Best Practice Recommendations for Dysphagia Management in Intensive Care Unit (ICU): A Delphi Study from Multidisciplinary Experts in Turkey.

There is no study about all aspects of oropharyngoesophageal (OPE) dysphagia from diagnosis to follow-up in a multidisciplinary manner in the world. In order to close this gap, we aimed to create a recommendation study that can be used in clinical practice, addressing all aspects of dysphagia in the ICU in detail with the opinion of experienced multidisciplinary experts. This recommendation paper was generated by a multidisciplinary team, using the seven-step process and a three-modified Delphi round via e-mail. Firstly, 15 open-ended questions were created, and then detailed recommendations including general principles, management, diagnosis, rehabilitation, and follow-up were created with the answers from these questions, Each recommendation item was voted on by the experts as overall consensus (strong recommendation), approaching consensus (weak recommendation), and divergent consensus (not recommended).In the first Delphi round, a questionnaire consisting of 413 items evaluated with a scale of 0-10 was prepared from the opinions and suggestions given to 15 open-ended questions. In the second Delphi round, 55.4% were accepted and revised suggestions were created. At the end of the third Delphi round, the revised suggestion form was approved again and the final proposals containing 133 items were created. This study includes comprehensive and detailed recommendations, including a broad perspective from diagnosis to treatment and follow-up, as detailed as possible, for management of dysphagia in patients with both oropharyngeal- and esophageal-dysphagia in ICU.

Reliability and validity of the timed 360° turn test in people with multiple sclerosis.

Objectives: To investigate (1) the intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability of the timed 360° turn test in people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS); (2) the minimum detectable change in the timed 360° turn test times; (3) the concurrent and discriminant validity of the timed 360° turn test times; and (4) the cut-off times that best discriminate people with MS from healthy people and fallers from non-fallers with MS.Method: Sixty-one people with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS, 0-6.5) and 34 healthy people were recruited in this cross-sectional study. The timed 360° turn test was administered along with the Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, Four Square Step Test, and EDSS by two independent raters.Results: The timed 360° turn test showed good intrarater, interrater, and test-retest reliability. Minimal detectable changes were 1.49 s and 1.53 s for the dominant and non-dominant sides, respectively. The timed 360° turn test was strongly correlated with other outcome measures. Significant differences in 360° turn times were found between people with MS and healthy people and between fallers and non-fallers with MS (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively). The cut-off times of 2.65 s on the dominant side and 2.42 s on the non-dominant best discriminated people with MS from healthy people, while 3.65 s on the dominant side and 3.75 s on the non-dominant best discriminated fallers from non-fallers with MS.Conclusions: The timed 360° turn test is a simple and reliable tool for assessing turning ability in MS.

Turkish version of Parkinson Fatigue Scale: Validity and reliability study of binary scoring method.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Parkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS) into Turkish and to evaluate its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2015 and May 2016, a total of 138 patients (84 males, 54 females; mean age 62.8±9.3 years; range, 42 to 83 years) with Parkinson's disease (PD) were included in this study. The Turkish version of the PFS was analyzed for data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, reliability, and validity. We used the binary scoring method of the Parkinson Fatigue Scale. RESULTS: The data quality for the Turkish version of the PFS was excellent. The scaling assumption was acceptable. The scale provided an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha was 0.955 for a test and 0.941 for a retest, and corrected item-to-total correlations were ranged from 0.478 to 0.849. The test-retest reliability (correlation coefficients were ranged from 0.650 to 0.875) was adequate. Although the total binary score of the PFS was not associated with demographic and clinical data, it was significantly correlated with some of the clinical rating scale scores, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Schwab & England Activities of Daily Living Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, 36-item Short Form Health Survey, 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, and Fatigue Severity Scale. CONCLUSION: The Turkish version of the PFS is an acceptable, valid, and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue in PD patients.

Reliability and validity study of a Turkish version of the fatigue severity scale in Parkinson's disease patients.

The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients for use in clinical settings. A consecutive 106 patients with PD were included in the study. The Turkish version of FSS was analyzed for reliability (internal consistency and reproducibility) and validity (convergent and discriminant). The Turkish version of FSS yielded an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.960 and corrected item-total correlations: 0.761-0.891), and it was established as reproducible (test-retest intraclass correlations for items: 0.887-0.936). The FSS total score was correlated significantly with PD-related variables. Between-group differences on both items and the total score of FSS by modified Hoehn and Yahr staging were found to be statistically significant. The present study has shown that the Turkish version of the FSS is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of fatigue in PD patients.