Esophageal thermal lesions in radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: A prospective comparative study of thermal sensors.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal thermal lesion (ETL) is a complication of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (RFAF). To prospectively compare the incidence of ETL, we used two linear, five- and three-sensor esophageal thermal monitoring catheters (ETMC5 and ETMC3). We also evaluated the predictors of ETL. METHODS: Patients receiving their first RFAF (n = 106) were randomized into two groups, ETMC5 (n = 52) and ETMC3 (n = 54). Ablation was followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 3 days. RESULTS: Esophageal thermal lesion was detected in 7/106 (6.6%) patients (ETMC5: 3/52 [5.8%] vs. ETMC3: 4/54 [7.4%]; p = 1.0). The maximum temperature and number of measurements > 39.0°C did not differ between the groups (ETMC5: 40.5°C and 5.4 vs. ETMC3: 40.6°C and 4.9; p = .83 and p = .58, respectively). In ETMC5 group, the catheter had to be moved significantly less often (0.12 vs. 0.42; p = .0014) and fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter (79.2 min vs. 101.7 min; p = .0038) compared with ECMC3 group. The total number of ablations in ETMC5 group was significantly greater (50.2 vs. 37.7; p = .030) and ablation time was significantly longer (52.1 min vs. 40.1 min; p = .0039). Only body mass index (BMI) was significantly different between patients with and without ETL (21.4 ± 2.5 vs. 24.3 ± 3.4; p = .022). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ETL was comparable between ETMC5 and ETMC3 groups; however, fluoroscopy time, total ablation time, and total number of ablations differed significantly. Lower BMI may increase the risk of developing ETL.

Relationship between device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and heart failure in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading preventable cause of heart failure (HF) for which early detection and treatment is critical. Subclinical-AF is likely to go untreated in the routine care of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis of our study is that subclinical-AF is associated with HF hospitalization and increasing an inappropriate therapy. METHODS: We investigated 153 patients with an ejection fraction less than 35%. We divided into three groups, subclinical-AF (n = 30), clinical-AF (n = 45) and no-AF (n = 78). We compared the baseline characteristics, HF hospitalization, and device therapy among three groups. The follow-up period was 50 months after classification of the groups. RESULTS: The average age was 66 ± 15 years and the average ejection fraction was 26 ± 8%. Inappropriate therapy and biventricular pacing were significantly different between subclinical-AF and other groups (inappropriate therapy: subclinical-AF 13% vs clinical-AF 8.9% vs no-AF 7.7%: P = .04, biventricular pacing: subclinical-AF 81% vs clinical-AF 85% vs no-AF 94%, P = .001). Using Kaplan-Meier method, subclinical-AF group had a significantly higher HF hospitalization rate as compared with other groups. (subclinical-AF 70% vs clinical-AF 49% vs no-AF 38%, log-rank: P = .03). In multivariable analysis, subclinical-AF was a predictor of HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Subclinical-AF after CRT-D implantation was associated with a significantly increased risk of HF hospitalization. The loss of the biventricular pacing and increasing an inappropriate therapy might affect the risk of HF hospitalization.

J-Wave Elevation in the Inferior Leads Predicts Lethal Ventricular Arrhythmia Initiated by Premature Ventricular Contractions With Right Bundle Branch Block and Superior Axis.

BACKGROUND: Lethal ventricular arrhythmia (VA) can be initiated by idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from the left ventricular (LV) inferior wall. Furthermore, J-wave elevation in the inferior leads on ECG is sometimes associated with lethal VA. However, the relationship between these PVCs and J-wave elevation in patients with lethal VA is unclear, so we investigated it in the present study.Methods and Results:We studied 32 consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation of idiopathic PVCs with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and superior axis. Thee PVCs were originating from the inferior wall of the LV. Lethal VA was defined as ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) with loss of consciousness (LOC). Among 32 patients, 3 had VF and 2 had VT with LOC. Other 27 had non-lethal VA. Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly difference between lethal and non-lethal VA. The ratio of J-wave elevation in lethal VA was significantly higher as compared with non-lethal VA (100% vs. 11.1%, P<0.0001). Furthermore, no patients with J-wave elevation in the inferior leads had recurrence of lethal VA after RF ablation of the PVCs. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that J-wave elevation in the inferior leads might be a predictor of lethal VA initiated by PVCs with RBBB and superior axis. RF ablation of these PVCs was a useful method of treating lethal VA.

