Prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in moderate term survivors of liver transplantation.

The prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus after liver transplantation are not well understood. Thus, we sought to identify independent risk factors for the development of diabetes after liver transplantation using currently accepted medical criteria. We studied the prevalence and risk factors in 253 adult recipients transplanted at UCLA between January 1998 and December 2002. Analysis of the retrospective data was performed using demographic, immunosuppression and liver disease variables. Factors found to be significant on a univariate analysis were further studied in a multivariate analysis. There were 158 men and 95 women in our study. The mean age was 51.4 +/- 11.0 years. The mean [+/- standard deviation (SD) pretransplant body mass index was 26.7 (+/-5.1). Most patients were transplanted for hepatitis C (HCV). The prevalence of diabetes after transplantation was 17.8%. In a multivariate analysis only gender [odds ratio (OR) = 0.37; p = 0.02] was independently predictive of the development of diabetes. This study in a large liver transplant recipient population identifies male gender as an independent risk factor for the development of diabetes. Follow-up studies are needed to assess the impact of diabetes, and its intervention on post-transplant morbidity and mortality.

A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors affecting the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to identify models that predict patient and graft survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The national epidemic of HCV infection has become the leading cause of hepatic failure that requires OLT. Rapidly increasing demands for OLT and depleted donor organ pools mandate appropriate selection of patients and donors. Such selection should be guided by a better understanding of the factors that influence the outcome of OLT. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 510 patients who underwent OLT for HCV during the past decade. Seven donor, 10 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect outcome were dichotomized at the median for univariate screening. Factors that achieved a probability value less than 0.2 or that were thought to be relevant were entered into a stepdown Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Overall patient and graft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 68%, and 60% and 73%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Overall median time to HCV recurrence was 34 months after transplantation. Neither HCV recurrence nor HCV-positive donor status significantly decreased patient and graft survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, use of HCV-positive donors reduced the median time of recurrence to 22.9 months compared with 35.7 months after transplantation of HCV-negative livers. Stratification of patients into five subgroups, based on time of recurrence, revealed that early HCV recurrence was associated with significantly increased rates of patient death and graft loss. Donor, recipient, and operative variables that may affect OLT outcome were analyzed. On univariate analysis, recipient age, serum creatinine, donor length of hospital stay, donor female gender, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status of recipient, and presence of hepatocellular cancer affected the outcome of OLT. Elevation of pretransplant HCV RNA was associated with an increased risk of graft loss. Of 15 variables considered by multivariate Cox regression analysis, recipient age, UNOS status, donor gender, and log creatinine were simultaneous significant predictors for patient survival. Simultaneously significant factors for graft failure included log creatinine, log alanine transaminase, log aspartate transaminase, UNOS status, donor gender, and warm ischemia time. These variables were therefore entered into prognostic models for patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: The earlier the recurrence of HCV, the greater the impact on patient and graft survival. The use of HCV-positive donors may accelerate HCV recurrence, and they should be used judiciously. Patient survival at the time of transplantation is predicted by donor gender, UNOS status, serum creatinine, and recipient age. Graft survival is affected by donor gender, warm ischemia time, and pretransplant patient condition. The authors' current survival prognostic models require further multicenter validation.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of biliary anastomosis with or without T-tube after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Biliary reconstruction continues to be a major source of morbidity following orthotopic liver transplantation. We wished to determine if choledochocholedochostomy without a T-tube was associated with fewer biliary complications and was less costly than choledochocholedochostomy with a T-tube. A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent liver transplantation was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups: group I had bile duct reconstruction with T-tube and group II did not have a T-tube. The results were interpreted on an intention-to-treat analysis. We identified 147 adult patients who underwent initial liver transplantation. There were 76 patients in group I and 71 patients in group II. There were no statistical differences between the two groups regarding underlying cause of liver disease, patient age, gender or United Network for Organ Sharing status. As the decision to use a T-tube was made at the time of surgery, the two groups may not be strictly