Src homology-2 domain binding assays by scintillation proximity and surface plasmon resonance.

Various SH2 competitive binding assays, based on different techniques, have been described in the literature to identify and characterize SH2 ligands. The consideration that most reported methods show experimental limitations associated with assay parameters has prompted us to base our Src-SH2 inhibitor discovery program on the use of two different assays. In this study, two conceptually different biochemical methods designed to discover Src-SH2 inhibitors, respectively scintillation proximity assay (SPA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR), have been evaluated and compared. For its high sensitivity and adaptability to automation SPA was chosen for high capacity screening (primary screen), whereas SPR was used for hits confirmation (secondary screening). However with the drastic improvement of inhibitor affinities, the limit of sensitivity was rapidly reached for the SPR assay based on the canonical pYEEI ligand. The substitution of the natural, monophosphorylated peptide ligand with a triphosphorylated peptide has allowed us to remarkably increase its sensitivity, so that molecules with nanomolar affinities could be easily differentiated in terms of IC(50) ranking. Such a new, improved SPR assay can be of great interest for the study of high affinity ligands of different SH2-based drug targets.

Discovery of thioazepinone ligands for Src SH2: from non-specific to specific binding.

The structure-based design and synthesis of new thioazepinones as ligands for Src SH2 protein is presented. From benzothioazepinones, ligands with somewhat unspecific binding properties, simpler thioazepinones were designed, the best ones demonstrated nanomolar affinity for Src SH2. A few of these new ligands were crystallized with the protein and demonstrated a specific binding mode with the protein.

Residues in the ligand binding domain that confer progestin or glucocorticoid specificity and modulate the receptor transactivation capacity.

To localize regions conferring ligand binding specificity of the human glucocorticoid (hGR) and progesterone (hPR) receptors, we constructed chimeras comprising the DNA-binding domain of the yeast transcription factor GAL4, linked to the ligand binding domain of hGR or hPR. Replacement of a sequence of hGR encompassing helices H6 and H7 with the homologous sequence from hPR creates a chimeric protein GP3, which binds the progestin RU 27987 with high affinity, and results in a concomitant loss of glucocorticoid binding [dexamethasone (DEX), RU 43044]. Moreover, GP3 is not able to mediate RU 27987-induced transactivation. A detailed mutational analysis of this sequence and the study of the recently solved hPR crystal structure revealed five residues that confer progestin responsiveness to GR or modulate ligand binding and transcriptional activation. Notably, the simultaneous presence of residues Ser637 and Phe639 on GP3, lining the ligand binding pocket, is specifically involved in RU 27987 binding. The absence of residues Asp641, Gln642, and Leu647 on GP3 is accountable for the lack of glucocorticoids binding on GP3. Unlike residue 642, residues 641 and 647 are not in direct contact with the ligand and most likely act through steric-mediated interactions. The presence of Gln642 and Leu647 are determinant for transcriptional activation in response to DEX and RU 27987, respectively. DEX-dependent transactivation is further enhanced by the presence of Leu647.

Sequences in the ligand-binding domains of the human androgen and progesterone receptors which determine their distinct ligand identities.

The natural ligands of the progesterone (PR) and androgen (AR) receptors, progesterone and testosterone, differ only by their 17 beta-substitution. To identify within the AR and PR ligand-binding domains (LBDs) the sequences responsible for the differential recognition of these ligands, chimeric LBDs assembled from five homologous AR/PR 'cassettes' linked to the GAL4-DNA binding domain were constructed, and their ligand binding and transactivation characteristics were determined. Replacing the central cassette 3 of PR by that of AR generated a progesterone- and testosterone-responsive PR LBD with the AR residues 788-RHLS-791 being specifically involved in testosterone recognition, while the introduction of the C-terminal PR cassette 5 into AR conferred progestin responsiveness onto the AR LBD. These results suggest that residues within AR 788-RHLS-791 interact with the testosterone 17 beta-OH, while PR cassette 5 apparently contains the amino acid(s) specifically involved in the recognition of the progesterone 17 beta-acetyl group. However, ligand binding and transactivation by these chimeras were significantly decreased compared with those of the parental LBDs, indicating that residues located outside of these cassettes contribute to the proper positioning of the steroids in the AR and PR ligand-binding pockets (LBPs). Indeed, certain AR/PR chimeras acquired efficient ligand binding, but were unable to transactivate, indicating that the ligand was improperly bound in the chimeric. LBP and could not induce the conformational changes leading to a transcriptionally competent activation function (AF-2) within the LBD. The properties of the various LBD chimeras are discussed in view of the recently solved three-dimensional structures of the retinoid X receptor alpha apo- and retinoic acid receptor gamma holo-LBDs.

Non-steroidal antiandrogens: synthesis and biological profile of high-affinity ligands for the androgen receptor.

