Assessment of Natural Sunlight Protection Provided by 10 High-SPF Broad-Spectrum Sunscreens and Sun-Protective Fabrics.

In 1978, the FDA Advisory Panel proposed both indoor and natural sunlight SPF testing methods but reverted to indoor testing only in 1993. Today's sunscreen sun protection and broad-spectrum claims are based on mandated clinical tests using solar simulators and in vitro spectrophotometers. This research evaluated the protection of 10 high-SPF (30-110), broad-spectrum sunscreen products, as well as 6 sun-protective fabrics against natural sunlight in Arequipa, Peru. Each of the 17 subjects was exposed to natural sunlight for 1 h and 59 min under clear skies, with temperatures and humidity similar to those in an indoor clinical laboratory. Test sites were photographed 16-24 h later. Four dermatologists evaluated the photographs for erythema and persistent pigment darkening (PPD). Perceptible sun-induced skin injury (sunburn and/or pigmentation) was detected at 97% of the sunscreen-protected scores. The most sun-sensitive subjects obtained the least erythema protection. The higher the SPF was, the higher the erythema protection, but the intensity of PPD was also higher. The 2 sunscreens using only FDA-approved sunscreen filters rated 30 SPF and 45+ SPF performed poorly: Eighty-one percent of the 136 scores were graded 1 minimal erythema dose or higher erythema, achieving, at a maximum, SPF of 5-7 in natural sunlight. Sun-protective fabrics tested provided excellent sun protection. The erythema and PPD observed through the sunscreens in less than 2 h are incongruous with the broad-spectrum, high-SPF sunscreen claims. Reapplying these sunscreens and staying in the sun longer, as stated on the product labels, would have subjected the subjects to even more UV exposure. High-SPF, broad-spectrum sunscreen claims based on indoor solar simulator testing do not agree with the natural sunlight protection test results.

The Challenge of Managing Psoriasis: Unmet Medical Needs and Stakeholder Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a debilitating chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease affecting approximately 7.4 million adults in the United States. Plaque psoriasis is the most common form, affecting 80% to 90% of patients. OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact and challenges that psoriasis presents for various stakeholders, and to provide nondermatologist healthcare decision makers with information to enhance their contributions to drug and pharmacy benefit design discussions. DISCUSSION: Psoriasis carries an increased risk for early mortality and an increased prevalence of comorbidities, including psoriatic arthritis, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. It is also associated with anxiety, depression, and social isolation, and can negatively impact patients' relationships, productivity, and careers. The physical, psychologic, social, and economic impact of psoriasis, plus the associated stigma, result in cumulative impairment over a patient's lifetime. The current treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis include topical therapy, phototherapy, and systemic drugs (nonbiologic and biologic); however, patient satisfaction remains low, combination therapy and treatment switching are common, and many patients remain untreated or undertreated. Clinicians should consider the patient holistically, and should select treatment based on a range of factors, including disease severity (with physical and psychosocial manifestations), susceptibility to cumulative life-course impairment (considering personality, behavior, and cognition), comorbidities, concomitant medication, and patient preference. It is estimated that the total annual direct cost of treating psoriasis in the United States in 2015 exceeded $12.2 billion. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis is a complex disease, and appropriate management is correspondingly complex. Newer psoriasis treatments provide improved efficacy and safety versus traditional treatments, but challenges remain in ensuring patients access to these medications. An improved understanding of the barriers to appropriate treatment is needed, as well as clear and accessible information for payers and clinicians on current treatment options, to ensure that decision makers can control costs while providing patients with optimal care.

Treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with concomitant efalizumab and narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: Efalizumab therapy and narrow-band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy have different mechanisms of action; combined therapy may be more effective than either treatment alone in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of efalizumab (1 mg/kg/wk) combined with NB-UVB 3 times a week for 12 weeks, followed by efalizumab monotherapy for 12 additional weeks. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled with mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 12.8 +/- 7.4, mean physician's global assessment (PGA) of 5 +/- 1, and mean body surface area (BSA) affected of 18.2% +/- 15.3% at baseline. At week 12, 65% of patients (n = 13) achieved PASI 75; mean PGA was 2 +/- 1, corresponding to a 60% reduction; and mean BSA was 4.7% +/- 4.1%, corresponding to a 74% reduction. The improvements seen at week 12 were maintained during the ensuing efalizumab monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Combination of efalizumab and NB-UVB followed by efalizumab monotherapy was effective and well tolerated, this warranting further investigation.

Open label trial of alefacept in palmoplantar pustular psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPP) is difficult to treat. We assessed the effectiveness of alefacept in PPP and the safety of a 30 mg/week dose. METHODS: Fifteen individuals with PPP were started on 15 mg/week intramuscularly (IM) alefacept. Efficacy was measured by the PPP severity instrument (PSI). Treatment was continued for 16 weeks, and the alefacept dose was increased to 30 mg/week IM at week 9 if the PSI did not decrease by at least 25%. Other outcomes included physician's global assessment (PGA), reported adverse events and CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts. Clinical response was observed for 12 weeks after the last injection. RESULTS: The severity of PPP improved in both the PSI and the PGA (p<0.0001 and p = 0.0009, respectively). Much of the improvement occurred after 10 weeks of therapy. Nail severity scores improved (p = 0.0003). CD4+ counts decreased, but all remained >250 cells/mm3. There were no severe adverse effects or discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Alefacept in doses up to 30 mg/week was well tolerated in patients with PPP and appeared to have some efficacy. The use of concomitant therapy, the lack of a comparator, and the small sample size are limitations of the study.

