ITI-007 demonstrates brain occupancy at serotonin 5-HT2A and dopamine D2 receptors and serotonin transporters using positron emission tomography in healthy volunteers.

RATIONALE: Central modulation of serotonin and dopamine underlies efficacy for a variety of psychiatric therapeutics. ITI-007 is an investigational new drug in development for treatment of schizophrenia, mood disorders, and other neuropsychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine brain occupancy of ITI-007 at serotonin 5-HT2A receptors, dopamine D2 receptors, and serotonin transporters using positron emission tomography (PET) in 16 healthy volunteers. METHODS: Carbon-11-MDL100907, carbon-11-raclopride, and carbon-11-3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulfanyl)-benzonitrile) (carbon-11-DASB) were used as the radiotracers for imaging 5-HT2A receptors, D2 receptors, and serotonin transporters, respectively. Brain regions of interest were outlined using magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) with cerebellum as the reference region. Binding potentials were estimated by fitting a simplified reference tissue model to the measured tissue-time activity curves. Target occupancy was expressed as percent change in the binding potentials before and after ITI-007 administration. RESULTS: Oral ITI-007 (10-40 mg) was safe and well tolerated. ITI-007 rapidly entered the brain with long-lasting and dose-related occupancy. ITI-007 (10 mg) demonstrated high occupancy (>80 %) of cortical 5-HT2A receptors and low occupancy of striatal D2 receptors (~12 %). D2 receptor occupancy increased with dose and significantly correlated with plasma concentrations (r (2) = 0.68, p = 0.002). ITI-007 (40 mg) resulted in peak occupancy up to 39 % of striatal D2 receptors and 33 % of striatal serotonin transporters. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide evidence for a central mechanism of action via dopaminergic and serotonergic pathways for ITI-007 in living human brain and valuable information to aid dose selection for future clinical trials.

A phase Ib, dose-finding study of multiple doses of remimazolam (CNS 7056) in volunteers undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: We performed the first multiple dose study of remimazolam designed to assess both the feasibility of maintaining suitable sedation during colonoscopy and reversing the sedative effects of remimazolam with flumazenil. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received fentanyl followed by remimazolam for sedation during colonoscopy. Three dose groups of 15 volunteers each received remimazolam in increasing initial doses, plus top-up doses to maintain sedation for a 30-minute period. In a separate double-blind crossover part of the trial, 6 volunteers were sedated with a single high dose of remimazolam, followed by flumazenil or placebo to reverse the sedation. RESULTS: Successful sedation that was adequate for colonoscopy was achieved in >70% of subjects. After the procedure, subjects rapidly recovered to fully alert, with a median of <10 minutes overall. Failures were due to the inability to sedate or adverse events, with 1 subject failing due to hypotension (arterial blood pressure 80/40) and low SpO2 (<90%). There were no serious adverse events reported, and no events that were unexpected with the combination of a benzodiazepine and fentanyl. The study also showed that sedation was rapidly reversible (1.0 minutes flumazenil vs 10.5 minutes placebo) without resedation. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam has the attributes of a sedative drug, with success rates comparable with recent studies of other drugs. Remimazolam provided adequate sedation in 33 of 44 subjects undergoing colonoscopy, and its sedative effects were easily reversed with flumazenil.

A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics.