comparable. The mean hospital stay was longer in group I (31.1 +/- 27.9d) than in group II (18.8 +/- 15.5d) (p = 0.001). Biliary complications were statistically more frequent in patients from group I patients (25/76, 32.9%) than in patients from group II (11/71, 15.5%) (p = 0.01). There was a trend for the costs associated with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the management of biliary complications to be greater for group I than for group II, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.235). Our study suggests choledochocholedochostomy without T-tube reconstruction is the preferred strategy for biliary reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation. It is not only associated with fewer biliary complications, but also less costly than using choledochocholedochostomy over a T-tube. Randomized prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C: outcome, effect of immunosuppression, and causes of retransplantation during an 8-year single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: HCV has become the leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatic failure leading to OLT. Recurrent HCV after OLT is associated with significant complications and may lead to graft loss that requires retransplantation (re-OLT). The authors studied the outcome of transplantation for HCV, the effect of primary immunotherapy, and causes of retransplantation. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of their experience during an 8-year period (1990-1997), during which 374 patients underwent transplants for HCV (298 [79.6%] received one OLT; 76 [20.4%] required re-OLT). Median follow-up was 2 years (range 0 to 8.3). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine in 190 patients and tacrolimus in 132 patients. In a third group of patients, therapy was switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus or from tacrolimus to cyclosporine (cyclosporine/tacrolimus group). RESULTS: Overall, 1-, 2-, and 5-year actuarial patient survival rates were 86%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. The 2-year patient survival rate was 81 % in the cyclosporine group, 85% in the tacrolimus group, and 82% in the cyclosporine/tacrolimus group. In patients receiving one OLT, overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 85%, 81%, and 75%, respectively. The 2-year patient survival rate was 79% in the cyclosporine group, 84% in the tacrolimus group, and 80% in the cyclosporine/tacrolimus group. The overall graft survival rates were 70%, 65%, and 60% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. The graft survival rate at 2 years was similar under cyclosporine (68.5%), tacrolimus (64%), or cyclosporine/tacrolimus (60%) therapy. Re-OLT was required in 42 (11.2%) patients for graft dysfunction in the initial 30 days after OLT. Other causes for re-OLT included hepatic artery thrombosis in 10 (2.6%), chronic rejection in 8 (2.1%), and recurrent HCV in 13 (3.4%) patients. The overall survival rates after re-OLT were 63% and 58% at 1 and 2 years. The 1-year survival rate after re-OLT was 61 % for graft dysfunction, 50% for chronic rejection, 60% for hepatic artery thrombosis, and 60% for recurrent HCV. At re-OLT, 85.3% of the patients were critically ill (United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 1); only 14.7% of the patients were UNOS status 2 and 3. In re-OLT for chronic rejection and recurrent HCV, the 1-year survival rate of UNOS 1 patients was 38.4%, compared with 87.5% for UNOS 2 and 3 patients. In patients requiring re-OLT, there was no difference in the 1-year patient survival rate after re-OLT when cyclosporine (60%), tacrolimus (63%), or cyclosporine/tacrolimus (56%) was used for primary therapy. With cyclosporine, three patients (1.5%) required re-OLT for chronic rejection versus one patient (0.7%) with tacrolimus. Re-OLT for recurrent HCV was required in four (3%) and seven (3.6%) patients with tacrolimus and cyclosporine therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Orthotopic liver transplantation for HCV is performed with excellent results. There are no distinct advantages to the use of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus immunosuppression when patient and graft survival are considered. Re-OLT is an important option in the treatment of recurrent HCV and should be performed early in the course of recurrent disease. Survival after re-OLT is not distinctively affected by cyclosporine or tacrolimus primary immunotherapy. The incidence of re-OLT for recurrent HCV or chronic rejection is low after either tacrolimus or cyclosporine therapy.

A simple model to estimate survival after retransplantation of the liver.

To formulate a model predicting survival after liver retransplantation, we analyzed in detail the last 150 cases of hepatic retransplantation at UCLA. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified five variables that demonstrated independent simultaneous prognostic value in estimating patient survival after retransplantation: (1) age group (pediatric or adult), (2) recipient requiring preoperative mechanical ventilation, (3) donor organ cold ischemia > or =12 hr, (4) preoperative serum creatinine, and (5) preoperative serum total bilirubin. The Cox regression equation that predicts survival based on these covariates was simplified by assigning individual patients a risk classification based on a 5-point scoring system. We demonstrate that this system can be employed to identify a subgroup of patients in which the expected outcome is too poor to justify retransplantation. These findings may assist in the rational selection of patients suitable for retransplantation.

Prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation using combination lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin.

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease are prone to recurrence. The mainstay of prophylaxis has been passive immunotherapy with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). Antiviral therapy with lamivudine has proven effective in lowering hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and improving histology in patients with hepatitis B infection; its role in prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation is under investigation. Viral breakthrough and resistance, however, are a significant problem with monotherapy with either HBIG or lamivudine. The efficacy of combination lamivudine/HBIG prophylaxis has not been reported. Fourteen patients underwent transplantation for decompensated liver disease owing to hepatitis B. Lamivudine (150 mg p.o./d) was begun before transplantation in 10 patients, including 4 who were HBV DNA-positive. In addition, 1 patient was HBV DNA-positive when transplanted. HBIG was given perioperatively and continued thereafter; treatment with lamivudine was maintained or initiated at the time of transplantation and continued indefinitely. The median follow-up was 387 days. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival was 93% (1 patient died of unrelated causes). At a median interval of 28 days following lamivudine treatment, all 5 HBV DNA-positive patients cleared HBV DNA from the serum; 1 went on to clear hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), before transplantation, at day 148 of lamivudine treatment. By the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at a median of 346 days (range, 130-525 days) following transplantation, all 13 surviving patients had no detectable serum HBV DNA. Lamivudine suppresses HBV replication in patients awaiting liver transplantation. At a median follow-up of 1.1 years, combination prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG prevented hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation for decompensated cirrhosis after jejunoileal bypass: a strategy for management.

BACKGROUND: Although jejunoileal bypass results in end-stage liver disease in up to 100% of patients, little is known about outcome after liver transplantation. METHODS: The clinical courses of six patients who underwent liver transplantation at UCLA for decompensated cirrhosis owing to a jejunoileal bypass were reviewed. Liver function, allograft pathology, renal function, and nutritional status were assessed. RESULTS: Of the four patients with an intact jejunoileal bypass, two of the three who were biopsied had recurrent steatotic liver disease. The two patients whose jejunoileal bypass was reversed at the time of liver transplantation had lower alkaline phosphatase, lower creatinine, higher albumin, and higher cholesterol, and were more obese than their counterparts with intact bypasses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing liver transplantation for jejunoileal bypass-associated liver disease should, if possible, have their bypass reversed at the time of transplantation; otherwise, they must be followed closely and be biopsied routinely. Recurrent liver disease should prompt reversal of the jejunoileal bypass.

Long-term survival after retransplantation of the liver.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined the long-term outcome of patients undergoing hepatic retransplantation at their institution. Donor, operative, and recipient factors impacting on outcome as well as parameters of patient resource utilization were examined. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic retransplantation provides the only available option for liver transplant recipients in whom an existing graft has failed. However, such patients are known to exhibit patient and graft survival after retransplantation that is inferior to that expected using the same organs in naiive recipients. The critical shortage of donor organs and resultant prolonged patient waiting periods before transplantation prompted the authors to evaluate the results of a liberal policy of retransplantation and to examine the factors contributing to the inferior outcome observed in retransplanted patients. METHODS: A total of 2053 liver transplants were performed at the UCLA Medical Center during a 13-year period from February 1, 1984, to October 1, 1996. A total of 356 retransplants were performed in 299 patients (retransplant rate = 17%). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with survival. Additionally, a case-control comparison was performed between the last 150 retransplanted patients and 150 primarily transplanted patients who were matched for age and United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) status. Differences between these groups in donor, operative, and recipient variables were studied for their correlation with patient survival. Days of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and hospital charges incurred during the transplant admissions were compared for retransplanted patients and control patients. RESULTS: Survival of retransplanted patients at 1, 5, and 10 years was 62%, 47%, and 45%, respectively. This survival is significantly less than that seen in patients undergoing primary hepatic transplantation at the authors' center during the same period (83%, 74%, and 68%). A number of variables proved to have a significant impact on outcome including recipient age group, interval to retransplantation, total number of grafts, and recipient UNOS status. Recipient primary diagnosis, cause for retransplantation, and whether the patient was retransplanted before or after June 1, 1992, did not reach statistical significance as factors influencing survival. In the case-control comparison, the authors found that of the more than 25 variables studied, only preoperative ventilator status showed both a significant difference between control patients and retransplanted patients and also was a factor predictive of survival in retransplanted patients. Retransplant patients had significantly longer hospital and intensive care unit stays and accumulated total hospitalization charges more than 170% of those by control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic retransplantation, although life-saving in almost 50% of patients with a failing liver allograft, is costly and uses scarce donor organs inefficiently. The data presented define patient characteristics and preoperative variables that impact patient outcome and should assist in the rational application of retransplantation.

