Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(8): 102070, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33484934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine growth restriction is a leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Using enoxaparin may enhance the placental circulation and improve the intrauterine growth. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in treatment of intra-uterine growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN: 125 women with intrauterine growth restriction were randomized to control group and intervention group (receiving routine high risk pregnancy prenatal care plus daily subcutaneous injection of 40 mg enoxaparin). Prolongation of pregnancy, fetal birth weight, fetal outcome and enoxaparin side effects were compared in 2 groups. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar in 2 groups. Mean gestational age at delivery was 36.73(±2.71) in enoxaparin group and 36.85(±2.17) in control group which showed no statistically significant difference. Mean fetal birth weight had also no statistically significant difference in enoxaparin and control group (2370.16 ± 580.72 g versus 2456.07 ± 543.06 g). Rate of betamethasone administration, intubation, NICU admission, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, intra-ventricular hemorrhage, hypoglycemia and low apgar score were similar in two groups. No major adverse effect was seen. CONCLUSION: Enoxaparin did not prolong the pregnancy and fetal birth weight and did not improve the fetal outcome even in patients with impaired baseline Doppler findings.


Subject(s)
Enoxaparin/pharmacology , Fetal Growth Retardation/drug therapy , Adult , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods
2.
Int J Prev Med ; 10: 24, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30820311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis are two methods for prenatal diagnosis. The goal of this study was to compare amniocentesis and CVS-related complications in a large sample of Iranian women. METHODS: Medical records of 1624 women who underwent amniocentesis or CVS due to medical indications between 2008 and 2016 were reviewed. Data regarding age, gravidity, parity, gestational age, type of procedure, neonatal weight (and percentile), trisomia, abortion, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), severe IUGR, preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension were recorded. RESULTS: Finally, 1215 cases were evaluated. Mean maternal age, gravidity, and gestational age were significantly different between two groups. Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, IUGR, severe IUGR, and intrauterine fetal death were not significantly different between two groups. Trisomy 18 and 21 were common in cases underwent amniocentesis. CONCLUSIONS: Women who underwent CVS are not at higher risk for developing hypertensive disorders than women underwent amniocentesis.

3.
Acta Med Iran ; 55(8): 536-537, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29034653

ABSTRACT

Achondroplasia is an autosomal dominant disease which is characterized by limb shortening and narrow trunk, and macrocephaly. Women with achondroplasia suffer from infertility, menorrhagia, dysmenorrhoea, leiomyomata and early menopause. Our case was a 26-year-old woman with achondroplasia who had scoliosis and osteoporosis. She referred to our clinic at 9 weeks of gestation and had all screenings completely. She had a single female fetus with no abnormalities. She had an emergent due to rupture of membranes at 37 weeks and 3 days under general anesthesia. The neonate had no complications. The first minute Apgar score was 9 and 5th-minute Apgar score were 10. Umbilical artery Ph was 7.26 and birth weight was 3140. A woman with achondroplasia could have a normal pregnancy and give birth to a healthy term neonate under precise screening.


Subject(s)
Achondroplasia/complications , Pregnancy Outcome , Adult , Anesthesia, General , Apgar Score , Birth Weight , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy
4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 25(7): 1021-4, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to determine the comparative efficacy of probiotic yoghurt and clindamycin in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women in the third trimester. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This randomized clinical trial was performed as an open-label study. 310 symptomatic patients with BV were recruited. Diagnosis of BV was through Amsel criteria. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either probiotic yoghurt (100 g twice a day/week) or orally administered clindamycin (300 mg twice a day/week). RESULTS: Ten patients in probiotic group and 9 subjects in clindamycin group had symptom recurrence (p > 0.05). 132 patients in probiotic group and 105 subjects in clindamycin group had pH decrease (p < 0.0001). 140 patients in probiotic group and 141 subjects in clindamycin group had complete symptomatic cure (p > 0.05). Twelve patients in probiotic group and seven subjects in clindamycin group had preterm birth. Nine women in probiotic group and five subjects in clindamycin group had PROM (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to the obtained results, it may be concluded that probiotics would have a good efficacy in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy leading to decreased burden of subsequent preterm birth.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clindamycin/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Vaginosis, Bacterial/therapy , Yogurt/microbiology , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Premature Birth/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...