Molecular Imaging for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious, potentially life-threatening condition. Currently, the modified Duke criteria is used to assist with the diagnosis of IE, but it can still remain difficult. Growing data supports the potential use of molecular imaging to assist in the diagnosis of IE. Our objective was to understand the potential utility of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), 67Ga citrate and radiolabeled white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy in the diagnosis of IE. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the use of all 3 modalities in IE was conducted. The literature search identified 2753 articles. A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria (10 for 18F-FDG, 3 for WBC and 1 for both modalities). No 67Ga citrate study met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity of 18F-FDG studies with adequate cardiac preparation for the diagnosis of IE was 81% (95% CI, 73%-86%) and pooled specificity was 85% (95% CI, 78%-91%). There was good overall accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.897. Pooled sensitivity of WBC for the diagnosis of IE was 86% (95% CI, 77%-92%) and pooled specificity was 97% (95% CI, 92%-99%). The overall accuracy of WBC was excellent with an AUC of 0.957. CONCLUSIONS: Both 18F-FDG and WBC have good sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the diagnosis of IE. Both modalities are useful in the investigation of IE, and should be considered in cases where the diagnosis is uncertain.

Positron Emission Tomography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in the Diagnosis of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is increasing, and their associated infections result in significant morbidity and mortality. The introduction of better cardiac imaging techniques could be useful for diagnosing this condition and guiding therapy. Our objective was to systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of Fluor-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography, labeled leukocyte scintigraphy (LS), and Gallium-67 citrate scintigraphy for the diagnosis of CIED infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the use of all 3 modalities in CIED infection were conducted. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves of each imaging modalities were determined. The literature search identified 2493 articles. A total of 13 articles (11 studies for 18F-FDG PET-CT and 2 for LS), met the inclusion criteria. No studies for 67Ga citrate scintigraphy met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET-CT for the diagnosis of CIED infection was 87% (95% CI, 82%-91%) and pooled specificity was 94% (95% CI, 88%-98%). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated good overall accuracy, with an area under the curve of 0.935. There were insufficient data to do a meta-analysis for LS, but both studies reported sensitivity above 90% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Both 18F-FDG PET-CT and LS yield high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and thus seem to be useful for the diagnosis of CIED infection, based on robust data for 18F-FDG PET-CT but limited data for LS. When available,18F-FDG PET-CT may be preferred.

Alpha Angle Measurements in Healthy Adult Volunteers Vary Depending on the MRI Plane Acquisition Used.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that cam deformities are located at a more anterosuperior location than was previously described. PURPOSE: To establish, in a large group of asymptomatic participants, the normative range of the alpha angle in the anterosuperior location in both the oblique axial and radial views of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: In 197 asymptomatic participants (394 asymptomatic hips) with a mean age of 29.4 years (range, 21.4-50.6 years), T1-weighted MRI scans were studied. The anterosuperior alpha angle measurement was performed by 2 observers using a previously described methodology and also using the radial view. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was determined for interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Descriptive statistics, the Student t test, correlation studies, and the Bland-Altman technique were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The ICC for interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility was 0.74 (good agreement) and 0.84 (very good agreement), respectively. Anterosuperiorly, the mean (±SD) alpha angles in the oblique axial and radial views were 45.11° ± 8.52° and 50.30° ± 7.91°, respectively ( P < .0001). The upper limits of the 95% reference interval for the oblique axial and radial views were 63° and 66°, respectively. In the oblique axial view, the mean (±SD) alpha angle for male participants was 48.3° ± 7.5° compared with 42.6° ± 6.2° for female participants ( P < .0001), and in the radial view, it was 53.0° ± 7.1° compared with 48.1° ± 5.6°, respectively ( P < .0001). Linear regression analysis demonstrated an insignificant relationship between age and alpha angle, regardless of the imaging plane ( r2 = 0.06). CONCLUSION: We suggest using a higher threshold of 63° (in the oblique axial view) and 66° (in the radial view) at the 1:30 clockface position for the diagnosis of a cam-type deformity. This is significantly higher than 50° to 55° at the 3-o'clock position traditionally used based on the oblique axial view that has been initially described.

Comparing alternative design options for chronic disease prevention interventions.

