Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review.

Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. This review aims to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were: clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were: duplicates; non-English publications; non-full-text publications; studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9%). With regards to intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). Intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case that had a complication (transient exophthalmos). Mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.

E-scooters and maxillofacial fractures: a seven-year multi-centre retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Standing electric scooters (e-scooters) are a cost-effective and environmentally-friendly transport alternative, but also elicit substantial concern regarding associated craniofacial injuries. This study aims to describe the patient factors, procedural factors and post-operative outcomes of maxillofacial fractures caused by e-scooter accidents. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients aged 18 years or older who were surgically treated for these injuries in 2014-2020 at two Australian tertiary hospitals. RESULTS: There were 18 cases included. Most cases were male (66%). The mean age was 35 years. Common risk factors were alcohol use (86%) and lack of helmet use (62%). The most common fracture pattern was zygomatico-maxillary complex (ZMC) fractures (50%). There were no associated systemic injuries. Mean operation timing was 12 days post-injury for ZMC fractures and 3 days post-injury for condyle fractures. For ZMC fractures, the most common method of fixation was 2-point fixation (66%). For condyle fractures, the most common surgical approach was arch bars only (83%). Post-operative complications were reported in six cases, with malocclusion being the most common (n = 3). Revision surgeries were performed in two cases. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillofacial fractures associated with e-scooter accidents appear to be increasing in incidence. Robust longitudinal evaluations with larger sample sizes are required to better understand associated presentations, surgical approaches and post-operative complications.

Traumatic maxillofacial and brain injuries: a systematic review.

Concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) and maxillofacial fractures carry the risk of significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this review was to explore the demographics, types of injury, and complications of traumatic maxillofacial and brain injuries, in order to contribute to comprehensive health strategies. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating combined traumatic maxillofacial and brain injuries. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, publication date before 1990, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 754 articles identified, 15 eligible articles representing 1421 cases were included. The mean age was 38.3 years. Most cases were male (79%). The most common mechanism of injury was traffic accidents (53.4%). The most common fracture pattern was middle third fractures (52.4%). Seven studies had an explicit definition for TBI, using the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), radiological evidence, and/or specific symptoms. There were 147 complications reported in 62 of 253 cases (24.5%), with the most common being infection (n=54, 36.7%). Significant risk factors for complications included delayed surgical repair, low GCS, and upper third fractures. Robust longitudinal evaluations with clear definitions of TBI are required. Gaps in knowledge include risk factors for complications and fracture pattern-GCS correlations.

Submental intubation in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review 1986-2018.

Submental intubation is a low-risk alternative to tracheostomy when nasotracheal or orotracheal intubation is not appropriate. To improve the selection of patients and clinical outcomes we have explored published papers on submental intubation in oral and maxillofacial surgery, and included a proposal for a decision pathway. Systematic searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for papers published between 1986 and 2018 yielded 116 eligible articles (one randomised controlled trial, 61 case series, 40 case reports, six surgical techniques, and eight letters) that included 2 229 patients. Measured outcomes were the indications, techniques, devices used, time taken to complete the procedure, and complications. Indications were trauma (81%), orthognathic surgery (15%), disease (2%), and cosmetic surgery (1%). Technical preferences were for a one-tube (84%) over a two-tube technique (6%), and a paramedian (52%) over a median incision (33%). The preferred device was a reinforced endotracheal tube (85%). The mean (range) intubation time was 10 (2-37) minutes. The complication rate was 7% (n=152), the most common being superficial skin infection (n=54), hypertrophic scarring (n=18), and damage to the tube apparatus (n=15). Submental intubation has minimal complications, takes a short time to do, and it is a useful alternative to tracheostomy in some oral and maxillofacial operations. More robust evidence regarding the selection of patients, modifications to the technique, and a comparison of risk with that of tracheostomy, are needed for further evaluation of its feasibility.