Comparative analysis of the tumor microbiome, molecular profiles, and immune cell abundances by HPV status in mucosal head and neck cancers and their impact on survival.

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) comprises a diverse group of tumors with variable treatment response and prognosis. The tumor microenvironment (TME), which includes microbiome and immune cells, can impact outcomes. Here, we sought to relate the presence of specific microbes, gene expression, and tumor immune infiltration using tumor transcriptomics from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and associate these with overall survival (OS). RNA sequencing (RNAseq) from HNSCC tumors in TCGA was processed through the exogenous sequences in tumors and immune cells (exotic) pipeline to identify and quantify low-abundance microbes. The detection of the Papillomaviridae family of viruses assessed HPV status. All statistical analyses were performed using R. A total of 499 RNAseq samples from TCGA were analyzed. HPV was detected in 111 samples (22%), most commonly Alphapapillomavirus 9 (90.1%). The presence of Alphapapillomavirus 9 was associated with improved OS [HR = 0.60 (95%CI: 0.40-0.89, p = .01)]. Among other microbes, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis was associated with the worst survival (HR = 3.88; p = .008), while Pseudomonas viridiflava had the best survival (HR = 0.05; p = .036). Microbial species found more abundant in HPV- tumors included several gram-negative anaerobes. HPV- tumors had a significantly higher abundance of M0 (p < .001) and M2 macrophages (p = .035), while HPV+ tumors had more T regulatory cells (p < .001) and CD8+ T-cells (p < .001). We identified microbes in HNSCC tumor samples significantly associated with survival. A greater abundance of certain anaerobic microbes was seen in HPV tumors and pro-tumorigenic macrophages. These findings suggest that TME can be used to predict patient outcomes and may help identify mechanisms of resistance to systemic therapies.

Real-Time Gated Proton Therapy: Commissioning and Clinical Workflow for the Hitachi System.

Purpose: To describe the commissioning of real-time gated proton therapy (RGPT) and the establishment of an appropriate clinical workflow for the treatment of patients. Materials and Methods: Hitachi PROBEAT provides pencil beam scanning proton therapy with an advanced onboard imaging system including real-time fluoroscopy. RGPT utilizes a matching score to provide instantaneous system performance feedback and quality control for patient safety. The CIRS Dynamic System combined with a Thorax Phantom or plastic water was utilized to mimic target motion. The OCTAVIUS was utilized to measure end-to-end dosimetric accuracy for a moving target across a range of simulated situations. Using this dosimetric data, the gating threshold was carefully evaluated and selected based on the intended treatment sites and planning techniques. An image-guidance workflow was developed and applied to patient treatment. Results: Dosimetric data demonstrated that proton plan delivery uncertainty could be within 2 mm for a moving target. The dose delivery to a moving target could pass 3%/3 mm gamma analysis following the commissioning process and application of the clinical workflow detailed in this manuscript. A clinical workflow was established and successfully applied to patient treatment utilizing RGPT. Prostate cancer patients with implanted platinum fiducial markers were treated with RGPT. Their target motion and gating signal data were available for intrafraction motion analysis. Conclusion: Real-time gated proton therapy with the Hitachi System has been fully investigated and commissioned for clinical application. RGPT can provide advanced and reliable real-time image guidance to enhance patient safety and inform important treatment planning parameters, such as planning target volume margins and uncertainty parameters for robust plan optimization. RGPT improved the treatment of patients with prostate cancer in situations where intrafraction motion is more than defined tolerance.