Aplastic anemia complicating orthotopic liver transplantation.

The clinical characteristics and outcome of posttransplantation aplastic anemia (AA) were determined in 12 of 1,736 patients (0.007%) undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) that were afflicted with AA. None of the affected patients had a history of hematologic disease. Median patient age was 53 years (range, 2-61 years); 10 of the affected patients were men, and 2 were women. The etiologies of AA included non-A, non-B, non-C fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) (3 patients), graft-versus-host disease (4 patients), Parvovirus-induced (1 patient), and idiopathic (4 patients). The median duration between OLT and the onset of AA was 12 days (range, 11-14 days) in the 3 patients undergoing OLT for FHF; in contrast, AA developed in the other 9 patients at 37 days (range, 27-51 days) after OLT. Eleven patients were treated with reduction of their cyclosporine or tacrolimus dosage, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, anti-thymocyte globulin, and Solumedrol. Two of the 3 patients developing AA following OLT for FHF achieved hematologic recovery 21 and 92 days after diagnosis. In contrast, all 9 non-FHF patients developing AA after OLT died, 5 due to infectious complications and 4 following intracranial bleeding. AA is an unusual complication of OLT. In the setting of FHF, it affects young males in the early posttransplantation period, and, when infectious complications can be avoided, remission and stable allograft function can be anticipated. However, in the non-FHF patient, AA occurs in older individuals later in the posttransplantation period and has a uniformly poor outcome.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis. A 12-year single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze a single center's 12-year experience with 127 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a chronic cholestatic liver disease of unknown origin that occurs most commonly in young men and is associated frequently (70-80%) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with PSC also are at risk for the development of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and those with IBD for colon carcinoma. Although the course of PSC is variable, it frequently is progressive, leading to cirrhosis and requirement for OLT. METHODS: The medical records of 127 consecutive patients undergoing OLT for PSC from July 1, 1984, to May 30, 1996, were reviewed. Actuarial patient and graft survival was determined at 1,2, and 5 years. The incidence and outcome of patients with CCA, recurrent sclerosing cholangitis, and post-transplant colon carcinoma was determined. Results were analyzed by way of stepwise Cox regression to determine the statistical strength of independent associations between pretransplant covariates and patient survival. The median follow-up period was 3.01 years. Incidental cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) was defined as a tumor < 1 cm in size that was discovered at the time of pathologic sectioning of the explanted liver. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (72%) had associated IBD. Seventy-nine (62%) had undergone previous biliary tract surgery. One hundred seven patients (84%) received a single graft, whereas 20 patients (16%) required 22 retransplants. Patients received either cyclosporine- (n = 76) or tacrolimus- (n = 51) based immunosuppression. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year actuarial patient survivals were 90%, 86%, and 85%, respectively, whereas graft survival was 82%, 77%, and 72%, respectively. The presence of previous biliary surgery had no effect on patient survival. Ten patients (8%) had ICCA and their survival was not significantly different from patients without ICCA (100%, 83%, and 83% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively). Four patients were known to have CCA at the time of OLT, all recurred within 6 months, and had a significantly worse outcome (p < 0.0001). Recurrent sclerosing cholangitis developed in 11 patients (8.6%). The patient and graft survival in this group was not different from those in whom recurrence did not develop (patient; 100%, 90%, and 90%; graft: 80%, 70%, and 52%). Thirty patients (23%) underwent colectomy after liver transplantation for dysplasia-carcinoma or symptomatic colitis. Of the nine covariates entered into the Cox multivariate regression analysis, only common bile duct frozen section biopsy specimen showing CCA was predictive of a survival disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation provides excellent patient and graft survival rates for patients affected with PSC independent of pretransplant biliary tract surgery. Incidental cholangiocarcinoma does not affect patient survival significantly. However, known CCA or common duct frozen section biopsy specimen or both showing CCA are associated with poor recipient survival, and OLT should be proscribed in these cases. Recurrent PSC occurs in approximately 9% of cases but does not affect patient survival. Post-transplant colectomy does not affect patient survival adversely.

