Tricuspid edge-to-edge repair for tricuspid valve prolapse and flail leaflet: feasibility in comparison to patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation.

AIMS: Transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) has gained widespread use for the treatment of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in symptomatic patients with high operative risk. Although secondary TR is the most common pathology, some patients exhibit primary or predominantly primary TR. Characterization of patients with these pathologies in the T-TEER context has not been systematically performed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients assigned to T-TEER by the interdisciplinary heart team were consecutively recruited in two European centres over 4 years. Echocardiographic images were evaluated to distinguish between primary and secondary causes of TR. Both groups were compared concerning procedural results. A total of 339 patients were recruited, 13% with primary TR and 87% with secondary TR. Patients with primary TR had a smaller right ventricle (basal diameter 45 vs. 49 mm, P = 0.004), a better right ventricular function (fractional area change 45 vs. 41%, P = 0.001), a smaller right (28 vs. 34 cm2, P = 0.021) and left (52 vs. 67 mL/m2, P = 0.038) atrium, and a better left ventricular ejection fraction (60 vs. 52%, P = 0.005). The severity of TR was similar in primary and secondary TR at baseline (TR vena contracta width pre-interventional 13 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 5 mm, P = 0.19), and T-TEER significantly reduced TR in both groups (TR vena contracta width post-interventional 4 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 5 mm, P = 0.10). These findings remained stable after propensity score matching. Complications were similar between both groups. CONCLUSION: T-TEER confers equally safe and effective reduction of TR in patients with primary and secondary TR.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Isolated Aortic Regurgitation Using a New Self-Expanding TAVR System.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) are often not considered for surgery because of increased surgical risk. Because of unique anatomical characteristics among patients with AR, interventional treatment options are limited, and implantation results are inconsistent compared with those among patients with aortic stenosis. OBJECTIVES: The authors describe the initial commercial experience of the first Conformité Européenne-marked transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement system (JenaValve Trilogy [JV]) for the treatment of patients with AR. METHODS: This multicenter registry included 58 consecutive patients from 6 centers across Germany. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was performed with the JV system for isolated severe and symptomatic AR. Patient characteristics, primary implantation outcomes, and valve performance up to 30 days were analyzed using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 76.5 ± 9 years, with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 4.2% ± 4.3%. Device success was achieved in 98% of patients. The mean gradient was 4.3 ± 1.6 mm Hg, and no moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation occurred. No conversion to open heart surgery or valve embolization was reported. There were no major vascular complications or bleeding events. The rate of new permanent pacemaker implantation was 19.6%. At 30 days, 92% of the patients were in NYHA functional class I or II, and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of patients with severe symptomatic AR using the transfemoral JV system is safe and effective. Given its favorable hemodynamic performance and low complication rates, this system may offer a new treatment option for patients with AR not suitable for surgery.

Characterization of Screen Failures Among Patients Evaluated for Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair (TriSelect-Study).

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVr) has significantly expanded treatment options for tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, a sizeable proportion of patients are still declined for TTVr and little is known about their clinical characteristics and cardiac morphology. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize patients who screen fail for TTVr with respect to their clinical characteristics and cardiac morphology. METHODS: A total of 547 patients were evaluated for TTVr between January 2016 to December 2021 from 3 centers in the United States and Germany. Clinical records and echocardiographic studies were used to assess medical history and right ventricular (RV) and tricuspid valve (TV) characteristics. RESULTS: Median age was 80 (IQR: 74-83) years and 60.0% were female. Over half (58.1%) were accepted for TTVr. Of those who were deemed unsuitable for TTVr (41.9%), the most common exclusion reasons were anatomical criteria (56.8%). In the regression analysis, RV and right atrial size, TV coaptation gap, and tethering area were identified as independent screen failure predictors. Other rejection reasons included clinical futility (17.9%), low symptom burden (12.7%), and technical limitations (12.7%). Most of the excluded patients (71.6%) were managed conservatively with medical therapy, while a small number either proceeded to TV surgery (22.3%) or subsequently became eligible for transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement in later available clinical trials in the United States (6.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of TTVr screen failure patients are excluded due to TV, right atrial, and RV enlargement. However, a significant proportion is excluded due to clinical futility. These identifiable anatomical and clinical characteristics emphasize the importance of earlier referral and intervention of TR and the need for continued innovation of Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.

A case report: transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a dedicated valve system for severe aortic regurgitation in a patient with a left ventricular assist device.

Background: Up to 30% of patients with the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) develop moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR) within the first year. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is the treatment of choice in patients with native AR. However, the high perioperative risk in patients with LVAD might prohibit surgery and choice of therapy is challenging. Case summary: We report on a 55-year-old female patient with a severe AR 15 months after implantation of LVAD due to advanced heart failure (HF) as a consequence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Surgical aortic valve replacement was discarded due to high surgical risk. Thus, the decision was made to evaluate a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the TrilogyXTä prothesis (JenaValve Technology, Inc., CA, USA). Echocardiographic and fluoroscopic control showed an optimal valve position with no evidence of valvular or paravalvular regurgitation. The patient was discharged 6 days later in a good general condition. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient showed noteworthy symptomatic improvement with no sign of HF. Discussion: Aortic regurgitation is a common complication among advanced HF patients treated with LVADSystems and associated with a deterioration in the quality of life and worsen clinical prognosis. The treatment options are limited to percutaneous occluder devices, SAVR, off-label TAVR, and heart transplantation. With the approval of the TrilogyXT JenaValve system, a novel dedicated TF-TAVR option is now available. Our experience demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of this system in patients with LVAD and AR resulting in effective elimination of AR.