Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 16(1): 30-40, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23441770

ABSTRACT

AIM: This Clinical Guidance is aimed to help practitioners assess, diagnose and manage their patients with osteoporosis (OP), using the best available evidence. METHODS: A literature search using PubMed (MEDLINE) and The Cochrane Library identified all relevant articles on OP and its assessment, diagnosis and treatment, from 2005, to update from the previous edition published in 2006. The studies were assessed and the level of evidence assigned; for each statement, studies with the highest level of evidence were used to frame the recommendation. RESULTS: This article summarizes the diagnostic and treatment pathways for OP, highlighting the new data that have changed the way we assess and treat OP. Instead of starting treatment based on bone mineral density alone, there has been a move to assessing 10-year fracture risk before treatment, using tools such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). There has been a re-evaluation on calcium supplementation and more emphasis on the importance of vitamin D. There has been concern about the potential adverse effects of the long-term usage of bisphosphonates, which we have discussed fully. New drugs that have been licensed since 2006 in Malaysia have been included. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate intake of calcium (1000 mg from both diet and supplements) and vitamin D (800 IU) daily remain important in the treatment of OP. However, in confirmed OP, pharmacological therapy with anti-resorptives is the mainstay of treatment. Patients need to be regularly assessed while on medication and treatment adjusted as required.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Bone Density , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Compounds/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Dietary Supplements , Female , Humans , MEDLINE , Malaysia , Male , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/physiopathology , Osteoporotic Fractures , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Vitamin D/administration & dosage
2.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 12(4): 329-35, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20374371

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to ascertain the management of gout by doctors in Malaysia. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was carried out among doctors attending rheumatology post-graduate courses, where gout was not a lecture topic. RESULTS: A total of 128 questionnaires were analyzed, of which the majority (67: 52.3%) were general practitioners. In the treatment of acute gout, 68.0% use non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 53.9% use selective COX-2 inhibitors (coxibs), 66.4% use colchicine and 10.2% use allopurinol (ALLO). In the treatment of chronic gout, 36.7% use NSAIDs, 44.5% use coxibs, 19.5% use colchicine and 93% use ALLO. In both acute and chronic gout, corticosteroids (CS) are not used by over 90% of respondents. Fifty percent would stop ALLO during an acute attack. 95.3% do not start ALLO during an acute attack; 87.5% would start ALLO after the attack, with a median of 14 days afterwards. Once ALLO was started, 54.7% would continue indefinitely. Regarding target urate levels while on treatment, 10.9% would be satisfied with a high normal range, 21.9% middle of the range, 18.0% low normal range and 45.3% anywhere within the normal range. Fifteen percent would treat asymptomatic hyperuricemia. CONCLUSIONS: In Malaysia, anti-inflammatory agents are most commonly used for the treatment of acute and chronic gout, with corticosteroid usage at a low level. However, there are areas of concern regarding the diagnosis of gout and the usage of ALLO which are not consistent with current guidelines.


Subject(s)
Gout Suppressants/therapeutic use , Gout/drug therapy , Primary Health Care , Professional Practice , Acute Disease , Allopurinol/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Gout/diagnosis , Gout/physiopathology , Humans , Malaysia , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice/statistics & numerical data , Reference Values , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uric Acid/blood
3.
J Rheumatol ; 35(12): 2344-7, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19004038

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess bone mineral density (BMD) changes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing longterm therapy with corticosteroids (CS) while taking calcium, calcitriol, or alendronate. The primary endpoint was BMD changes at 2 years. METHODS: Premenopausal SLE patients were randomized into 3 groups according to medication: calcium carbonate 500 mg bd (calcium alone), calcitriol 0.25 microg bd plus calcium carbonate 500 mg bd (calcitriol + calcium), and alendronate 70 mg/week plus calcium carbonate 500 mg bd (alendronate + calcium). BMD was measured at baseline and at the end of the first and second years. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were recruited. There were 33 patients taking calcium alone, 33 calcitriol + calcium, and 32 alendronate + calcium. On randomization, median duration of CS use was 2.5 years (range 0-20 yrs). Seventy-seven patients (78.6%) completed the study (23 taking calcium alone, 27 calcitriol + calcium, 27 alendronate + calcium). There were no significant differences in mean CS dosages among the 3 groups at the time of BMD measurements. After 2 years, there were no significant changes in BMD in the calcium-alone and calcitriol + calcium groups, apart from a 0.93% (p < 0.001) reduction in total hip BMD in the calcium-alone group. In contrast, the alendronate + calcium group showed significant increases in BMD of 2.69% (p < 0.001) in the lumbar spine and 1.41% (p < 0.001) in total hip. CONCLUSION: Both calcium alone and calcitriol + calcium preserved lumbar spine BMD in premenopausal patients with SLE taking longterm CS at 2 years, whereas alendronate + calcium led to increases in BMD in lumbar spine and total hip. Premenopausal women taking CS should be considered for osteoporosis prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
Alendronate/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density , Calcitriol/therapeutic use , Calcium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/blood , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Calcium/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Premenopause , Young Adult
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12971563

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) is often problematic because the range of possible differential diagnoses is broad. We report on a case in which a patient presented with FUO and was subsequently found to have both a collagen vascular disease and an intercurrent infection. Treatment for the collagen vascular disease with corticosteroids exacerbated the intercurrent infection. The problems in the diagnosis and management of such cases are discussed.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Collagen Diseases/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Fever of Unknown Origin/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Vascular Diseases/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...