Interaction of Drosophila acetylcholinesterases with D-tubocurarine: an explanation of the activation by an inhibitor.

Homotropic cooperativity in Drosophila melanogaster acetylcholinesterase seems to be a consequence of an initial substrate binding to a high-affinity peripheral substrate binding site situated around the negative charge of D413 (G335, Torpedo numbering). An appropriate mutation which turns the peripheral binding site to a low-affinity spot abolishes apparent activation but improves the overall enzyme effectiveness. This contradiction can be explained as less effective inhibition due to a shorter occupation of such a peripheral site. A similar effect can be achieved by an appropriate peripheral inhibitor such as TC, which can in special cases, when less effective heterotropic inhibition prevails over homotropic, acts as an activator. At the highest substrate concentrations, however, these enzymes are always inhibited, although steric components may influence the strength of inhibition like in the F368G mutant (F290, Torpedo numbering). Cooperative effects thus may include a steric component, but covering of the entrance must affect influx and efflux to different extents.

Progress curves analysis as an alternative for exploration of activation-inhibition phenomena in cholinesterases.

The kinetic behaviour of insect acetylcholinesterases deviates from the Michaelis-Menten pattern. These deviations are known as activation or inhibition at various substrate concentrations and can be more or less observable depending on mutations around the active site of the enzyme. Most kinetic studies on these enzymes still rely on initial rate measurements. It is demonstrated here that according to this method one of the deviations can be overlooked. We attempt to point out that in such cases a detailed step-by-step progress curves analysis is successful. The study is focused on two different methods of analysing progress curves: (i) the first one is based on an integrated initial rate equation which can sufficiently fit truncated progress curves under corresponding conditions; and (ii) the other one precludes the algebraic formulae, but uses numerical integration for searching a non analytical solution of ordinary differential equations describing a kinetic model. All methods are tested on three different acetylcholinesterase mutants from Drosophila melanogaster. The results indicate that kinetic parameters for the E107K mutant with highly expressive activation and inhibition can be well evaluated applying any analysis method. It is quite different for E107W and E107Y mutants where latent activation is present, but discovered only using one or the other progress curves analysis methods.