Technical note: subscapularis-sparing approach to perform anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a multiplanar humeral osteotomy and angled glenoid instruments.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty is typically performed through the deltopectoral approach followed by either a subscapularis tenotomy, tendon peel, or lesser tuberosity osteotomy to provide adequate exposure. These subscapularis-takedown methods have been associated with incomplete subscapularis healing, however, and as a result often lead to functional deficits and complications. Subscapularis-sparing approaches have been introduced to mitigate these complications, but thus far have either been limited to hemiarthroplasty or resulted in residual inferior humeral head osteophytes and humeral component size mismatch. The present technique demonstrates the possibility for surgeons to capitalize on the improved patient outcomes that are afforded by subscapularis-sparing approaches, while still utilizing the deltopectoral interval to perform a total glenohumeral joint arthroplasty. METHODS: This article describes in detail the placement of a stemless anatomic TSA with the use of angled glenoid instruments through a subscapularis-sparing deltopectoral approach. Postoperatively, patients are placed in a sling but are instructed to remove as tolerated, as early as the 1st postoperative week. Physical therapy is started at week 1 with a 4-phase progression. CONCLUSIONS: This technique using a TSA system with a polyaxial glenoid reamer and angled pegs on the backside of the glenoid allows the potential for maintenance of the strong postoperative radiographic and patient-reported outcomes that are achieved using traditional TSA approaches, with the advantage of accelerated rehabilitation protocols and decreased risk of subscapularis insufficiency that result from the use of subscapularis-sparing approaches.

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a stem-free ellipsoid humeral implant in patients of all ages.

BACKGROUND: Stem-free shoulder arthroplasty has recently been shown to have comparable results to stemmed arthroplasty, though stemless designs are typically used in a younger patient population. Additionally, although the native humeral head is elliptical in shape, clinical results with ellipsoid implants in shoulder arthroplasty have not been reported on previously. This case series reports on the outcomes of a recently introduced anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with an ellipsoid-shaped articular surface and unique multiplanar platform type of stemless fixation. METHODS: This retrospective case series examines the initial cohort of patients who received an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using an ellipsoid stem-free humeral prosthesis and an all-polyethylene glenoid component from the Catalyst CSR Total Shoulder System (Catalyst OrthoScience) over a 1-year period. Inclusion criteria were patients with a diagnosis of advanced glenohumeral joint arthritis with an intact rotator cuff, regardless of patient age. Clinical outcomes including shoulder range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures, as well as radiographs, were evaluated at multiple time points postoperatively, with minimum 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-three shoulders in 57 patients with a mean age of 73.0 years (range 60-85 years) were included in the study with a mean follow-up period of 30.5 months (range 24-41 months). Forward elevation improved from 121° to 150° (P < .0001), external rotation improved from 28° to 48° (P < .0001), and internal rotation improved from L3 to L1 (P < .001). There were statistically significant improvements exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score (37 to 94, P < .001), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) (40 to 93, P < .001), visual analog scale (6.3 to 0.4, P < .001), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical domain T score (44 to 57, P < .001). The improvement in the ASES score also exceeded the threshold for the substantial clinical benefit. Age, sex, and preoperative glenoid morphology did not appear to have an effect on the clinical outcome scores. There were no implant failures or evidence of radiographic loosening of the humerus component in any patients. CONCLUSION: At 2-year minimum follow-up, this stem-free ellipsoid humerus total shoulder arthroplasty provides very good results with high patient satisfaction, clinical improvement in all outcome measures studied, and no signs of loosening.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Bone-Sparing, Precision Multiplanar Humeral Prosthesis.

Proper reconstruction of proximal humeral anatomy is of primary importance to maximize patient outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty. This article describes a new arthroplasty technique, where a fixed multiplanar bone resection is made and a novel implant, which is designed to precisely match the bone resection, is inserted.

