Commonly Prescribed Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens and Incidence of AIDS-Defining Neurological Conditions.

BACKGROUND: The differential effects of commonly prescribed combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimens on AIDS-defining neurological conditions (neuroAIDS) remain unknown. SETTING: Prospective cohort studies of HIV-positive individuals from Europe and the Americas included in the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration. METHODS: Individuals who initiated a first-line cART regimen in 2004 or later containing a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone and either atazanavir, lopinavir, darunavir, or efavirenz were followed from cART initiation until death, lost to follow-up, pregnancy, the cohort-specific administrative end of follow-up, or the event of interest, whichever occurred earliest. We evaluated 4 neuroAIDS conditions: HIV dementia and the opportunistic infections toxoplasmosis, cryptococcal meningitis, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. For each outcome, we estimated hazard ratios for atazanavir, lopinavir, and darunavir compared with efavirenz via a pooled logistic model. Our models were adjusted for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Twenty six thousand one hundred seventy-two individuals initiated efavirenz, 5858 initiated atazanavir, 8479 initiated lopinavir, and 4799 initiated darunavir. Compared with efavirenz, the adjusted HIV dementia hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.72 (1.00 to 2.96) for atazanavir, 2.21 (1.38 to 3.54) for lopinavir, and 1.41 (0.61 to 3.24) for darunavir. The respective hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the combined end point were 1.18 (0.74 to 1.88) for atazanavir, 1.61 (1.14 to 2.27) for lopinavir, and 1.36 (0.74 to 2.48) for darunavir. The results varied in subsets defined by calendar year, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone, and age. CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with an increased risk of neuroAIDS after initiating lopinavir compared with efavirenz, but temporal changes in prescribing trends and confounding by indication could explain our findings.

Seasonal variability in the incidence of carcinomatous meningitis.

OBJECT: The aim of the study was to investigate whether there are seasonal differences in the occurrence of carcinomatous meningitis (CM), with a greater prevalence of the disease in months with higher temperatures. METHODS: The authors searched the records of all patients with a diagnosis of CM from 1998 until 2013 at the University Hospital of Patras, Greece. The date of hospitalization was extracted for each patient. The cases were divided into 2 categories depending on the time of CM diagnosis. Based on the official data regarding the annual temperature distribution in this region, the authors divided the patients into 2 groups. The first group consisted of cases diagnosed with CM from October 15 to April 15 (cold climate and shorter daytime duration), whereas the second group comprised patients diagnosed between April 15 and October 15 (warm climate and longer daytime duration). RESULTS: Overall, 44 confirmed cases of CM were found. The most common type of malignancy associated with the development of CM was breast cancer (27 patients), while the second most common tumor was lung carcinoma (11 patients). The median interval between the time of initial cancer diagnosis and CM was 4.5 years. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with CM during the period between April 15 and October 15, while the remaining 13 patients developed CM between October 15 and April 15, a significant difference (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more patients developed CM during the warm season of the year. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to provide evidence for the potential seasonal variability in CM incidence. However, these results should be validated prospectively in larger cohorts.