Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Nat Prod ; 83(4): 843-851, 2020 04 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32091209

ABSTRACT

The culture broth of Burkholderia rinojensis strain A396 is herbicidal to a number of weed species with greater observed efficacy against broadleaf than grass weeds. A portion of this activity is attributed to romidepsin, a 16-membered cyclic depsipeptide bridged by a 15-membered macrocyclic disulfide. Romidepsin, which is present in small amounts in the broth (18 to 25 µg mL-1), was isolated and purified using standard chromatographic techniques. It was established that romidepsin is a natural proherbicide that targets the activity of plant histone deacetylases (HDAC). Assays to measure plant HDAC activity were optimized by testing a number of HDAC substrates. The activity of romidepsin was greater when its macrocyclic-forming disulfide bridge was reduced to liberate a highly reactive free butenyl thiol side chain. Reduction was achieved using 200 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride. A similar bioactivation of the proherbicide via reduction of the disulfide bridge of romidepsin was observed in plant-cell-free extracts. Molecular dynamic simulation of the binding of romidepsin to Arabidopsis thaliana HDAC19 indicated the reduced form of the compound could reach deep inside the catalytic domain and interact with an associated zinc atom required for enzyme activity.


Subject(s)
Biological Control Agents/chemistry , Biological Control Agents/pharmacology , Burkholderia/chemistry , Depsipeptides/chemistry , Depsipeptides/pharmacology , Herbicides/chemistry , Herbicides/pharmacology , Arabidopsis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Cucumis sativus/chemistry , Culture Media/chemistry , Disulfides , Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Molecular Structure , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Leaves/chemistry , Substrate Specificity
2.
Planta ; 243(4): 925-33, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26733464

ABSTRACT

MAIN CONCLUSION: Insertion of the gene encoding phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT) has resulted in cotton plants resistant to the herbicide glufosinate. However, the lower expression and commensurate reduction in PAT activity is a key factor in the low level of injury observed in the WideStrike(®) cotton and relatively high level of resistance observed in LibertyLink(®) cotton. LibertyLink(®) cotton cultivars are engineered for glufosinate resistance by overexpressing the bar gene that encodes phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (PAT), whereas the insect-resistant WideStrike(®) cultivars were obtained using the similar pat gene as a selectable marker. The latter cultivars carry some level of resistance to glufosinate which enticed certain farmers to select this herbicide for weed control with WideStrike(®) cotton. The potency of glufosinate on conventional FM 993, insect-resistant FM 975WS, and glufosinate-resistant IMACD 6001LL cotton cultivars was evaluated and contrasted to the relative levels of PAT expression and activity. Conventional cotton was sensitive to glufosinate. The single copy of the pat gene present in the insect-resistant cultivar resulted in very low RNA expression of the gene and undetectable PAT activity in in vitro assays. Nonetheless, the presence of this gene provided a good level of resistance to glufosinate in terms of visual injury and effect on photosynthetic electron transport. The injury is proportional to the amount of ammonia accumulation. The strong promoter associated with bar expression in the glufosinate-resistant cultivar led to high RNA expression levels and PAT activity which protected this cultivar from glufosinate injury. While the insect-resistant cultivar demonstrated a good level of resistance to glufosinate, its safety margin is lower than that of the glufosinate-resistant cultivar. Therefore, farmers should be extremely careful in using glufosinate on cultivars not expressly designed and commercialized as resistant to this herbicide.


Subject(s)
Acetyltransferases/genetics , Aminobutyrates/pharmacology , Gossypium/drug effects , Gossypium/genetics , Herbicide Resistance/genetics , Herbicides/pharmacology , Aminobutyrates/administration & dosage , Ammonia/metabolism , Crops, Agricultural/drug effects , Crops, Agricultural/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant , Glutamic Acid/metabolism , Herbicides/administration & dosage , Herbicides/metabolism , Plants, Genetically Modified , Promoter Regions, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...