Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 16: E95, 2019 07 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31344336

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have examined the impact of community health on employers. We explored whether employed adults and their adult dependents living in less-healthy communities in the greater Philadelphia region used more care and incurred higher costs to employers than employees from healthier communities. METHODS: We used a multi-employer database to identify adult employees and dependents with continuous employment and mapped them to 31 zip code regions. We calculated community health scores at the regional level, by using metrics similar to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) County Health Rankings but with local data. We used descriptive analyses and multilevel linear modeling to explore relationships between community health and 3 outcome variables: emergency department (ED) use, hospital use, and paid claims. Business leaders reviewed findings and offered insights on preparedness to invest in community health improvement. RESULTS: Poorer community health was associated with high use of ED services, after controlling for age and sex. After including a summary measure of racial composition at the zip code region level, the relationship between community health and ED use became nonsignificant. No significant relationships between community health and hospitalizations or paid claims were identified. Business leaders expressed interest in further understanding health needs of communities where their employees live. CONCLUSION: The health of communities in which adult employees and dependents live was associated with ED use, but similar relationships were not seen for hospitalizations or paid claims. This finding suggests a need for more primary care access. Despite limited quantitative evidence, business leaders expressed interest in guidance on investing in community health improvement.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Public Health/economics , Workplace , Adult , Female , Health Benefit Plans, Employee , Humans , Investments , Male , Pennsylvania , Primary Health Care
3.
Am J Manag Care ; 19(5): e166-74, 2013 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23781915

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify Medicaid patients, based on 1 year of administrative data, who were at high risk of admission to a hospital in the next year, and who were most likely to benefit from outreach and targeted interventions. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study for predictive modeling. METHODS: Claims, enrollment, and eligibility data for 2007 from a state Medicaid program were used to provide the independent variables for a logistic regression model to predict inpatient stays in 2008 for fully covered, continuously enrolled, disabled members. The model was developed using a 50% random sample from the state and was validated against the other 50%. Further validation was carried out by applying the parameters from the model to data from a second state's disabled Medicaid population. RESULTS: The strongest predictors in the model developed from the first 50% sample were over age 65 years, inpatient stay(s) in 2007, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model based on the 50% state sample and its application to the 2 other samples ranged from 0.79 to 0.81. Models developed independently for all 3 samples were as high as 0.86. The results show a consistent trend of more accurate prediction of hospitalization with increasing risk score. CONCLUSIONS: This is a fairly robust method for targeting Medicaid members with a high probability of future avoidable hospitalizations for possible case management or other interventions. Comparison with a second state's Medicaid program provides additional evidence for the usefulness of the model.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Hospitalization/trends , Medicaid , Models, Theoretical , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , United States
4.
Am J Med Qual ; 28(6): 464-71, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23482676

ABSTRACT

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) in 2007. PQRS was developed as a value-based, pay-for-reporting initiative intended to increase quality and decrease costs. Jefferson University Physicians (JUP) was an early participant in this voluntary program. In this article, the policy context for CMS's launch of PQRS and JUP's implementation strategy, lessons learned, and an account of benefits and barriers to participation are reviewed. In 2010, JUP achieved 94% provider participation and an average incentive of $772 per participating provider. Net incentives earned across JUP in 2010 topped $171 000, although these earnings were significantly offset by implementation and maintenance costs. PQRS represents CMS's first step toward aligning quality and cost in the ambulatory care setting. Faculty practice plans must be prepared to meet this challenge in order to avoid future penalties and to advance quality of care.


