Relationship of demographic and clinical factors to free and total prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the role of demographic and clinical parameters in the measurements of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA (fPSA), and percent free PSA (%fPSA). METHODS: This was a cohort study of volunteers to a randomized screening trial. A central laboratory determined PSA and fPSA for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. A baseline evaluation of free and total PSA was done for 7183 white, black, Asian, Hispanic, and other male volunteers, aged 55 to 74 years. Comparisons were made across racial and ethnic groups and across a set of clinical parameters from a baseline questionnaire. RESULTS: The median levels of serum PSA were less than 2.1 ng/mL in each age-race grouping of the study participants. The levels of free and total PSA were higher in black (n = 868, 12%) participants than in white (n = 4995, 70%) and Asian (n = 849, 11.8%) participants. Individuals who identified themselves as ethnically Hispanic (n = 339, 4.7%) had median PSA levels higher than whites who were not Hispanic. The free and total PSA levels increased with age, particularly among men 70 to 74 years old. However, the %fPSA levels showed less variation among the four racial groups or by age. The free and total PSA levels were higher among those who had a history of benign prostatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic (age and race/ethnicity) and clinical (history of benign prostatic disease) variables had a moderate effect on the measures of PSA and fPSA and very little effect on %fPSA.

Study design in the evaluation of breast cancer imaging technologies.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Bringing a new imaging technology to market is a complex process. Beyond conceptualization and proof of concept, obtaining U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for clinical use depends on the documented experimental establishment of safety and efficacy. In turn, safety and efficacy are evaluated in the context of the intended use of the technology. The purpose of this study was to examine a conceptual framework for technology development and evaluation, focusing on new breast imaging technologies as a highly visible and current case in point. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The FDA views technology development in terms of a preclinical and four clinical phases of assessment. With a concept of research and development as a learning model, this phased-assessment concept of regulatory review against intended use was integrated with a five-level version of a hierarchy-of-efficacy framework for evaluating imaging technologies. Study design and analysis issues are presented in this context, as are approaches to supporting expanded clinical indications and new intended uses after a new technology is marketed. CONCLUSION: Breast imaging technologies may be intended for use as replacements for standard-of-care technologies, as adjuncts, or as complementary technologies. Study designs must be appropriate to establish claims of superiority or equivalence to the standard for the intended use. Screening technologies are ultimately judged on their demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing cause-specific mortality through early detection, but they may be brought to market for other uses on the basis of lesser standards of efficacy (eg, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and stage of disease detected).

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status.

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial is enrolling 148,000 men and women ages 55-74 at ten screening centers nationwide with balanced randomization to intervention and control arms. For prostate cancer, men receive a digital rectal examination and a blood test for prostate-specific antigen. For lung cancer, men and women receive a posteroanterior view chest X-ray. For colorectal cancer, men and women undergo a 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscopy. For ovarian cancer, women receive a blood test for the CA125 tumor marker and transvaginal ultrasound. Members of the control arm continue with their usual care. Follow-up in both groups will continue for at least 13 years from randomization to assess health status and cause of death. The primary endpoint is mortality from the four PLCO cancers, which accounts for about 53% of all cancer deaths in men and 41% of cancer deaths in women in the United States each year. Blood specimens are collected from screened participants, buccal cell DNA from controls, and histology slides from cases; these are maintained in a biorepository. Participants complete a baseline questionnaire (covering health status and risk factors) and a dietary questionnaire. More than 12,000 participants were enrolled in the pilot phase (concluded in September 1994). Changes in the eligibility criteria followed. As of April 2000, enrollment exceeded 144,500. Data are scanned into designated on-site computers for uploading by participant identification number to the coordinating center for quality checks, archival storage, and preparation of analysis datasets for use by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Scientific direction is provided by NCI scientists, trial investigators, external consultants, and an independent data safety and monitoring board. Performance and data quality are monitored via data edits, site visits, random record audits, and teleconferences. The PLCO trial is formally endorsed by the American Cancer Society and has been ranked by the American Urological Association as one of the most important prostate cancer studies being conducted. Special efforts to enroll black participants are cosponsored by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Design of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