Prospective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated proton therapy for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: the PRONTO study rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Oncologic surgical resection is the standard of care for extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (STS), often accompanied by the addition of pre- or postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT may decrease the risk of joint stiffness and fibrosis at the cost of higher rates of wound complications. Hypofractionated, preoperative RT has been shown to provide acceptable outcomes in prospective trials. Proton beam therapy (PBT) provides the means to decrease dose to surrounding organs at risk, such as the skin, bone, soft tissues, and adjacent joint(s), and has not yet been studied in patients with extremity and truncal sarcoma. METHODS: Our study titled "PROspective phase II trial of preoperative hypofractionated protoN therapy for extremity and Truncal soft tissue sarcOma (PRONTO)" is a non-randomized, prospective phase II trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of preoperative, hypofractionated PBT for patients with STS of the extremity and trunk planned for surgical resection. Adult patients with Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status ≤ 2 with resectable extremity and truncal STS will be included, with the aim to accrue 40 patients. Treatment will consist of 30 Gy radiobiological equivalent of PBT in 5 fractions delivered every other day, followed by surgical resection 2-12 weeks later. The primary outcome is rate of major wound complications as defined according to the National Cancer Institute of Canada Sarcoma2 (NCIC-SR2) Multicenter Trial. Secondary objectives include rate of late grade ≥ 2 toxicity, local recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival at 1- and 2-years, functional outcomes, quality of life, and pathologic response. DISCUSSION: PRONTO represents the first trial evaluating the use of hypofractionated PBT for STS. We aim to prove the safety and efficacy of this approach and to compare our results to historical outcomes established by previous trials. Given the low number of proton centers and limited availability, the short course of PBT may provide the opportunity to treat patients who would otherwise be limited when treating with daily RT over several weeks. We hope that this trial will lead to increased referral patterns, offer benefits towards patient convenience and clinic workflow efficiency, and provide evidence supporting the use of PBT in this setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05917301 (registered 23/6/2023).

Palliative Quad Shot Radiation Therapy with or without Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) have limited treatment options. 'QuadShot' (QS), a hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen, can provide symptomatic relief and local control and may potentiate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared outcomes of QS ± concurrent ICIs in the palliative treatment of HNC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients who received ≥three cycles of QS from 2017 to 2022 and excluded patients without post-treatment clinical evaluation or imaging. Outcomes for patients who received QS alone were compared to those treated with ICI concurrent with QS, defined as receipt of ICI within 4 weeks of QS. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, of whom 57% received concurrent ICI. Median age was 65.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57.9-77.8), and 50% patients had received prior radiation to a median dose of 66 Gy (IQR: 60-70). Median follow-up was 8.8 months. Local control was significantly higher with concurrent ICIs (12-month: 85% vs. 63%, p = 0.038). Distant control (12-month: 56% vs. 63%, p = 0.629) and median overall survival (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.850) were similar between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ICI was a significant predictor of local control (HR for local failure: 0.238; 95% CI: 0.073-0.778; p = 0.018). Overall, 23% patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, which was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of QS with concurrent ICIs was well tolerated and significantly improved local control compared to QS alone. The median OS of 9.4 months compares favorably to historical controls for patients with HNC treated with QS. This approach represents a promising treatment option for patients with HNC unsuited for curative-intent treatment and warrants prospective evaluation.

Immunoprofiles and Oncologic Outcomes of 15 Patients with Androgen Receptor-Positive Salivary Duct Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinomas (SDC) are a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland neoplasm. They can present with distinct immunoprofiles, such as androgen receptor (AR) and HER-2/Neu-positivity. To date, no consensus exists on how to best manage this entity. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic AR+ SDC of the parotid from 2013 to 2019 treated with curative intent were included. Immunologic tumor profiling was conducted using 24 distinct markers. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant control, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included. Nine (60%) patients presented with T4 disease and eight (53%) had positive ipsilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Ten (67%) patients underwent trimodality therapy, including surgery followed by adjuvant radiation and concurrent systemic therapy. The median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 4.8-6.1). The estimated 5-year rates of LRR, distant progression, and OS were 6%, 13%, and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite only including AR+ SDC of the parotid, immunoprofiles, such as expression of HER-2, were highly variable, highlighting the potential to tailor systemic regimens based on individual histologic profiles in the future. Studies with larger patient numbers using tumor-specific molecular profiling and tumor heterogeneity analyses are justified to better understand the biology of these tumors. Molecularly informed treatment approaches, including the potential use of AR- and HER-2/Neu-directed therapies upfront in the definitive setting, may hold future promise to further improve outcomes for these patients.

