Factors affecting patient satisfaction with outpatient rheumatology phone visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction with virtual care, and identify factors associated with level of satisfaction. Surveys were mailed to all patients who had a phone visit at The Ottawa Hospital Rheumatology division. Patients' satisfaction with various aspects of the phone visits was assessed on a 5-point scale and analyzed according to demographic variables using chi-square and regression analyses. Of 2423 surveys mailed, we received 742 responses (31%). Eighty-nine percent of patients were satisfied overall with the phone visit. Statistically significant less satisfaction was seen in patients who spoke to a resident compared to their rheumatologist (p < 0.001), were not called on time (p < 0.001), had difficulty using a telephone (p < 0.001), needed assistance of a second person (p < 0.01), or had new consultations (versus routine follow-up, p = 0.01), the former 3 factors being significant in a multivariate regression analysis. Rheumatology patients expressed a high level of satisfaction with virtual care; however, areas of improvement were identified. Patients' satisfaction will be important to inform future decisions regarding the sustainability of virtual care. Further research is required to understand the impacts of virtual care on patients' Key Points • Patients in rheumatology practice were satisfied with phone visits and preferred this method to in-person visits during the pandemic. • Speaking directly to the rheumatologist, being phoned on time, and the capability of using the telephone were the major determinants of high patient satisfaction. • Based on the identified factors, further improvement of the quality of and satisfaction with phone visits can be pursued given that virtual care may continue longer, beyond the pandemic.

Characteristics and outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with histologically diagnosed aortitis.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate characteristics and prospective adverse aortic outcomes in a cohort of patients with non-infectious histological aortitis. METHODS: Patients with histological aortitis, diagnosed at the Ottawa Hospital after surgical repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections, consented to enrolment in a prospective observational cohort. Patients were assessed for an underlying inflammatory condition and followed prospectively with periodic clinical, laboratory and radiographic assessments. Aortic outcomes during follow-up included significant events, defined as new thoracic or abdominal aortic aneurysms, dissections, ruptures or other complications requiring aortic intervention, in addition to aortic branch ectasias, aneurysms and stenosis. RESULTS: Sixteen patients with histological aortitis from surgical procedures performed between 2010 and 2017 were included; nine had idiopathic and seven had secondary aortitis. Idiopathic patients were more likely to have smoked (100 vs 43%, P = 0.02) and had more associated arch or descending aortic aneurysms on pre-operative baseline imaging compared with secondary aortitis (6 vs 0, P = 0.01). At the median 3.6 years of follow-up, eight patients (50%) had 10 significant aortic events. The incidence of aortic dissection was higher in the first year post-surgery, compared with subsequent years, whereas incident aneurysms occurred throughout follow-up. Elevated inflammatory markers during follow-up trended towards association with accumulation of severe aortic damage. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported prospective study in patients with histological aortitis. Within the limitations of a small cohort, we report a high incidence of aortic complications. Studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to corroborate these findings.

A case of antiphospholipid syndrome presenting cryptogenically as Budd-Chiari syndrome, then fulminantly as Libman-Sacks endocarditis.

A 58 year-old left-handed woman was transferred to our hospital with an evolving left middle cerebral artery stroke, severe thrombocytopenia and elevated inflammatory markers. She had a history of chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) 16 months prior, attributed to a calcified web in the inferior vena cava that was stented. No thrombophilia testing was performed at that time. The current presentation demonstrated dense right-sided facial and arm paresis and neglect. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were elevated, an autoimmune workup was consistent with a new diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus and triple-positive antiphospholipid antibodies. A transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated a vegetation consistent with Libman-Sacks endocarditis (LSE), thought to have embolised to the brain. The patient was treated acutely with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and clopidogrel. This case demonstrates an atypical constellation of the antiphospholipid syndrome, with a novel presentation of BCS and LSE, and reinforces the importance of hypercoagulability screening in this population.

The Temporal Risk of Heart Failure Associated With Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer Patients: A Population Study.

BACKGROUND: The late cardiac effect of adjuvant trastuzumab and its potential interaction with anthracycline have not been well-studied on a population level. METHODS: In this retrospective population-based cohort study, female breast cancer patients in Ontario, diagnosed between 2003 and 2009, were identified by the Ontario Cancer Registry and linked to administrative databases to ascertain demographics, cardiac risk factors, comorbidities, and use of adjuvant trastuzumab and other chemotherapy. Patients with pre-existing heart failure (HF) were excluded. The main endpoint was new diagnosis of HF. Analyses included Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis, multivariable piecewise Cox regression, and competing risk and propensity score analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Nineteen thousand seventy-four women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were identified, of whom 3371 (17.7%) also received adjuvant trastuzumab. Anthracycline use was 84.9% overall. After a median follow-up of 5.9 years, patients treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy were more likely to develop HF than patients on chemotherapy alone (5-year cumulative incidences of 5.2% vs 2.5%; log-rank P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, adjuvant trastuzumab remained independently associated with incident HF in the first 1.5 years (HR = 5.77, 95% CI = 4.38 to 7.62, P < .001), but not thereafter (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.33, P = .53). Anthracycline use did not increase the risk of HF with trastuzumab synergistically, neither within (P interaction = .92) nor beyond 1.5 years (P interaction = .23). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant trastuzumab was associated with increased risk of new incidence of HF in breast cancer survivors during the period of adjuvant treatment but not thereafter. Routine intensive monitoring may not be necessary after completing adjuvant therapy.