The objectives of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial are to determine in screenees ages 55-74 at entry whether screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy (60-cm sigmoidoscope) can reduce mortality from colorectal cancer, whether screening with chest X-ray can reduce mortality from lung cancer, whether screening men with digital rectal examination (DRE) plus serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can reduce mortality from prostate cancer, and whether screening women with CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) can reduce mortality from ovarian cancer. Secondary objectives are to assess screening variables other than mortality for each of the interventions including sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value; to assess incidence, stage, and survival of cancer cases; and to investigate biologic and/or prognostic characterizations of tumor tissue and biochemical products as intermediate endpoints. The design is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized trial with 37,000 females and 37,000 males in each of the two arms. In the intervention arm, the PSA and CA125 tests are performed at entry, then annually for 5 years. The DRE, TVU, and chest X-ray exams are performed at entry and then annually for 3 years. Sigmoidoscopy is performed at entry and then at the 5-year point. Participants in the control arm follow their usual medical care practices. Participants will be followed for at least 13 years from randomization to ascertain all cancers of the prostate, lung, colorectum, and ovary, as well as deaths from all causes. A pilot phase was undertaken to assess the randomization, screening, and data collection procedures of the trial and to estimate design parameters such as compliance and contamination levels. This paper describes eligibility, consent, and other design features of the trial, randomization and screening procedures, and an outline of the follow-up procedures. Sample-size calculations are reported, and a data analysis plan is presented.

Coordination and management of a large multicenter screening trial: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial.

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial is a large and complex multi-institutional, multifaceted organization with a 20-year horizon. The implementation of the trial began with the creation of an organizational structure that supports strong leadership, cooperation, and effective communication among the trial collaborators including an operational framework for the development, review, and pretest of instruments, data collection, and management procedures; the setting of high-quality standards for training of trial staff; and the development of a comprehensive assessment plan for evaluation of all trial activities. This paper describes the process and methods used in the coordination and management of the PLCO trial. These include the role of the steering committee and its subcommittees and working groups, the establishment of regular and ad hoc communications among collaborators, the training of screening center coordinators and examiners, the PLCO manual of operations and procedures, and the development and implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance plan.

Etiologic and early marker studies in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, which is randomizing 74,000 screening arm participants (37,000 men, 37,000 women; ages 55-74) and an equal number of nonscreened controls, is a unique setting for the investigation of the etiology of cancer and other diseases and for the evaluation of potential molecular markers of early disease. At entry, baseline information is collected by questionnaire on dietary intake, tobacco and alcohol use, reproductive history (for women), family history of cancer, use of selected drugs, and other selected risk factors. Blood samples collected at the baseline screening exam are aliquoted to serum, plasma, red blood cell, and buffy coat fractions. At the next two annual screening visits, serum samples are collected. At the third annual reexamination, cryopreserved whole blood is obtained, in addition to serum, plasma, red blood cell, and buffy coat fractions. At the fourth and fifth years, serum, plasma, and buffy coat are collected. All blood samples are shipped to a central repository for long-term storage at -70 degrees C. Dietary questionnaires and buccal cells for DNA analysis are obtained from nonscreened controls. Cancer cases are identified through annual follow-up questionnaires, and all deaths are identified through vital status tracing mechanisms. Procedures are being developed to obtain archival pathologic material for selected cases of cancer and related diseases. Initial investigations are focusing on the etiology of colorectal cancer and on the operative characteristics of tests for the early detection of colorectal and prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute.

Screening for prostate cancer and subsequent treatment is of unknown benefit but carries known treatment related morbidity and mortality risks. The recent enthusiasm for screening in the United States contrasts sharply with the more cautious attitudes of the European and Canadian medical communities. Current data from screening series without randomization and controls are inadequate to determine screening benefit. The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer (randomized, controlled) screening trial of the National Cancer Institute, to include 74,000 men (and 74,000 women) 60 to 74 years old, has a design power of 90% to determine a 20% reduction of prostate cancer mortality from a baseline and 3 subsequent annual screens using prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Randomization of participants into this trial began on November 16, 1993. Ten screening centers nationwide, a coordinating center, a laboratory and a biorepository are participating under contract.

