Biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela en cáncer de mama, ¿está justificada la espera al resultado intraoperatorio? / Intraoperative sentinel node biopsy, is it worth the wait?

Objetivo: En nuestro centro, el estudio de la biopsia selectiva del ganglio centinela (BSGC) se realiza de forma intraoperatoria. El objetivo principal del presente trabajo es conocer qué proporción de pacientes se beneficia de la espera intraoperatoria al resultado de la BSGC. Material y métodos: Se ha realizado un análisis retrospectivo de pacientes intervenidas en nuestro centro entre el 1 de enero de 2018 y el 30 de junio de 2019. Se incluyeron mujeres con tumores T1-T2, tratadas mediante tumorectomía y BSGC estudiado mediante método one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA). Resultados: Se incluyeron 149 mujeres en el estudio. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en cuestión de datos demográficos entre el grupo tratado mediante linfadenectomía axilar (LA) y el grupo tratado exclusivamente con BSGC. Se realizaron 18 LA tras el análisis del GC estudiado de forma intraoperatoria. Solo en seis de los casos se extrajeron tres o más GC. La localización por cuadrante de la lesión, permeación linfovascular y carga tumoral total muestran diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los grupos. En el análisis multivariante, únicamente la carga tumoral total (TTL) se establece como variable independiente de necesidad de LA. Conclusiones: La obtención del resultado de la BSGC de forma diferida permite disminuir el tiempo de anestesia de las pacientes y tiempo de ocupación de quirófano, ya que en el momento actual no se realiza ningún procedimiento adicional en un elevado porcentaje de casos. (AU)

Introduction: In our institution, the study of selective sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is performed intraoperatively. The main objective of our study is to know the proportion of patients who benefits from the waiting of the results of SLNB. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients operated on our center between January 1 st, 2018 and June 30, 2019 was carried out. We included women diagnosed with T1–T2 tumors, treated by lumpectomy and SLNB studied using OSNA method. Results: Our study included 149 women. There were not statistically significant differences in terms of demographic data between the group treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and exclusively SLNB group. After analysis of SLN intraoperatively, there were performed 18 axillary lymphadenectomies. Only in six of these 18 cases, three or more sentinel nodes were founded. The location of the tumor, the presence of lymphovascular permeation and the total tumor load (TTL) showed statistically significant differences between groups. Only the TTL was established as the independent factor of the need for ALND. Conclusions: Obtaining a deferred result of the SLNB allowed reducing the time of anesthesia and occupation of the operating room, since in a high percentage of cases an additional procedure is not performed. (AU)

Intraoperative sentinel node biopsy, is it worth the wait?

INTRODUCTION: In our institution, the study of selective sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is performed intraoperatively. The main objective of our study is to know the proportion of patients who benefits from the waiting of the results of SLNB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients operated on our center between January 1st, 2018 and June 30, 2019 was carried out. We included women diagnosed with T1-T2 tumors, treated by lumpectomy and SLNB studied using OSNA method. RESULTS: Our study included 149 women. There were not statistically significant differences in terms of demographic data between the group treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and exclusively SLNB group. After analysis of SLN intraoperatively, there were performed 18 axillary lymphadenectomies. Only in six of this 18 cases, three or more sentinel nodes were founded. The location of the tumor, the presence of lymphovascular permeation and the total tumor load (TTL) showed statistically significant differences between groups. Only the TTL was established as the independent factor of the need for ALND. DISCUSSION: Obtaining a deferred result of the SLNB allowed reducing the time of anesthesia and occupation of the operating room, since in a high percentage of cases an additional procedure is not performed.

