Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Skeletal Radiol ; 53(6): 1183-1190, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38196026

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assess the diagnostic utility of repeat sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations following an inconclusive initial examination performed for suspected sacroiliitis. METHOD: Subjects with > 1 SIJ MRI examinations, an inconclusive first scan and at least 6 months interval between scans, were included. All scans were evaluated for the presence of structural/active SIJ lesions as well as any other pathology. Clinical data was extracted from the patients' clinical files, and any missing data was obtained by a telephone interview. Diagnosis and active/structural scores were compared between first and follow-up examinations (t test). RESULTS: Seventy-one subjects were included in the study, 77.4% females, mean age 41.0 ± 15 years, mean time interval between exams 30.4 ± 25.24 months. Twelve subjects performed > 2 scans. In only two subjects (2.81%), both females, MRI diagnosis changed from inconclusive to definite sacroiliitis. None of the subjects with > 2 scans had evidence of sacroiliitis in any of the following MRI examinations. Significant differences were observed between the scores of active SIJ lesion of the first and follow-up MRI (1.51/1.62, p = 0.02) but not for scores of structural lesions (1.22/1.68, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat SIJ MRI when the first MRI is inconclusive for sacroiliitis is more valuable in ruling out than in securing diagnosis of sacroiliitis. We suggest that when MRI findings are inconclusive, decision-making should be based on clinical data.


Subject(s)
Sacroiliitis , Spondylarthritis , Female , Humans , Child, Preschool , Male , Sacroiliac Joint/diagnostic imaging , Sacroiliac Joint/pathology , Sacroiliitis/diagnostic imaging , Sacroiliitis/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Spondylarthritis/pathology
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 227(4): 599.e1-599.e9, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35752301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the rise of medical treatments for the termination of pregnancy, to date, no prospective trial has evaluated the efficacy of misoprostol in treating retained products of conception after induced termination of pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare medical management with misoprostol with expectant management for retained products of conception after first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted at a university-affiliated tertiary medical center. Consenting consecutive women who underwent a routine 3-week follow-up evaluation after medical termination of pregnancy and had a sonographic suspicion of retained products of conception, defined as sonographic evidence of intrauterine remnant (>12 mm) with a positive Doppler flow, were recruited. The participants were randomized into a medical treatment group (800 µg of sublingually administered misoprostol) or expectant management. They all underwent repeat ultrasound scans every 2 weeks until a maximum of 6 weeks, and those suspected of persistent retained products of conception were referred to operative hysteroscopy. The primary endpoint was successful treatment defined as no need for surgical intervention because of persistent retained products of conception within 8 weeks from pregnancy termination. RESULTS: There was no marked difference in demographic characteristics between the study groups. The median sonographically demonstrated retained product length was 20 mm (interquartile range, 17-25) in the medically managed group compared with 20 mm (interquartile range, 17-26) in the expectantly managed group (P=.733). Treatment succeeded in 42 of 68 women (61.8%) in the medically managed group compared with 36 of 63 women (57.1%) in the expectantly managed group (relative risk, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.70; P=.590). There was no difference in adverse outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There was no clinically meaningful advantage for medical treatment with misoprostol compared with expectant management after first-trimester medical termination of pregnancy in women with suspected retained products of conception. Surgical intervention can be avoided in up to 60% of women who are managed expectantly for 8 weeks of follow-up.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal , Abortion, Induced , Abortion, Spontaneous , Misoprostol , Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal/therapeutic use , Abortion, Spontaneous/surgery , Female , Humans , Misoprostol/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...