Hyperlipidemia after liver transplantation: natural history and treatment with the hydroxy-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor pravastatin.

This study was designed to determine the frequency of hyperlipidemia after orthotopic liver transplantation and whether treatment with a hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor was safe and efficacious. Cholesterol levels were assessed in 45 consecutive adult liver transplants (mean +/- SE). Four of 22 patients on cyclosporine (CsA) (18%) and three of 23 patients on FK506 (13%) had levels >225 mg/dl at 12 months (cholesterol levels for patients on CsA [total n=22]: pre-Tx = 140+/-11, 1 month = 183+/-36,3 months = 221+/-12, 6 months = 211+/-11, 12 months = 202+/-14 [P<0.01 vs. pre-Tx]; FK506 [total n=23]: Pre-Tx = 151+/-13, 1 month = 187+/-22, 3 months = 188+/-10, 6 months = 184+/-13, 12 months = 164+/-9 [P=0.02 vs. CsA]). A separate cohort of patients with stable graft function, cholesterol >225 mg/dl, and two additional risk factors for coronary artery disease were started on pravastatin. Ninety-eight patients were enrolled. Sixteen patients (16%) discontinued the drug because of subjective complaints. No episodes of rhabdomyolysis or hepatotoxicity occurred (cholesterol levels for patients on CsA [total n=65]: pretreatment = 251+/-7, 6 months = 220+/-7 [P=0.01 vs. pretreatment], 12 months = 224+/-8 [P=0.01 vs. pretreatment]; FK506 [total n=17]: pretreatment = 251+/-17, 6 months = 219+/-17, 12 months = 208+/-17 [P=0.08 vs. pretreatment]). Natural killer cells isolated from normal volunteers (n=14) exhibited 27+/-9% specific lysis. Patients on FK506 or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression alone (n=11) exhibited 20+/-4% specific lysis. Standard immunosuppression plus pravastatin (n=10) decreased lysis to 0.2+/-10% (P<0.02 vs. controls and standard immunosuppression). We conclude: (1) posttransplant hyperlipidemia occurs less frequently in liver transplant patients than in renal or cardiac transplants; (2) pravastatin is safe and efficacious for cholesterol reduction in liver transplant patients; and (3) pravastatin coadministered with standard immunosuppression reduces natural killer cell-specific lysis in these recipients.

Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure in a Jehovah's Witness.

Jehovah's Witness patients who refuse transfusions have generally not been felt to be candidates for liver transplantation owing to the frequent requirement for blood transfusions during liver transplantation. This is the first report to our knowledge of successful emergent liver transplantation without the use of blood or blood products in a Jehovah's Witness. The surgical and anesthetic strategies employed in achieving a successful outcome are discussed.

A randomized prospective trial of steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation.

