Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator for the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death among Patients With Cancer.

Data are limited regarding the characteristics and outcomes of patients with cancer who are found eligible for primary defibrillator therapy. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with preexisting cancer diagnoses who become eligible for a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) defibrillator. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-ICD (MADIT-ICD) benefit scores were calculated. The study included 75 cancer patients at a median age of 73 (interquartile range 64, 81) years at heart failure diagnosis. Active cancer was present in 51%. Overall, 55% of the cohort had coronary artery disease and 37% were CRT eligible. We found that 48%, 49%, and 3% of cohorts had low, intermediate, and high MADIT-ICD Benefit scores, respectively. Only 27% of patients underwent primary defibrillator implantation. Using multivariate analysis, indication for CRT and intermediate/high MADIT-ICD Benefit categories were found as independent predictors for implantation (odds ratio 8.42 p <0.001 and odds ratio 3.74 p = 0.040, respectively). During a median follow-up of 5.3 (interquartile range 4.5, 7.2) years, one patient (5%) with a defibrillator had appropriate shock therapy and 2 patients (10%) had bacteremia. Of 13 patients with CRT defibrillator-implants, one patient was admitted for heart failure exacerbation (8%). Using a time-varying covariate model, we did not observe statistically significant differences in the survival of patients with cancer implanted versus those not implanted with primary defibrillators (hazard ratio 0.521, p = 0.127). In conclusion, although primary defibrillator therapy is underutilized in patients with cancer, its relative benefit is limited because of competing risk of nonarrhythmic mortality. These findings highlight the need for personalized cardiologic and oncologic coevaluation.

Combined mechanical circulatory support for ventricular fibrillation in left ventricular assist device patient.

Ventricular fibrillation, a life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia, may result in pulselessness, loss of consciousness and sudden cardiac death. In this case report, we describe our experience in managing a 54-year-old man with HeartMate3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplantation due to dilated non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, presenting with incessant ventricular arrhythmia for 35 days despite multiple attempts to restore normal rhythm with external direct current cardioversion and anti-arrhythmic medications. The patient remained stable in ventricular arrhythmia with no progression to asystole, but hemodynamic collapse due to right heart failure occurred in the third week. Combined use of two mechanical circulatory support devices (LVAD with VA ECMO) was needed to achieve haemodynamic and metabolic stability, eventually leading to successful heart transplantation in the index admission. The patient was discharged home 2 weeks after transplantation in good clinical condition.

Implantation of cardiac electronic devices in active COVID-19 patients: Results from an international survey.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation rates as well as the clinical and procedural characteristics and outcomes in patients with known active coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to gather information regarding CIED procedures during active COVID-19, performed with personal protective equipment, based on an international survey. METHODS: Fifty-three centers from 13 countries across 4 continents provided information on 166 patients with known active COVID-19 who underwent a CIED procedure. RESULTS: The CIED procedure rate in 133,655 hospitalized COVID-19 patients ranged from 0 to 16.2 per 1000 patients (P <.001). Most devices were implanted due to high-degree/complete atrioventricular block (112 [67.5%]) or sick sinus syndrome (31 [18.7%]). Of the 166 patients in the study survey, the 30-day complication rate was 13.9% and the 180-day mortality rate was 9.6%. One patient had a fatal outcome as a direct result of the procedure. Differences in patient and procedural characteristics and outcomes were found between Europe and North America. An older population (76.6 vs 66 years; P <.001) with a nonsignificant higher complication rate (16.5% vs 7.7%; P = .2) was observed in Europe vs North America, whereas higher rates of critically ill patients (33.3% vs 3.3%; P <.001) and mortality (26.9% vs 5%; P = .002) were observed in North America vs Europe. CONCLUSION: CIED procedure rates during known active COVID-19 disease varied greatly, from 0 to 16.2 per 1000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients worldwide. Patients with active COVID-19 infection who underwent CIED implantation had high complication and mortality rates. Operators should take these risks into consideration before proceeding with CIED implantation in active COVID-19 patients.

