[Evaluation of advantages of Contractubex gel usage for postsurgical scars treatment in comparison with absence of systematized topical scars treatment of kids with congenital cleft lip and palate]. / Otsenka preimushchestv primeneniya gelya Kontraktubeks pri posleoperatsionnykh rubtsakh v sravnenii s otsutstviem sistematizirovannogo mestnogo lecheniya u detei s vrozhdennymi rasshchelinami verkhnei guby i neba.

OBJECTIVE: Is to evaluate the advantage of Contractubex gel with regards to influence on vascularisation, pigmentation, thickness, surface size, configuration, and elisticity of postsurgical scars of children (after cheilorinoplasty) in comparison to absence of systematized topical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Into the prospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-centered, in parallel groups, open, controlled study were included 60 patients aged 2,5 months and older with postsurgical scars after first cheilorinoplasty after 7-14 day after operation. Patients were randomized into 2 groups of 30 patients in each. I group - patients get applications of Contractubex gel 3 times a day (in the morning, in the afternoon, in the evening) in accordance with patient information leaflet. II group - control group with no regular therapy of of postsurgical scars (without treatment or without application of oils and gels with anticsarring action). The period of medicine usage - 9 months and more for each patient, the each patient observation duration is 18 months. RESULTS: After analysis of the primary as well as secondary efficacy criteria (total grade based on POSAS scale, reported by investigator/parent) after 3, 6, 12, 18 months of observation in both groups a positive statistically significant dynamics was registered. At the same time in the Contractubex group results were statistically significantly better than in the control group. Positive dynamics was achieved quickier in the main group than in the contol group and was to observe already after 3 months of therapy, during the whole treatment and observation phase, and after 18 months of therapy. Additionally conducted photodocumentation of postsurgical scar development dynamics in terms of the study confirms positive effect of surgery and absence of visual data regarding keloids or hyperthrophic scars formation in patients in both groups. Adverse events, i. a. pain, itch, burning, long-run hyperemia were not registered during the whole period os study. CONCLUSION: The conducted study has shown high efficacy and safety of Contractubex usage for the treatment of postsurgical scars of children with with congenital cleft lip and palate (from 2,5 months old). The statistically significant advantage of the therapy with Contractubex was demonstrated in comparison with the control group (with no regular topical treatment). The obtained results allow to recommend Contractubex gel as an effective and safe medicine for the treatment of scarring after surgeries for kids directly after sutures removal.

[The choice of antibacterial therapy for the children with labial and palatal cleft admitted to a surgical clinic].

For the purpose of the present study, faucial smears were obtained for the microbiological examination and the choice of adequate antibacterial therapy from the children presenting with pathological changes in the pharyngeal lymphoid tissue ring (congenital isolated labial and palatal cleft). The majority of the patients were children during the first year of life who had Gram-negative microorganisms in the oral cavity from day 1 after admission to the surgical clinic. The data obtained show that the development of intercurrent diseases and postoperative complications can be prevented by the parenteral application of cephalosporins of the III and IV generations as well as by oral administration of cefixime and protected aminopenicillins.

[Dynamics of the otoscopic and audiologic picture in children with congenital isolated palatal clefts at different stages of surgical treatment].

This otoscopic study including tympanometry and the test for otoacoustic emission involved children since birth till the age of 1.5 years with an isolated grade II (n=16) and III (n=20) palatal cleft. The patients were examined before and at different stages of surgical treatment. Normalization of the otoscopic picture and functional capacity of the Eustachian tube was achieved in 70% of the children with congenital isolated palatal clefts due to the recovery of natural anatomic characteristics of palatal muscles following surgical intervention within the first year of life.

Velopharyngeal function for speech after the Frolova primary palatoplasty technique.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken by several members of the University of Florida Craniofacial Center to assess the results of palatoplasty performed by the method devised by Larisa Y. Frolova, M.D. in 1971. DESIGN: The assessment was based on evaluation of each subject's speech and velopharyngeal function through perceptual measures, nasometry, and video-nasendoscopy. SETTING: The study took place at the National Pediatric Center for Congenital Maxillofacial Pathology, Moscow, Russia, under the auspices and with the cooperation of Dr. Frolova, director of the program. SUBJECTS: One hundred twelve children (40 girls and 72 boys; age range, 4 to 10 years; mean age, 7.5 years) with repaired cleft palate who had undergone palatoplasty 2 to 4 years earlier and had no secondary surgery were randomly selected from the center's clinical files by the staff. Subjects with known conditions that could jeopardize normal speech development were excluded. METHODS: Each subject was assessed for speech and velopharyngeal function with a battery of perceptual measures and videonasendoscopy. RESULTS: The percentage of subjects judged to have normal resonance was 55.5%. An additional 9.5% of the subjects judged to be hyponasal increased the rate of nonhypernasal outcome to 64%. CONCLUSIONS: The Furlow double-Z palatoplasty has had an increasing rate of success (up to 87%), whereas the Frolova technique has a success rate of only 55% to 65%.

Otologic and audiologic status of Russian children with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, researchers evaluated the otologic and audiologic status of 112 children with repaired cleft lip and palate who had received primary palatal repair by means of Frolova palatoplasty, a surgical technique developed by Dr. Larisa Y. Frolova, founder and director of the National Pediatric Center for Congenital Maxillofacial Pathology, Moscow, Russia. DESIGN: Results of hearing thresholds and tympanograms for these Russian children were compared with data previously reported from a group of 48 children and adults with repaired cleft lip and palate at the University of Florida Craniofacial Center, Gainesville, Florida. RESULTS: There were no substantial differences in hearing thresholds between the two groups, which was surprising in view of the vast differences between middle ear management techniques used in Russia and the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Considering these findings and the growing body of literature favoring a more conservative approach to the management of middle ear effusion in infants with cleft lip and palate, a reexamination of otologic strategies in the United States seems advisable.