Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur Psychiatry ; 33: 9-17, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26852375

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patient's relatives usually care for patients with schizophrenia, and as informal caregivers they experience negative consequences. The aim of the EDUCA-III trial is to test the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention program (PIP) versus standard care to reduce the caregiver burden at post-intervention (4 months), and at follow-up (8 months). METHOD: A two-arm, evaluator blind, multicentre, randomized controlled trial. The PIP group had 12 weekly group sessions. The control intervention group had the usual support and standard care. Primary outcomes were change scores since baseline on the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ). RESULTS: One hundred and nine caregivers were randomized to PIP and 114 to control condition from 23 research sites. The decrease of ZBI scores was significantly higher on the PIP arm at 4 months (mean difference [MD]=-4.33; 95% CI -7.96, -0.71), and at 8 months (MD=-4.46; 95% CI -7.79, -1.13). There were no significant decreases in the IEQ scores (MD at 4 months=-2.80; 95% CI -6.27, 0.67; MD at 8 months=-2.85; 95% CI -6.51, 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The PIP condition seems to reduce caregiver burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32545295.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Health Education , Schizophrenia/therapy , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Caregivers/education , Caregivers/psychology , Cost of Illness , Counseling , Educational Measurement/methods , Efficiency, Organizational , Female , Health Education/methods , Health Education/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 266(2): 89-124, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26874960

ABSTRACT

This European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance paper is a result of the Working Group on Mental Health Consequences of Economic Crises of the EPA Council of National Psychiatric Associations. Its purpose is to identify the impact on mental health in Europe of the economic downturn and the measures that may be taken to respond to it. We performed a review of the existing literature that yields 350 articles on which our conclusions and recommendations are based. Evidence-based tables and recommendations were developed through an expert consensus process. Literature dealing with the consequences of economic turmoil on the health and health behaviours of the population is heterogeneous, and the results are not completely unequivocal. However, there is a broad consensus about the deleterious consequences of economic crises on mental health, particularly on psychological well-being, depression, anxiety disorders, insomnia, alcohol abuse, and suicidal behaviour. Unemployment, indebtedness, precarious working conditions, inequalities, lack of social connectedness, and housing instability emerge as main risk factors. Men at working age could be particularly at risk, together with previous low SES or stigmatized populations. Generalized austerity measures and poor developed welfare systems trend to increase the harmful effects of economic crises on mental health. Although many articles suggest limitations of existing research and provide suggestions for future research, there is relatively little discussion of policy approaches to address the negative impact of economic crises on mental health. The few studies that addressed policy questions suggested that the development of social protection programs such as active labour programs, social support systems, protection for housing instability, and better access to mental health care, particularly at primary care level, is strongly needed.


Subject(s)
Economic Recession , Mental Health/economics , Mental Health/standards , Psychiatry , Societies, Medical/standards , Europe , Humans , Psychiatry/economics , Psychiatry/methods , Psychiatry/standards
3.
Inf. psiquiátr ; (209): 271-281, jul.-sept. 2012. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-107129

ABSTRACT

Introducción. La escala de sobrecarga de Zarit (ZBi) se utiliza para evaluar la sobrecarga que experimentan los cuidadores informales de personas con discapacidades o dependencias. como escala acumulativa, la ZBi debería evaluar el constructo latente de sobrecarga desde una perspectiva unidimensional. Sin embargo, diferentes análisis factoriales han indicado que presenta una estructura multidimensional, lo que puede ser importante para una correcta interpretación de la escala. Objetivos. Analizar y comparar el ajuste de las diferentes estructuras factoriales propuestas para la ZBi mediante Análisis Factorial confirmatorio (..) (AU)


Introduction. The Zarit Burden interview (ZBi) is usually applied to assess the burden experienced by caregivers of persons with severe functional limitations. As a measurement scale giving a total score, the ZBi implicitly assumes that the latent construct it measures is unidimensional. However several factorial analyses of the ZBi have reported instead a multidimensional structure, what can be relevant for a correct interpretation. Aims. to analyze and to compare the fit of the factorial structures so far reported for the ZBi by using confirmatory factor analyses (cFA) applied to (..) (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Workload/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Assisted Living Facilities , Dementia/epidemiology , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...