Effects of subconjunctival ropivacaine, liposomal bupivacaine, and mepivacaine on corneal sensitivity in healthy horses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate corneal sensitivity and adverse events following subconjunctival administration of three local anesthetics in horses. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, masked, crossover study. ANIMALS: Twelve healthy adult mares. METHODS: The subconjunctival space of the treated eye was injected with 0.2 mL of liposomal bupivacaine (1.3%), ropivacaine (0.5%), or mepivacaine (2%). All horses received each medication once and the contralateral eye received saline (control). Corneal touch threshold (CTT) was measured using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer before sedation, after sedation, and at specified intervals until it returned to baseline. Ocular examinations were performed at 24-, 72, and 168 h post-injection to monitor for adverse effects. RESULTS: The mean total time of anesthesia (TTA) was 168.3 min for ropivacaine, 169.2 min for liposomal bupivacaine, 103.3 min for mepivacaine and 30.7 min for the control. TTA for liposomal bupivacaine (p < .001) and ropivacaine (p = .001) was longer than the control. TTA for mepivacaine was not different from the control (p = .138), liposomal bupivacaine (p = .075) or ropivacaine (p = .150). Injection site hemorrhage reduced TTA regardless of treatments (p = .047). No adverse effects attributed to injections were noted. CONCLUSION: All three medications were well tolerated. Subconjunctival administration of ropivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine resulted in longer TTAs compared to the control; however, their TTAs were not different from that of mepivacaine. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Subconjunctivally administered liposomal bupivacaine and ropivacaine are viable options to provide prolonged corneal analgesia in horses. Future studies are needed to assess the efficacy in diseased eyes.

Pd-Catalyzed Alkene Diamination Reactions with O-Benzoylhydroxylamine Electrophiles: Evidence Supporting a Pd(II/IV) Catalytic Cycle, the Role of 2,4-Pentanedione Derivatives as Ligands, and Expanded Substrate Scope.

This article describes continued studies on Pd-catalyzed alkene diamination reactions between N-allylguanidines or ureas and O-benzoylhydroxylamine derivatives, which serve as N-centered electrophiles. The transformations generate cyclic guanidines and ureas bearing dialkylaminomethyl groups in moderate to good yield. We describe new mechanistic experiments that have led to a revised mechanistic hypothesis that involves a key oxidative addition of the electrophile to a PdII complex, followed by reductive elimination from PdIV to form the alkyl carbon-nitrogen bond. In addition, we demonstrate that acac, not phosphine, serves as a key ligand for palladium. Moreover, simple acac derivatives bearing substituted aryl groups outperform acac in the catalytic reactions, and phosphines inhibit catalysis in many cases. These discoveries have led to a significant expansion in the scope of this chemistry, which now allows for the coupling of a variety of cyclic amines, acyclic secondary amines, and primary amines. In addition, we also demonstrate that these new conditions allow for the use of amide nucleophiles, in addition to guanidines and ureas.

[Synostosic and non-synostosic cranial deformities]. / Deformidades craneales sinostósicas y no sinostósicas.

In the last decades alterations in the skull shape have increased at the expense of plagiocephaly, as consequence of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations to sleep the infant in the supine position. The clinician must differentiate between positional plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis, since if a cranial synostosis is proven, the therapeutic behavior will be potentially neurosurgical. Although three-dimensional skull tomography with bone window is the study of greater sensitivity and diagnostic specificity, the majority of cases can be confirmed by the clinic, reserving the radiography or ultrasound with a suture approach for doubtful cases. Craniosynostosis must be early referral to a craniofacial team to define the indication, opportunity and most appropriate surgical technique, in order to avoid future neurocognitive and psychosocial complications. Children with positional plagiocephaly regardless of the treatment of cranial deformity may have a higher risk of motor development delay. For correction, repositioning and physiotherapy are suggested in mild to moderate forms, reserving the use of cranial orthesis in severe forms.

Deformidades craneales sinostósicas y no sinostósicas / Synostosic and non-synostosic cranial deformities

Las alteraciones de la forma del cráneo han aumentado en las últimas décadas a expensas de las plagiocefalias, como consecuencia de las recomendaciones de la Academia Americana de Pediatría de dormir al lactante en decúbito supino. El clínico debe diferenciar entre plagiocefalia posicional y craneosinostosis, ya que la conducta terapéutica será potencialmente neuroquirúrgica de comprobar una sinostosis craneal. Si bien la tomografía de cráneo tridimensional con ventana ósea es el estudio de mayor sensibilidad y especificidad diagnóstica, la mayoría de los casos pueden confirmarse por la clínica, reservando la radiografía simple o de preferencia la ecografía con enfoque de suturas para casos dudosos. Las craneosinostosis deben derivarse tempranamente a un equipo craneofacial para definir la indicación, oportunidad y técnica quirúrgica más adecuada para evitar futuras complicaciones neurocognitivos y psicosociales. Los niños con plagiocefalias posicionales, independientemente del tratamiento de la deformidad craneal, pueden tener más riesgo de retraso del desarrollo motor. Para su corrección se sugiere reposicionamiento y fisioterapia en formas leves a moderadas, reservando el uso de ortésis craneal en formas graves.

In the last decades alterations in the skull shape have increased at the expense of plagiocephaly, as consequence of the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations to sleep the infant in the supine position. The clinician must differentiate between positional plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis, since if a cranial synostosis is proven, the therapeutic behavior will be potentially neurosurgical. Although three-dimensional skull tomography with bone window is the study of greater sensitivity and diagnostic specificity, the majority of cases can be confirmed by the clinic, reserving the radiography or ultrasound with a suture approach for doubtful cases. Craniosynostosis must be early referral to a craniofacial team to define the indication, opportunity and most appropriate surgical technique, in order to avoid future neurocognitive and psychosocial complications. Children with positional plagiocephaly regardless of the treatment of cranial deformity may have a higher risk of motor development delay. For correction, repositioning and physiotherapy are suggested in mild to moderate forms, reserving the use of cranial orthesis in severe forms.