Albumin as a Prognostic Marker for Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence following Cryoballoon Ablation of Pulmonary Venous.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation has clinical significance. Identifying risk factors for AF recurrence is important. We investigated serum albumin (SA) levels (g/dL) as a prognostic factor for the recurrence of AF following cryoballoon PVI ablation. Methods: We included patients who underwent cryoballoon PVI ablation at our institution between the years 2013 and 2018. The primary outcome was recurrence of AF during follow up. Results: Our cohort consisted of 126 patients (67% males, mean age 61.8 ± 10.0 years). The pattern of AF amongst the cohort was paroxysmal in 62.5%, persistent in 25.4%, and longstanding persistent in 6.3%. Those with lower SA levels had a mean AF duration significantly less than those with higher SA levels (2.81 years, 7.34 years, and 6.37 years for SA levels of <3.8, 3.8−4.1, and ≥4.1, respectively; p = 0.003). Patients with lower SA levels were significantly more likely to have had more previous cardioversions and a larger left atrial area and volume. The mean follow-up was 380 days, in which the AF recurrence rate was 20.6%. Patients with lower SA level had significantly more AF recurrences (47.4%, 16.7%, and 2.2% for SA levels of <3.8, 3.8−4.1, and ≥4.1, respectively; p < 0.001). Upon multivariate analysis, an SA level < 3.8 was associated with a higher risk of AF recurrence (OR = 5.422 95% CI 1.134; 25.910; p < 0.001). Conclusion: SA levels were found to be a strong independent marker for AF recurrence following PVI ablation.

Safety of High-Dose Dabigatran in Elderly and Younger Patients with a Low Bleeding Risk: A Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at risk for stroke, dabigatran 150 mg twice a day (DE150) is superior to warfarin for stroke prevention. However, there is paucity of data with respect to bleeding risk at this dose in elderly patients (≥75 years). We aimed to evaluate the safety of DE150 in comparison to warfarin in a real-world population with AF and low bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score ≤2). METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 754 consecutive patients with AF and HAS-BLED score ≤2 were included. We compared outcome of elderly patients (age ≥75 tears) to younger patients (age <75 years). The primary end point was the combined incidence of all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic emboli, and major bleeding event during a mean follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: There were 230 (30%) elderly patients, 151 patients were treated with warfarin, and 79 were treated with DE150. Fifty-two patients experienced the primary endpoint during the 1-year follow-up. Among the elderly, at 1-year of follow-up, the cumulative event rate of the combined endpoint in the DE150 and warfarin was 8.9 and 15.9% respectively (p = 0.14). After adjustment for age and gender, patients who were treated with DE150 had a nonsignificant difference in the risk for the combined end point as patients treated with warfarin both among the elderly and among the younger population (HR 0.58, 95% C.I = 0.25-1.39 and HR = 1.12, 95% C.I 0.62-2.00, respectively [p for age-group-by-treatment interaction = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Dabigatran 150 mg twice a day can be safely used among elderly AF patients with low bleeding risk.

Epicardial fat and the risk of atrial tachy-arrhythmia recurrence post pulmonary vein isolation: a computed tomography study.

Epicardial and Pericardia fat have been hypothesized to exert local and systemic pathogenic effects on nearby cardiac structures. The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of epicardial and pericardial fat volumes on the outcome of patients that underwent a first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoablation. We included 130 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) that underwent contrast enhanced ECG-gated cardiac computed tomography (CCT) before a PVI. The control group included 50 patients in normal sinus rhythm that underwent ECG-gated CT to rule out coronary artery disease. Epicardial and pericardial fat volumes were quantified with CCT. Patients with AF compared to patients with normal sinus rhythm (control group) had significantly larger epicardial (140.3 ± 58.1 vs. 55.9 ± 17.7 ml; respectively, P < 0.001) and pericardial (77.0 ± 35.5 ml vs. 27.2 ± 9.5 ml; respectively, P < 0.001) fat volumes. Among patients that underwent PVIs, those with AF recurrence had a greater epicardial (175.0 ± 54.4 ml vs. 130.7 ± SD 54.2 ml; respectively, P < 0.001) and pericardial (93.7 ± SD 42.8 vs. 72.5 ± SD 31.9 ml; respectively, P < 0.001) fat volumes, compared to patients with no AF recurrence. Multivariate analyses revealed that epicardial fat was an independent predictor of recurrence post-ablation (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16 per 10-ml increase in volume; P = 0.009). Pericardial fat was associated with 7% increase in risk of recurrent AF (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.18; P = 0.117). Epicardial fat, assessed with contrast enhanced CCT, is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after PVI ablation.