Scalp Irradiation with 3D-Milled Bolus: Initial Dosimetric and Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A bolus is required when treating scalp lesions with photon radiation therapy. Traditional bolus materials face several issues, including air gaps and setup difficulty due to irregular, convex scalp geometry. A 3D-milled bolus is custom-formed to match individual patient anatomy, allowing improved dose coverage and homogeneity. Here, we describe the creation process of a 3D-milled bolus and report the outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) utilizing a 3D-milled bolus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients treated from 2016 to 2022 using a 3D-milled bolus and VMAT were included. Histologies included squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14, 64%) and angiosarcoma (n = 8, 36%). A total of 7 (32%) patients were treated in the intact and 15 (68%) in the postoperative setting. The median prescription dose was 66.0 Gy (range: 60.0-69.96). RESULTS: The target included the entire scalp for 8 (36%) patients; in the remaining 14 (64%), the median ratio of planning target volume to scalp volume was 35% (range: 25-90%). The median dose homogeneity index was 1.07 (range: 1.03-1.15). Six (27%) patients experienced acute grade 3 dermatitis and one (5%) patient experienced late grade 3 skin ulceration. With a median follow-up of 21.4 months (range: 4.0-75.4), the 18-month rates of locoregional control and overall survival were 75% and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the clinical outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with the combination of VMAT and a 3D-milled bolus. This technique resulted in favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile in comparison with historic controls and warrants further investigation in a larger prospective study.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Brain Metastases: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Guideline.

Purpose: Brain metastases are common among adult patients with solid malignancies and are increasingly being treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). As more patients with brain metastases are becoming eligible for SRS, there is a need for practical review of patient selection and treatment considerations. Methods and Materials: Two patient cases were identified to use as the foundation for a discussion of a wide and representative range of management principles: (A) SRS alone for 5 to 15 lesions and (B) a large single metastasis to be treated with pre- or postoperative SRS. Patient selection, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints are discussed. Literature relevant to these cases is summarized to provide a framework for treatment of similar patients. Results: Treatment of brain metastases with SRS requires many considerations including optimal patient selection, fractionation selection, and plan optimization. Conclusions: Case-based practice guidelines developed by the Radiosurgery Society provide a practical guide to the common scenarios noted above affecting patients with metastatic brain tumors.

The Radiosurgery Society Case-Based Discussion of the Management of Head and Neck or Skull Base Paragangliomas with Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Radiotherapy.

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) have been used for the treatment of head and neck or skull base paraganglioma for a considerable time, demonstrating promising local control rates and a favorable safety profile compared with surgical approaches. Nevertheless, the choice of treatment must be carefully tailored to each patient's preferences, tumor location, and size, as well as anticipated treatment-related morbidity. This case-based review serves as a practical and concise guide for the use of SRS and FSRT in the management of head and neck or skull base paragangliomas, providing information on the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up considerations, and potential pitfalls.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Radiosurgery Society Guide to the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer Illustrated by Challenging Cases.

Traditionally, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) involved lengthy courses with low daily doses. However, advancements in radiation delivery and a better understanding of prostate radiobiology have enabled the development of shorter courses of EBRT. Ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy, administering doses greater than 5 Gy per fraction, is now considered a standard of care regimen for localized PCa, particularly for intermediate-risk disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), a specific type of ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy employing advanced planning, imaging, and treatment technology to deliver in five or fewer fractions, is gaining prominence as a cost-effective, convenient, and safe alternative to longer radiotherapy courses. It is crucial to address practical considerations related to patient selection, fractionation scheme, target delineation, and planning objectives. This is especially important in challenging clinical situations where clear evidence for guidance may be lacking. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide with the aim of providing a practical framework for delivering SBRT to the intact prostate, exemplified by two case studies. The article will explore common SBRT dose/fractionation schemes and dose constraints for organs-at-risk. Additionally, it will review existing evidence and expert opinions on topics such as SBRT dose escalation, the use of rectal spacers, the role of androgen deprivation therapy in the context of SBRT, SBRT in special patient populations (e.g., high-risk disease, large prostate, high baseline urinary symptom burdens, and inflammatory bowel disease), as well as new imaging-guidance techniques like Magnetic Resonance Imaging for SBRT delivery.