Subject(s)
Disclosure , Group Practice , Medicine , Organizational Policy , Program Development , Quality Control , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humans , Organizational Case Studies , Philadelphia , Reimbursement, Incentive , United States , Value-Based Purchasing
5.
Per Med ; 10(2): 139-147, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29758848

ABSTRACT

AIM: An economic model was used to evaluate the potential economic impact and cost-effectiveness of companion diagnostic testing for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS & METHODS: A decision analysis model examined alternative patient management strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC who were not amenable to surgical treatment. A review of the literature provided the variables used to develop a timely base case and sensitivity analysis. A potential future scenario was also modeled. The model includes three options: conventional treatment (CT), new treatment (NT) and companion diagnostic (CD) strategy. RESULTS: In the base case analysis based upon current data, the cost per life-year saved for CT, NT option and CD was US$43,367, US$47,394 and US$47,779, respectively. The cost per life-year saved for CT, NT option and CD in a potential future scenario with more expensive, effective targeted therapy was US$47,748, US$69,255 and US$66,369, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the future scenario, CDs have an incremental cost-effectiveness of US$56,829 per life-year saved when compared with NT as a first-line treatment. This is one demonstration of how CDs may be a cost-effective option for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC when the NT is extremely expensive but the outcome is significantly improved.

6.
Am J Manag Care ; 18(8): e291-9, 2012 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22928798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To refine a previously published standardized quality and utilization measurement set for migraine care and to establish performance benchmarks. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective application of the migraine measurement set to health plan data in order to assess patterns of health service utilization. METHODS: Measurement specifications were applied to data from 10 health plans for measurement year 2009. RESULTS: Of the 2.9 million continuously enrolled members of the health plans, 138,004 (4.7%) met inclusion criteria for the migraine population. Of these, 26% did not have a migraine diagnosis, but were utilizing migraine drugs; 12% had a computed tomography scan within the year (range 8%-25% across plans); and 8% had magnetic resonance imaging (range 6%-11%). Nearly 18% of the migraineurs had 1 or more visits to an emergency department/urgent care center for migraine; few (6%) were followed up with primary care visits. Approximately one-fourth of the migraineurs were not being routinely monitored by a physician. Medication utilization also was examined for members of the migraine population with pharmacy benefits. A significant proportion (42%) were given a migraine preventive, 38% had at least 1 prescription for a triptan, and 2% of those on triptans were potentially overutilizing the medication. Among patients aged 18 to 49 years who were given triptans, 3% had a cardiac contraindication; this percentage rose to 7% for patients aged 50 to 64 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the value of standardized measures in identifying potential quality issues for migraine care, including underdiagnosis, overutilization of imaging, and underutilization of preventive drugs.


Subject(s)
Managed Care Programs , Migraine Disorders , Quality of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , United States , Young Adult
7.
Pain Med ; 13(7): 886-96, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22694154

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several prominent guidelines recommend that patients on long-term opioid therapy have periodic urine drug monitoring (UDM) for appropriate use; however, none address the specific questions of which patients to test, which substances to test for, how often to test, and how to act on the results. DESIGN: In the absence of adequate scientific evidence in the literature, a panel of experts in the field of pain and addiction medicine was convened to develop consensus UDM recommendations. The panel met three times between March 2010 and April 2011, and reviewed several drafts of the recommendations document between meetings. RESULTS: The group was able to achieve consensus on a set of UDM recommendations addressing test selection, test frequency, interpretation of results, and how to handle discrepancies based on specific results. CONCLUSION: While the participating panel members recognize that there currently is a limited evidence base to support the expert panel's recommendations, primary care providers and pain specialists are largely acting today based on anecdote, intuition, and individual experience. The recommendations are meant to begin to provide a framework for standardizing practices for UDM in the treatment of chronic pain, and to serve as a catalyst to advance research that quantifies the effects of UDM on opioid therapy management and patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/urine , Pain/urine , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Substance Abuse Detection/standards , Urinalysis/standards , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Opioid-Related Disorders/etiology , Pain/complications , Pain/drug therapy , United States
8.
Popul Health Manag ; 15(1): 46-51, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22166083

