Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 41(1): 91-101, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34524699

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate and synthesize the effects (benefits and harms) of electrical stimulation (EE), alone or in association with other interventions, compared with sham and other interventions, for the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction in myelomeningocele. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted following the methodological recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020200425). A search was performed in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, LILACS, and PEDro. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed any EE in children diagnosed with myelomeningocele and neurogenic bladder and/or urinary incontinence were included and reported. RESULTS: When comparing EE versus sham groups, some estimated effects showed a wide confidence interval, probably due to the small sample size of the included studies. This indicates an imprecision in these findings. Regarding the safety of this intervention and safety of the lower urinary tract, no adverse events resulting from EE were reported. All the included studies have evaluated the efficacy of EE compared with sham, but different EE parameters and electrode positions among studies make it impossible to perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on very low certainty evidence, the findings of this systematic review suggested no difference between EE and sham to improve urinary incontinence in children with myelomeningocele. However, the small sample size and the imprecision arising from the wide confidence intervals must be considered. Future RCTs following a rigorous methodology, as recommended by the CONSORT statement, should be conducted to support the use of this intervention in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Meningomyelocele , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic , Child , Electric Stimulation , Humans , Meningomyelocele/complications , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/etiology , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy
2.
Trials ; 19(1): 702, 2018 12 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30583740

ABSTRACT

After publication of our article [1] we became aware that several sections of text in our Methods section were copied from a previously published article [2].

3.
Trials ; 19(1): 71, 2018 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29373998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is described as a subgroup of orofacial pain with a set of signs and symptoms that involve the temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, ears, and neck. TMD can occur unilaterally or bilaterally and approximately 70% of the population is affected with at least one sign. The disorder progresses with orofacial pain, muscle pain involving the masticatory and cervical muscles, joint noises (clicks and pops), joint block, mandibular dysfunction, and headache. The etiology can be abnormal occlusion and/or posture, trauma involving local tissues, repetitive microtrauma, parafunctional habits, and an increase in emotional stress. Studies have demonstrated that phototherapy is an efficient option for the treatment of TMD, leading to improvements in pain and orofacial function. METHODS: The aim of the proposed study is to compare the effects of two sources of photobiomodulation in individuals with TMD. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial is proposed, which will involve 80 individuals aged 18-65 years allocated to either a laser group or light-emitting diode (LED) group submitted to 12 sessions of phototherapy. The Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMDs will be used to evaluate all participants. Pain will be measured using the visual analog scale and maximum vertical mandibular movement will be determined with the aid of digital calipers. DISCUSSION: This study compares the effects of two modalities of laser therapy on the pain and orofacial function of patients with TMD dysfunction. Photobiomodulation and LED therapy are treatment options for reducing the inflammatory process and pain as well as inducing the regeneration of the target tissue. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03257748 . Registered on 8 August 2017.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Masticatory Muscles/radiation effects , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/radiotherapy , Temporomandibular Joint/radiation effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Low-Level Light Therapy/adverse effects , Male , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recovery of Function , Temporomandibular Joint/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...