Frailty and Sarcopenia Assessment upon HospitalAdmission to Internal Medicine Predicts Length ofHospital Stay and Re-Admission: A ProspectiveStudy of 980 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Frailty and sarcopenia are associated with frequent hospitalizations and poor clinical outcomes in geriatric patients. Ascertaining this association for younger patients hospitalized in internal medicine departments could help better prognosticate patients in the realm of internal medicine. METHODS: During a 1-year prospective study in an internal medicine department, we evaluated patients upon admission for sarcopenia and frailty. We used the FRAIL questionnaire, blood alanine-amino transferase (ALT) activity, and mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC) measurements. RESULTS: We recruited 980 consecutive patients upon hospital admission (median age 72 years (IQR 65-79); 56.8% males). According to the FRAIL questionnaire, 106 (10.8%) patients were robust, 368 (37.5%) pre-frail, and 506 (51.7%) were frail. The median ALT value was 19IU/L (IQR 14-28). The median MAMC value was 27.8 (IQR 25.7-30.2). Patients with low ALT activity level (<17IU/L) were frailer according to their FRAIL score (3 (IQR 2-4) vs. 2 (IQR 1-3); p < 0.001). Higher MAMC values were associated with higher ALT activity, both representing robustness. The rate of 30 days readmission in the whole cohort was 17.4%. Frail patients, according to the FRAIL score (FS), had a higher risk for 30 days readmission (for FS > 2, HR = 1.99; 95CI = 1.29-3.08; p = 0.002). Frail patients, according to low ALT activity, also had a significantly higher risk for 30 days readmission (HR = 2.22; 95CI = 1.26-3.91; p = 0.006). After excluding patients whose length of stay (LOS) was ≥10 days, 252 (27.5%) stayed in-hospital for 4 days or longer. Frail patients according to FS had a higher risk for LOS ≥4 days (for FS > 2, HR = 1.87; 95CI = 1.39-2.52; p < 0.001). Frail patients, according to low ALT activity, were also at higher risk for LOS ≥4 days (HR = 1.87; 95CI = 1.39-2.52; p < 0.001). MAMC values were not correlated with patients' LOS or risk for re-admission. CONCLUSION: Frailty and sarcopenia upon admission to internal medicine departments are associated with longer hospitalization and increased risk for re-admission.

Hyperferritinemia in the elderly can differentiate the bad from the worst: A retrospective cohort analysis.

Both total-body iron stores and inflammation influence the concentration of ferritin in the blood. Ferritin as an inflammatory marker might serve as a prognostic marker in the elderly. Therefore, we characterized the clinical circumstances and long-term outcomes of hyperferritinemia (> 1000 µg/L) in hospitalized elderly patients.A retrospective analysis of elderly (> 70 years) inpatients with ferritin levels of > 1000 µg/L in a tertiary medical center during a 3-year period. We obtained both laboratory and clinical data, assessing the potential association of high ferritin levels with long-term mortality.Overall, 242 patients (median age 79 years; median ferritin level 1436 µg/L) met the inclusion criteria and were followed for a median time of 18.6 months. Clinical outcomes were dismal for the whole cohort: the diagnosis of solid malignancy occurred in 23.5% of cases while 31% had a severe infection (ranging from sepsis to septic shock). The median survival time of the whole cohort was 4.7 months only. Within the cohort, risk stratification was feasible: higher ferritin levels differentiate between groups of patients who had a poor prognosis (with either septic shock or solid malignancy) and those who had a relatively favorable prognosis (patients diagnosed as suffering from sepsis without shock and patients with iatrogenic causes for hyperferritinemia).Hyperferritinemia in elderly inpatients is associated with high rates of mortality. Within this group of patients, differential ferritin levels enable further risk stratification. High ferritin levels in the elderly can differentiate the bad from the worst.

The 'SILENT Alarm': When History Taking Reveals a Potentially Fatal Toxicity.

INTRODUCTION: The combination of acute/sub-acute neurological and metabolic derangements should always raise the suspicion of toxicity, either endogenous or exogenous. The adverse effects of psychiatric medications are especially difficult to determine since the psychiatric background of patients is often inaccessible. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 66-year-old man presented to the emergency department with dysarthria and uncontrolled tremor, rapidly deteriorating into a complex of severe neurological and metabolic derangements. Only after repeated attempts to take a thorough history was lithium toxicity identified. CONCLUSION: Thorough, comprehensive history taking, including chronic medications and their substitutes, is essential and lifesaving when potentially lethal medications are involved. LEARNING POINTS: Meticulous direct and collateral history taking is essential for correct diagnosis and to reveal psychiatric diagnoses and medications not reported by patients and caregivers.As drug interactions can cause potentially fatal side effects, it is of the utmost importance to gain access to the patient's full medication list.It is important to educate patients about the potential toxicity of their prescribed medications and to encourage them to seek medical attention when serious manifestations of toxicity are present.