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the improved effectiveness of a disease management treatment protocol incorporating comprehensive lipid profiling and targeted lipid care based on lipid profile findings in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) or congestive heart failure (CHF) enrolled in a managed care plan. This retrospective cohort study, conducted over a 2-year period, compared outcomes between patients with a standard lipid profile to those evaluated with a comprehensive lipid profile. All adult members of the WellMed Medical Management, Inc. managed care health plan diagnosed with IHD or CHF, and continuously enrolled between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2008, were included in the study. Cases were defined as those who had at least 1 comprehensive lipid test (the VAP [vertical auto profile] ultracentrifuge test) during this period (n=1767); they were compared to those who had no lipid testing or traditional standard lipid testing only (controls, n=289). Univariate statistics were analyzed to describe the groups, and bivariate t tests or chi-squares examined differences between the 2 cohorts. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders. The results show that the case group had lower total costs ($4852.62 vs. $7413.18; P=0.0255), fewer inpatient stays (13.1% vs. 18.3% of controls; P=0.0175) and emergency department visits (11.9% vs. 15.6% of controls; P=0.0832). Prescription use and frequency of lipid measurement suggested improved control resulting from a targeted approach to managing specific dyslipidemias. A treatment protocol incorporating a comprehensive lipid profile appears to improve care and reduce utilization and costs in a disease management program for cardiac patients.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Dyslipidemias/diagnosis , Dyslipidemias/therapy , Heart Failure/therapy , Lipids/blood , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Dyslipidemias/blood , Dyslipidemias/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Failure/blood , Heart Failure/economics , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Managed Care Programs/economics , Medication Adherence , Myocardial Ischemia/blood , Myocardial Ischemia/economics , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
9.
Am J Med Qual ; 26(1): 53-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20861514

ABSTRACT

Rates of adherence to 2 quality measures, modeled after Heathcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures, were evaluated in a pediatric population in a convenient care (retail medicine) clinic setting. The measures were appropriate testing for children with pharyngitis and appropriate treatment for children with upper-respiratory infection (URI). The convenient care clinic (CCC) achieved a ranking above the HEDIS 90th percentile for the pharyngitis measure and approximately midway between the 50th and 90th percentiles for the URI measure for the 2007 reporting period. This represents the third major study reporting quality of care for pharyngitis in a CCC setting and the first study for URIs. Other aspects of quality--namely access, follow-up, and equity--are also reported on for the population in question.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Pharyngitis/therapy , Quality of Health Care/standards , Respiratory Tract Infections/therapy , Commerce , Electronic Health Records , Humans , Medical Audit , Retrospective Studies , United States
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21174480

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: little is known about the economics of acquiring and processing the more than 14 million units of red blood cells used annually in the US. OBJECTIVE: to determine the average price paid by hospitals to suppliers for a unit of red blood cells and to identify cost variations by region and facility type and size. A secondary objective was to examine costs for additional blood components as well as costs for blood-related processes performed by hospitals. Qualitative input was sought to identify potential cost drivers. METHODS: a cross-sectional survey was performed of a randomized sample of hospital-based blood bank and transfusion service directors. The survey instrument assessed costs of specific blood components and services as incurred by hospitals. Analysis of variance was performed to test for significant variation in costs for red blood cells by geographic region and division, facility type and bed capacity. RESULTS: a total of 213 surveys were completed. The mean (SD) acquisition cost for one unit of red blood cells purchased from a supplier (n = 204) was $US210.74 ± 37.9 and the mean charge to the patient (n = 167) was $US343.63 ± 135. There was significant statistical variation in acquisition cost by US census region (p < 0.0001) and division (p < 0.0001). Teaching hospitals were more likely to receive volume discounts than other facility types. The mean prices paid per unit for fresh frozen plasma (n = 167) and apheresis platelets (n = 153) were $US60.70 ± 20 and $US533.90 ± 69, respectively. The median cost for mandated screening performed onsite (n = 56) was $US50.00 ± 120 and the median storage and retrieval cost (n = 46) was $US68.00 ± 81 per unit. A total of 28% of respondents reported that costs for acquisition, screening and transfusion had 'increased dramatically' over the past 5 years and 23% reported that blood shortages were a significant problem. CONCLUSIONS: the cost of blood continues to increase and price varies by geography. However, the rate of increase in acquisition costs for red blood cells appears to be slowing. This information should be used by organizations and policy makers to improve financing and utilization management for blood components and services.


