Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 28(13): 8651-8662, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National medical/surgical organizations have recommended the use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) to bridge surgery delay of weeks to months for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer during the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The effects of NET of varying durations on pathologic response are unclear. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we evaluated objective response to short (< 9 weeks), moderate (9-27 weeks), and long (> 27 weeks) duration of NET. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study cohort included female patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic invasive HR+ breast cancer, stratifying by those who received NET versus no NET between 2004 and 2016. Pathologic response was grouped into four categories (complete, downstaged, stable, upstaged) by comparing clinical and pathologic staging data. Objective response to NET included complete, downstaged, and stable pathologic response. Clinical characteristics were compared using χ2 and analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with NET use and objective response according to NET duration. RESULTS: A minority (1.2%) received NET in our cohort. Factors associated with NET use included older age, non-Black patients, more advanced clinical stage, higher comorbidity score, government insurance, and lobular histology. Objective response rate (ORR) was 56.7%, 52.1%, and 49.0% after short, moderate, and long NET duration, respectively. CONCLUSION: Short NET duration did not result in an inferior ORR. Future study to evaluate the interaction between surgery delay and NET use on clinical outcome will provide insights into the safety of NET to bridge potential surgery delay in patients with HR+ breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Receptor, ErbB-2 , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Am Surg ; 86(12): 1684-1690, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32845724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adenoid cystic breast carcinoma (ACC) is a rare subtype of triple-negative breast cancer. We aim to characterize the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of women diagnosed with ACC at a large medical center. METHODS: Female patients diagnosed with ACC at our institution between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients with limited clinicopathologic data were excluded. RESULTS: In our final study cohort (n = 9), the majority of ACCs (6/9, 66.7%) were hormone receptor (-) (HR-) and HER-2/neu (-) (HER2-), while 3 ACCs were HR+ HER2-. Two patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 4 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. The crude local and distant recurrence rate of our cohort was 22.2% and 11.1% (median follow-up of 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ACCs were triple negative but some ACCs were HR+. The unadjusted local and distant recurrence rates were not negligible, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be warranted in select cases.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/surgery , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...