Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 49(3): 509-514, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161845

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine significant factors affecting spacio-temporal distribution of lumpy skin disease (LSD) in Mashonaland West Province of Zimbabwe. A retrospective study of LSD from year 2000 to 2013 was undertaken using records from the Department of Livestock and Veterinary Services, Mashonaland West Province, Zimbabwe. Descriptive statistics was computed on LSD cases, treatments, vaccinations, and deaths. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significant factors affecting LSD distribution across diverse farming sectors (localities), districts, months, and years as from 2000 to 2013 in Mashonaland West Province. Districts bordering frequently vaccinated (foot and mouth) and game areas had significantly higher LSD outbreaks (p < 0.05) than those further away. LSD cases were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in resettlement (7.79 ± 1.42) and communal (7.59 ± 1.67) areas where there is sufficient veterinary institutional support than in commercial (6.79 ± 620) and A2 (6.85 ± 1.66) areas, whereas LSD cases were significantly lower (p < 0.05) probably due to under reporting in A1 (3.34 ± 0.46) and small scale (3.60 ± 0.46). Hot wet season had higher (p < 0.05) LSD cases than dry months as highest LSD cases were recorded in March (13.11 ± 5.89). Above normal annual rainfall had significantly higher (p < 0.05) LSD cases than normal and below normal rainfall. The study recommends strengthening of existing veterinary service structures for livestock movement and disease surveillance and vaccination to reduce further spread of the disease.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Lumpy Skin Disease/epidemiology , Agriculture , Animals , Cattle , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/veterinary , Zimbabwe/epidemiology
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 141(7): 1522-35, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442901

ABSTRACT

In southern African transfrontier conservation areas (TFCAs), people, livestock and wildlife share space and resources in semi-arid landscapes. One consequence of the coexistence of wild and domestic herbivores is the risk of pathogen transmission. This risk threatens local livelihoods relying on animal production, public health in the case of zoonoses, national economies in the context of transboundary animal diseases, and the success of integrated conservation and development initiatives. The level of interaction between sympatric wild and domestic hosts, defining different wildlife/livestock interfaces, characterizes opportunities of pathogen transmission between host populations. Exploring the relationship between infection burden and different types of wildlife/domestic interfaces is therefore necessary to manage the sanitary risk in animal populations through control options adapted to these multi-host systems. Here, we assessed the infection burdens of sympatric domestic cattle (Bos taurus/Bos indicus) and African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) at an unfenced interface and compared the infection burdens of cattle populations at different wildlife/livestock interfaces in the Great Limpopo TFCA. Patterns of infection in ungulate populations varied between wild and domestic hosts and between cattle populations at different wildlife/livestock interfaces. Foot-and-mouth disease, Rift Valley fever and theileriosis infections were detected in buffalo and cattle at unfenced interfaces; bovine tuberculosis was only present in buffalo; and brucellosis and lumpy skin disease only in cattle. At unfenced interfaces, cattle populations presented significantly higher Theileria parva and brucellosis prevalence. We hypothesize that cattle populations at wildlife/livestock interfaces face an increased risk of infection compared to those isolated from wildlife, and that the type of interface could influence the diversity and quantity of pathogens shared. Additional host behavioural and molecular epidemiological studies need to be conducted to support this hypothesis. If it is confirmed, the management of wildlife/livestock interfaces will need to be considered through the prism of livestock and public health.


Subject(s)
Buffaloes , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/epidemiology , Mycobacterium bovis , Rift Valley Fever/veterinary , Theileriasis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/veterinary , Animals , Animals, Wild , Brucellosis, Bovine/diagnosis , Brucellosis, Bovine/epidemiology , Brucellosis, Bovine/transmission , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Female , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/diagnosis , Foot-and-Mouth Disease/transmission , Lumpy Skin Disease/diagnosis , Lumpy Skin Disease/epidemiology , Lumpy Skin Disease/transmission , Male , Mozambique/epidemiology , Prevalence , Rift Valley Fever/diagnosis , Rift Valley Fever/epidemiology , Rift Valley Fever/transmission , South Africa/epidemiology , Theileriasis/diagnosis , Theileriasis/transmission , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tuberculosis/transmission , Zimbabwe/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...