Outcomes comparison of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic and open surgery for patients undergoing rectal cancer resection with concurrent stoma creation.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in rectal cancer resection, there remains limited knowledge of its clinical advantage over laparoscopic (Lap) and open (OS) surgery. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of RAS with Lap and OS for rectal cancer. METHODS: We identified all patients aged ≥ 18 years who had elective rectal cancer resection requiring temporary or permanent stoma formation from 1/2013 to 12/2020 from the PINC AI™ Healthcare Database. We completed multivariable logistic regression analysis accounting for hospital clustering to compare ileostomy formation between surgical approaches. Next, we built inverse probability of treatment-weighted analyses to compare outcomes for ileostomy and permanent colostomy separately. Outcomes included postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, discharge to home, reoperation, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS: A total of 12,787 patients (OS: 5599 [43.8%]; Lap: 2872 [22.5%]; RAS: 4316 [33.7%]) underwent elective rectal cancer resection. Compared to OS, patients who had Lap (OR 1.29, p < 0.001) or RAS (OR 1.53, p < 0.001) were more likely to have an ileostomy rather than permanent colostomy. In those with ileostomy, RAS was associated with fewer ileus (OR 0.71, p < 0.001) and less bleeding (OR 0.50, p < 0.001) compared to Lap. In addition, RAS was associated with lower anastomotic leak (OR 0.25, p < 0.001), less bleeding (OR 0.51, p < 0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (OR 0.70, p = 0.022) when compared to OS. In those patients who had permanent colostomy formation, RAS was associated with fewer ileus (OR 0.72, p < 0.001), less bleeding (OR 0.78, p = 0.021), lower 30-day reoperation (OR 0.49, p < 0.001), and higher discharge to home (OR 1.26, p = 0.013) than Lap, as well as OS. CONCLUSION: Rectal cancer patients treated with RAS were more likely to have an ileostomy rather than a permanent colostomy and more enhanced recovery compared to Lap and OS.

Causes of death in patients operated for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. This study evaluates the causes of death in patients operated on for colorectal cancer and their determinants. METHODS: An Instructional Review Board-approved database containing patients who underwent surgical resection for colorectal cancer from 2004 to 2018 (last followed up in December 2020) in a tertiary care institution. Data on the underlying cause of death was extracted from the Registry of Vital Records and Statistics in Massachusetts. RESULTS: A total of 576 deaths were recorded in the database, of which 290 (50.35%) patients died of colorectal cancer. Deaths from colorectal cancer gradually decreased over time, whereas deaths from other cancers increased, and deaths from cardiovascular diseases remained stable. Patients who died from colorectal cancer were younger, died earlier in the disease course, had fewer comorbidities, higher rates of stage IV disease, rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy, extramural vascular invasion, perineural invasion, R0 resection, and preserved mismatch repair protein status. On multivariate analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio for 10-year increase = 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.95), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (adjusted odds ratio = 0.64, confidence interval 0.42-0.98), stage IV disease (adjusted odds ratio = 3.02, confidence interval 1.59-5.9), neoadjuvant therapy (adjusted odds ratio = 7.91, confidence interval 2.64-28.13), extramural vascular invasion (adjusted odds ratio = 2.3, confidence interval 1.36-3.91) & time from diagnosis to death (adjusted odds ratio = 0.76, confidence interval 0.68-0.83) predicted death due to colorectal cancer versus other causes, whereas tumor location, perineural invasion, R0 resection, and mismatch repair protein status did not. CONCLUSION: There is a declining trend of deaths from colorectal cancer, presumably reflecting advances in colorectal cancer management strategies and better screening over time. However, younger patients disproportionately contribute to death due to colorectal cancer and need aggressive screening and management strategies.

Metformin Does not Affect Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy and Resection.