BACKGROUND: A new benzodiazepine, remimazolam, metabolized by tissue esterases to an inactive compound, CNS 7054, has been developed to permit a fast onset, a short and more predictable duration of sedative action, and a more rapid recovery profile than with currently available benzodiazepines. We report on the safety and efficacy of the first human study. METHODS: A phase I, single-center, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, randomized, single-dose escalation study was conducted. Up to 10 cohorts of healthy subjects were scheduled to receive a single 1-minute IV infusion of remimazolam, midazolam, or placebo. In the 10 possible cohorts, remimazolam doses were from 0.01 to 0.35 mg/kg. In cohorts 1 to 3, 6 subjects received remimazolam and 1 placebo. From cohort 4 onward, an additional 3 subjects in each cohort received midazolam (0.075 mg/kg). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were measured. A stop criterion of loss of consciousness for >5 minutes in >50% of subjects was predefined. RESULTS: The stop criterion was reached in cohort 9 (0.30 mg/kg remimazolam) so that 81 subjects were enrolled. Remimazolam was well tolerated in all dose cohorts, and no serious adverse events (AEs) were reported. Three AEs of mild (Spo(2) 85%-88%) hemoglobin desaturation (2 in the remimazolam groups and 1 in the midazolam group) resolved spontaneously, and 1 AE of moderate hemoglobin desaturation (Spo(2) 75%) resolved with a chin lift in the highest remimazolam dose group. No supplemental oxygen or manual ventilation was required. Vital signs remained stable throughout, although there was an increase in heart rate 2 minutes postdose for both remimazolam and midazolam. There were no reports of hypo- or hypertension. The pharmacokinetic behavior of remimazolam was linear and its systemic clearance approximately 3 times that of midazolam. Clearance was essentially independent of body weight. A rapid onset and dose-dependent sedation was observed after administration of remimazolam at 0.05 mg/kg and higher. Remimazolam (0.075 to 0.20 mg/kg) induced peak sedation levels similar to or higher than those achieved with midazolam (0.075 mg/kg). Median recovery times after approximately equieffective doses of remimazolam (0.10 and 0.15 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.075 mg/kg) were 10 and 40 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Remimazolam provided sedation with rapid onset and offset, and was well tolerated. There was no supplemental oxygen or ventilation required. On the basis of these data, further studies on the potential utility of remimazolam for sedation/anesthesia are warranted.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of single intravenous dose of MGAWN1, a novel monoclonal antibody to West Nile virus.

West Nile Virus (WNV) is a neurotropic flavivirus that can cause debilitating diseases, such as encephalitis, meningitis, or flaccid paralysis. We report the safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (MGAWN1) targeting the E protein of WNV in a phase 1 study, the first to be performed on humans. A single intravenous infusion of saline or of MGAWN1 at escalating doses (0.3, 1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg of body weight) was administered to 40 healthy volunteers (30 receiving MGAWN1; 10 receiving placebo). Subjects were evaluated on days 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 56, 91, 120, and 180 by clinical assessments, clinical laboratory studies, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assays. All 40 subjects tolerated the infusion of the study drug, and 39 subjects completed the study. One serious adverse event of schizophrenia occurred in the 0.3-mg/kg cohort. One grade 3 neutropenia occurred in the 3-mg/kg cohort. Six MGAWN1-treated subjects experienced 11 drug-related adverse events, including diarrhea (1 subject), chest discomfort (1), oral herpes (1), rhinitis (1), neutropenia (2), leukopenia (1), dizziness (1), headache (2), and somnolence (1). In the 30-mg/kg cohort, MGAWN1 had a half-life of 26.7 days and a maximum concentration in serum (C(max)) of 953 microg/ml. This study suggests that single infusions of MGAWN1 up to 30 mg/kg appear to be safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects. The C(max) of 953 microg/ml exceeds the target level in serum estimated from hamster studies by 28-fold and should provide excess WNV neutralizing activity and penetration into the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Further evaluation of MGAWN1 for the treatment of West Nile virus infections is warranted.

Effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of maribavir in healthy adults.

Maribavir, an oral antiviral drug with activity against cytomegalovirus, is currently undergoing studies to assess its efficacy and safety as cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following stem cell or solid organ transplantation. The main objective of this study was to assess the effects of oral ketoconazole, a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isoenzyme, on the pharmacokinetics of maribavir. This was an open-label crossover study with 20 healthy adults. Subjects were administered a single dose of maribavir at 400 mg. After a washout period, subjects received a single dose of ketoconazole at 400 mg followed by a single dose of maribavir. Blood samples were collected for each drug sequence, and pharmacokinetic parameters for maribavir and its principal metabolite, VP 44469, were determined. Safety was evaluated by physical examination, clinical laboratory testing, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and monitoring for adverse events. Ketoconazole moderately reduced the clearance of both maribavir and VP 44469; oral clearance values were 35% and 13% lower, respectively, for maribavir-plus-ketoconazole treatment than for maribavir alone. Based on the assumption of complete inhibition of CYP3A4 activity, CYP3A4 is responsible for 35% of the overall clearance of maribavir. Treatment was generally well tolerated. The most-common adverse event was dysgeusia (taste disturbance), reported by nine (47%) and seven (35%) subjects in the maribavir alone and maribavir-plus-ketoconazole groups, respectively. The pharmacokinetic findings, in combination with the acceptable tolerability within the maribavir and maribavir-plus-ketoconazole treatment groups, suggest that no dose adjustment of maribavir is necessary when coadministered with CYP3A4 inhibitors or substrates.