The safety of steroid withdrawal in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients has been studied in a prospective trial with a comparison control group. Sixty-four recipients of ABO-compatible grafts (42 adults, 22 children) were randomized into a steroid withdrawal (SW) group and a control group. Inclusion criteria included survival > one year post-OLT and no rejection > six months after OLT. Exclusion criteria included previous graft loss secondary to rejection, > two episodes of documented rejection, patients transplanted for autoimmune hepatitis, and patients unable to receive azathioprine. Target HPLC cyclosporine levels in both groups were 100-200 ng/ml. Thirty-three patients entered the SW group and 31 the control group at a mean of 3.5 years after OLT; follow-ups were 592 and 527 days, respectively. Two patients in each group developed biopsy-proven rejection. In the SW group one patient rejected at three months, the other at nine months. Both rejection episodes resolved with only reinstitution of oral prednisone. Of the two patients who rejected in the control group (one at 7 months, one at 11 months) one required conversion to tacrolimus and the other intravenous steroids. There were no significant differences between the two groups for prednisone, azathioprine, cyclosporine doses, cyclosporine levels, liver function tests, and white blood cell counts at base line compared with 12 months. Fasting serum cholesterol in the SW group decreased from 194 +/- 44 mg/dl at baseline to 175 +/- 37 mg/dl at one year, whereas in the control group cholesterol rose from 180 +/- 48 mg/dl to 193 +/- 44 mg/dl. In pediatric patients no significant difference in age-adjusted height velocities over one year was seen between the two groups. We concluded that dual therapy with cyclosporine and azathioprine in stable long-term liver allograft recipients is not associated with an increase in rejection incidence. Prednisone withdrawal may be associated with an improvement in lipid profiles.

Biliary tract complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Endoscopic approach to diagnosis and therapy.

This study was undertaken to further define the role of endoscopic methods in the evaluation and treatment of biliary tract complications after liver transplantation and to determine the efficacy and safety of this approach. Fifty liver transplant patients were referred for endoscopic evaluation of a suspected biliary tract complication. Two patient groups were identified based on the indication for the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): Group 1 was suspected of having biliary fistula and group 2 was suspected of having bile duct obstruction. Group 1 consisted of 35 patients who developed bile peritonitis after inadvertent migration of the T-tube or intentional T-tube removal. Group 2 consisted of 15 patients who developed cholestatic hepatic chemistries in the absence of allograft rejection on liver biopsy. ERCP identified a biliary fistula at the T-tube insertion site into the bile duct in 32 (91%) group 1 patients. Twenty-six of 26 treated with a nasobiliary tube had fistula closure at a mean 5.2 days. Five of 6 treated with a stent, with or without sphincterotomy, had no leak at the time of stent removal (mean, 45 days). ERCP identified a cause for the cholestatic hepatic chemistries in 11 (73.5%) group 2 patients, including bile duct stones (n = 4), anastomotic (n = 3) or intrahepatic (n = 2) strictures, bile duct necrosis (n = 1), and hemobilia (n = 1). Five of the 5 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy were treated successfully. The endoscopic complication rate was 4% and the 30-day mortality rate was 2%. During a mean follow-up of 15 months, 94% of the patients who were treated successfully had no recurrent biliary tract disease. The results of this study suggest that ERCP is an effective modality in the evaluation of patients with suspected biliary tract complications after liver transplantation. In selected patients, endoscopic therapy obviates the need for additional surgical or percutaneous intervention.

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the recurrence rate and survival of patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Historically, liver transplantation for HCC has yielded poor long-term survival. Multimodality therapy has been initiated in an effort to improve survival statistics. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were placed on 6 months of intravenous fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cisplatin after OLT. Risk factors, recurrence rates, and survival rates were analyzed and compared with historic controls. RESULTS: Overall long-term survival in the protocol patients was 46% at 3 years, improved over our historic controls of 5.8% at 3 years (p = 0.0001). Overall recurrence rate was 20% (n = 4). Possible risk factors, such as tumor size, vascular invasion, multifocality, capsular invasion, and tumor differentiation, were not found to be significantly predictive of survival. Three patients with long-term, disease-free survival had tumors > 5 cm. Side effects from chemotherapy were common, but rarely severe. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy after transplantation for HCC can provide long-term cure and may improve survival, even in patients with stage III and IV disease.

Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma to bone in a liver transplant patient. A case report.

Although previously unreported in the orthopaedic literature, hepatocellular carcinoma metastasizes to bone in 2 to 20% of cases. The poor prognosis associated with this tumor often results in patient demise before the need for orthopaedic intervention. A liver transplant recipient with no known history of hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed with this tumor when open reduction and internal fixation of an impending pathologic femoral fracture were performed. Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a lytic osseous metastasis in appropriate patient populations.