Subject(s)
Blood Banks/economics , Blood Transfusion/economics , Hospital Costs , Blood Banks/statistics & numerical data , Blood Component Transfusion/economics , Blood Component Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , United States
11.
Drugs Aging ; 27(10): 845-54, 2010 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20883064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) management guidelines recommend that most patients with HF receive an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) and a ß-blocker (ß-adrenoceptor antagonist), collectively referred to as 'cardiac drugs', based on results from randomized controlled trials showing that these drugs reduce mortality. However, the results of randomized controlled trials may not be generalizable to the population most likely (i.e. the elderly) to receive these drugs in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of cardiac drugs for reducing mortality in the elderly Medicare HF population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, survey-weighted, cohort analysis of the 2002 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Cost and Use files. PARTICIPANTS: 12 697 beneficiaries, of whom 1062 had a diagnosis of HF and 577 were eligible to receive cardiac drugs. MEASUREMENTS: Association between mortality and cardiac drugs, adjusted for sociodemographics, co-morbidity and propensity to receive cardiac drugs. RESULTS: The mortality rate among the 577 eligible beneficiaries with HF was 9.7%. The mortality rate for those receiving an ACE inhibitor or ARB alone, a ß-blocker alone, or both an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a ß-blocker, was 6.1%, 5.9% and 5.3%, respectively; in the absence of any of the three cardiac drugs, the mortality rate was 20.0% (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, mortality rates remained significantly lower for beneficiaries receiving an ACE inhibitor or ARB alone (odds ratio [OR] 0.24; 95% CI 0.11, 0.50), a ß-blocker alone (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.07, 0.41), or both an ACE inhibitor or ARB and a ß-blocker (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10, 0.55) compared with patients who did not receive any of the three cardiac drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Use of guideline-recommended cardiac drugs is associated with reduced mortality in the elderly Medicare HF population. Providing evidence of the benefit of cardiac drugs among the elderly with HF will become increasingly important as the size of the Medicare population grows.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use , Guideline Adherence , Heart Failure/mortality , Aged , Cohort Studies , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Humans , Medicare , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
12.
Popul Health Manag ; 13(1): 9-13, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20158318

ABSTRACT

This study examines the indirect costs associated with surgery for axial low back pain using data obtained from a prospective multicenter clinical trial that compared Charité artificial disc replacement with anterior lumbar interbody fusion using iliac crest bone graft. While 75% of study subjects reported full- or part-time employment prior to surgery, this percentage dropped to 45% at 6 weeks postoperatively. Return to preoperative employment levels occurred at approximately 6 months postoperatively. Two years after surgery, employment levels were 16% higher than preoperative levels. Lost productivity related to absenteeism resulted in lost wages averaging $2884 per patient during the first postoperative year. Although short-term indirect costs of surgery are substantial from a societal perspective, the higher employment rate at 2 years suggests a long-term economic benefit. The findings demonstrate the significant, though not surprising, impact of spinal disability on productivity, and the importance of including measurement of lost productivity and return to work in the economic evaluation of related interventions.


