Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Heliyon ; 10(5): e27370, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38463808

ABSTRACT

Background: We conducted a phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing safety and efficacy of RCP recombinant spike protein Covid-19 vaccine to BBIBP (Sinopharm). Methods: Adult Iranian population received RCP or BBIBP in a randomized, double blind and an additional non-randomized open labeled trial arms. Eligible participants signed a written informed consent and received two intramuscular injections three weeks apart. In the randomized arm, an intranasal dose of vaccine or adjuvant-only preparation were given to the RCP and BBIBP recipients at day 51 respectively. Participants were actively followed for up to 4 months for safety and efficacy outcomes. Primary outcome was PCR + symptomatic Covid-19 disease two weeks after the second dose. The non-inferiority margin was 10% of reported BBIBP vaccine efficacy (HR = 1.36). Results: We recruited 23,110 participants (7224 in the randomized and 15,886 in the non-randomized arm). We observed 604 primary outcome events during 4 months of active follow-up including 121 and 133 in the randomized and 157 and 193 cases in the non-randomized arms among recipients of RCP and BBIBP respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for the primary outcome in those receiving RCP compared with BBIBP interval were 0.91 (0.71-1.16) and 0.62 (0.49-0.77) in the randomized and non-randomized arms respectively. The upper boundary of 99.1% confidence interval of HR = 0.91 (0.67-1.22) remained below the margin of non-inferiority in the randomized arm after observing the early stopping rules using O'Brien Fleming method. Conclusion: Our study showed that the RCP efficacy is non-inferior and its safety profile is comparable to the BBIBP.

2.
Clin Lab ; 70(1)2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38213201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The goal was to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of two commonly used biocides, chlorhexidine, and benzalkonium chloride, against MDR isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Escherichia coli ST131, as well as the prevalence of resistance genes. METHODS: MIC of chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride and their effects on both the planktonic phase and biofilm were determined. Finally, the presence of genes responsible for resistance to quaternary ammonium compounds was investigated by PCR. RESULTS: No significant relationship was observed between the presence of resistance genes and different concentrations of quaternary ammonium compounds (benzalkonium chloride). There was no association between biofilm formation and the presence of resistance genes. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorhexidine digluconate and benzalkonium chloride at appropriate concentrations could prevent biofilm formation.


Subject(s)
Benzalkonium Compounds , Chlorhexidine , Humans , Chlorhexidine/pharmacology , Benzalkonium Compounds/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genetics , Escherichia coli/genetics , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...