Safety of efalizumab in adults with chronic moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a phase IIIb, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To provide safety data for efalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG(1) antibody, in adults with chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: A 12-week, Phase IIIb, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. At 58 study sites in the USA and Canada, 686 patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis received an initial conditioning dose of efalizumab 0.7 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) followed by either 11 weekly doses of efalizumab 1 mg/kg SC or matching placebo. Main outcome measures were safety and tolerability outcomes (primary) and efficacy outcomes (secondary). RESULTS: During 12 weeks of therapy with efalizumab or placebo, the incidence of clinical adverse events was 82.2% and 72.9%, respectively; the incidence of serious adverse events was 1.8% and 3.4%, respectively; and the incidence of nonserious adverse events leading to withdrawal was 1.8% and 1.7%, respectively. In the efalizumab group, there were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory parameters and no evidence of end-organ toxicities. A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving efalizumab than those receiving placebo achieved > or = 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (P < 0.001), > or = 50% improvement in PASI (P < 0.001), and a static Physician's Global Assessment rating of Minimal or Clear (P < 0.001). The mean improvement in the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment was significantly greater in the efalizumab group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Efalizumab treatment SC for 12 weeks was safe, well tolerated, and effective in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Etanercept monotherapy in patients with psoriasis: a summary of safety, based on an integrated multistudy database.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor antagonist, is an approved treatment in the United States and Europe for plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To further examine the safety profile of etanercept in patients with chronic, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Safety data from an integrated database of 1347 patients from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials were analyzed. Safety end points included incidence rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, infections, serious infections, injection site reactions, and routine laboratory assessments. Pooled safety results from the first 12 weeks of each trial are reported here. RESULTS: Rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, infections, and serious infections in the first 12 weeks of the 3 trials were similar among all active groups as well as each active group, compared with the placebo group. No dose-related toxicities were reported. LIMITATIONS: This report includes a relatively short (12-week) time frame; data from patients exposed to etanercept for longer periods are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept was generally safe in a large cohort of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Diagnosis and treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

UNLABELLED: Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic, heterogeneous disease whose pathogenesis is unknown, although genetic, environmental, and immunologic factors play major roles. Psoriatic arthritis can follow an aggressive clinical course, and differentiating it from other arthropathies is sometimes difficult. Diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis is based on history, physical examination, the usual absence of rheumatoid factor, and characteristic radiographic features. At least 40% of patients with psoriatic arthritis develop radiographically detectable joint destruction; therefore, proper diagnosis and early treatment can have a significant impact on disease course and outcome. Understanding the pathogenesis of psoriatic disease has led to the use of several biologic agents that work by modulating T-cell signaling or by inhibiting key cytokines involved in inflammation, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF). TNF inhibitors have demonstrated excellent efficacy in resolving skin and joint disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis and have been shown to be safe agents in various inflammatory disorders. This article reviews the diagnostic and treatment challenges of psoriatic arthritis as they relate to pathogenesis and burden of disease. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: At the conclusion of this learning activity, participants should have acquired a more comprehensive knowledge of our current understanding of the classification, clinical presentation, etiology, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis, and treatment of psoriatic arthritis.

An integrated analysis of thirteen trials summarizing the long-term safety of alefacept in psoriasis patients who have received up to nine courses of therapy.

BACKGROUND: Information on longer-term safety and tolerability is needed to confidently prescribe alefacept therapy for chronic plaque psoriasis beyond 1 or 2 courses. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to further examine the safety profile of alefacept by integrating data from clinical trials involving patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who received up to 9 courses of therapy over a 5-year period. METHODS: Data from 13 clinical trials conducted in patients with plaque psoriasis were integrated because they had similar inclusion/exclusion criteria and assessments. Patients who enrolled in the analyzed trials were aged > or =15 years with chronic plaque psoriasis for > or =12 months that involved > or =10% of body surface area, and CD4+ T lymphocyte counts above the lower limit of normal (>404 cells/microL). The incidences of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, discontinuations for AEs, infections, serious infections, malignancies, and anti-alefacept antibodies were summarized for each course of alefacept. The incidence of infections was stratified according to CD4+ T lymphocyte counts (<250 cells/microL vs > or =250 cells/microL). RESULTS: Data from 13 clinical trials of alefacept were integrated and summarized (multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies, n = 6; multicenter, open-label studies, n = 5; other, n = 2). The analyzed population (n = 1869) included 1291 (69.1%) men and 578 (30.9%) women, between the ages of 15 and 84 years (mean, 44.8 years), of whom 1648 (88.2%) were white. Weights ranged from 40 kg to 206 kg (mean, 90.0 kg). A total of 1369 of these patients had been included in a previous analysis. Among the most commonly reported AEs in each treatment course were headache (0%-14.2%), nasopharyngitis (7.7%-25.0%), influenza (0%-8.1%), upper respiratory tract infection (0%-12.5%), and pruritus (0%-7.5%). The rates of discontinuations due to AEs (0%-4.8%), serious AEs (0%-4.8%), serious infections (0%-0.9%), or malignancies (0%-4.8%) did not appear to increase with repeated exposure. Fewer than 1 % of patients in each course developed a serious infection. No opportunistic infections or infection-related deaths were reported. The incidence of infections appeared to be unrelated to CD4+ T lymphocyte counts. Fewer than 2.5% of patients tested positive for anti-alefacept antibodies during any course of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated analysis of data from 13 trials with 1869 patients supports the safety and tolerability of alefacept for longer-term treatment of psoriasis.

