Utility of week one radiographs post total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: We retrospectively analysed 129 consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroplasty at a university-affiliated hospital in Melbourne, Australia between February and September 2011 with respect to the quality of the week one radiographs, placement of the prosthesis and the presence of a peri-prosthetic fracture or dislocation. METHOD: Patient records and radiographs were reviewed to ascertain whether a deviation in routine management occurred based on the information obtained from week one post-operative radiographs. RESULTS: 116 of the 129 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. 115 patients underwent routine week one hip radiographs with a mean time after surgery of 2.5 days. 89 (77%) of these patients had radiographs with a typical post-operative appearance. 26 (23%) had radiographs with an atypical appearance defined by the presence of one or more of the following: offset difference of >10 mm (11%), leg length difference of >10 mm (11%), sub-optimal acetabular component inclination of <30° or >50° (9%), sub-optimal femoral stem position of >5° varus or valgus (2%), sub-optimal femoral Greun cement distribution of 2 or more absent zones (2%), cement extrusion (1%), peri-prosthetic fracture (0) or dislocation (0). None of the routine week one radiographs resulted in a change in early post-operative management. 1 patient underwent non-routine, immediate post-operative radiographs. DISCUSSION: Our study did not demonstrate a case where deviation from standard clinical pathways occurred as a result of routine post-operative radiographs. A higher power study would help the established surgeon to determine whether post-operative radiographs could be performed at a more comfortable and convenient time such as the outpatient setting.

Functional outcome of complex intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus treated through a triceps-sparing approach.

Complex intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (AO/ASIF type C) pose a significant challenge to the treating surgeon. This study aimed to review the functional outcome of these fractures managed with open reduction and internal fixation through a posterior triceps-sparing approach. Nine cases were treated over a 7-year period, with 7 patients available for review. Of note, the majority of cases were accompanied with significant associated injuries, including vascular and soft tissue trauma. A retrospective analysis of a consecutive series, managed by a single surgeon, was conducted at a mean follow-up period of 35.1 months (range, 6-78). The mean age was 41 years (range, 12-73). At the time of review, all fractures had united and the median arc was 90 degrees (range, 70-115). All patients achieved good clinical scores as determined by the Mayo Clinic Performance Index. Quality of life assessment (SF-36) revealed no significant difference compared to the general population. The mean DASH score was 17.9, indicating mild residual impairment. There was no x-ray evidence of heterotopic ossification or post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The posterior triceps-sparing approach provides adequate exposure to the fracture site and allows early rehabilitation. Satisfactory functional outcome can be achieved for complex type C fractures of the distal humerus treated through this approach.

Experienced physiotherapists as gatekeepers to hospital orthopaedic outpatient care.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact, quality and acceptability of a musculoskeletal screening clinic provided by physiotherapists for patients referred to the outpatient orthopaedic department at a major metropolitan hospital. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective observational trial undertaken between 29 November 2005 and 6 June 2006 at the Northern Hospital (a tertiary teaching hospital in outer Melbourne) of 52 patients with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions who were assessed by one of two physiotherapists with postgraduate qualifications and subsequently by an orthopaedic surgeon. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of new patients referred who could have been managed without needing to see a surgeon; level of agreement between physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeon on diagnoses and management decisions; and levels of satisfaction of patients, referring general practitioners and the orthopaedic surgeon with the physiotherapist-led screening initiative. RESULTS: 45 of 52 selected patients (31 women and 21 men; mean age, 53.3 years) attended their appointment with the physiotherapist; of these, 38 also attended a later appointment with the orthopaedic surgeon. Seven of the 38 patients were listed for surgery, and seven others needed management by the surgeon (injection for three, imaging for four). Almost two-thirds (63%) were appropriate for non-surgical management. The physiotherapists identified the same patient management plans as the surgeon for 74% of the group. Patients and doctors reported high levels of satisfaction with the physiotherapist-led service. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two-thirds of patients with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions referred by their GPs to one public outpatient orthopaedic department did not need to see a surgeon at the time of referral, and were appropriately assessed and managed by experienced, qualified physiotherapists.