Racial inequities in emergency department wait times for pregnancy-related concerns.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department care is common among US pregnant women. Given the increased likelihood of serious and life-threatening pregnancy-related health conditions among Black mothers, timeliness of emergency department care is vital. The objective of this study was to evaluate racial/ethnic variations in emergency department wait times for receiving obstetrical care among a nationally representative population. METHODS: The study used pooled 2016-2018 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative sample of emergency department visits. Regression models were estimated to determine whether emergency department wait time was associated with the race/ethnicity of the perinatal patient. Adjusted models controlled for age, obesity status, insurance type, whether the patient arrived by ambulance, triage status, presence of a patient dashboard, and region. RESULTS: There were a total of 821 reported pregnancy-related visits in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey sample of emergency department visits. Of those 821 visits, 40.6% were among White women, 27.7% among Black women, and 27.5% among Hispanic women. Mean wait times differed substantially by race/ethnicity. After adjusting for potential confounders, Black women waited 46% longer than White women with emergency department visits for pregnancy problems (p < .05). Those reporting another race waited 95% longer for pregnancy problems in the emergency department than White women (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Findings from this study document significant racial/ethnic differences in wait times for perinatal emergency department care. Although inequities in wait times may emerge across the spectrum of care, documenting the factors influencing racial disparities in wait times are critical to promoting equitable perinatal health outcomes.

The weathering hypothesis and stillbirth: racial disparities across the life span.

Objective: Given that studies have consistently demonstrated increased risk of stillbirth with increasing maternal age as well as race-ethnic disparities in stillbirth, the primary research question is how stillbirth risks within and between race-ethnic groups change with age.Design: Using fetal death (stillbirth) and live birth data from the National Center for Health Statistics 2007-2014. We calculated crude stillbirth rates (per 1,000 deliveries). Using multivariable logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for stillbirth across age groups to examine disparities in stillbirth among non-Hispanic blacks (blacks) and non-Hispanic whites (whites).Results: Rates and risks of stillbirth increased as maternal age increased; however, the magnitude of risk varies by race-ethnicity. Compared to women less than 20, black women age 40+ had a risk of almost 3.5 times (aOR = 3.47, 95% CI = 3.24-3.70) whereas among white women age 40+, the risk was more than 2.5 times (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI = 2.55-2.82). The risk of stillbirth among blacks compared to whites increased, peaking at ages 30-34 (aOR = 2.64, 95% CI = 2.56-2.73). At age 35 and beyond, the disparity in risks declined.Conclusion: As age increased, the risk of stillbirth increased for both blacks and whites. Because the disparity in risk between blacks and whites did not continue to increase with age, stillbirth does not seem to reflect the weathering hypothesis as other perinatal outcomes do.

Pockets of progress amidst persistent racial disparities in low birthweight rates.

Racial disparities persist in adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birthweight (LBW), and infant mortality across the U.S. Although pervasive, these disparities are not universal. Some communities have experienced significant improvements in black (or African American) birth outcomes, both in absolute rates and in rate ratios relative to whites. This study assessed county-level progress on trends in black and white LBW rates as an indicator of progress toward more equal birth outcomes for black infants. County-level LBW data were obtained from the 2003 to 2013 U.S. Natality files. Black LBW rates, black-white rate ratios and percent differences over time were calculated. Trend lines were first assessed for significant differences in slope (i.e., converging, diverging, or parallel trend lines). For counties with parallel trend lines, intercepts were tested for statistically significant differences (sustained equality vs. persistent disparities). To assess progress, black LBW rates were compared to white LBW rates, and the trend lines were tested for significant decline. Each county's progress toward black-white equality was ultimately categorized into five possible trend patterns (n = 408): (1) converging LBW rates with reductions in the black LBW rate (decreasing disparities, n = 4, 1%); (2) converging LBW rates due to worsening white LBW rates (n = 5, 1%); (3) diverging LBW rates (increasing disparities, n = 9, 2%); (4) parallel LBW rates (persistent disparities, n = 373, 91%); and (5) overlapping trend lines (sustained equality, n = 18, 4%). Only four counties demonstrated improvement toward equality with decreasing black LBW rates. There is significant county-level variation in progress toward racial equality in adverse birth outcomes such as low birthweight. Still, some communities are demonstrating that more equitable outcomes are possible. Further research is needed in these positive exemplar communities to identify what works in accelerating progress toward more equal birth outcomes.

Disparities in Infant Mortality by Race Among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Infants.