Vertebral Compression Fracture After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: The Role of Vertebral Endplate Disruption.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a common, but serious toxicity of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Several variables that place patients at high risk of VCF have previously been identified, including advanced Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), a widely adopted clinical decision criterion to assess spinal instability. We examine the role of tumoral endplate (EP) disruption in the risk of VCF and attempt to incorporate it into a simple risk stratification system. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study from a single institution. Demographic and treatment information was collected for patients who received spinal SBRT between 2013 and 2019. EP disruption was noted on pre-SBRT computed tomography scan. The primary end point of 1-year cumulative incidence of VCF was assessed on follow-up MRI and computed tomography scans at 3-month intervals after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were included. The median follow-up was 18 months. Approximately 48 patients (43%) had at least one EP disruption. Twenty patients (18%) experienced a VCF at a median of 5.2 months from SBRT. Patients with at least one EP disruption were more likely to experience VCF than those with no EP disruption (29% vs 6%, P < .001). A nomogram was created using the variables of EP disruption, a SINS of ≥7, and adverse histology. Patients were stratified into groups at low and high risk of VCF, which were associated with 2% and 38% risk of VCF ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: EP disruption is a novel risk factor for VCF in patients who will undergo spinal SBRT. A simple nomogram incorporating EP disruption, adverse histology, and SINS score is effective for quickly assessing risk of VCF. These data require validation in prospective studies and could be helpful in counseling patients regarding VCF risk and referring for prophylactic interventions in high-risk populations.

Improved local control following dose-escalated stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for metastatic sarcomas: An international multi-institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) following stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for extracranial sarcoma metastases. METHODS: A prospectively-maintained institutional registry was queried for patients with metastases from sarcoma primaries managed with SABR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized for univariate analyses to assess potential prognostic factors regarding LC and OS. A Cox proportional hazards multivariate (MVA) model was employed to further assess initially identified independent variables. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients with 118 lesions with LC information were identified. Common metastatic sites treated were lung (77), non-spinal bone (15), and spine (10). The median biologically effective dose (BED4) was 175 Gy4 (range56.3 Gy4-360 Gy4) with a median dose/fractionation schedule of 50 Gy/5 fractions. One- and 2-year OS rates were 81.3 % (95 % CI: 71.2-88.1 %6) and 50.5 % (95 % CI: 38.6-61.3 %, respectively. On Cox MVA, advanced age and non-lung metastases were associated with inferior OS (p < 0.03) with patients with 0-2 of these risk factors having estimated 2-year OS of 65.1 %, 38.9 %, and N/A, respectively. One- and 2-year LC rates were 85.3 % (95 % CI: 77.7-90.9 %) and 78.2 % (95 % CI: 67.9-85.6 %), respectively. On MVA, only BED4 < 175 Gy was associated with inferior LC (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.33; p = 0.01). Ten of 118 treated lesions had treatment-related toxicities (all Grade 1-2). CONCLUSION: Age and lung vs. non-lung metastases were prognostic of OS and should be considered in patient selection for SABR. Dose escalation when feasible with BED4 ≥ 175 Gy is recommended given durable LC achieved without a subsequent increase in toxicity.

Outcomes of definitive local therapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in elderly patients ≥70 years with HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is increasing among elderly (≥70 years) patients and the optimal treatment approach is not known. In this study, we aimed to determine disease and toxicity outcomes in an elderly HPV-OPSCC population primarily treated with a chemoradiation (CRT) approach. We identified 70 elderly HPV-OPSCC patients who were treated with either surgery, radiotherapy, or CRT between 2011 and 2021. Time-to-event analysis for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable cox regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio associated with covariates. The median follow-up for our cohort was 43.9 months. Of the 70 elderly patients, 55 (78.6%) receive CRT and 15 (22.4%) received RT alone. Two patients underwent TORS resection. Of the 55 patients treated with CRT, the most common systemic agents were weekly carboplatin/taxol (n = 18), cetuximab (n = 17), and weekly cisplatin (n = 11). The 5-year OS, PFS, and LC were 57%, 52%, and 91%, respectively. On univariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were significant predictors of OS, while on multivariate analysis only CCI was a significant predictor of OS (p = 0.006). The rate of late peg tube dependency, osteoradionecrosis, and aspiration was 10%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. Definitive local therapy in elderly HPV-OPSCC patients is associated with excellent LC and a low rate of late toxicities. Prospective studies are needed to further stratify subgroups of elderly patients who may benefit from aggressive definitive local therapy.