INTRODUCTION: There is emerging evidence that metformin may have a protective effect in patients with cancer. However, its current evidence in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is inconclusive. We aim to assess the effect of metformin on long-term outcomes in patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection. METHODS: A retrospective review of 324 patients with nonmetastatic LARC who received neoadjuvant therapy and major surgical resection from 2004 to 2018. There were 27 patients who received metformin before surgery and 297 patients who did not receive metformin. RESULTS: Metformin users were associated with a significantly higher age, BMI, ASA score, and 30-day readmissions (P < .05). There was no difference in overall survival (OS, P = .18) or disease-free survival (DFS, P = .33) between the two groups. On Cox regression, metformin intake did not predict OS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.4-1.77) when controlled for age (HR 1.04, 1.02-1.06), sex (HR 1.13, 0.69-1.85), BMI (HR 0.97, 0.92-1.02), ASA score (HR: 1.7, 1.06-2.73), TNT (HR 0.31, 0.1-0.92), pathological Stage III disease (HR 2.55, 1.51-4.32), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) (HR 3.06, 1.7-5.5), and adjuvant therapy (HR 0.1, 0.04-0.27 for <25 months OS and HR 0.3, 0.15-0.59 for ≥25 months). Disease-free survival showed a similar trend with no significant effect of metformin (HR 0.77, 0.39-1.52) when controlled for age, sex, BMI, ASA, TNT, Stage III disease, EMVI, and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Metformin does not affect long-term survival in LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. Studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate the findings further.

Incidence of Secondary Cancers After Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) induces secondary cancers is controversial. This retrospective cohort study describes the incidence of secondary cancers in LARC patients. METHODS: We compared 364 LARC patients who received conventional (50.4 Gy) or short course neoadjuvant radiation (25 Gy x 5 fractions) followed by resection to 142 patients with surgically resected rectal cancer who did not receive radiation at a single institution from 2004 to 2018. Secondary cancer was defined as any nonmetastatic noncolorectal malignancy diagnosed via biopsy or definitive imaging criteria at least 6 mo after completion of neoadjuvant therapy or after resection in the comparison group. RESULTS: Among the neoadjuvant radiation group (364 patients, 40% female, age 61 ± 13 y), 32 patients developed 34 (9.3%) secondary cancers. Three cases involved a pelvic organ. Among the comparison group (142 patients, 39% female, age 64 ± 15 y), 15 patients (10.6%) developed a secondary cancer. Five cases involved pelvic organs. Secondary cancer incidence did not differ between groups. Latency period to secondary cancer diagnosis was 6.7 ± 4.3 y. Patients who received radiation underwent longer median follow-up (6.8 versus 4.5 y, P < 0.01) and were significantly less likely to develop a pelvic organ cancer (odds ratio 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.83; P = 0.02). No genetic mutations or cancer syndromes were identified among patients with secondary cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is not associated with increased secondary cancer risk in LARC patients and may have a local protective effect on pelvic organs, especially prostate. Ongoing follow-up is critical to continue risk assessment.

Implementation of a New Surgeon Onboarding Program in an Academic-affiliated Community Hospital.

Best practices in onboarding are well-established, but surgeons frequently receive suboptimal introductions to new practice settings. At the same time, increasing regionalization of surgical programs and strategic alignments between academic and community hospitals have increased the demand for surgeons to practice at multiple sites with variable resources and institutional cultures. In response to this growing problem, we developed and implemented a surgeon onboarding program in an academic-affiliated community hospital. This pilot demonstrated excellent process adherence, user satisfaction, and significant improvements in preparedness to practice. We therefore conclude that robust onboarding is feasible and can be readily implemented by a local team to promote safe transitions in practice settings for surgeons.

Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer Survival is Comparable to Sporadic Cases after Surgery: a Matched-Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) confers an increased lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). The pathogenesis of colitis-associated CRC is considered distinct from sporadic CRC, but existing is mixed on long-term oncologic outcomes. This study aims to compare clinicopathological characteristics and survival between colitis-associated and sporadic CRC. METHODS: Data was retrospectively extracted and analyzed from a single institutional database of patients with surgically resected CRC between 2004 and 2015. Patients with IBD were identified as having colitis-associated CRC. The remainder were classified as sporadic CRC. Propensity score matching was performed. Univariate and survival analyses were carried out to estimate the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Of 2275 patients included in this analysis, 65 carried a diagnosis of IBD (2.9%, 33 Crohn's disease, 29 ulcerative colitis, 3 indeterminate colitis). Average age at CRC diagnosis was 62 years for colitis-associated CRC and 65 for sporadic CRC. The final propensity score matched cohort consisted of 65 colitis-associated and 130 sporadic CRC cases. Patients with colitis-associated CRC were more likely to undergo total proctocolectomy (p < 0.01) and had higher incidence of locoregional recurrence (p = 0.026) compared to sporadic CRC patients. There were no significant differences in time to recurrence, tumor grade, extramural vascular invasion, perineural invasion, or rate of R0 resections. Overall survival and disease-free survival did not differ between groups. On multiple Cox regression, IBD diagnosis was not a significant predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with colitis-associated CRC who undergo surgical resection have comparable overall and disease-free survival to patients with sporadic CRC.

