 18 years, and who received treatment at an outpatient pain management clinic. We used thematic text analysis to identify qualitative themes related to caregiving, pain, treatment, substance use, coping strategies, and sources of support. RESULTS: A diverse sample of women reported high levels of stress and pain, substance use, interpersonal violence, depression, and financial strain. Most described difficulties at work, interacting with children or grandchildren, and engaging routine, daily activities due to their pain. Most indicated that they spent less time with family and friends due to their pain and had limited sources of support to help them navigate both caregiving and pain. Many described barriers to receiving appropriate healthcare, including prescription opioids, due to stigma or logistics, though most also reported positive healthcare experiences. Women also reported added daily-life, physical, mental health, and interpersonal stressors and difficulty navigating the healthcare system to receive needed care. DISCUSSION: For women with chronic pain in child caregiver roles, results highlight the importance of care tailored to the physical needs of child caregiving and of trauma-informed approaches given the prevalence of comorbid conditions and trauma.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Caregivers , Chronic Pain , Interviews as Topic , Qualitative Research , Humans , Female , Chronic Pain/psychology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Middle Aged , Caregivers/psychology , Adult , Child , Pain Management/methods , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
2.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 49(2): 79-86, 2024 Feb 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364919

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Major traumatic injuries are a known risk factor for persistent opioid use, but data describing the relationship between specific traumatic injuries and opioid use is lacking. METHODS: We used insurance claims data from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2020 to estimate the incidence of new persistent opioid use in three hospitalized trauma populations: individuals hospitalized after burn injury (3809, 1504 of whom required tissue grafting), individuals hospitalized after motor vehicle collision (MVC; 9041), and individuals hospitalized after orthopedic injury (47, 637). New persistent opioid use was defined as receipt of ≥1 opioid prescriptions 90-180 days following injury in an individual with no opioid prescriptions during the year prior to injury. RESULTS: New persistent opioid use was observed in 12% (267/2305) of individuals hospitalized after burn injury with no grafting, and 12% (176/1504) of burn injury patients requiring tissue grafting. In addition, new persistent opioid use was observed in 16% (1454/9041) of individuals hospitalized after MVC, and 20% (9455/47, 637) of individuals hospitalized after orthopedic trauma. In comparison, rates of persistent opioid use in all trauma cohorts (19%, 11, 352/60, 487) were greater than the rates of persistent opioid use in both non-traumatic major surgery (13%) and non-traumatic minor surgery (9%). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that new persistent opioid use frequently occurs in these common hospitalized trauma populations. Improved interventions to reduce persistent pain and opioid use in patients hospitalized after these and other traumas are needed.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Incidence , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Pain/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies
3.
Pain Med ; 25(4): 275-282, 2024 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092363