Factors Associated with Total Laryngectomy Utilization in Patients with cT4a Laryngeal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations for upfront total laryngectomy (TL), many patients with cT4a laryngeal cancer (LC) instead undergo definitive chemoradiation, which is associated with inferior survival. Sociodemographic and oncologic characteristics associated with TL utilization in this population are understudied. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized hospital registry data from the National Cancer Database to analyze patients diagnosed with cT4a LC from 2004 to 2017. Patients were stratified by receipt of TL, and patient and facility characteristics were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analyses and Cox proportional hazards methodology were performed to determine variables associated with receipt of TL and with overall survival (OS), respectively. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatment groups using log-rank testing. TL usage over time was assessed. RESULTS: There were 11,149 patients identified. TL utilization increased from 36% in 2004 to 55% in 2017. Treatment at an academic/research program (OR 3.06) or integrated network cancer program (OR 1.50), male sex (OR 1.19), and Medicaid insurance (OR 1.31) were associated with increased likelihood of undergoing TL on multivariate analysis (MVA), whereas age > 61 (OR 0.81), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥ 3 (OR 0.74), and clinically positive regional nodes (OR 0.78 [cN1], OR 0.67 [cN2], OR 0.21 [cN3]) were associated with decreased likelihood. Those undergoing TL with post-operative radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy) had better survival than those receiving chemoradiation (median OS 121 vs. 97 months; p = 0.003), and TL + PORT was associated with lower risk of death compared to chemoradiation on MVA (HR 0.72; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Usage of TL for cT4a LC is increasing over time but remains below 60%. Patients seeking care at academic/research centers are significantly more likely to undergo TL, highlighting the importance of decreasing barriers to accessing these centers. Increased focus should be placed on understanding and addressing the additional patient-, physician-, and system-level factors that lead to decreased utilization of surgery.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Review.

PURPOSE: The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for gynecologic malignancies is controversial. We discuss certain circumstances when highly precise SBRT may be a useful tool to consider in the management of selected patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Case selection included the following scenarios, the first 2 with palliative intent, para-aortic nodal oligorecurrence of ovarian cancer, pelvic sidewall oligorecurrence of cervical cancer, and inoperable endometrial cancer boost after intensity modulated radiation to the pelvis treated with curative intent. Patient characteristics, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints were discussed. Relevant literature to these cases was summarized to provide a framework for treatment of similar patients. RESULTS: Treatment of gynecologic malignancies with SBRT requires many considerations, including treatment intent, optimal patient selection, fractionation selection, tumor localization, and plan optimization. Although other treatment paradigms including conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and brachytherapy remain the standard-of-care for definitive treatment of gynecologic malignancies, SBRT may have a role in palliative cases or those where high doses are not required due to the unacceptable toxicity that may occur with SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: A case-based practice review was developed by the Radiosurgery Society to provide a practical guide to the common scenarios noted above affecting patients with gynecologic malignancies.

Daily Head and Neck Treatment Assessment for Optimal Proton Therapy Planning Robustness.

Robust optimization in proton therapy ensures adequate target coverage; however, validation of fractional plan quality and setup uncertainty in patients has not been performed. We aimed to assess plan robustness on delivered head and neck proton plans classified into two categories: (1) primary only (PO) and (2) primary and neck nodal (PNN) coverage. Registration at the machine was utilized for daily CBCT to generate a synthetic CT. The dose for the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR) was compared to the expected robustness bands using 3.5% range uncertainty and 3 mm vs. 5 mm setup uncertainty. The fractional deviation was defined as D95% and V100% outside of uncertainty constraints. About 203 daily fractions from 6 patients were included for analysis. The percentage of fractions that exceeded robustness calculations was greater in 3 mm as compared to 5 mm setup uncertainty for both CTV and OAR volumes. PO plans had clinically insignificant average fractional deviation, less than 1%, in delivered D95% and V100%. In comparison, PNN plans had up to 2.2% average fractional deviation in delivered V100% using 3 mm robustness. Given the need to balance dose accuracy with OAR sparing, we recommend the utilization of 3 mm setup uncertainty as an acceptable simulation of the dose delivered.

