Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Med ; 16(1): 149-59, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25288189

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain (NPP) is a chronic syndrome suffered by patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), for which there is no cure. Underlying cellular mechanisms involved in its pathogenesis are multifaceted, presenting significant challenges in its management. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 15 relapsing-remitting MS patients with MS-induced NPP was conducted to evaluate nabilone combined with gabapentin (GBP). Eligible patients stabilized on GBP (≥1,800 mg/day) with inadequate pain relief were recruited. Nabilone or placebo was titrated over 4 weeks (0.5 mg/week increase) followed by 5-week maintenance of 1 mg oral nabilone (placebo) twice daily. Primary outcomes included two daily patient-reported measures using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), pain intensity (VASpain), and impact of pain on daily activities (VASimpact). Hierarchical regression modeling was conducted on each outcome to determine if within-person pain trajectory differed across study groups, during 63-day follow-up. RESULTS: After adjustment for key patient-level covariates (e.g., age, sex, Expanded Disability Status Scale, duration of MS, baseline pain), a significant group × time(2) interaction term was reported for both the VASpain (P < 0.01) and VASimpact score (P < 0.01), demonstrating the adjusted rate of decrease for both outcomes was statistically greater in nabilone vs placebo study group. No significant difference in attrition rates was noted between treatments. Nabilone was well tolerated, with dizziness/drowsiness most frequently reported. CONCLUSION: Nabilone as an adjunctive to GBP is an effective, well-tolerated combination for MS-induced NPP. The results of this study identify a novel therapeutic combination for use in this population of patients predisposed to tolerability issues that may otherwise prevent effective pain management.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Dronabinol/analogs & derivatives , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/complications , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Adult , Amines/therapeutic use , Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Female , Gabapentin , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuralgia/etiology , Pain Measurement , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use
2.
Mult Scler ; 17(4): 397-403, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21212089

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus may produce superantigens that can non-specifically activate CD4(+) cells to potentially target the myelin basic protein. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the association between individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) and colonization with S. aureus harbouring superantigens. METHODS: Nasal swabs were collected from non-MS subjects and patients with MS who had not experienced a relapse in the past six months (MS stable group) and who had suffered a relapse within 30 days of study recruitment (MS exacerbation group). S. aureus was isolated from the anterior nares of participants following standard procedures and staphylococcal superantigen genes (sea, seb, and tsst-1) were detected using standard laboratory PCR techniques. RESULTS: The study enrolled 204 patients, 80 in the non-MS and MS stable groups and 44 patients in the MS exacerbation group. Overall, 27.0% of patients were colonized with S. aureus with no significant differences identified between study groups. Amongst individuals colonized with S. aureus, the prevalence of sea was significantly greater in the MS exacerbation versus non-MS study group (p < 0.05; odds ratio 7.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-49.5). CONCLUSIONS: The ability to rapidly screen patients for the presence of S. aureus producing sea may serve as a useful marker of a potential MS exacerbation.


Subject(s)
Enterotoxins/immunology , Multiple Sclerosis/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/immunology , Staphylococcus aureus/immunology , Superantigens/immunology , Adult , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/immunology , Nasal Cavity/immunology , Risk Factors
3.
Int J Neurosci ; 120(10): 631-40, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20942577

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue and cognitive deficits are common symptoms affecting patients with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: The effects of interferon beta on fatigue and cognitive deficits were assessed in 50 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (recruited at a single center). The pre-treatment assessments were performed on visits 1 and 2 (Months 0 and 3). Patients started treatment with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a or beta-1b, or intramuscular interferon beta-1a at Month 3, with reassessment at visits 3 and 4 (6 and 12 months, respectively). Co-primary endpoints were change in fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale) and change in cognition (Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests) from pre-treatment to visits 3 and 4. Follow-up data were obtained for 40 patients. RESULTS: The pre-treatment demographic and disease characteristics did not differ between groups. Improvements in fatigue levels were reported for patients receiving subcutaneous interferon beta-1a versus patients in the intramuscular interferon beta-1a group (p = .04) and in the interferon beta-1b group (p = .09). Improvements were also reported in five out of 17 cognitive indices for all the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that interferon beta may reduce fatigue and cognitive deficits in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Larger, randomized, and controlled studies are required to confirm our findings.


Subject(s)
Cognition Disorders/drug therapy , Fatigue/drug therapy , Interferon-beta/administration & dosage , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Disease Progression , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interferon beta-1a , Interferon beta-1b , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/complications , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
4.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 11(1): 17-31, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20001426

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: In recent times, our knowledge of cannabinoids and the endocannabinoid system has greatly advanced. With expanding knowledge, synthetic cannabinoids - including nabilone, dronabinol and a combination of synthetic Delta9-THC and cannabidiol - have been developed and tested for benefit in a variety of therapeutic indications. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: The aim of this article is to provide a summative review of the vast amount of clinical trial data now available on these agents. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: To locate clinical trials for review, a literature search was performed using PubMed between the dates of 25 May and 30 June 2009. Search parameters were set to isolate only human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and 2009. Keywords consistently used for each search include: cannabinoids, marijuana, THC, nabilone and dronabinol. Preferential selection was given to the best-designed trials, focusing on placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs with the largest patient populations, if available. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: As efficacy and tolerability of these agents remain questionable, it is important that cannabinoids not be considered 'first-line' therapies for conditions for which there are more supported and better-tolerated agents. Instead, these agents could be considered in a situation of treatment failure with standard therapies or as adjunctive agents where appropriate.


Subject(s)
Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Cannabis/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain/drug therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Cannabis/chemistry , Double-Blind Method , Dronabinol/analogs & derivatives , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypersensitivity
5.
Consult Pharm ; 24(12): 885-902, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20156002

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the neuropathic pain treatment algorithm previously published by Namaka et al. in 2004. This algorithm focuses on the strategic incorporation of the latest pain therapies while providing an update of any recent developments involving medications previously listed in the algorithm. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Toxnet databases were used to conduct all literature searches on neuropathic pain and targeted treatment strategies. Comprehensive search efforts in the identified databases included studies published between 1980 and 2009. The search term "neuropathic pain" was used along with each of the agents outlined in this review: pregabalin, paroxetine CR, duloxetine, tramadol XL, Tramacet, Sativex, and nabilone. STUDY SELECTION: A total of 90 studies were reviewed and selected based on level 1, 2, and 3 search strategies. DATA EXTRACTION: Level 1 search strategies were initially aimed at evidence-based trials of large sample size (N > 100), with a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design conducted by investigators well versed in the specialty area of interest. A level 2 search was conducted for additional trials that had many, but not all, of the desirable traits of evidence-based trials. In addition, a level 3 search strategy was conducted to compare key findings stated in anecdotal reports of very small (N < 15), poorly designed trials with the results of well-designed, evidence-based trials identified in level 1 and/or level 2 searches. DATA SYNTHESIS: Based on a thorough evaluation of the literature, pregabalin, paroxetine CR, and duloxetine have been placed in the updated algorithm as first-line agents, while tramadol XL, Tramacet, Sativex, and nabilone function primarily as adjunctive agents. CONCLUSION: The updated algorithm provides a baseline framework from which clinicians can justify the medication they prescribe.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/therapeutic use , Neuralgia/drug therapy , Algorithms , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/pharmacology , Duloxetine Hydrochloride , Humans , Neuralgia/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Paroxetine/adverse effects , Paroxetine/pharmacology , Paroxetine/therapeutic use , Pregabalin , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Thiophenes/pharmacology , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/adverse effects , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/analogs & derivatives , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/pharmacology , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...