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain in the context of certain factors may be associated with potential for nonmedical prescription opioid use; however, identifying this risk can be challenging and complex. Several variables alone have been associated with non-prescribed opioid use, including depression, anxiety, pain interference, and trauma exposure. Prior research has often failed to integrate these assessments together, which is important as these factors may cluster together in important and complex ways. The current study aimed to identify classes of patients with chronic pain who have differential risk for use of nonmedical prescription opioid use, depression and anxiety, and pain severity, interference, and catastrophizing, and interpersonal violence exposure. METHODS: Self-report and medical record data from patients (N = 211; Mage = 48, 69.0% women, 69.0% white) at a pain management center were collected. RESULTS: Latent class analysis revealed 3 classes with (1) low probability of clinically significant depression, anxiety, pain, and nonmedical prescription opioid use (44.7%), (2) high probability of clinically significant depression, anxiety, pain, pain catastrophizing, trauma, and nonmedical prescription opioid use (41.3%), and (3) high probability of severe pain and nonmedical prescription opioid use (14.0%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk classes had either high levels of depression and anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and interpersonal violence exposure, or pain severity and interference. Future research should continue to explore these classes in large, diverse samples, and prospective study designs. Finally, results underscore that opioid use is complex, not easily identified by a single factor, and may be motivated by complex unmet clinical needs.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Opioid-Related Disorders , Humans , Female , Male , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Depression/epidemiology , Latent Class Analysis , Prospective Studies , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety/epidemiology , Prescriptions
4.
Cureus ; 15(5): e39656, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37388588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:  Empathy is associated with desirable outcomes in healthcare, including improved patient-clinician rapport, fewer patient complications, and reduced clinician burnout. Despite these benefits, research suggests empathy declines during professional training. This study aimed to explore the impact of book club participation on clinicians' and trainees' empathy and perspectives on empathetic patient care. METHODS:  In this mixed-methods study, anesthesiology clinicians and trainees were invited to respond to a baseline online empathy survey followed by an invitation to read a book and to participate in one of four facilitated book club sessions. Post-intervention empathy was measured. The primary outcome of the quantitative analysis was a change in empathy scores as measured by the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire. A thematic analysis of book club sessions and open-ended comments in the post-intervention survey was conducted. RESULTS:  Participants included 74 responders to the baseline survey and 73 responders to the post-intervention survey. Empathy score change in the book club participants was not statistically significant from those who did not participate in any book club sessions (F(2, 39) = 0.42, p=0.66). Thematic analysis of the book club sessions revealed four themes that highlight how the book club enhanced empathy awareness among trainees and clinicians: 1) a wake-up call, 2) deciding whether to take action, 3) learning and nurturing empathy, and 4) changing the culture. CONCLUSION:  There were no significant changes in empathy scores associated with book club participation. Thematic analysis highlighted barriers toward empathetic patient care, areas for improvement, and voiced intentions to practice with heightened empathy. Book clubs may be a viable venue to nurture a culture of increased self-awareness and motivation to counteract loss of empathy, but just one experience may not be sufficient.

5.
Anesth Analg ; 129(3): 776-783, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31425219

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic surgery have been shown to decrease length of stay with no impact on readmission, but no study has assessed predictors of admission in this population. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of admission after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH) performed under an ERAS pathway. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing LH/RAH for benign indications within an ERAS pathway. Data collected included same-day discharge, reason for admission, incidences of urgent clinic and emergency room (ER) visits, readmissions, reoperations, and 9 postulated predictors of admission listed below. Patient demographics, markers of baseline health, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups (ERAS patients discharged on the day of surgery versus admitted) using Fisher exact and Student t tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the potential risk factors for being admitted, adjusting for age, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, preoperative diagnosis indicative of hysterectomy, preoperative chronic pain, completion of a preprocedure pain-coping skills counseling session, procedure time, and compliance to the ERAS pathway. RESULTS: There were 165 patients undergoing LH/RAH within an ERAS pathway; 93 (56%) were discharged on the day of surgery and 72 were admitted. There were no significant differences in ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations between groups (ER visits: discharged 13% versus admitted 13%, P = .99; 90-day readmission: discharged 4% versus admitted 7%, P = .51; and 90-day reoperation: discharged 4% versus admitted 3%, P = .70). The most common reasons for admission were postoperative urinary retention (n = 21, 30%), inadequate pain control (n = 21, 30%), postoperative nausea and vomiting (n = 7, 10%), and planned admissions (n = 7, 10%). Increased ASA physical status, being African American, and increased length of procedure were significantly associated with an increased risk of admission (ASA physical status III versus ASA physical status I or II: odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-7.16; P = .007; African American: OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.02-5.96; P = .04; and length of procedure, assessed in 30-minute increments: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We were able to define predictors of admission for patients having LH/RAH managed with an ERAS pathway. Increased ASA physical status, being African American, and increased length of procedure were significantly associated with admission after LH/RAH performed under an ERAS pathway. In addition, the incidences of urgent clinic and ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days of surgery were similar for patients who were discharged on the day of surgery compared to those admitted.