Comparative In Silico Analysis of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the Pre-Operative Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: While pre-operative radiation did not improve abdominal recurrence-free survival for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the randomized STRASS trial, it did reduce rates of local recurrence. However, the risk of toxicity was substantial and the time to surgery was prolonged. A combination of hypofractionation and proton therapy may reduce delays from the initiation of radiation to surgery and limit the dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). We conducted a dosimetric comparison of the pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton radiotherapy (IMPT). METHODS: Pre-operative IMRT and IMPT plans were generated on 10 RPS patients. The prescription was 25 Gy radiobiological equivalents (GyEs) (radiobiological effective dose of 1.1) to the clinical target volume and 30 GyEs to the margin at risk, all in five fractions. Comparisons were made using student T-tests. RESULTS: The following endpoints were significantly lower with IMPT than with IMRT: mean doses to liver, bone, and all genitourinary and gastrointestinal OARs; bowel, kidney, and bone V5-V20; stomach V15; liver V5; maximum doses to stomach, spinal canal, and body; and whole-body integral dose. CONCLUSIONS: IMPT maintained target coverage while significantly reducing the dose to adjacent OARs and integral dose compared to IMRT. A prospective trial treating RPS with pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated IMPT at our institution is currently being pursued.

In silico comparison of whole pelvis intensity-modulated photon versus proton therapy for the postoperative management of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist comparing intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton (IMPT) radiation therapy when treating the prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes in the postoperative setting for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate dosimetric differences between IMRT and IMPT when treating with whole pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IMRT and IMPT plans were generated for 10 post-prostatectomy patients treated between July and August 2020. The prescription was 50 Gy radiobiologic equivalent (GyE) (proton radiobiological effective dose 1.1) to the pelvis and 70 GyE to the prostate bed in 2 GyE per fraction. Paired 2-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare clinical target volume (CTV) coverage and dose to organs at risk (OARs). RESULTS: CTV coverage was met for all plans with 99% of CTVs receiving ≥99% of prescription doses. Dose to OARs was significantly higher with IMRT than IMPT for the following endpoints: bladder V5-V65; bowel V5-V45; sigmoid V5-V50; rectum V5-V70; femoral head V40 and maximum dose; bone V5-V65. Select endpoints with significant differences included bladder V30 (63.5 vs. 44.4%, p < .001), bowel V15 (949 vs. 191 cc, p = .001) and V30 (386 vs. 121 cc, p < .001), rectum V40 (81.8 vs. 32.1%, p < .001) and V50 (47.6 vs. 24.9%, p < .001), femoral head maximum doses (46.4-47.1 vs. 38.3-38.6GyE, p < .001), and bone V10 (93.3 vs. 85.4%, p < . 001). Mean doses for all OARs were significantly higher with IMRT, including bladder (41.9 vs. 29.7GyE, p < .001), bowel (21.2 vs. 5.5GyE, p < .001), and rectum (50.8 vs. 27.3GyE, p < .001). Integral dose to 'Body - CTV' was significantly higher with IMRT (32.8 vs. 18.4 J, p < .001). CONCLUSION: IMPT provides comparable target coverage to IMRT when treating prostate cancer with WPRT in the postoperative setting while significantly reducing dose to OARs. These data can inform the future clinical management and delivery of post-prostatectomy irradiation for prostate cancer.

Radiotherapy for Mobile Spine and Sacral Chordoma: A Critical Review and Practical Guide from the Spine Tumor Academy.

Chordomas are rare tumors of the embryologic spinal cord remnant. They are locally aggressive and typically managed with surgery and either adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiation therapy. However, there is great variability in practice patterns including radiation type and fractionation regimen, and limited high-level data to drive decision making. The purpose of this manuscript was to summarize the current literature specific to radiotherapy in the management of spine and sacral chordoma and to provide practice recommendations on behalf of the Spine Tumor Academy. A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. Medline and Embase databases were utilized. The primary outcome measure was the rate of local control. A detailed review and interpretation of eligible studies is provided in the manuscript tables and text. Recommendations were defined as follows: (1) consensus: approved by >75% of experts; (2) predominant: approved by >50% of experts; (3) controversial: not approved by a majority of experts. Expert consensus supports dose escalation as critical in optimizing local control following radiation therapy for chordoma. In addition, comprehensive target volumes including sites of potential microscopic involvement improve local control compared with focal targets. Level I and high-quality multi-institutional data comparing treatment modalities, sequencing of radiation and surgery, and dose/fractionation schedules are needed to optimize patient outcomes in this locally aggressive malignancy.

