ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the correlation between coronal imbalance and lower-limb physiological parameters in degenerative scoliosis using the biplanar whole body imaging system (EOS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 101 successive EOS images were selected between January 2018 and December 2021. Of the selected images, 63 patients were in the degenerative scoliosis group (DSG) and 38 patients were in the control group (CG). Two independent observers performed measurements of the parameters and compared the two groups. RESULTS: Among parameters examined, significant inter-group differences were found for coronal pelvic tilt angle (CPT), bilateral femoral length difference (ΔFL), and bilateral total lower limb length (ΔTL) difference. Additionally, the knee and ankle joints had more severe degeneration on the main curved side in patients with degenerative scoliosis. In the left curved group, 18 (42.86%) and 24 (57.1%) patients had more severe degeneration in the left knee and left ankle, respectively. In the right lateral bending group, 13 (61.9%) and 14 (66.7%) patients had more severe degeneration in the right knee and right ankle, respectively. Statistical differences were found in the degree of degeneration in both knee and ankle joints bilaterally. CONCLUSION: This study showed that biomechanical parameters of the lower limbs are affected in cases of degenerative scoliosis with altered coronal balance. The lower limb on the main curve side became shorter compared to its counterpart, and joint degeneration of the knee and ankle joints became more severe.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A well-established reference is lacking for diagnosing lateral patellar compression syndrome (LPCS), and this diagnosis currently depends on clinicians' subjective judgment and several examination results. X-rays are primarily used to diagnose LPCS, but they have low detection rates of patellar tilt using the congruence angle (CA) and patellar tilting angle (PTA). METHODS: We enrolled 87 patients (31 men and 56 women; mean age: 42.11±15.33 years) between 2016 and 2019 and divided them as per diagnosis into three groups of 29 each: LPCS, patellar dislocation (PD, control), and meniscus tear (MT, negative control) groups. A senior radiologist and the chief physician of sports medicine examined their patellar axial radiographs of the knee in 30° flexion using a computer imaging system, measuring LPCA, CA and PTA. Univariate analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare measurement data with normal distribution and non-normal distribution, respectively. Bonferroni correction was used to analyze different indicators for different groups. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to verify the value of LPCA in the initial diagnosis of LPCS. RESULTS: LPCA (19.88±7.49) was significantly higher in LPCS group than in MT (13.68±4.69) and PD groups (10.16±4.43) (P<0.01) and was also significantly higher on affected side than on healthy side (16.44±5.00) (P=0.04). LPCA >13.9° had sensitivity and specificity of 89.66% and 68.97%, respectively, for LPCS diagnosis (AUC: 0.82, 95% confidence interval: 0.719-0.891, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that LPCA measured using an axial patellar radiograph of the knee in 30° flexion is high in patients with LPCS, and it may be used for diagnosing LPCS.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We sought to compare local tumor control after conventionally fractionated image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus adjuvant CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients who underwent separation surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with MESCC who were treated at our hospital. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local progression and overall survival. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with MESCC underwent separation surgery between 2013 and 2018, among whom 6 were lost to follow-up, 24 received conventionally fractionated image-guided IMRT, and 26 were treated with CyberKnife SBRT. The median follow-up was 16.5 months (range, 2.1-47.5 months). Eleven patients experienced local failure including 9 and 2 from the IMRT and SBRT groups, respectively. The local progression-free survival rates were significantly higher in the SBRT group than IMRT group at 6 months (95.5% vs. 82.0%), 1 year (90.9% vs. 71.8%), and 2 years (90.9% vs. 57.6%) (P = 0.035). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified radiotherapy method (P = 0.034) and receipt of preoperative radiotherapy (P = 0.047) as significant predictors of local control, while visceral metastasis (P = 0.048) and high-malignancy primary tumor type (P = 0.002) were negative predictors of overall survival. Moreover, postoperative SBRT was noninferior to IMRT in terms of pain control, adverse effects, and performance in treating irradiated spinal metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid surgery-radiosurgery therapy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with MESCC. SBRT provided higher local control rates compared with IMRT. Thus postoperative SBRT should be considered for patients expected to have relatively long survival.