Hemiarthroplasty for the rotator cuff-deficient shoulder. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is a common treatment for cuff tear arthropathy and glenohumeral arthritis associated with a massive tear of the rotator cuff; however, to our knowledge, long-term outcomes and preoperative factors affecting results have not been reported. METHODS: Thirty-four shoulders in thirty-one patients with cuff tear arthropathy or a massive rotator cuff tear with glenohumeral arthritis underwent hemiarthroplasty at an average age of seventy-two years. Outcomes in all patients were evaluated by direct physical examination and according to the limited goals criteria of Neer et al. at a mean of 3.7 years postoperatively. In twenty-five shoulders, long-term outcomes were measured with use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scoring system and follow-up data were obtained at a mean of ten years (range, four to sixteen years) postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six of thirty-four shoulders satisfied the limited goals criteria described by Neer et al. The mean active forward elevation improved from 78 degrees preoperatively to 111 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean active external rotation improved from 15 degrees preoperatively to 38 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.0001). One patient with a history of four failed rotator cuff repairs had anterosuperior instability develop after surgery. The mean final total ASES score was 67 points (range, 35 to 100 points). Of the sixteen shoulders in patients who could actively elevate the arm to > or =90 degrees preoperatively, fourteen achieved satisfactory results according to the limited goals criteria of Neer et al. Patients who could actively elevate the arm to 90 degrees had significantly better function (mean ASES function score, 31 compared with 23 points; p = 0.05), pain relief (mean ASES pain score, 48 compared with 30 points; p = 0.002), and higher total ASES scores (mean, 80 compared with 54 points; p < 0.001) than the patients who were unable to actively elevate the arm to 90 degrees . CONCLUSIONS: Hemiarthroplasty can provide good long-term results in rotator cuff-deficient patients with glenohumeral arthritis. Patients who have preoperative forward elevation of > or =90 degrees benefit the most. A low complication rate can be expected for this procedure.

Hemiarthroplasty for the rotator cuff-deficient shoulder.

BACKGROUND: Hemiarthroplasty is a common treatment for cuff tear arthropathy and glenohumeral arthritis associated with a massive tear of the rotator cuff; however, to our knowledge, long-term outcomes and preoperative factors affecting results have not been reported. METHODS: Thirty-four shoulders in thirty-one patients with cuff tear arthropathy or a massive rotator cuff tear with glenohumeral arthritis underwent hemiarthroplasty at an average age of seventy-two years. Outcomes in all patients were evaluated by direct physical examination and according to the limited goals criteria of Neer et al. at a mean of 3.7 years postoperatively. In twenty-five shoulders, long-term outcomes were measured with use of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scoring system and follow-up data were obtained at a mean of ten years (range, four to sixteen years) postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six of thirty-four shoulders satisfied the limited goals criteria described by Neer et al. The mean active forward elevation improved from 78 degrees preoperatively to 111 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean active external rotation improved from 15 degrees preoperatively to 38 degrees postoperatively (p < 0.0001). One patient with a history of four failed rotator cuff repairs had anterosuperior instability develop after surgery. The mean final total ASES score was 67 points (range, 35 to 100 points). Of the sixteen shoulders in patients who could actively elevate the arm to >or=90 degrees preoperatively, fourteen achieved satisfactory results according to the limited goals criteria of Neer et al. Patients who could actively elevate the arm to 90 degrees had significantly better function (mean ASES function score, 31 compared with 23 points; p = 0.05), pain relief (mean ASES pain score, 48 compared with 30 points; p = 0.002), and higher total ASES scores (mean, 80 compared with 54 points; p < 0.001) than the patients who were unable to actively elevate the arm to 90 degrees . CONCLUSIONS: Hemiarthroplasty can provide good long-term results in rotator cuff-deficient patients with glenohumeral arthritis. Patients who have preoperative forward elevation of >or=90 degrees benefit the most. A low complication rate can be expected for this procedure.

Shoulder impingement revisited: advanced concepts of pathomechanics and treatment.

Subacromial impingement is a common disorder of the shoulder that is still poorly understood. Knowledge of the pathogenesis of this condition has expanded greatly since it was described by Neer 40 years ago. Research has shown that multiple factors contribute to the development of rotator cuff disease. New investigations are exploring this disorder with input from several scientific disciplines. It is essential that orthopaedic surgeons treating patients with subacromial impingement understand the underlying mechanisms, the new research, and the current trends in management of this disease.