Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown period on adult musculoskeletal injuries and surgical management: a retrospective monocentric study.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to the worldwide implementation of unprecedented public protection measures. On the 17th of March, the French government announced a lockdown of the population for 8 weeks. This monocentric study assessed the impact of this lockdown on the musculoskeletal injuries treated at the emergency department as well as the surgical indications. We carried out a retrospective study in the Emergency Department and the Surgery Department of Nantes University Hospital from 18 February to 11 May 2020. We collected data pertaining to the demographics, the mechanism, the type, the severity, and inter-hospital transfer for musculoskeletal injuries from our institution. We compared the 4-week pre-lockdown period and the 8-week lockdown period divided into two 4-week periods: early lockdown and late lockdown. There was a 52.1% decrease in musculoskeletal injuries among patients presenting to the Emergency Department between the pre-lockdown and the lockdown period (weekly incidence: 415.3 ± 44.2 vs. 198.5 ± 46.0, respectively, p < .001). The number of patients with surgical indications decreased by 33.4% (weekly incidence: 44.3 ± 3.8 vs. 28.5 ± 10.2, p = .048). The policy for inter-hospital transfers to private entities resulted in 64 transfers (29.4%) during the lockdown period. There was an increase in the incidence of surgical high severity trauma (Injury Severity Score > 16) between the pre-lockdown and the early lockdown period (2 (1.1%) vs. 7 (7.2%), respectively, p = .010) as well as between the pre-lockdown and the late lockdown period (2 (1.1%) vs. 10 (8.3%), respectively, p = .004). We observed a significant increase in the weekly emergency department patient admissions between the early and the late lockdown period (161.5 ± 22.9, 235.5 ± 27.7, respectively, p = .028). A pronounced decrease in the incidence of musculoskeletal injuries was observed secondary to the lockdown measures, with emergency department patient admissions being halved and surgical indications being reduced by a third. The increase in musculoskeletal injuries during the late confinement period and the higher incidence of severe trauma highlights the importance of maintaining a functional trauma center organization with an inter-hospital transfer policy in case of a COVID-19s wave lockdown.

Are third-generation cephalosporins associated with a better prognosis than amoxicillin-clavulanate in patients hospitalized in the medical ward for community-onset pneumonia?

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether treatment with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime is associated with lower in-hospital mortality than amoxicillin-clavulanate in pati0ents hospitalized in medical wards for community-onset pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and multicentre study of patients hospitalized in French medical wards for community-onset pneumonia between 2002 and 2015. Treatments with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime or amoxicillin-clavulanate were defined by their start in the emergency department for a duration of 5 days or more with no other ß-lactam. A logistic regression analysis was performed on the overall population, and a propensity score analysis was restricted to patients treated with either ceftriaxone/cefotaxime or amoxicillin-clavulanate. RESULTS: 1698 patients (median age, 80 y) were included, of which 716 and 198 were treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate and ceftriaxone/cefotaxime, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 10% (9-12%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were treatment with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime (aOR 2.9; (1.4-5.7)), pneumonia severity index class 4 or 5 (aOR 7.8 (4.3-15.7)), do-not-resuscitate order (aOR 8.7 (5.2-14.6)) and fluid therapy (aOR 6.3 (2.5-15.1)). The propensity score analysis was performed on 178 patients treated with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime matched with 178 patients treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate; no significant association between treatment with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime and in-hospital mortality was found (OR 1.5 (0.7-3.0)). CONCLUSION: In the largest study aiming to compare amoxicillin-clavulanate and ceftriaxone/cefotaxime in community-onset pneumonia, ceftriaxone/cefotaxime was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality than amoxicillin-clavulanate. Our results suggest that ceftriaxone/cefotaxime should not be preferred over amoxicillin-clavulanate for patients hospitalized in medical wards with community-onset pneumonia.

Increasing use of third-generation cephalosporins for pneumonia in the emergency department: may some prescriptions be avoided?