Patient Factors Affecting Inpatient Mortality Following Colorectal Cancer Resection.

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to identify factors for inpatient death in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer (CRC). STUDY DESIGN: Unmatched 1:3 case-control study of surgically resected CRC at a tertiary care institution between 2004 and 2018. Variables for multivariate analysis were selected using tetrachoric correlation followed by a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) penalized regression model. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included (N = 35 patients who died inpatient, N = 105 patients who did not die). Patients who died were older, had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), higher rates of preoperative anemia, hypoalbuminemia, emergency surgeries, blood transfusion, postoperative vasopressor requirement, anastomotic leak, and postoperative ICU admission than patients who underwent surgical resection without inpatient mortality. Anemia (aOR = 8.62, 1.44-91.58), emergency admission (aOR = 5.71, 1.46-24.36), and ICU admission (aOR 45.51, 8.31-448.4) significantly predicted inpatient mortality when controlled for CCI and hypoalbuminemia. CONCLUSIONS: Surprisingly, it appears that pre-existing anemia and perioperative factors are more important in predicting inpatient mortality of patients undergoing CRC surgery than baseline comorbidity or nutritional status.

Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis.

Given the progression of laparoscopic surgery, questions continue to arise as to the ideal technique for a laparoscopic colectomy. The most debated of these questions is whether it is best to complete an intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal (ECA) intestinal anastomosis. Here, we review the literature to date and report the equivalent safety and efficacy of ICA and ECA for laparoscopic right colectomy. However, these studies also indicate that when completed, ICA may prove beneficial with respect to earlier return of bowel function, less postoperative pain, shorter incision length, and reduced risk of wound infections. For this, we present the tips and tricks for completing all forms of laparoscopic ICAs during laparoscopic colectomy.

The time Interval Between the End of Radiotherapy and Surgery Does Not Affect Outcomes in Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The ideal time interval between the completion of chemoradiotherapy and subsequent surgical resection of advanced stage rectal tumors is highly debated. Our aim is to study the effect of the time interval between the completion of chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection on postoperative and oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resected locally advanced rectal tumors between 2004 and 2015 were included in this analysis. The time interval was calculated from the date of radiation completion to date of surgery. Patients were split into 2 groups based on the time interval (<8 weeks and >8 weeks). Postoperative outcomes (anastomotic leak, pathologic complete response (pCR), and readmission) and survival were assessed with multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression models while adjusting for relevant confounders. RESULTS: 200 patients (62% male) underwent resection with a median time interval of 8 weeks from completion of radiotherapy. On multivariable logistic regression, there was no significant increase in odds between time interval to surgery and anastomotic leak (aOR = .8 [.27-2.7], P = .8), pCR (aOR = 1.2[.58-2.6] P = .6), or readmission (aOR = 1.02, 95% CI:0.49-2.24, P = .9). Time interval to surgery was not an independent prognostic factor for overall (HR = 1.04 CI = .4-2.65, P = .9) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.2 CI = .5-2.9, P = .6). CONCLUSION: The time interval between neoadjuvant radiotherapy completion and surgical resection does not affect anastomotic leak rate, achievement of pCR, or overall and disease-free survival in patients with rectal cancer. Extended periods of time to surgical resection are relatively safe.

Association of age with outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the association of age with outcomes in patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by major surgery. METHODS: Retrospective review of 328 patients with LARC, N = 99 < 70 years (younger) versus N = 229 ≥ 70 years (elderly) from 2004 to 2018. RESULTS: Elderly patients had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay and 30-day readmissions (p < 0.05). They also had worse overall survival (OS) & disease-free survival (DFS) (p < 0.001), but similar disease-specific survival (DSS) compared to younger group. Age was not associated with hazard of death (HR 1.01, 0.98-1.03). Rather, CCI (HR 1.29, 1.01-1.5), extramural vascular invasion (HR 4.98, 2.84-8.74), and adjuvant therapy (0.37, 0.21-0.64) were significantly associated with the hazard of death; when controlled for stage, tumor distance from anal verge, and neoadjuvant completion. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities and lower rates of adjuvant therapy, and not chronologic age, are associated with poor OS of elderly patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant therapy and major surgery.