Subject(s)
Bone Transplantation , Health Care Costs , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/economics , Low Back Pain/economics , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Absenteeism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Clinical Trials as Topic , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Disability Evaluation , Efficiency , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Logistic Models , Low Back Pain/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pennsylvania , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
13.
Popul Health Manag ; 12(6): 337-43, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20038260

ABSTRACT

The disease management (DM) model for the treatment of chronic conditions has been around for many years and has been found to be effective for diseases of high prevalence and high cost (eg, diabetes, asthma, heart disease). With an increasing number of people living with cancer and the continual escalation of treatment costs, DM vendors have begun to implement DM concepts into cancer care. However, the multitude of cancer types, treatment options, and adverse effects have all presented barriers to oncology DM, and data reflecting the effectiveness of oncology DM have remained scarce. Oncology costs, the lack of congruence between provider and patient expectations of treatment, the lack of prevention and early detection for many cancers, and, most importantly, the inability of people to adhere to healthy lifestyles are additional obstacles that must be overcome. Moreover, when designing an oncology DM program, it is imperative to look at cancers individually as the etiology, treatment, and impact of cancer can be markedly different from one patient to the next. An effective oncology DM program is one that acts to decrease fatigue, reduces nosocomial infections, deals with dehydration and pain, manages anemia, identifies and treats skin infections, recognizes and treats depression and other psychological distress, provides patients access to palliative care services, facilitates informed decision making and end-of-life transitions, and promotes communication between patients and their providers as well as between physicians. Moving forward, DM vendors and health insurance companies capable of incorporating DM with medical management will be in the best position to provide optimal cancer care.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Medical Oncology , Humans , Incidence , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Program Development , Psychology , United States/epidemiology
15.
Popul Health Manag ; 12(5): 265-71, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19848568

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate diabetes quality measurement efforts, assess their strengths and areas for improvement, and identify gaps not adequately addressed by these measures. We conducted an environmental scan of diabetes quality measures, focusing on metrics included in the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse or promulgated by leading measurement organizations. Key informant interviews were also completed with thought leaders who develop, promote, and use quality measures. The environmental scan identified 146 distinct measures spanning 31 clinical processes or outcomes. This suggests a measurement system that is both redundant and inconsistent, with many different measures assessing the same clinical indicators. Interviewees believe that current diabetes measurement efforts are excessively broad and complex and expressed a need for better harmonization of these measures. Several gaps were also found, including a lack of measures focusing on population health, structural elements of health care, and prevention of diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Public Health/methods , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Pressure , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin , Health Status Indicators , Health Surveys , Humans , Lipid Metabolism , Lipids/analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , Young Adult
16.
Popul Health Manag ; 12(4): 185-90, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19663620

ABSTRACT

Chronic opioid treatment is a highly effective method to treat chronic pain; however, the prevalence of abuse of opioids can make treating patients with these agents difficult for clinicians. The objective of this study was to describe rates of inappropriate utilization, abuse, and diversion in a population of patients who were prescribed chronic opioids, as measured by urine drug testing in the clinical setting. A retrospective analysis was conducted of results from all urine drug tests conducted by Ameritox, Ltd. between January 2006 and January 2009, for patients whose physicians ordered the test in order to screen for noncompliance. Data from 938,586 patient test samples showed that 75% of patients were unlikely to be taking their medications in a manner consistent with their prescribed pain regimen. Thirty-eight percent of patients were found to have no detectable level of their prescribed medication, 29% had a nonprescribed medication present, 27% had a drug level higher than expected, 15% had a drug level lower than expected, and 11% had illicit drugs detected in their urine. Note that all categories add to a total greater than 100% as each category is not mutually exclusive, and a single patient could fall into multiple categories. The high observed rate of noncompliance demonstrates a significant clinical concern and confirms the importance of periodic urine drug screening for the population prescribed long-term opioid therapy.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/urine , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
17.
Am J Med Qual ; 24(4): 287-94, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19411626

ABSTRACT

Efforts to improve the quality of ambulatory care have received tremendous attention as bold new initiatives aimed at influencing the environment of care through financial incentives, public transparency, and information technology rapidly spread. Academic medical centers, which represent a long tradition of excellence and innovation in medical care, might be expected to lead the charge in these new arenas, but motivation for change may be mitigated by the unique complexity and multiple goals of these institutions. A survey conducted in the fall of 2006 examined the early impact of these major new influences on faculty practice plans. Respondents reported that many institutions have begun to develop key components of a quality infrastructure, but much work remains before a robust model emerges at most sites. Some academic medical centers have also embraced pay-for-performance and public reporting efforts, but many are not equipped or eager to engage in these new initiatives.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Humans , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration
18.
Popul Health Manag ; 11(4): 203-8, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18942925