Effect of fibrotic capsule debridement during generator replacement on cardiac implantable electronic device infection risk.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) replacement is increasingly common. It has been proposed that capsule removal at the time of CIED replacement may reduce infection rates. In this study, we aimed to assess how pocket capsule removal impacted infection rates in patients undergoing CIED replacement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent CIED replacement from 2006 to 2016 at a single centre. We retrieved patient data, procedure details, and clinical outcomes. To evaluate the relationship between capsule removal and CIED infection, we used the Cox proportional hazard model, with adjustment for multiple variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 773 patients underwent device replacement. Of these patients, 194 (25%) underwent capsule debridement during the replacement procedure. The mean patient age was 75 ± 15 years, and 281 (36.3%) were females. The replaced CIEDs included DDD pacemakers (32%), VDD pacemakers (15%), VVI/AAI pacemakers (13%), defibrillators (22%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT-D/P) (17%). During an average follow-up of 3.6 years, 42 (5%) patients experienced a CIED infection. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients who underwent capsule removal had a significantly lower risk of CIED infection, with a hazard ratio of 0.32 (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.83; P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Capsule debridement during CIED replacement was associated with a significant reduction of CIED infection risk. There is a need for randomized controlled studies to confirm these findings.

Gender-Related Differences in Outcomes of Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gender-related differences (GRD) exist in the outcome of patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVES: To assess GRD in patients who underwent CRT. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 178 patients who were implanted with a CRT in a tertiary center 2005-2009 was analyzed. Primary outcome was 1 year mortality. Secondary endpoints were readmission and complication rates. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in 1 year mortality rates (14.6% males vs. 11.8% females, P = 0.7) or in readmission rate (50.7% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.3). The complication rate was only numerically higher in women (14.7% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.09). Men more often had CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) implants (63.2% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.003) and had a higher rate of ischemic cardiomyopathy (79.2% vs. 38.2%, P < 0.001). There was a trend to higher incidence of ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia in men before CRT implantation (29.9% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.07%). A higher proportion of men upgraded from implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to CRT-D, 20.8% vs. 8.8%, P = 0.047. On multivariate model, chronic renal failure was an independent predictor of 1 year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 3.6; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.4-9.5), CRT-D had a protective effect compared to CRT-pacemaker (HR 0.3, 95%CI 0.12-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: No GRD was found in 1 year mortality or readmission rates in patients treated with CRT. There was a trend toward a higher complication rate in females. Men were implanted more often with CRT-D and more frequently underwent upgrading of ICD to CRT-D.

Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Syncope prognosis varies widely: 1 year mortality may range from 0% in the case of vasovagal events up to 30% in the presence of heart disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and indication of primary prevention and compare patients presenting with or without prior syncope. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 75 patients who underwent ICD implantation with the indication of primary prevention and history of syncope and compared them to a control group of 80 patients without prior syncope. We assessed the number of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), and death in each group during the follow-up. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 893 days (810-976, 95% confidence interval) (no difference between groups). Patients with prior syncope had a higher ejection fraction (EF) (35.5 ± 12.6 vs. 31.4 ± 8.76, P = 0.02), more episodes of VT (21.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.001) and VF (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) and also received more electric shocks (18.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004) and ATP (17.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.031). There were no differences in inappropriate shocks (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 0.74), in cardiovascular mortality (cumulative 5 year estimate 29.9% vs. 32.2% P = 0.97) and any death (cumulative 5 year estimate 38.1% vs. 48.9% P = 0.18) during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Syncopal patients before ICD implantation seem to have more episodes of VT/VF and shock or ATP. No mortality differences were observed.

The incremental benefit of non-pulmonary vein left atrial ablation in patients undergoing a repeat persistent atrial fibrillation ablation procedure.

PURPOSE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after an initial persistent AF ablation procedure is high, frequently resulting in the need for a repeat AF ablation procedure. Guidance on the optimal strategy for repeat procedures is non-existent. The objective of this study was to compare the freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia associated with two strategies for repeat persistent AF ablation procedure: (1) pulmonary vein re-isolation alone and (2) non-pulmonary vein LA ablation in addition to pulmonary vein re-isolation. METHODS: A retrospective multi-center case-controlled study was undertaken. Time-to-recurrent AF with each strategy was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional-hazards regression model was used to determine time-dependent predictors of recurrent AF after the repeat procedure in the entire cohort. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were included in the cohort-39 patients who did not undergo additional LA ablation and 59 patients who had did. AF after the repeat procedure occurred in 38 % of the cohort during a mean follow-up of 18 ± 11 months. Additional LA ablation at the repeat procedure was not associated with a less arrhythmia recurrence (HR = 1.55, p = 0.28). The only variable associated with arrhythmia recurrence after the repeat procedure was additional LA ablation during the initial ablation procedure (HR = 4.13, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: LA ablation in addition to pulmonary vein re-isolation during a repeat persistent AF ablation procedure was not associated with reduced arrhythmia recurrence after a repeat persistent AF ablation procedure.