Prostate cancer screening: what we know and what we need to know.

OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the evidence for recommending the screening of asymptomatic men for prostate cancer with a blood test to detect a prostate-specific antigen (PSA). DATA SOURCES: Relevant articles on screening for prostate cancer were identified from MEDLINE searches, from the authors' files, and from the bibliographies of identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: In the absence of controlled prospective trials, the studies are primarily retrospective and contain information about the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of tests used to screen for prostate cancer; the natural history of untreated prostate cancer; the morbidity, mortality, and costs of definitive treatment; and reviews of screening study biases. DATA EXTRACTION: Potential treatment-related mortality and costs that could be incurred by screening were estimated using defined assumptions. RESULTS: Although screening for prostate cancer has the potential to save lives, because of possible overdiagnosis, screening and subsequent therapy could actually have a net unfavorable effect on mortality or quality of life or both. Given the performance characteristics of the test, widespread screening efforts would probably cost billions of dollars. CONCLUSIONS: The net benefit from widespread screening is unclear. A randomized prospective study of the effect of screening on prostate cancer mortality has therefore been initiated by the National Cancer Institute.

Scheduling mammograms for asymptomatic women.

A decision theoretic model was used to investigate the relative importance of risk level, radiation hazard, mammographic accuracy, and cost in mammographic screening decision. The model uses woman-specific medical and family history facts and clinic-specific information regarding mammographic accuracy and practice to profile both woman and clinic, and to formulate periodic screening recommendations. Model parameters were varied extensively to investigate the sensitivity of screening schedules to input values. Multivariate risk was estimated within the program using published data from the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project 5-year follow-up study. Radiation hazard estimates were developed from published radiation physics and radioepidemiologic risk data. Benchmark values for mammographic sensitivity and specificity under screening conditions were calculated from Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project data. Procedural costs used in the analysis were varied around values reflecting conditions at the Washington University Medical Center. Mortality advantages of early versus late breast cancer detection were accounted for using Health Insurance Plan of New York case survival rates. Results are compared with published screening policies to provide insight into implicit assumptions behind those policies. This analysis emphasizes the importance of accounting for variations in clinical accuracy under screening circumstances, in costs, in radiation exposure, and in woman-specific risk when recommending mammographic screening.

Multispectral analysis of MR images of the breast.

Preliminary investigations were conducted into the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) images for tissue classification of the breast on the basis of relative signal intensity. Multispectral techniques originally developed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for satellite image analysis were used in sequence selection, image data correction, image standardization, and image interpretation. Numerous sequence combinations with varying repetition times (TR) and echo times (TE) were considered, and a triplet was selected consisting of long TR/long TE, short TR/short TE, and an opposed phase sequence with intermediate TR and TE. Correction to remove system-imposed intensity inhomogeneities was required for all images. Image standardization based on fat and pectoral muscle signals was necessary for intercase comparisons. Multispectral images obtained based on this analysis suggest the feasibility of intensity-based image classification.

Radiogenic breast cancer effects of mammographic screening.

The radiocarcinogenic implications of published breast-screening policies were compared. With the use of radioepidemiologic data published recently by the National Institutes of Health, expected excess breast cancers were projected. With a base-line mammogram at age 35 and annual mammography after age 40, as few as 150 or as many as 1,000 radiogenic breast cancers were projected for a screening population of 1 million women, depending on the mammographic system employed and the screening schedule.

ROC analysis of mammography and palpation for breast screening.

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) for mammography and clinical palpation individually and in combination are generated using screening data from Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP) No. 25. Detailed standard records of disease features observed on screening were kept by all examiners. And actual disease states at examination were determined for each case by pathology or follow-up. The ROCs are produced from these objective data without the usual concern for examiners' ultimate diagnostic conclusions. Comparative analysis of the ROCs illustrates the clear superiority of mammography over clinical palpation as an individual screening modality as well as the further superiority of the combined use of both modalities.