ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy. BACKGROUND DATA: Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis. Open Appendectomy (OA) has its complications rates (10-20%) and negative explorations in young women are about 25-30%. Acute appendicitis has a 3.1% morbidity and with perforation up to 47.2% and a mortality rate less than 1%. Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been shown in many studies with lower intraoperatory and postoperatory complications, less hospitalization days, lower pain and faster return to daily activities when its compared with OA. METHODS: We perform a retrospective and descriptive trial with 1,883 patients with acute appendicitis between January 2000 to September 2004. Patients smaller than 15 years old and with other postoperatory diagnosis were excluded. Ji2 and t Student statistic tests were performed. RESULTS: We obtained 1,272 patients with acute appendicitis, 49% male and 51% female. LA was performed in 732 patients, 46.1% male and 53.9% female and OA was performed in 541 patients, 52.6% male and 47.3% female. Similar midage patients in both groups. LS was performed in 180 patients with complicated appendicitis and 116 patients by OA. LA was converted to open surgery in 4.5% patients. Morbidity was lower for laparoscopic group with statistical difference. There were no difference in fasting and hospitalization days. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure is a good choice for differential diagnosis overall in young women and complicated appendicitis with lower morbidity than the OA.
Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lipomas are the most frequent benign tumors of the digestive tract and 50% are localized in the colon. Most are found submucosally and may vary in their incidence, localization, symptoms and pathogenesis, making diagnosis difficult. We undertook this study to learn the different presentations of an ileocecal valve (ICV) lipoma and conduct a review of the literature due to this uncommon location. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 78-year-old female with intermittent small bowel occlusion, abdominal distention and constipation. Colonoscopy showed a submucous tumor at the ICV, CT scan showed a tumor at the ICV with fat density. Laparotomy was performed with primary resection of the lesion by cecotomy, frozen section was reported as nonmalignant so a primary closure without ICV involvement was achieved. Definitive pathology revealed a benign lipoma. CONCLUSION: It is important to know the different presentations of these benign tumors because if there is mucosal ulceration they can be mistaken for a malignant lesion and lead to greater resections. Resection is necessary if they are symptomatic or >2 cm.
Subject(s)
Ileal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Ileocecal Valve , Lipoma/diagnosis , Aged , Female , Humans , Ileal Neoplasms/complications , Ileal Neoplasms/surgery , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Lipoma/complications , Lipoma/surgeryABSTRACT
Introducción: los lipomas son los tumores benignos más frecuentes en tubo digestivo y hasta 50 % se encuentra en el colon. La mayoría son submucosos y varían de acuerdo a su incidencia, localización, sintomatología y patogénesis, lo que dificulta su diagnóstico. Nuestro objetivo fue conocer las diferentes manifestaciones clínicas causadas por un lipoma en la válvula ileocecal, y hacer una revisión de la literatura de esta localización poco frecuente. Caso clínico: mujer de 78 años que presentó cuadros repetidos de oclusión intestinal parcial con distensión abdominal, constipación y obstipación. Se realizó colonoscopia que mostró tumoración submucosa de 30 mm en válvula ileocecal; la tomografía computarizada de abdomen mostró tumoración nodular de densidad grasa en válvula ileocecal. La paciente fue sometida a laparotomía exploradora y cecotomía, donde se identificó y resecó tumoración submucosa, la cual fue enviada a estudio transoperatorio; dado que se trató de una tumoración benigna, se respetó la válvula ileocecal y se realizó cierre primario. El reporte histopatológico definitivo fue lipoma, negativo para malignidad. Conclusiones: es importante conocer las distintas formas de presentación de los lipomas, ya que fácilmente pueden confundirse con lesiones malignas (sobre todo si existe ulceración de la mucosa) y someter al paciente a procedimientos mayores. Sólo deben resecarse si producen síntomas o son mayores a 2 cm.
BACKGROUND: Lipomas are the most frequent benign tumors of the digestive tract and 50% are localized in the colon. Most are found submucosally and may vary in their incidence, localization, symptoms and pathogenesis, making diagnosis difficult. We undertook this study to learn the different presentations of an ileocecal valve (ICV) lipoma and conduct a review of the literature due to this uncommon location. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 78-year-old female with intermittent small bowel occlusion, abdominal distention and constipation. Colonoscopy showed a submucous tumor at the ICV, CT scan showed a tumor at the ICV with fat density. Laparotomy was performed with primary resection of the lesion by cecotomy, frozen section was reported as nonmalignant so a primary closure without ICV involvement was achieved. Definitive pathology revealed a benign lipoma. CONCLUSION: It is important to know the different presentations of these benign tumors because if there is mucosal ulceration they can be mistaken for a malignant lesion and lead to greater resections. Resection is necessary if they are symptomatic or >2 cm.