Subject(s)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/trends , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/trends , Patient Admission/trends , Adult , Female , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
6.
Oncologist ; 18(4): 381-90, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442307

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cancer patients carry rising burdens of health care-related out-of-pocket expenses, and a growing number of patients are considered "underinsured." Our objective was to describe experiences of insured cancer patients requesting copayment assistance and to describe the impact of health care expenses on well-being and treatment. METHODS: We conducted baseline and follow-up surveys regarding the impact of health care costs on well-being and treatment among cancer patients who contacted a national copayment assistance foundation along with a comparison sample of patients treated at an academic medical center. RESULTS: Among 254 participants, 75% applied for drug copayment assistance. Forty-two percent of participants reported a significant or catastrophic subjective financial burden; 68% cut back on leisure activities, 46% reduced spending on food and clothing, and 46% used savings to defray out-of-pocket expenses. To save money, 20% took less than the prescribed amount of medication, 19% partially filled prescriptions, and 24% avoided filling prescriptions altogether. Copayment assistance applicants were more likely than nonapplicants to employ at least one of these strategies to defray costs (98% vs. 78%). In an adjusted analysis, younger age, larger household size, applying for copayment assistance, and communicating with physicians about costs were associated with greater subjective financial burden. CONCLUSION: Insured patients undergoing cancer treatment and seeking copayment assistance experience considerable subjective financial burden, and they may alter their care to defray out-of-pocket expenses. Health insurance does not eliminate financial distress or health disparities among cancer patients. Future research should investigate coverage thresholds that minimize adverse financial outcomes and identify cancer patients at greatest risk for financial toxicity.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/therapy , Patients , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Data Collection , Female , Financial Support , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Quality of Health Care
7.
Lung Cancer ; 76(2): 248-52, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22112290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the prognostic importance of functional capacity and exercise behavior in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a prospective design, 118 consecutive participants with histologically confirmed metastatic (inoperable) NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG) 0-3 completed a six-minute walk test to assess functional capacity and questionnaire that assessed self-reported exercise behavior. Cox proportional models were used to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality according to six-minute walk distance (6MWD) (<358.5m, 358.5-450 m, ≥450 m) and exercise behavior (MET-hrswk(-1)) categories with adjustment for important covariates. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 26.6 months; 77 deaths were reported during this period. Functional capacity was an independent predictor of survival (P(trend)=0.003) and added incremental prognostic value beyond that provided by PS plus other traditional markers of prognosis (P(trend)=0.025). Compared with patients achieving a 6MWD <358.5m, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.34-1.07) for a 6MWD of 358.5-450 m, and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24-0.93) for a 6MWD >450 m. In unadjusted analysis, there was a borderline significant effect of exercise behavior on survival (p=0.052). Median survival was 12.89 months (95% CI, 9.11-21.05 months) for those reporting <9MET-hrswk(-1) compared with 25.63 months (95% CI, 11.28 to ∞ months) for those reporting ≥9MET-hrswk(-1). CONCLUSIONS: Functional capacity is a strong independent predictor of survival in advanced NSCLC that adds to the prediction of survival beyond traditional risk factors. This parameter may improve risk stratification and prognostication in NSCLC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/physiopathology , Exercise/physiology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Test/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Walking/physiology
8.
Clin Transplant ; 26(1): 97-104, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21395692

ABSTRACT

Caregivers for patients undergoing solid organ transplantation play an essential role in the process of transplantation. However, little is known about stress and coping among these caregivers. Six hundred and twenty-one primary caregivers of potential candidates for lung (n = 317), liver (n = 147), heart (n = 115), and/or kidney (n = 42) transplantation completed a psychometric test battery at the time of the candidate's initial pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation. Caregivers were generally well adjusted, with only 17% exhibiting clinical symptoms of depression (Beck Depression Inventory-II score >13) and 13% reporting clinical levels of anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory score >48). Greater caregiver burden and negative coping styles were associated with higher levels of depression. Greater objective burden and avoidant coping were associated with higher levels of anxiety. Caregivers evidenced a high degree of socially desirable (i.e., defensive) responding, which may reflect a deliberate effort to minimize fears or worries so as to not jeopardize patients' listing status.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Caregivers/psychology , Organ Transplantation/psychology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Waiting Lists , Anxiety/etiology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...