Impacto de la resección no planificada y la reintervención de sarcomas de partes blandas en su pronóstico / Impact of unplanned resection and re-excision of a soft tissue sarcoma on prognosis

INTRODUCCIÓN: Hasta un 40% de los sarcomas de partes blandas (SPB) son resecados de forma no planificada, dejando tumor residual en más del 50% de los casos. La implicación pronóstica de estas resecciones no está claramente definida, dado que existen escasos estudios comparativos que demuestren cómo afecta a la tasa de recurrencia local, de metástasis y de supervivencia. MÉTODOS: Revisión retrospectiva de pacientes intervenidos de un SPB de enero de 2000 a enero de 2016 clasificándolos respecto a intervención planificada o no planificada. Se compararon las tasas de recurrencia y metástasis en global y por estadios. RESULTADOS: Ceintitrés pacientes con SPB fueron tratados de forma planificada y 16 de forma no planificada, con 13 reintervenciones. El 40% del grupo planificado presentó un estadio avanzado respecto al 20% del grupo no planificado. El 77% de los pacientes con resección no planificada reintervenidos presentaron tumor residual en la pieza. La tasa de recidiva local en el grupo de no planificados fue considerablemente más alta (73,5% frente al 43,8%). La tasa de metástasis en no planificados fue del 45,5%, frente al 56,3% en planificados (p > 0,05). En el grupo de no planificados el patrón de recidiva fue más errático con peores resultados en estadios precoces. Concusiones: La resección no planificada de los SPB asocia mayores tasas de recurrencia local y peores resultados funcionales a pesar del manejo oncológico posterior. En las lesiones de partes blandas es fundamental reconocer los signos de alarma que sugieren malignidad para llevar a cabo un estudio diagnóstico específico y evitar resecciones inadecuadas

INTRODUCTION: Up to 40% of all initial operations for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are unplanned, which would leave residual macroscopic tumor in more than 50% of the cases. The effect this has on local recurrence rate, metastases rate and survival has never been fully established, due to the lack of randomized studies. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with STS treated in our unit between January 2001-January 2016. We classified them whether they had been treated by initial planned or unplanned operation. Outcomes were compared in both groups globally and stage-matched. Endpoints were local recurrence and distant metastases. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients of STS underwent a planned excision and 16 an unplanned excision, 13 of them underwent further re-excision.40% of patients with planned excision had an advanced stage in regard to the unplanned excision group which presented earlier stages.77% of patients with unplanned excision had residual tumor identified after surgical re-excision. Local recurrence rate in the unplanned excision group was considerably higher 73,5% vs.43,8%. Metastases rate was lower in planned excision group, 45,5% vs 56,3% (P > .05). The recurrence pattern in the unplanned excision group was unstable, with worse outcomes in earlier stages. CONCLUSION: The unplanned excision of a soft tissue sarcoma may compromise disease local control, with higher rates of local recurrence and metastases, and worse functional out- comes, despite further oncological treatment. We need to recognize the clinical features for malignancy risk in soft tissue lumps for a safe diagnosis to avoid inadequate resections

Impact of unplanned resection and re-excision of a soft tissue sarcoma on prognosis. / Impacto de la resección no planificada y la reintervención de sarcomas de partes blandas en su pronóstico.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 40% of all initial operations for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are unplanned, which would leave residual macroscopic tumor in more than 50% of the cases. The effect this has on local recurrence rate, metastases rate and survival has never been fully established, due to the lack of randomized studies. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with STS treated in our unit between January 2001-January 2016. We classified them whether they had been treated by initial planned or unplanned operation. Outcomes were compared in both groups globally and stage-matched. Endpoints were local recurrence and distant metastases. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients of STS underwent a planned excision and 16 an unplanned excision, 13 of them underwent further re-excision. 40% of patients with planned excision had an advanced stage in regard to the unplanned excision group which presented earlier stages. 77% of patients with unplanned excision had residual tumor identified after surgical re-excision. Local recurrence rate in the unplanned excision group was considerably higher 73,5% vs. 43,8%. Metastases rate was lower in planned excision group, 45,5% vs 56,3% (P > .05). The recurrence pattern in the unplanned excision group was unstable, with worse outcomes in earlier stages. CONCLUSION: The unplanned excision of a soft tissue sarcoma may compromise disease local control, with higher rates of local recurrence and metastases, and worse functional out- comes, despite further oncological treatment. We need to recognize the clinical features for malignancy risk in soft tissue lumps for a safe diagnosis to avoid inadequate resections.