New N-substituted arylthiohydantoin antiandrogens were synthesized. These compounds presented exceptionally high relative binding affinities (RBAs) for the rat androgen receptor (AR): up to 3 times that of testosterone (T) and 100 times the RBAs of non-steroidal antiandrogens such as flutamide, Casodex and Anandron. Furthermore, unlike available markers for AR, they were totally devoid of any binding to the other steroid receptors. RU 59063, the molecule with the highest RBA, was tritiated. When it was compared to [3H]T for the assay of rat, mouse, hamster and human AR, it gave rise to the same number of binding sites but its K alpha (6 x 10(9) M-1) for rat and human AR were, respectively 3 and 8 times higher than that of T. Moreover RU 59063, unlike T, was devoid of any specific binding to human plasma. In vivo, these compounds displayed antiandrogenic activity while being devoid of any agonistic effect. Thus, RU 56187, given orally in castrated male animals, prevented in a dose-dependent manner the effects of 3 mg/kg testosterone propionate (TP) on mouse renal ornithine decarboxylase (acute test) and of 0.5 mg/kg TP on rat prostate weight (chronic test). In these two models, its ED50 was 0.6 and 1 mg/kg, respectively. In the intact rat, when given alone, it inhibited dose-dependently the effect of endogenous androgens on the seminal vesicles (ED50 approximately 1 mg/kg) and prostate (ED50 approximately 3 mg/kg) weights. These results suggest that these new compounds may be useful as specific markers for the androgen receptor as well as for the treatment of androgen-dependent diseases or disorders such as prostate cancer, acne, hirsutism and male pattern baldness.

Switching agonistic, antagonistic, and mixed transcriptional responses to 11 beta-substituted progestins by mutation of the progesterone receptor.

The study of transcription activation by a series of RU486-related 11 beta-substituted progestins revealed three types of ligands: agonists, antagonists, and a novel type of compounds that exerted a mixed activity. These ligands conferred to the human progesterone receptor (hPR) only weak activation properties despite high affinity binding and, hence, acted as agonists and, at the same time, as partial antagonists of pure agonists. When the same series of ligands was tested with mutant PRs, transcriptional activation/inactivation profiles were different from those seen with the wild-type PR, since several steroids initially classified as antagonists switched to mixed responses. One compound that acted as an antagonist for the hPR was an agonist for a mutated PR in which 15 amino acids of the hormone-binding domain were replaced by the corresponding divergent residues of the chicken homolog. In analyzing a series of steroids with wild-type and mutant PRs, we observed that a phenyl group (or a phenyl derivative) in the 11 beta position of RU486-related steroids generates antagonism with hPR, but has to be bound in a critical position in the hormone-binding domain to exert its antagonistic activity. Apparently, a deviation from this positioning by mutations in the hormone-binding domain can generate mixed or even agonistic activities.

Mechanisms of antihormone action.

The mechanisms of action of two types of anti-hormones is discussed. Type I anti-hormones comprise the antiestrogen hydroxy-tamoxifen and the antiprogestin RU486, both of which promote DNA binding of the cognate receptors and, due to the activity of one of the two transcription activation functions of the estrogen and progesterone receptors, act as mixed agonist/antagonists. Evidence supporting that ICI 164,384 is also a member of the same group is presented. Type II antagonists impair DNA binding of the corresponding receptor in vitro and, in some cases, also in vivo. Ligand-mapping, an approach to identify the site of interaction of a steroid substitution within the hormone-binding domain of the receptor has been used to identify the 11 beta-pocket of the progesterone receptor and revealed that a single amino acid is responsible for the differential antagonistic effect of RU486 in man, chicken and hamster.

A single amino acid that determines the sensitivity of progesterone receptors to RU486.

The progesterone analog RU486, an abortifacient, inhibits the action of progestins in humans but not in chickens or hamsters. Substitution of cysteine at position 575 by glycine in the hormone binding domain (HBD) of the chicken progesterone receptor (cPR) generated a cPR that binds RU486 and whose activity is antagonized by that compound. In fact, all receptors that bind RU486 have a glycine at the corresponding position. The hamster PR, like cPR, has a cysteine. Only glycine--not methionine or leucine--at position 575 allowed binding of RU486 to cPR. Substitution of this glycine by cysteine in the human PR (hPR) abrogated binding of RU486 but not that of an agonist. The corresponding mutation in the human glucocorticoid receptor resulted in a loss of binding of both dexamethasone and RU486. Examination of a series of 11 beta-substituted steroids showed that antagonism is not an intrinsic property of an antihormone, because one hPR antagonist acted as an agonist for a mutated hPR. The positioning of an aromatic 11 beta-substitution in the PR HBD appears to be critical for generating agonistic or antagonistic activity.