Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Turk J Med Sci ; 46(2): 287-90, 2016 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27511486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative changes taking place in the nasal senses of patients who underwent a rhinoplasty through the open or closed incision method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 15 patients had a closed rhinoplasty surgery and 15 others had an open one. By pinpointing 9 spots in the nose, a sensory assessment was made by means of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments prior to the surgery and 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery. RESULTS: In the open and closed groups, there was hypoesthesia 1 week after the surgery compared with the preoperative period (P = 0.01 and P = 0.016). In the first week a sense reduction in the upper columella was observed in the open group when compared with the closed one (P = 0.035). There were no other significant differences between the groups in the nasal regions at other times. CONCLUSION: It was ascertained that there was reduced sensation in the upper columella in the open incision group in the first postoperative week. The sensation was reduced in both groups in the first postoperative week. The nasal sensation recovered after the first month.


Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty , Smell , Humans , Nasal Septum , Nose , Prospective Studies
2.
Int J Clin Exp Med ; 8(10): 19388-93, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26770580

ABSTRACT

Regional anesthesia methods in the lower extremity include central blocks where spinal and epidural anesthesia are performed as well as peripheral nerve blocks, which are performed by injecting anesthetics locally to nerves. The study aimed to provide a retrospective comparison of unilateral spinal block and ankle block methods in foot operations. Some 60 ASA I-III patients who underwent operation under regional anesthesia were retrospectively examined. Two groups, known as the Unilateral Spinal Block Group (Group S) (n=30) and the Ankle Block Group (Group A) (n=30), were designed. Average blood pressure (ABP), heart rate (HR), block formation time (BFT), time for being ready for operation (TBRFO), total operation duration (TOD), visual analogue scale (VAS), first analgesic need time (FANT) and any complications were all recorded. The BFTs were longer in Group A than Group S, while the FANTs were longer in Group A postoperatively. When these decreases in Group A and Group S were compared with the basal values before the block, all decreases in Group S following the block were considered statistically significant (P<0.05), while the decreases in Group A in the 5(th) and 15(th) minutes were not considered statistically significant. The VASs measured postoperatively at the 6(th), 12(th) and 24(th) hours of Group A were lower than those of Group S (P≤0.05). Despite the longer block formation, the ankle block is safer when compared to the spinal anesthesia, which involves risky hemodynamic changes in patients with associated diseases.

3.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 64(10): 1201-2, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25823167

ABSTRACT

Anthrax is a zoonotic disease caused by a bacterium called Bacillus Anthracis. In humans, it causes a cutaneous, gastro-intestinal and inhalation form of disease. The in-cutaneous form progresses along with skin necrosis and oedema. Since the necroses in the skin are not quite superficial, they can affect the tendon sheaths progressing close to the skin. Therefore, in surgical treatment, the closure in the areas where tendons are surfaced must be provided by a flap instead of a graft.The repair on the existing patient was performed with a graft since the flap repair was not accepted, and thus, restrictions in hand movements occurred during the post-operative period.


Subject(s)
Anthrax/diagnosis , Anthrax/therapy , Anthrax/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 64(11): 1322-3, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25831658

ABSTRACT

Numerous complications after septoplasty have been identified in the literature. Blindness and palatal perforation are among the rarest complications. The palatal perforation experienced by the presented patient was because he was not thoroughly examined before surgery. Secondly, we wanted to emphasize the fact that care must be taken during septoplasty operation, particularly while performing the intervention to the inferior septal area.


Subject(s)
Nasal Septum/abnormalities , Nasal Septum/surgery , Oral Fistula/etiology , Palate, Hard/pathology , Rhinoplasty/adverse effects , Adult , Humans , Male , Oral Fistula/pathology , Oral Fistula/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...