OBJECTIVES: U.S.-born Hispanic infants have a well-documented health advantage relative to other minority groups. However, little published research has examined racial heterogeneity within the Hispanic population, in relation to health outcomes. The current study aims to explore possible implications of racial identification for the health of U.S. born Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic infants. Methods Data were drawn from 2007 to 2008 NCHS Cohort Linked Live Birth-Infant Death Files, restricted to deliveries of Hispanic black, Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black (NHB) and non-Hispanic white mothers (NHW) (n = 7,901,858). Adjusted odds ratios for first week mortality, neonatal, postneonatal, and overall infant mortality were calculated for each group, using NHW as the reference group. RESULTS: A distinct health gradient was observed in which NHB infants (n = 1,250,222) had the highest risk of first week (aOR 2.29, CI 2.21-2.37), neonatal (aOR 2.23, CI 2.17-2.30), postneonatal (aOR 1.74, CI 1.68-1.81), and infant mortality (aOR 2.05, CI 2.00-2.10) compared to NHW infants (n = 4,578,150). Hispanic black infants (n = 84,377) also experienced higher risk of first-week (aOR 1.28 (1.12-1.47), neonatal (aOR .27, CI 1.13-1.44), postneonatal (aOR 1.34, CI 1.15-1.56), and infant mortality (aOR 1.30, CI 1.18-1.43) compared to both NHW and Hispanic white infants (n = 1,989,109). Conclusions for Practice: Risk of infant mortality varies among Hispanic infants by race, with poorer outcomes experienced by Hispanic black infants. Compared to non-Hispanic infants of the same race, Hispanic black infants experience a smaller health disadvantage and Hispanic white infants have better or similar infant health outcomes. Our findings suggest implications of racial heterogeneity on infant health outcomes, and provide insight into the role of race as a social construct.

Disparities in Prenatal Care Utilization Among U.S. Versus Foreign-Born Women with Chronic Conditions.

We examined disparities in prenatal care utilization (PNCU) among U.S. and foreign-born women with chronic conditions. We performed a cross-sectional analyses using data from 2011 to 2012 National Center for Health Statistics Natality Files (n = 6,644,577) to examine the association between maternal nativity (U.S. vs. foreign-born), presence of a chronic condition (diabetes or hypertensive disorder) and PNCU. After adjustment for selected maternal characteristics, overall and among those with chronic conditions, foreign-born women reported significantly lower odds of intensive and adequate PNCU and higher odds of intermediate and inadequate PNCU than U.S.-born women. Few differences in report of no care were found by maternal nativity. These findings suggest that foreign-born women may be receiving some form of prenatal care, but adequacy of care is likely to be lower compared to U.S.-born counterparts, even among those with chronic conditions.

A systematic review of the association between family meals and adolescent risk outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature examining the relationship between family meals and adolescent health risk outcomes. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of original empirical studies published between January 1990 and September 2013. Based on data from selected studies, we conducted logistic regression models to examine the correlates of reporting a protective association between frequent family meals and adolescent outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 254 analyses from 26 selected studies, most reported a significant association between family meals and the adolescent risk outcome-of-interest. However, model analyses which controlled for family connectedness variables, or used advanced empirical methods to account for family-level confounders, were less likely than unadjusted models to report significant relationships. CONCLUSIONS: The type of analysis conducted was significantly associated with the likelihood of finding a protective relationship between family meals and the adolescent outcome-of-interest, yet very few studies are using such methods in the literature.

Future plans and social/recreational activities of youth with special health care needs: the implications of parental help in completing surveys.

BACKGROUND: A major focus of the literature on youth with special health care needs (YSHCN) is the transition to adult health care. As perceptions of disability are a product of interactions between youth and their environment, it is important to understand youth's needs and experiences beyond health care. Few studies have addressed social/recreational activity participation and future plans and none have included parent/caregiver help in survey completion as a potential factor impacting responses. OBJECTIVES: We describe activity participation and identification of future plans among YSHCN and examine the impact of receiving parent/caregiver assistance to complete a survey on these responses. Implications for research, policy, and practice affecting programs serving and providing transition assistance for YSHCN are discussed. METHODS: Data are from a survey of YSHCN conducted during Alabama's 2010 Title V Maternal and Child Health Needs Assessment. Analyses included descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Youth who received help completing the survey were less likely to report participating in certain social/recreational activities and key future plans, including hobbies, getting married, having children, and working for pay. CONCLUSIONS: For YSHCN, parent/caregiver assistance to complete a survey is a critical consideration in analyses and interpretation of results. Whether, how much, and what type of help received may represent a more objective proxy measure of perceptions of condition severity or impact on abilities than do self-reported ratings of these factors. Our results also raise questions about the distinctions between youth and parent/caregiver perceptions of independence, participation, and potential.