Effect of Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Sequencing on Local Control and Survival in Patients With Spine Metastases.

Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly used to treat spinal metastases in combination with immunotherapy (IT). The optimal sequencing of these modalities is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether sequencing of IT and SBRT was associated with differences in local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity when treating spine metastases. Methods and Materials: All patients at our institution who received spine SBRT from 2010 to 2019 with systemic therapy data available were reviewed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was LC. Secondary endpoints were toxicity (fracture and radiation myelitis) and OS. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine whether IT sequencing (before versus after SBRT) and use of IT were associated with LC or OS. Results: A total of 191 lesions in 128 patients met inclusion criteria with 50 (26%) lesions in 33 (26%) patients who received IT. Fourteen (11%) patients with 24 (13%) lesions received the first IT dose before SBRT, whereas 19 (15%) patients with 26 (14%) lesions received the first dose after SBRT. LC did not differ between lesions treated with IT before SBRT versus after SBRT (1 year 73% versus 81%, log rank = 0.275, P = .600). Fracture risk was not associated with IT timing (χ2 = 0.137, P = .934) or receipt of IT (χ2 = 0.508, P = .476), and no radiation myelitis events occurred. Median OS was 31.8 versus 6.6 months for the IT after SBRT versus IT before SBRT cohorts, respectively (log rank = 13.193, P < .001). On Cox univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, receipt of IT before SBRT and Karnofsky performance status <80 were associated with worse OS. IT treatment versus none was not associated with any difference in LC (log rank = 1.063, P = .303) or OS (log rank = 1.736, P = .188). Conclusions: Sequencing of IT and SBRT was not associated with any difference in LC or toxicity, but delivering IT after SBRT versus before SBRT was associated with improved OS.

Comparing Ultra-hypofractionated Proton versus Photon Therapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Purpose: Recent single institution, phase II evidence has demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of ultra-hypofractionated, preoperative photon therapy in 5 fractions for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Our purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric benefits of modern scanning beam proton therapy compared with conventional photon radiation therapy (RT) for the neoadjuvant treatment of adult extremity STS. Materials and Methods: Existing proton and photon plans for 11 adult patients with STS of the lower extremities previously treated preoperatively with neoadjuvant RT at our center were used to create proton therapy plans using Raystation Treatment Planning System v10.A. Volumes were delineated, and doses reported consistent with International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements reports 50, 62, and 78. Target volumes were optimized such that 100% clinical target volume (CTV) was covered by 99% of the prescription dose. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy for PT and RT delivered in 5 fractions. For proton therapy, doses are reported in GyRBE = 1.1 Gy. The constraints for adjacent organs at risk (OARs) within 1 cm of the CTV were the following: femur V30Gy ≤ 50%, joint V30Gy < 50%, femoral head V30Gy ≤ 5 cm3, strip V12 ≤ 10%, and skin V12 < 50%. Target coverage goals, OAR constraints, and integral dose were compared by Student t test with P < .05 significance. Results: A minimum 99% CTV coverage was achieved for all plans. OAR dose constraints were achieved for all proton and photon plans; however, mean doses to the femur (10.7 ± 8.5 vs 16.1 ± 7.7 GyRBE), femoral head (2.0 ± 4.4 vs 3.6 ± 6.4 GyRBE), and proximal joint (1.8 ± 2.4 vs 3.5 ± 4.4 GyRBE) were all significantly lower with PT vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (all P < .05). Integral dose was significantly reduced for proton vs photon plans. Conformity and heterogeneity indices were significantly better for proton therapy. Conclusion: Proton therapy maintained target coverage while significantly reducing integral and mean doses to the proximal organs at risk compared with RT. Further prospective investigation is warranted to validate these findings and potential benefit in the management of adult STS.