Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Disaster Med ; 4(3): 181-3, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19739461

ABSTRACT

Multiple countries including the United States and France are investing heavily in countermeasures to the threat of a "dirty bomb." All of the machinery simply involves a variation on a Geiger counter that picks up excess photon irradiation. Classically, a "dirty bomb" is defined as a dangerous radioactive material mixed in a variety of ways with high explosive, so when detonated, radioactive material is dispersed. Solid radioactive material such as Cesium or Cobalt sends off very penetrating ('hard') photons from which one cannot simply be protected by sheet lead or a heavy door. For official occasions with dignitaries of State, such a bomb could prove a modest distraction, but simple radiation physics suggests such a bomb would be limited in the damage it could cause, would largely be a mess to be cleaned up by an appropriately trained crew, would involve a very confined area, and thoroughly fails to comprehend the mentality of al-Queda 'central' that wishes to follow 9/11 with an equal or greater show of terrorist force. The author would argue this sort of mind-think occurs when you have too few people in the hard sciences in your intelligence sections.


Subject(s)
Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Chemical Terrorism/prevention & control , Civil Defense/organization & administration , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Weapons of Mass Destruction , Decontamination , Environmental Monitoring , Humans
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 74(3): 659-60, 2009 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19480965
3.
Nature ; 457(7227): 257, 2009 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19148079
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...