A randomized trial of etanercept as monotherapy for psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine safety and efficacy of monotherapy with etanercept. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Outpatient, ambulatory; private practice and university dermatology research centers. PATIENTS: Patients aged at least 18 years, with plaque psoriasis involving 10% or more of body surface area; 148 were screened and 112 were randomly assigned to treatment groups and received study drug. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received placebo or etanercept, 25 mg, subcutaneously twice a week for 24 weeks. Other psoriasis therapies were limited during the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety measurements included tracking of adverse events and laboratory values. Efficacy was evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI); the primary end point was a 75% improvement in PASI. Other efficacy measurements included patient and physician global assessments and quality-of-life measures. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, 17 (30%) of the 57 etanercept-treated patients and 1 (2%) of the 55 placebo-treated patients had achieved PASI 75%, and after 24 weeks, 32 (56%) of etanercept-treated patients and 3 (5%) of placebo-treated patients had reached this level (P<.001 for both time points). By 24 weeks, psoriasis was clear or minimal by physician's global assessment in more than 50% of patients who received etanercept. Treatment failure (PASI response <50) occurred in 23% of patients at week 24. All other measures confirmed the efficacy of etanercept. Adverse events were similar among etanercept and placebo groups. CONCLUSION: Etanercept monotherapy provided significant benefit to patients with psoriasis and had a favorable safety profile.

Etanercept as monotherapy in patients with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of etanercept, a TNF antagonist, for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this 24-week, double-blind study, 672 patients underwent randomization and 652 either received placebo or received etanercept subcutaneously at a low dose (25 mg once weekly), a medium dose (25 mg twice weekly), or a high dose (50 mg twice weekly). After 12 weeks, patients in the placebo group began twice-weekly treatment with 25 mg of etanercept. The primary measure of clinical response was the psoriasis area-and-severity index. RESULTS: At week 12, there was an improvement from base line of 75 percent or more in the psoriasis area-and-severity index in 4 percent of the patients in the placebo group, as compared with 14 percent of those in the low-dose--etanercept group, 34 percent in the medium-dose--etanercept group, and 49 percent in the high-dose-etanercept group (P<0.001 for all three comparisons with the placebo group). The clinical responses continued to improve with longer treatment. At week 24, there was at least a 75 percent improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index in 25 percent of the patients in the low-dose group, 44 percent of those in the medium-dose group, and 59 percent in the high-dose group. The responses as measured by improvements in the psoriasis area-and-severity index were paralleled by improvements in global assessments by physicians and the patients and in quality-of-life measures. Etanercept was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of psoriasis with etanercept led to a significant reduction in the severity of disease over a period of 24 weeks.

CD4+ T-cell-directed antibody responses are maintained in patients with psoriasis receiving alefacept: results of a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Alefacept, human LFA-3/IgG(1) fusion protein, selectively reduces memory-effector (CD45RO(+)) T cells, a source of the pathogenic mediators of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of alefacept on immune function, T-cell-dependent humoral responses to a neoantigen (PhiX174) and recall antigen (tetanus toxoid) were assessed. METHODS: Patients with psoriasis were randomized to the control group or to receive alefacept (7.5 mg intravenously weekly for 12 weeks). The alefacept group received PhiX174 immunizations at weeks 6, 12, 20, and 26 and tetanus toxoid at week 21; control subjects received PhiX174 at weeks 6 and 12 and tetanus at week 10. RESULTS: Mean anti-PhiX174 titers were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in the percentage of responders (anti-PhiX174 IgG >/=30% of the total anti-PhiX174) between the alefacept group and the control group (86% and 82%, respectively; P =.73). The percentage of patients with anti-tetanus toxoid titer increases >/=2 times baseline also was similar (alefacept, 89%; control 91%). CONCLUSION: A single 12-week course of alefacept did not impair primary or secondary antibody responses to a neoantigen or memory responses to a recall antigen. The selective immunomodulatory effect of alefacept against a potentially pathogenic T-cell subset is associated with maintenance of a significant aspect of immune function (antibody response) to fight infection and respond to vaccinations.