ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between concomitant sexually transmitted infections in women infected with HIV. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched for articles published in English and Portuguese between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2015, using relevant keywords, including AIDS, HIV, female genital diseases, and sexually transmitted infections. Articles that associated sexually transmitted infections with HIV-infected women were selected for inclusion. Those that only investigated prevalence in pregnant women or focused on social or behavioral aspects were excluded. RESULTS: Of 108 identified articles, 24 were included. When correlated with HIV, genital herpes demonstrated an increased recurrence rate and increased replication rate for HIV in the mucosa. In HIV-positive women, syphilis can cause more genital ulcers. Bacterial vaginosis provides a pool of microorganisms that can increase the viral copy levels of genital HIV. Chlamydia, gonorrhea, and candidiasis may be more severe and complicated in women infected with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of HIV-positive patients who could have other sexually transmitted infections is important to protect women and decrease the risk of transmission.
Subject(s)
Coinfection/epidemiology , Genital Diseases, Female/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Coinfection/virology , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/virology , HIV Infections/virology , Humans , Prevalence , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/virology , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) compromises the health and routine of the patient. On the fifth stage of CKD, the patient becomes eligible to start renal replacement therapy: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) or kidney transplantation. The type of CKD treatment is essential to improving quality of life of the patient. OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of life of CKD stage 5 patients who perform HD and home PD. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with data collection, by convenience, through the application of socioeconomic and KDQOL SF-36 questionnaires in HD and PD patients of the Pro-Renal Foundation and satellite clinics in Curitiba-PR. RESULTS: The sample was 338 patients, 222 HD and 116 PD. Average age: 54.4 years for HD group (± 15.28) and 58.00 for the DP group (± 13.99). The variables: work status (p < 0.05), encouragement by dialysis staff (p < 0.01) and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) were in favor of DP; while physical functioning (p < 0.05) and emotional function (p < 0.01) were to HD. CONCLUSION: Objectively, PD was more favorable regarding quality of life, for the large number of items with significant results when compared to HD. However, the two variables of greatest significance found in HD (physical functioning and emotional functioning) ended up having a much greater impact on well-being and daily-life of the patient in the environment external to the clinic than those who were higher in DP, making HD the most favorable for patient quality of life.
Subject(s)
Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Peritoneal Dialysis , Quality of Life , Renal Dialysis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Referral and Consultation , Young AdultABSTRACT
Resumo Introdução: A doença renal crônica (DRC) compromete saúde e rotina de seu portador. No estágio V da DRC, o paciente torna-se elegível para iniciar a terapia substitutiva renal por hemodiálise (HD), diálise peritoneal (DP) ou transplante renal. O tipo de tratamento pode ser importante para melhorar a qualidade de vida do paciente. Objetivo: Comparar a qualidade de vida de pacientes renais crônicos em estágio V-D (em diálise) que realizam DP domiciliar ou HD. Métodos: Estudo transversal com coleta prospectiva, por conveniência, por meio da aplicação de questionários socioeconômicos e KDQOL-SF 36 em pacientes do ambulatório de DP e pacientes em HD da Fundação Pró-Renal e clínicas-satélite de Curitiba-PR. Resultados: Amostra de 338 pacientes, sendo 222 em HD, e 116 em DP. Idade média de 54,4 ± 15,28 anos para HD e 58,0 ± 13,99 para DP. Variáveis: situação do trabalho (p < 0,05), estímulo por parte da equipe de diálise (p < 0,01) e satisfação do paciente (p < 0,001) foram favoráveis à DP, enquanto que funcionamento físico (p < 0,05) e função emocional (p < 0,01) foram favoráveis à HD. Conclusão: Objetivamente, a DP mostrou-se melhor em relação à qualidade de vida por apresentar um maior número de itens com resultados significativos quando comparada à HD. Porém, as duas variáveis de maior significância encontradas na HD (funcionamento físico e funcionamento emocional) têm um impacto maior no bem-estar e no cotidiano no ambiente externo à clínica do que aquelas superiores na DP, tornando a HD mais favorável à qualidade de vida do paciente.
Abstract Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) compromises the health and routine of the patient. On the fifth stage of CKD, the patient becomes eligible to start renal replacement therapy: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) or kidney transplantation. The type of CKD treatment is essential to improving quality of life of the patient. Objective: To compare the quality of life of CKD stage 5 patients who perform HD and home PD. Methods: Cross-sectional study with data collection, by convenience, through the application of socioeconomic and KDQOL SF-36 questionnaires in HD and PD patients of the Pro-Renal Foundation and satellite clinics in Curitiba-PR. Results: The sample was 338 patients, 222 HD and 116 PD. Average age: 54.4 years for HD group (± 15.28) and 58.00 for the DP group (± 13.99). The variables: work status (p < 0.05), encouragement by dialysis staff (p < 0.01) and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) were in favor of DP; while physical functioning (p < 0.05) and emotional function (p < 0.01) were to HD. Conclusion: Objectively, PD was more favorable regarding quality of life, for the large number of items with significant results when compared to HD. However, the two variables of greatest significance found in HD (physical functioning and emotional functioning) ended up having a much greater impact on well-being and daily-life of the patient in the environment external to the clinic than those who were higher in DP, making HD the most favorable for patient quality of life.