Molecular Basis of Extramural Vascular Invasion (EMVI) in Colorectal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) is a known poor prognostic factor in colorectal carcinoma; however, its molecular basis has not been defined. This study aimed to assess the expression of molecular markers in EMVI positive colorectal carcinoma to understand their tumor microenvironment. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays of surgically resected colorectal cancer specimens for immunological markers, and BRAFV600E mutation (and on the tissue blocks for mismatch repair proteins). Automated quantification was used for CD8, LAG3, FOXP3, PU1, and CD163, and manual quantification was used for PDL1, HLA I markers (beta-2 microglobulin, HC10), and HLA II. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare EMVI positive and negative tumors. A logistic regression model was fitted to assess the predictive effect of biomarkers on EMVI. RESULTS: There were 340 EMVI positive and 678 EMVI negative chemo naïve tumors. PDL1 was barely expressed on tumor cells (median 0) in the entire cohort. We found a significantly lower expression of CD8, LAG3, FOXP3, PU1 cells, PDL1 positive macrophages, and beta-2 microglobulin on tumor cells in the EMVI positive subset (p ≤ 0.001). There was no association of BRAFV600E or deficient mismatch repair proteins (dMMR) with EMVI. PU1 (OR 0.8, 0.7-0.9) and low PDL1 (OR 1.6, 1.1-2.3) independently predicted EMVI on multivariate logistic regression among all biomarkers examined. CONCLUSION: There is a generalized blunting of immune response in EMVI positive colorectal carcinoma, which may contribute to a worse prognosis. Tumor-associated macrophages seem to play the most significant role in determining EMVI.

Patient Survival With ypT0N+ Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: After neoadjuvant therapy, pathologic analysis of rectal cancer resected specimens may show a complete response in the primary tissue cancer with residual tumor in the lymph nodes (ypT0N+). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the 5-year overall survival and factors associated with survival of ypT0N+ patients with rectal cancer who had neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and to compare these patients' survival with patients in other pathologic categories. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective analysis. SETTINGS: We used the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS: We identified patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery between 2006 and 2016. Besides ypT0N+, 5 pathologic categories were identified: ypT0N0, ypT1-2N0, ypT3-4N0, ypT1-2N+, and ypT3-4N+. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival. RESULTS: We included 30,751 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. A total of 342 patients developed ypT0N+, of whom 181 (52.9%) received total neoadjuvant therapy. Among patients who received total neoadjuvant therapy, developing ypT0N+ was associated with a lower 5-year overall survival than ypT0N0 and ypT1-2N0. However, ypT0N+ disease was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival than ypT3-4N+. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival between ypT0N+ and ypT3-4N0 or ypT1-2N+. Similar findings were noticed among patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with ypT0N+, older age, male gender, and higher number of positive lymph nodes were all associated with a decrease in the overall survival. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the retrospective nature of this study, lack of variables describing the chemotherapy and radiation regimens used, and paucity of data on disease-specific survival or recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Developing ypT0N+ was associated with a lower 5-year overall survival than ypT0N0 and ypT1-2N0. However, it was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival than ypT3-4N+. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B863 . SOBREVIDA DE LOS PACIENTES CON YPTN DESPUS DE LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE EN EL CNCER DE RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Después del tratamiento neoadyuvante en el cáncer de recto bajo, el análisis patológico de la pieza operatoria resecada, puede mostrar una respuesta patológica completa del tumor primario pero con tumor residual en los ganglios linfáticos (ypT0N+).OBJETIVOS:Describir la sobrevida general a 5 años y los factores asociados con la sobrevida de los pacientes ypT0N+ con cáncer de recto, que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía y comparar la sobrevida de estos pacientes con la de pacientes con otros estadios patológicos.DISEÑO:Realizamos un análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Utilizamos la base de datos nacional del cáncer.PACIENTES:Identificamos pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto que se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante total, seguida de cirugía entre 2006 y 2016. Además de ypT0N +, se identificaron 5 categorías patológicas: ypT0N0, ypT1-2N0, ypT3-4N0, ypT1-2N+, e ypT3-4N+.PRINCIPAL MEDIDA DE RESULTADO:La medida de resultado principal fue la supervivencia general a 5 años.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 30.751 pacientes con adenocarcinoma de recto. Un total de 342 pacientes desarrollaron ypT0N+, de los cuales 181 (52,9%) recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total. Entre los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total, el desarrollo de ypT0N+ se asoció con una supervivencia general a 5 años más baja que ypT0N0 e ypT1-2N0. Sin embargo, la enfermedad ypT0N+ se asoció con una supervivencia general a 5 años más alta que ypT3-4N+. No hubo diferencias en la supervivencia global a 5 años entre ypT0N+ y ypT3-4N0 o ypT1-2N+. Se observaron hallazgos similares entre los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y quimioterapia adyuvante. Para los pacientes con ypT0N+, la edad avanzada, el sexo masculino y un mayor número de ganglios linfáticos positivos se asociaron con una disminución en la supervivencia general.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyen la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio, la falta de variables que describan los regímenes de quimioterapia y radiación utilizados y la escasez de datos sobre la supervivencia o la recurrencia específicas de la enfermedad.CONCLUSIONES:El desarrollo de ypT0N+ se asoció con una supervivencia general a 5 años más baja que ypT0N0 e ypT1-2N0. Sin embargo, se asoció con una supervivencia global a 5 años más alta que ypT3-4N+. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B863 . (Traducción-Dr. Rodrigo Azolas ).