Syncope in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients.

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common clinical condition spanning from benign to life-threatening diseases. There is sparse information on the outcomes of syncopal patients who received an implantable cardiac defibrillator (lCD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes and prognosis of patients who underwent implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention of SCD and compare them to patients who presented with or without prior syncope. METHODS: We compared the medical records of 75 patients who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention of SCD and history of syncope to those of a similar group of 80 patients without prior syncope. We assessed the episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) and mortality in each group during follow-up. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 893 days (810-976, 95% CI) (no difference between groups). There was no significant difference in gender or age. Patients with prior syncope had a higher ejection fraction rate (35.5 ? 12.6 vs. 31.4 8.76, P = 0.02), experienced more episodes of VT (21.3% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.001) and VF (8% vs. 0%, P = 0.01), and received more electric shocks (18.7% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004) and ATP (17.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.031). There were no differences in inappropriate shocks (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 0.74), cardiovascular mortality (cumulative 5 year estimate 29.9% vs. 32.2%, P = 0.97) and any death (cumulative 5 year estimate 38.1% vs. 48.9%, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with syncope before ICD implantation seemed to have more episodes of VT/VF and shock or ATP. No differences in mortality were observed.

Antiarrhythmic therapy as an adjuvant to promote post pulmonary vein isolation success-a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Three months of empirical antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy after atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA) is a common practice to prevent early arrhythmia recurrence; the data of influence of this practice on longer term ablation outcomes is limited. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of published controlled trials comparing temporary AAD therapy after AFA with no AAD therapy in patients after AFA. The primary outcome was recurrence of arrhythmia. RESULTS: 1Eight prospective trials were included. Among 2952 patients, 1991 (67 %) had paroxysmal AF, and 967 (32.7 %) had persistent AF. In total, 1502 patients were treated with AADs and 1450 patients served as a control group (no AAD therapy). Various class IC-III antiarrhythmics were used. Length of AAD administration varied between 6 and 12 weeks after start of AFA. The follow-up duration ranged from 1.5 to 17 months after stopping medication. Among AAD treated patients, the recurrence of arrhythmia rate was 30.69 vs. 33.79 % in control patients (odd ratio 0.86, 95 % CI 0.71-1.06, P = 0.15). In patients who received largely amiodarone, there was a trend for difference in recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (odds ratio 0.60, 95 % CI 0.34-1.09, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term post pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) AAD therapy does not substantially reduce overall recurrence of AF after ablation.

High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels after Elective Cardioversion for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter.

BACKGROUND: The kinetics of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels after elective, biphasic, direct-current cardioversion for persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter remains unknown. METHODS: We examined hs-cTnT kinetics in 24 patients at baseline and at 2, 6 and 24 hours post-cardioversion, and again at 7 and 30 days. We also examined levels of creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). RESULTS: Median (25th, 75th interquartiles) baseline hs-cTnT concentration was 19.8 (10.4, 35.2) ng/L with 14 patients presenting with levels above the 99th percentile (13 ng/L). Hs-cTnT levels did not change significantly over time although they tended to decrease by 30 days, 18.8 ng/L (12.5, 23.3). There was no significant rise in other markers of myocardial injury. Similarly, BNP and hs-CRP levels were elevated at baseline and tended to decrease over time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation/flutter have elevated hs-cTnT levels, as part of a general rise in biomarkers such as BNP and hs-CRP, without a further rise after cardioversion. After cardioversion, there is a gradual non-significant decrease in biomarker levels over time, and thus a rise in hs-cTnT levels should not be attributed to cardioversion.

Association between Red Cell Distribution Width and Mortality after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a non-pharmacological option for patients with heart failure and interventricular dyssynchrony. Elevated red cell distribution width (RDW) reflects higher size and heterogeneity of erythrocytes and is associated with poor outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between RDW levels and outcomes after CRT implantation. METHODS: We conducted a cohort analysis of 156 patients (126 men, median age 69.0 years) who underwent CRT implantation in our institution during 2004-2008. RDW was measured at three time points before and after implantation. Primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome as hospital re-admissions. We investigated the association between RDW levels and primary outcome during a median follow-up of 61 months. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (60.9%) died during follow-up. Higher baseline RDW levels were associated with all-cause mortality (unadjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.20-1.52, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical, electrocardiographic and laboratory variables, baseline RDW levels were associated with mortality (HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.16-1.53). RDW levels 6 months and 12 months post-implantation were also associated with mortality (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.08-1.38, P = 0.001; and HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.32, P = 0.02, respectively). Patients who were re-admitted to hospital during follow-up (n = 78) had higher baseline RDW levels as compared to those who were not (14.9%, IQR 14.0, 16.0% vs. 14.3%, IQR 13.7, 15.0%, respectively, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: An elevated RDW level before and after CRT implantation is independently associated with all-cause mortality.

Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Thirty- to 35% of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation undergo implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) because of development of atrioventricular block (AVB) or development of a condition with high risk of progression to AVB. There are insufficient data regarding long-term follow-up on pacing dependency. From February 2009 to July 2011, 191 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed at the Rabin Medical Center (125 CoreValve and 66 Edwards SAPIEN). Thirty-two patients (16.7%) received a PPM (30 with CoreValve and 2 with Edwards SAPIEN). Data from the pacemaker clinic follow-up was available in 27 patients. After a mean follow-up of 52 weeks (range, 22 to 103), only 8 (29%) of 27 patients were pacing dependent. The indication of PPM in these 8 patients was complete AVB. In conclusion, in our center, the rate of PPM implantation was 16%, which is lower than that reported in the published works. Only 29% of those patients implanted with PPM were pacemaker dependent. Further studies are necessary to define reliable predictors for long-term pacing.

Electrocardiographic algorithm for the diagnosis of inadvertent implantation of permanent pacemaker lead in the left ventricular cavity.

Inadvertent placement of a pacemaker lead electrode in the left ventricle is an unusual complication and the electrocardiogram is a useful tool for the diagnoses. We present such a patient and review the electrocardiographic characteristics that should raise such a possibility.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a 2-year follow-up study.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with heart failure (HF) and represents an important comorbidity in these patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to be beneficial in patients with HF. Whether patients with AF benefit similarly from CRT as their counterparts in sinus rhythm is controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cohort analysis of 175 patients (138 men; age range 57-79 years) who underwent CRT implantation during 2004-2008 in our institution. AF was documented in 66 patients (37.7% of patients, 52 men). There were no differences in 1- or 2-year mortality between patients with and without AF (13.6% vs 11.79%, P = 0.7; 25.8% vs 16.9%, P = 0.2, respectively). There were no differences between the groups in the rate of complications after CRT implantation or in the rate of appropriate electrical shocks. In the subgroup of AF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) (n = 32, 48.5%), the 1-year mortality was 3.1% as compared to 23.5% in AF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (P = 0.03). This difference was no longer evident after 2 years (25.0% vs 26.5%, P = 0.8, respectively). Ten patients (15.2%) with AF underwent atrioventricular (AV) node ablation. The 2-year mortality of these patients was 10.0% as compared to 28.6% in AF patients who did not undergo AV-node ablation (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, no difference in mortality appears to exist between patients with or without AF and who undergo CRT implantation. Our findings of the beneficial effects of AV-node ablation and CRT-D in AF patients deserve further investigation.

Predictors and course of high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve Revalving System.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a novel treatment for high risk or inoperable patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. However, significant atrioventricular (AV) conduction system abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation might complicate this procedure. We used best subsets logistic regression analysis to identify the independent predictors for the development of high-degree AV block (HDAVB) among 70 patients who underwent TAVI at 3 referral centers in Israel from 2008 to 2010. The mean age of the study patients was 83 ± 4.6 years. Of the 70 patients, 28 (40%) developed AV conduction abnormalities requiring PPM implantation within 14 days (median 2) of the procedure. The indications for PPM implantation were HDAVB (n = 25), new-onset left bundle branch block with PR prolongation (n = 2), and slow atrial fibrillation (n = 1). Best subsets logistic regression analysis showed that, among the 15 prespecified clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic candidate risk factors, only right bundle branch block at baseline (odds ratio 43; p = 0.002) and deep valve implantation (<6 mm from the lower edge of the noncoronary cusp to the ventricular end of the prosthesis, odds ratio 22; p <0.001) were independently associated with the development of periprocedural HDAVB. At 3 months of follow-up, HDAVB was still present in 40% of the patients who received PPM implantation for this indication. In conclusion, 40% of the patients who undergo CoreValve TAVI require PPM implantation after the procedure, with most cases (36%) associated with the development of postprocedural HDAVB. Baseline conduction abnormalities (right bundle branch block) and deep valve implantation (>6 mm) independently predicted the development of HDAVB and the need for PPM implantation after CoreValve TAVI.