The effect on heart rate of combining single-dose fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator fingolimod (FTY720) is known to elicit a negative chronotropic effect at treatment initiation that attenuates over time with continued dosing. The authors determined the effect of combining a single dose of fingolimod with steady-state atenolol or diltiazem on heart rate and mean arterial pressure. METHODS: In a partially randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, three-period, crossover study, 25 healthy subjects received (1) a single oral 5-mg dose of fingolimod, (2) either 50 mg atenolol or 240 mg diltiazem once daily for 5 days, and (3) the antihypertensive for 5 days and a single dose of fingolimod on day 5. Telemetry and pharmacokinetic data were collected. RESULTS: The daytime mean heart rate nadir was 15% lower when fingolimod was combined with atenolol (42 +/- 7 bpm) compared with fingolimod alone (51 +/- 9 bpm) yielding a combination/monotherapy ratio of 0.85 (90%CI, 0.79-0.92). The daytime mean heart rate nadir from fingolimod alone (55 +/- 5 bpm) was not altered when combined with diltiazem (56 +/- 8 bpm) yielding a ratio of 0.99 (0.94-1.05). There was no clinically relevant change in mean arterial pressure when fingolimod was administered with atenolol or diltiazem compared with administration of the drugs alone in normotensive subjects. The pharmacokinetics of the drugs were not altered during coadministration. CONCLUSION: Adding fingolimod to a beta-blocker such as atenolol resulted in a moderately lower mean heart rate nadir compared with fingolimod alone. However, subjects who had a stronger negative chronotropic response to fingolimod alone (nadir < 50 bpm) had minimal or no further reduction in heart rate with the drug combination. Adding fingolimod to a calcium channel blocker such as diltiazem did not further lower the heart rate compared to fingolimod alone.

Effects of the neurokinin1 receptor antagonist aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone.

BACKGROUND: Aprepitant is a neurokinin(1) receptor antagonist that, in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) receptor antagonist, has been shown to be very effective in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. At doses used for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, aprepitant is a moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A4 and may be used in conjunction with corticosteroids such as dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, which are substrates of cytochrome P4503A4. The effects of aprepitant on the these 2 corticosteroids were evaluated. METHODS: Study 1 was an open-label, randomized, incomplete-block, 3-period crossover study with 20 subjects. Treatment A consisted of a standard oral dexamethasone regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (20 mg dexamethasone on day 1, 8 mg dexamethasone on days 2 to 5). Treatment B was used to examine the effects of oral aprepitant (125 mg aprepitant on day 1, 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 to 5) on the standard dexamethasone regimen. Treatment C was used to examine the effects of aprepitant on a modified dexamethasone regimen (12 mg dexamethasone on day 1, 4 mg dexamethasone on days 2 to 5). All subjects also received 32 mg ondansetron intravenously on day 1 only. Study 2 was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-period crossover study with 10 subjects. Subjects in one group received a regimen consisting of 125 mg methylprednisolone intravenously on day 1 and 40 mg methylprednisolone orally on days 2 to 3. Subjects in the other group received oral aprepitant (125 mg aprepitant on day 1, 80 mg aprepitant on days 2 to 3) in addition to the methylprednisolone regimen. RESULTS: In study 1, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24)) of oral dexamethasone on days 1 and 5 after the standard dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment A) was increased 2.2-fold (P <.010) with coadministration of aprepitant (treatment B). Coadministration of aprepitant with the modified dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment C) resulted in an AUC0-24 for dexamethasone similar to that observed after the standard dexamethasone plus ondansetron regimen (treatment A). In study 2, aprepitant increased the AUC0-24 of intravenous methylprednisolone 1.3-fold on day 1 (P <.010) and increased the AUC0-24 of oral methylprednisolone 2.5-fold on day 3 (P <.010). CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of aprepitant with dexamethasone or methylprednisolone resulted in increased plasma concentrations of the corticosteroids. These findings suggest that the dose of these corticosteroids should be adjusted when given with aprepitant.