Tumour genotypes account for survival differences in right- and left-sided colon cancers.

AIM: We sought to identify genetic differences between right- and left-sided colon cancers and using these differences explain lower survival in right-sided cancers. METHOD: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with colon cancer was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas, a cancer genetics registry with patient and tumour data from 20 North American institutions. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. Predictors for survival were identified using directed acyclic graphs and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 206 right- and 214 left-sided colon cancer patients with 84 recorded deaths were identified. The frequency of mutated alleles differed significantly in 12 of 25 genes between right- and left-sided tumours. Right-sided tumours had worse survival with a hazard ratio of 1.71 (95% confidence interval 1.10-2.64, P = 0.017). The total effect of the genetic loci on survival showed five genes had a sizeable effect on survival: DNAH5, MUC16, NEB, SMAD4, and USH2A. Lasso-penalized Cox regression selected 13 variables for the highest-performing model, which included cancer stage, positive resection margin, and mutated alleles at nine genes: MUC16, USH2A, SMAD4, SYNE1, FLG, NEB, TTN, OBSCN, and DNAH5. Post-selection inference demonstrated that mutations in MUC16 (P = 0.01) and DNAH5 (P = 0.02) were particularly predictive of 5-year overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that genetic mutations may explain survival differences between tumour sites. Further studies on larger patient populations may identify other genes, which could form the foundation for more precise prognostication and treatment decisions beyond current rudimentary TNM staging.

Transfer of virtual reality endoscopy training to live animal colonoscopy: a randomized control trial of proficiency vs. repetition-based training.

BACKGROUND: Low first-time pass rates of the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) exam stimulated development of virtual reality (VR) simulation curricula for test preparation. This study evaluates the transfer of VR endoscopy training to live porcine endoscopy performance and compares the relative effectiveness of a proficiency-based vs repetition-based VR training curriculum. METHODS: Novice endoscopists completed pretesting including the FES manual skills examination and Global Assessment of GI Endoscopic Skills (GAGES) assessment of porcine upper and lower endoscopy. Participants were randomly assigned one of two curricula: proficiency-based or repetition-based. Following curriculum completion, participants post-tested via repeat FES examination and GAGES porcine endoscopy assessments. The two cohorts pre-to-post-test differences were compared using ANCOVA. RESULTS: Twenty-two residents completed the curricula. There were no differences in demographics or clinical endoscopy experience between the groups. The repetition group spent significantly more time on the simulator (repetition: 242.2 min, SD 48.6) compared to the proficiency group (proficiency: 170.0 min, SD 66.3; p = 0.013). There was a significant improvement in porcine endoscopy (pre: 10.6, SD 2.8, post: 16.6, SD 3.4; p < 0.001) and colonoscopy (pre: 10.4, SD 2.7, post: 16.4, SD 4.2; p < 0.001) GAGES scores as well as FES manual skills performance (pre: 270.9, SD 105.5, post: 477.4, SD 68.9; p < 0.001) for the total cohort. There was no difference in post-test GAGES performance or FES manual skills exam performance between the two groups. Both the proficiency and repetition group had a 100% pass rate on the FES skills exam following VR curriculum completion. CONCLUSION: A VR endoscopy curriculum translates to improved performance in upper and lower endoscopy in a live animal model. VR curricula type did not affect FES manual skills examination or live colonoscopy outcomes; however, a proficiency curriculum is less time-consuming and can provide a structured approach to prepare for both the FES exam and clinical endoscopy.