ABSTRACT

Quality of care measures are increasingly important to health plans, purchasers, physicians, and patients. Appropriate measures can be used to assess quality and evaluate improvement and are necessary components of pay-for-performance programs. Despite the broad scope of activity in the development of quality measures, migraine headache has received little attention. Given the enormous costs associated with migraine, especially in terms of lost productivity and preventable health care utilization, health plans could gain from a structured approach to measuring the quality of migraine care their beneficiaries receive. A potential migraine quality measurement set was developed through a review of migraine care literature and guidelines, interviews with leaders in migraine care, health care purchasing, and managed care, and the assembly of an advisory board. The board discussed candidate measures and established consensus on a testable measurement set. Twenty measures were developed, focused primarily on diagnosis and utilization. Areas of utilization include physician visits, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and imaging. Use of both acute and preventive medications is included. More complex aspects of migraine care are also addressed, including triptan overuse, the relationship between acute and preventive medications, and follow-up after emergency department visits. The measures are currently being tested in health plans to assess their feasibility and value. A compelling case can be made for the development of migraine-specific quality measures for health plans. This effort to develop and test a starter set of measures should lead to new and innovative efforts to assess and improve quality of care for migraineurs.


Subject(s)
Health Benefit Plans, Employee , Migraine Disorders , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality of Health Care , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Quality Indicators, Health Care
19.
Manag Care ; 17(2): 48-52, 55-7, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18361259

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: It is widely acknowledged in small studies that provider variation from evidence-based care guidelines and patient medication nonadherence lead to less than optimal health outcomes, increasing costs, and higher utilization. The research presented here aims to determine the prevalence of patient adherence to a medication regimen and provider adherence to guidelines for a variety of chronic conditions, using nationally representative data. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of administrative claims data from a large national insurer was conducted. METHODOLOGY: The study examined multiple quality indicators exemplifying evidence-based medicine and medication adherence for several chronic conditions. Medication possession ratio (MPR) determined patient adherence. Using EBM Connect software created by Ingenix, we measured adherence to guidelines by applying a series of clinical rules and algorithms. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Adherence to the evidence-based practice guidelines examined in this study averaged approximately 59 percent, while patient medication nonadherence rates for all the conditions studied averaged 26.2 percent, with a range of 11 percent to 42 percent. Physician adherence to guidelines was highest in the prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids for persistent asthma. Ironically, medication adherence rates for inhaled corticosteroids were the worst identified. The best medication adherence rate was observed in patients with hypertension. CONCLUSION: Like earlier studies, this analysis finds that poor adherence is common across the nation and across common chronic conditions.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Guideline Adherence , Patient Compliance , Physicians , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States
20.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 8(11): 1643-50, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17685882

ABSTRACT

Candidemia is the most common nosocomial fungal infection in the US. More than one in four adults who acquire candidemia in the hospital setting die prior to discharge. In addition to high case-fatality rates and other adverse clinical outcomes in survivors, candidemia is associated with a substantial economic burden. High costs associated with complex diagnostics and procedures contribute to this burden, as do new pharmacotherapeutic approaches. Despite the high costs of many antifungal agents recommended for the treatment of candidemia, unambiguous clinical evidence to guide treatment selection does not exist. This article reviews the clinical and economic burdens of candidemia, describes candidemia cost drivers and discusses existing pharmacoeconomic data regarding the cost-effectiveness of candidemia rapid identification and treatment approaches.


Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/economics , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Candidiasis/economics , Fungemia/drug therapy , Fungemia/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Animals , Cost-Benefit Analysis/trends , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...