Third-generation cephalosporins are used to treat inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. Some of these prescriptions may be avoided, i.e. replaced by agents less likely to promote ESBL-mediated resistance. Our objectives were to assess the recent trend of third-generation cephalosporins use for pneumonia in the emergency department, and the proportion of avoidable prescriptions. This was a retrospective study of patients treated for community-acquired pneumonia in an emergency department, and subsequently hospitalized in non ICU wards. Third-generation cephalosporin prescriptions were presumed unavoidable if they met both criteria: (i) age ≥ 65 yr or comorbid condition, and (ii) allergy or intolerance to penicillin, or failure of penicillin first-line therapy, or treatment with penicillin in three previous months. Prescriptions were otherwise deemed avoidable. The proportion of patients treated with a third generation cephalosporin increased significantly from 13.9 % (6.9-24.1 %) in 2002 to 29.5 % (18.5-42.6 %) in 2012 (OR = 1.07 [1.01-1.14] , P = 0.02). This increase was independent from other factors associated with the prescription of a third-generation cephalosporin (immunocompromising condition, antibacterial therapy in three previous months, fluid resuscitation and REA-ICU class). Treatment with third-generation cephalosporin was avoidable in 118 out of 147 patients (80.3 % [72.7-86.2 %]). On day 7 after admission in the ED, treatment with third-generation cephalosporins was stopped or de-escalated in, respectively, 17 % and 32 % of patients. Antibiotic stewardship programs should be implemented to restrict the third-generation cephalosporins use for pneumonia in the emergency department.

How to reduce antibiotic consumption for community-acquired pneumonia?

BACKGROUND: The difficulty to diagnose community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the lack of scientific data regarding the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy are responsible for overprescribing antibiotics. OBJECTIVE: The authors had for objective to perform a systematic review of the international medical literature on strategies aimed at reducing antibiotic consumption for CAP. METHODS: We performed a Pubmed search using the keywords CAP, antibiotic use, duration of antibiotic therapy, procalcitonin, short-course treatment, and biomarkers. We then made a critical review of the selected articles. RESULTS: Our review identified two strategies used to reduce antibiotic consumption for CAP. The first one was based on procalcitonin (PCT) use. This strategy, even though reducing the duration of antibiotic therapy, does not seem optimal since it is associated with longer antibiotic treatment than recommended by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Moreover, this strategy is associated with an increased cost in biochemical tests. The other strategy is based on a 2-step clinical reassessment: 1) during the first 24 hours of hospitalization, to confirm the diagnosis of CAP and 2) during hospitalization, to shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy according to the patient's clinical status. CONCLUSION: Clinical reassessment, currently little studied compared to PCT guidance algorithm, seems to be promising to reduce antibiotic consumption for CAP. Especially since it was never compared to PCT guidance strategy in a randomized clinical trial.

[Three recurrent episodes of Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy precipitated by an emotional stressful event: a case report]. / Trois épisodes récurrents de Tako-Tsubo secondaires à un choc émotionnel : à propos d'un cas clinique.

Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy, first described in 1990 by Sato in Japan, has recently gained increasing consideration when reported in non-Japanese patients, including the United States and Europe. Typical presentation mimics acute coronary syndrome, with acute chest pain and/or dyspnoea, associated to electrocardiographic changes and moderate cardiac biomarkers release, but in which coronary angiography reveals no coronary arteries lesions and echocardiography or left ventriculography shows a reversible left ventricle systolic dysfunction. Prognosis is good, in contrast to acute coronary syndrome, provided that the patients survive the possible life-threatening acute presentation, with correction of the left ventricle systolic dysfunction within several days or weeks. As noted in several reviews, 3.5% to 10% of the patients have a recurrence during the first few years after the initial presentation. Here, we described a case of a 60-year-old female who had three episodes of Tako-Tsubo always preceded by severe emotional stress suggesting a potential common etiopathogenesis.