Idiopathic basal crux ventricular arrhythmias with left bundle branch block and superior axis: A comparison with inferior-septal valvular arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) with superior axis is common in patients with idiopathic-ventricular arrhythmia (VA) originating from the tricuspid annulus (TA) and rarely from the cardiac basal crux and mitral annulus (MA). We described the electrocardiography and electrophysiological findings of idiopathic-VA presenting with LBBB and superior axis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We described 42 idiopathic-VA patients who had an LBBB and superior axis; 15 basal crux-VA, 17 TA-VA, and 10 MA-VA. No patient had a structural heart disease. Among patients with idiopathic-VA referred for ablation, we investigated the electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics of basal crux-VA as compared with other LBBB and superior axis-VA. The left ventricular ejection fraction with MA-VA was significantly lower in comparison with basal crux-VA (P = .01). All patients had a positive R wave in lead I and aVL. The maximum deflection index with basal crux-VA was significantly higher in comparison with TA-VA or MA-VA (P = .01). Patients with basal crux-VA presented with QS wave in lead II more frequently as compared with TA-VA or MA-VA (P = .001). All MA-VA patients had Rs wave in V6, and basal crux-VA, and TA-VA patients had a monophasic R wave or Rs wave in V6. Basal crux-VA patients underwent ablation in the middle cardiac vein (MCV) or coronary sinus (success rate: 94%, recurrence rate: 6%). CONCLUSIONS: We could distinguish basal crux-VA, TA-VA, and MA-VA, using a combination of clinical and electrocardiographic findings. These findings might be useful for counseling patients about an ablation strategy. Ablation via the MCV is effective for eliminating basal crux-VA.

Intracardiac Thrombosis and Heart Failure in a Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cardiac Amyloidosis and an Implanted Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device.

BACKGROUND Intracardiac thrombosis has been known to be associated with not only hepatocellular carcinoma but also with amyloidosis and use of a cardiac implantable electronic device. We report a case of a continuous tumor thrombus with hepatocellular carcinoma from the portal vein and hepatic vein to the right atrium via the inferior vena cava in a patient with a cardiac amyloidosis and an implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device. CASE REPORT A 68-year-old female first admitted to our hospital because of heart failure with an AL type primary cardiac amyloidosis. After 3 years, she underwent an implantation of a CRT device for biventricular pacing following repeated episodes of heart failure and low left ventricular ejection fraction of 34% with NYHA class III. Again, she presented with symptoms of heart failure and cardiomegaly on chest x-ray at 7 years after the CRT device implantation. The echocardiography showed a huge echogenic mass occupying the right atrium, and 64 multi-detector computed tomography showed a lobulated heterogeneously enhancing mass of hepatocellular carcinoma in the right upper lobe of her liver and a continuous tumor thrombus from the portal vein and hepatic vein to the right atrium via the inferior vena cava. CONCLUSIONS Intracardiac thrombosis and heart failure occurred in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma and cardiac amyloidosis, who had an implanted CRT device, which resulted not only in hypercoagulability by the hepatocellular carcinoma itself and the accumulation of various risk factors, but also the progression of myocardial damage with the development of amyloidosis.

Association left ventricular lead and ventricular arrhythmias after upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: There are some controversial reports related to the pro-arrhythmic or anti-arrhythmic potential of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and little is known about the relationship between ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and left ventricular (LV)-lead threshold. HYPOTHESIS: Upgrade CRT is anti-arrhythmic effect of VA with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients and has a relationship with the incident of VA and LV-lead threshold. METHODS: Among 384 patients with the implantation of CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D), 102 patients underwent an upgrade from ICD to CRT-D. We divided patients into three groups; anti-arrhythmic effect after upgrade (n = 22), pro-arrhythmic effect (n = 14), and unchanging-VA events (n = 66). The VA event was determined by device reports. We described the electrocardiography parameters, LV-lead characteristics, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Before upgrade, the numbers of VA were 305 episodes and the numbers of ICD therapy were 157 episodes. While after upgrade, the numbers of VA were 193 episodes and the number of ICD therapy were 74 episodes. Ventricular tachycardia cycle length (VT-CL) after upgrade was significantly slower as compared to those with before upgrade. Pro-arrhythmic group was significantly higher with delta LV-lead threshold (after 1 month-baseline) as compared to those with anti-arrhythmic group (0.74 vs -0.21 V). Furthermore, pro-arrhythmic group was significantly bigger with delta VT-CL (after 3 months-before 3 months) as compared to those with anti-arrhythmic group (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: We described upgrade-CRT was associated with reduction of VA, ICD therapies and VT-CL. While 14 patients had a pro-arrhythmic effect and LV lead threshold might be associated with VA-incidents.