Impact of Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative on Health Care Expenditure in Major Bowel Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative links payments for Medicare beneficiaries during an episode of care (90 days from index surgery). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether major bowel participating Bundled Payments for Care Improvement organizations experience greater cost savings for colectomy while maintaining satisfactory quality outcomes compared to nonparticipating organizations. DESIGN: This is an Analysis of all Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participating hospitals for major bowel procedures (major bowel group) and propensity score-matched against Bundled Payments for Care Improvement organizations that do not include major bowel procedures (nonmajor bowel group) and those that do not participate in any Bundled Payments for Care Improvement program (non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement group). SETTING: Programs accepting Medicare and Medicaid in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients included were major bowel cases in the Medicare Standard Analytic file within Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Groups 329-331 at participating facilities between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2016. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcome measures included average total care expenditure and quality of care (length of stay, morbidity, and mortality) from 3 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: We abstracted 7609 major bowel episodes from 23 major bowel group facilities, 21,872 episodes from nonmajor bowel-matched hospitals, and 19,383 episodes from non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-matched hospitals. From the baseline (January 2011 to June 2012) to final period (July 2015 to June 2016), we noted a $2955 average reduction in care expenditures. The largest decrease in average total episode expenditure occurred within the major bowel group (14% reduction) compared to the other groups (6% reduction for nonmajor bowel and 5% reduction for non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement). Utilizing a generalized estimating equation to adjust for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics, the average total episode expenditure for the major bowel group decreased by $4885 (95% CI $4838-$4932; p < 0.001) compared to $2050 (95% CI $2038-$2061) for the non-Bundled Payments for Care Improvement group. All groups had similar reductions in length of stay, 30-day and 90-day complication rates, and readmission rates. LIMITATIONS: Analyses were limited by the retrospective nature of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Bundled Payments for Care Improvement participation for major bowel procedures resulted in a greater decrease in average total cost per episode of care than in nonparticipating hospitals without compromise in quality of care. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B837.IMPACTO DE LA INICIATIVA BUNDLED PAYMENT AGRUPADOS PARA LA MEJORA DE LA ATENCIÓN DEL GASTO SANITARIO EN LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS INTESTINALES MAYORESANTECEDENTES:La iniciativa de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención vincula los pagos para los beneficiarios de Medicare durante un episodio de atención (90 días desde la cirugía índice).OBJETIVO:Determinar si las principales organizaciones de Bundled Payment para el mejoramiento de la atención relacionados a los procedimientos intestinales experimentan mayores ahorros en los costos para una colectomía manteniendo resultados satisfactorios de calidad en comparación con las organizaciones no participantes.DISEÑO:Análisis de todos los hospitales participantes del programa Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención para procedimientos intestinales mayores (grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores) y puntaje de propensión comparado con las organizaciones que no incluyen dichos procedimientos (grupo que no incluye procedimientos intestinales mayores) y aquellos que no participan en ningún programa de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención (grupo no BPCI).MARCO:Programas que aceptan Medicare y Medicaid en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Casos intestinales mayores en el archivo analítico estándar de Medicare dentro de los grupos relacionados con el diagnóstico 329-331 en los centros participantes entre el 1/1/2011-30/6/2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Gasto total promedio y calidad de la atención (duración de la estadía, morbilidad, mortalidad) desde los 3 días preoperatorio hasta los 90 días postoperatorio.RESULTADOS:Hemos extraído 7609 episodios intestinales mayores de 23 instalaciones del grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores, 21.872 episodios de hospitales del grupo que no incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores y 19.383 episodios de hospitales del grupo no BPCI. Desde la línea de base (1/2011 - 6/2012) hasta el período final (7/2015 - 6/2016), notamos una reducción promedio de $2955 en los gastos de atención. La mayor disminución en el gasto promedio total por episodios ocurrió dentro del grupo que incluyen intestinales mayores (14% de reducción) en comparación con los otros grupos (6% de reducción para el grupo que no incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores, 5% de reducción para el no BPCI). Utilizando una ecuación de estimación generalizada para ajustar los datos demográficos del paciente, las comorbilidades y las características del hospital, el gasto total promedio por episodio para el grupo que incluyen procedimientos intestinales mayores disminuyó en $ 4885 (IC del 95%: $4838-4932; p <0,001) en comparación con $2050 (IC del 95%: $2038-2061) para el grupo que no pertenece al programa BPCI. Todos los grupos tuvieron reducciones similares en la duración de la estancia, tasas de complicaciones de 30/90 días y de readmisión.LIMITACIONES:Análisis limitados por la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:La participación de Bundled Payment para la mejora de la atención en aquellos procedimientos intestinales mayores resultó en una disminución mayor en el costo total promedio por episodio de atención que en los hospitales no participantes, sin comprometer la calidad de la atención. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B837. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto).

