Reirradiation salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose brachytherapy / Radioterapia de rescate con reirradiación para el cáncer de próstata recurrente después de braquiterapia primaria de dosis baja

Purpose: Local recurrence of prostate cancer after low-dose rate brachytherapy is a clinical problem with limited salvage treatment options. This prospective study evaluated the tolerability and outcome of salvage external beam radiation therapy (S-EBRT) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). Materials and methods: Between October 2012 and 2022, 18 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary LDR-BT and received S-EBRT. We evaluated biochemical failure (BF), overall survival (OS) and acute/late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0 or CTCAE v4, only before 2017). Results: Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5–124). The median age was at S-EBRT 68 years (range 59–79). 34% (6/18) were low risk, 44% (8/18) intermediate risk, 5% (1/18) high risk, and 17% (3/18) not specified. All patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and received 60 Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate and 40% (7/18) 55.2 Gy (2,3 Gy/fx) to the seminal vesicles. 56% received ADT The 3-year OS and biochemical relapse-free survival after S-EBRT were 100% and 89%, respectively, with a median PSA nadir 0,035 ng/mL (0,01–0,34). Acute cystitis was present in 72% (13/18) of patients (27% of Grade > 2). Urethritis was present in 78% (14/18) patients (16% of cases Grade > 3), and acute rectitis occurred in 22% (4/18) of patients (no cases Grade > 3). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer with S-EBRT could provide adequate disease control safely and be used as an additional treatment in the natural history of prostate cancer patients. However, the results are still early and the sample is small; larger studies with longer follow-up would be mandatory.(AU)

Reirradiation salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Local recurrence of prostate cancer after low-dose rate brachytherapy is a clinical problem with limited salvage treatment options. This prospective study evaluated the tolerability and outcome of salvage external beam radiation therapy (S-EBRT) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2012 and 2022, 18 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary LDR-BT and received S-EBRT. We evaluated biochemical failure (BF), overall survival (OS) and acute/late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0 or CTCAE v4, only before 2017). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5-124). The median age was at S-EBRT 68 years (range 59-79). 34% (6/18) were low risk, 44% (8/18) intermediate risk, 5% (1/18) high risk, and 17% (3/18) not specified. All patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and received 60 Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate and 40% (7/18) 55.2 Gy (2,3 Gy/fx) to the seminal vesicles. 56% received ADT The 3-year OS and biochemical relapse-free survival after S-EBRT were 100% and 89%, respectively, with a median PSA nadir 0,035 ng/mL (0,01-0,34). Acute cystitis was present in 72% (13/18) of patients (27% of Grade > 2). Urethritis was present in 78% (14/18) patients (16% of cases Grade > 3), and acute rectitis occurred in 22% (4/18) of patients (no cases Grade > 3). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer with S-EBRT could provide adequate disease control safely and be used as an additional treatment in the natural history of prostate cancer patients. However, the results are still early and the sample is small; larger studies with longer follow-up would be mandatory.

Making Radiation Oncology specialty more attractive to young medical graduates: pulling back the invisibility curtain

Purpose Radiation Oncology is one of the least-known medical specialties for young graduates at the end of their studies. An in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the Radiation Oncology visibility, the training plan, and why it is less attractive for new medical residents during the last years appears as the initial need to turn out this lack of knowledge. Materials and Methods An anonymous pilot survey of 24 questions addressed to specialists in-training in Radiation Oncology in Spain during August and September of 2022. Results A total of 50 in-training radiation oncologists answered the questionnaire and 90% of them believe that a lack of knowledge, mainly at the School of Medicine, was a major reason why choosing Radiation Oncology was unattractive. All responders were satisfied by choosing Radiation Oncology, and 76% were in favor of extending the residency to 5 years to improve their training. Research activity was considered essential (78%) to complete their training. Conclusion Increasing the presence of Radiation Oncology at the School of Medicine may be one solution to achieve greater attractiveness among future residents. Likewise, extending the training period to five years could help to enhance the learning of all radiotherapy techniques while promoting clinical research (AU)

Making Radiation Oncology specialty more attractive to young medical graduates: pulling back the invisibility curtain.

PURPOSE: Radiation Oncology is one of the least-known medical specialties for young graduates at the end of their studies. An in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the Radiation Oncology visibility, the training plan, and why it is less attractive for new medical residents during the last years appears as the initial need to turn out this lack of knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous pilot survey of 24 questions addressed to specialists in-training in Radiation Oncology in Spain during August and September of 2022. RESULTS: A total of 50 in-training radiation oncologists answered the questionnaire and 90% of them believe that a lack of knowledge, mainly at the School of Medicine, was a major reason why choosing Radiation Oncology was unattractive. All responders were satisfied by choosing Radiation Oncology, and 76% were in favor of extending the residency to 5 years to improve their training. Research activity was considered essential (78%) to complete their training. CONCLUSION: Increasing the presence of Radiation Oncology at the School of Medicine may be one solution to achieve greater attractiveness among future residents. Likewise, extending the training period to five years could help to enhance the learning of all radiotherapy techniques while promoting clinical research.

Haematological and renal toxicity of radiation therapy in neuroblastoma paediatric patients

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the renal and hematologic toxicity in paediatric patients with adrenal high-risk neuroblastoma who have received radiation therapy (RT) as part of radical treatment. Material and methods Pediatric patients diagnosed with high-risk adrenal neuroblastoma who received RT as part of the definitive treatment between January 2004 and May 2020 in a single institution were selected. Complete blood counts (CBC) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) pre-RT and post-RT were compared through the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and correlated with survival analysis by Cox regression. Results Forty-two children with a median age of 3 years at diagnosis and 2.8 years of follow-up were selected. A significant and acute decrease in lymphocytes was found (p = 0.002) 1 month from RT. Patients with a drop higher than 50% of the previous value experimented a significant reduction in overall survival (55 vs 10%; p = 0.031). At the end of the follow-up, a significant increase in all blood counts was observed. With respect to renal function, an acute and significant decrease in CrCl was observed tin patients younger than 4 years who received RT (p = 0.013). However, it was not clinically relevant. Conclusion Our data suggest that acute lymphopenia occurs after RT and could be associated with a poorer prognosis. Other blood counts are reduced after RT and all of them are in physiological range at the end of follow-up. Our cohort presented excellent renal outcomes without any case of chronic renal dysfunction (AU)

Haematological and renal toxicity of radiation therapy in neuroblastoma paediatric patients.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the renal and hematologic toxicity in paediatric patients with adrenal high-risk neuroblastoma who have received radiation therapy (RT) as part of radical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pediatric patients diagnosed with high-risk adrenal neuroblastoma who received RT as part of the definitive treatment between January 2004 and May 2020 in a single institution were selected. Complete blood counts (CBC) and creatinine clearance (CrCl) pre-RT and post-RT were compared through the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and correlated with survival analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS: Forty-two children with a median age of 3 years at diagnosis and 2.8 years of follow-up were selected. A significant and acute decrease in lymphocytes was found (p = 0.002) 1 month from RT. Patients with a drop higher than 50% of the previous value experimented a significant reduction in overall survival (55 vs 10%; p = 0.031). At the end of the follow-up, a significant increase in all blood counts was observed. With respect to renal function, an acute and significant decrease in CrCl was observed tin patients younger than 4 years who received RT (p = 0.013). However, it was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that acute lymphopenia occurs after RT and could be associated with a poorer prognosis. Other blood counts are reduced after RT and all of them are in physiological range at the end of follow-up. Our cohort presented excellent renal outcomes without any case of chronic renal dysfunction.