BACKGROUND: While the randomized clinical trial is considered to provide the highest level of evidence in clinical medicine, its superiority to other study designs in the context of prevention studies is debated. The purpose of this review was (i) to gather evidence about challenges facing both randomized controlled trials and observational designs for the conduct of population-based chronic disease prevention interventions and (ii) to consider the suitability of recently proposed hybrid designs for population-based prevention intervention studies. METHODS: Rapid review methods were employed for this study. Articles published within 2007-2012, were included if they: (i) discussed challenges or benefits related to any intervention study design, (ii) compared randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational designs or (iii) introduced a new study design potentially applicable to population-based interventions. After initial screening, papers retained for inclusion were subjected to content analysis and synthesis. RESULTS: A total of 35 included articles were reviewed and used for synthesis. Both RCTs and observational studies are subject to multiple challenges, the main being external and internal validity for RCTs and observational designs, respectively. Four new hybrid designs identified. CONCLUSION: Although any high quality design can produce high level of evidence, multiple challenges with prevention intervention RCTs or observational studies identified. New hybrid designs that carry benefits of randomized and observational methods may be the road ahead for to assess the effects of population-based interventions.

Differentiation of lipoma from liposarcoma on MRI using texture and shape analysis.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine if differentiation of lipoma from liposarcoma on magnetic resonance imaging can be improved using computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four histologically proven lipomatous tumors (24 lipomas and 20 liposarcomas) were studied retrospectively. Studies were performed at 1.5T and included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2-fat-suppressed, short inversion time inversion recovery, and contrast-enhanced sequences. Two experienced musculoskeletal radiologists blindly and independently noted their degree of confidence in malignancy using all available images/sequences for each patient. For CAD, tumors were segmented in three dimensions using T1-weighted images. Gray-level co-occurrence and run-length matrix textural features, as well as morphological features, were extracted from each tumor volume. Combinations of shape and textural features were used to train multiple, linear discriminant analysis classifiers. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each classifier for delineating lipoma from liposarcoma using 10-fold cross-validation. Diagnostic accuracy of the two radiologists was determined using contingency tables. Interreader agreement was evaluated by Cohen kappa. RESULTS: Using optimum-threshold criteria, CAD produced superior values (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are 85%, 96%, and 91%, respectively) compared to radiologist A (75%, 83%, and 80%) and radiologist B (80%, 75%, and 77%). Interreader agreement between radiologists was substantial (kappa [95% confidence interval]=0.69 [0.48-0.90]). CONCLUSIONS: CAD may help radiologists distinguish lipoma from liposarcoma.

Effectiveness of individual-focused interventions to prevent chronic disease.

BACKGROUND: The burden of chronic disease is projected to assume crisis proportions in most parts of the world by the middle of the century, focusing attention on the need for preventive interventions. We identify and review published research on primary prevention individual-level interventions in current practice and describe and discuss the limitations of the current evidence. The report facilitates prioritizing a research agenda for potential interventions that might be investigated within cohort studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a rapid review. Computerized database searches (PubMed and EMBASE) were performed in October 2012 to identify articles on primary prevention interventions that are directed at the individual level. Potentially, relevant International Agency of Research on Cancer handbooks and monographs were also reviewed. The review includes articles reported in English on the efficacy or effectiveness of a preventive intervention in an adult population. It excludes articles on alcohol or tobacco smoking. RESULTS: Many chronic disease interventions directed at individuals report a protective effect in the short term and some evidence for the efficacy of chemoprevention in chronic disease prevention exists. Evidence these effects persist in the longer term is inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: There are currently only limited evidence-based preventions for most chronic diseases, for which a summary is available in Table A1 (see Appendix B). Most individual-level intervention research studies have been conducted using case-control designs and some small, randomized studies. There are fewer impediments to lifestyle modifications when compared to prevention using chemoprevention and vaccination or other methods of prevention of persistent infection.

Modes of delivery in preventive intervention studies: a rapid review.

BACKGROUND: This review was commissioned to generate broad discussion about how to select intervention delivery modes when designing a complex, preventive intervention aimed at chronic disease through the promotion of physical activity, healthy diet and/or medication adherence. In this context, we asked, what are the delivery modes? What are the important design considerations? And how do these compare (e.g. strengths, limitations)? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This review utilized the methods of rapid review, an emerging methodology arising from health technology assessment. The search strategy was applied in Embase and MEDLINE. A qualitative, narrative synthesis was performed on included articles. RESULTS: After screening, 21 articles remained for synthesis (10 systematic reviews, including 1 review of reviews; four trials or studies; three commentaries or conference proceedings; and 2 were scoping projects). Our synthesis determined that major categories of design considerations when selecting intervention delivery modes include attention to the (i) candidate mode types, (ii) settings and social environment, (iii) intensity and timing, (iv) provider, (v) study population and participants, (vi) cost, (vii) behaviour change technique and (viii) theoretical basis. CONCLUSION: An array of modes of delivery is available for each of the intervention strategies under consideration (i.e. physical activity, dietary change and medication adherence). No single delivery mode was clearly more appropriate or more effective than another, each having unique strengths and limitations. Delivery mode decisions that take the above-mentioned factors (i-viii) into account will be more fit-for-purpose than those that do not.