Racially Conscious Cancer Screening Guidelines: A Path Towards Culturally Competent Science.

OBJECTIVE: To review the racial composition of the study populations that the current USPSTF screening guidelines for lung, breast, and colorectal cancer are based on, and the effects of their application across non-white individuals. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: USPSTF guidelines commonly become the basis for establishing standards of care, yet providers are often unaware of the racial composition of the study populations they are based on. METHODS: We accessed the USPSTF screening guidelines for lung, breast, and colorectal cancer via their website, and reviewed all referenced publications for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), focusing on the racial composition of their study populations. We then used PubMed to identify publications addressing the generalizability of such guidelines across non-white individuals. Lastly, we reviewed all guidelines published by non-USPSTF organizations to identify the availability of race-specific recommendations. RESULTS: Most RCTs used as basis for the current USPSTF guidelines either did not report race, or enrolled cohorts that were not representative of the U.S. population. Several studies were identified demonstrating the broad application of such guidelines across non-white individuals can lead to underdiagnosis and higher levels of advanced disease. Nearly all guideline-issuing bodies fail to provide race-specific recommendations, despite often acknowledging increased disease burden among non-whites. CONCLUSION: Concerted efforts to overcome limitations in the generalizability of RCTs are required to provide screening guidelines that are truly applicable to non-white populations. Broader policy changes to improve the pipeline for minority populations into science and medicine are needed to address the ongoing lack of diversity in these fields.

Zip Code-Related Income Disparities in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Screening and early detection reduce morbidity and mortality in colorectal cancer. Our aim is to study the effect of income disparities on the clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer in Massachusetts. METHODS: Patients were extracted from a database containing all surgically treated colorectal cancers between 2004 and 2015 at a tertiary hospital in Massachusetts. We split patients into 2 groups: "above-median income" and "below-median income" according to the median income of Massachusetts ($74,167). RESULTS: The analysis included 817 patients. The above-median income group consisted of 528 patients (65%) and the below-median income group consisted of 289 patients (35%). The mean age of presentation was 64 ± 15 years for the above-median income group and 67 ± 15 years for the below-median income group (P = .04). Patients with below-median income were screened less often (P < .001) and presented more frequently with metastatic disease (P = .02). Patients with above-median income survived an estimated 15 months longer than those with below-median income (P < .001). The survival distribution was statistically significantly different between the groups for stage III disease (P = .004), but not stages I, II, or IV (P = 1, 1, and .2, respectively). For stage III disease, a lower proportion of below-median income patients received chemotherapy (61% vs. 79%, P = .002) and a higher proportion underwent nonelective surgery (5% vs. 2%, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: In Massachusetts, patients with colorectal cancer residing in lower income areas are screened less, received adjuvant chemotherapy less, and have worse outcomes, especially when analyzing those who present with stage III disease.