Tenofovir plasma concentrations according to companion drugs: a cross-sectional study of HIV-positive patients with normal renal function.

As the risk of tenofovir-associated renal toxicity has been found to be proportional to the drug plasma concentration, our aim was to measure the determinants of tenofovir plasma exposure in HIV-positive patients with normal renal function. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted in HIV-positive patients chronically receiving tenofovir-containing highly active antiretroviral therapies (HAARTs). Patients on tenofovir-containing antiretroviral regimens, presenting 22 to 26 h after drug intake, having estimated glomerular filtration rates above 60 ml/min, reporting high adherence to antiretroviral medications (above 95% of the doses), and signing a written informed consent were included. Plasma tenofovir concentrations were measured through a validated high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC/LC-MS) method. The tenofovir trough concentrations in 195 patients (median, 50 ng/ml, and interquartile range, 35 to 77 ng/ml) were significantly associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate, body mass index, and third-drug class (protease-containing versus protease-sparing regimens) (with the highest exposure in unboosted-atazanavir recipients). The results of multivariate analysis showed that the third-drug class and the weight/creatinine ratio were independent predictors of tenofovir trough concentrations. This cross-sectional study shows that tenofovir trough concentrations are predicted by the weight/creatinine ratio and by the coadministered antiretrovirals, with protease inhibitors (whether boosted or unboosted) being associated with the highest plasma exposure. These data, previously available in healthy subjects or for some drugs only, could be useful for designing strategies to manage tenofovir-associated toxicity, since this toxicity has been reported to be dose dependent.

Short-term additional enfuvirtide therapy is associated with a greater immunological recovery in HIV very late presenters: a controlled pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the addition of enfuvirtide to standard highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) could confer immunovirological benefits in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected very late presenters. The current study is an open comparative therapeutic trial of standard protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART ± additional enfuvirtide in treatment-naïve deeply immunologically impaired HIV-positive patients. METHODS: Very late presenters (CD4 <50/mm(3)), without tuberculosis and neoplasms, were alternatively allocated to two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and lopinavir/ritonavir without (control arm, CO) or with (ENF arm) enfuvirtide 90 mg bid. Enfuvirtide was administered until the achievement of viral load <50 copies/ml and for at least 24 weeks. The primary objective was the magnitude of CD4+ cell recovery at 6 months. HIV RNA was intensively monitored in the first month, and, thereafter, monthly, as for CD4+ cell count and percentage, clinical data, and plasma drug concentrations. RESULTS: Of 22 enrolled patients (11 per arm), 19 completed the study (10 in the ENF arm). Baseline CD4+ cell counts and % were comparable, with 20 CD4+/mm(3) (12-37) and a percentage of 3.3 (1.7-7.1) in the ENF arm, and 16 CD4+/mm(3) (9-29) and a percentage of 3.1 (2.3-3.8) in the CO arm, respectively. The baseline viral load was also comparable between the two arms, with 5.77 log10 (5.42-6) and 5.39 log10 (5.06-6) in the ENF and CO arms, respectively. Enfuvirtide recipients had higher CD4+ percentage at week 8 (7.6 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.02) and at week 24 (10.7 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.02), and a greater CD4+ increase at week 24 (207 vs. 134 cells/mm(3), p = 0.04), with 70% of enfuvirtide intakers versus 12.5% of controls who achieved a CD4+ cell count >200/mm(3) (p = 0.01). At 48 weeks, patients in the ENF arm had CD4+ cell counts higher than controls (251 vs. 153cells/mm(3), p = 0.04) and were also found to be faster in reaching a CD4 cell count over 200/mm(3): 18 (8-24) versus 48 (36-108) weeks (p = 0.01). Viral load decay at week 4 was greater in the ENF arm (-3 vs. -2.2 log, p = 0.04), while the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 24 was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the addition of enfuvirtide to a lopinavir-based HAART was shown to be associated with a significantly faster and greater immunological recovery in newly discovered HIV-positive patients with very low CD4+ cell counts. Induction strategies using an enfuvirtide-based approach in such subjects warrant further investigation.

The use of trough ribavirin concentration to predict sustained virological response and haematological toxicity in HIV/HCV-co-infected patients treated with ribavirin and pegylated interferon.

OBJECTIVES: To study the association between trough ribavirin concentration (C(trough)) with sustained virological response (SVR) and haemoglobin (Hb) decrease in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-co-infected (HIV+/HCV+) patients treated with anti-HCV therapy. METHODS: HIV+/HCV+ patients treated with ribavirin and pegylated interferon were prospectively evaluated. Qualitative and quantitative HCV-RNA, Hb levels and ribavirin C(trough) were measured at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 during therapy. HCV-RNA was also measured at 24 weeks after the end of therapy. Efficacy analysis was performed on patients with a definitive virological outcome (SVR, relapser and non-responder), whereas for toxicity analysis, dropouts were considered until the last available observation. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (54.7% with genotype 1 or 4) were included. Overall, no correlation between ribavirin C(trough) and early virological response (EVR) nor SVR was found. However, in patients with genotype 1 or 4, ribavirin C(trough) was independently associated with EVR (P = 0.036) and SVR (P = 0.046). A ribavirin C(trough) cut-off of 1600 ng/mL was found to be associated with both EVR (chi(2) = 5.69, P = 0.028) and SVR (chi(2)=4.2, P = 0.04). Higher ribavirin C(trough) correlated with Hb decrease (R = -0.361, P = 0.009) and was independently associated with an Hb decrease of >4 g/dL (P = 0.009). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that a ribavirin C(trough) of >2300 ng/mL was associated with an Hb decrease of >4 g/dL (chi(2) = 8.08, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed a relationship between ribavirin exposure and both efficacy and toxicity. Moreover, we found ribavirin C(trough) cut-offs for both SVR in genotypes 1 and 4 and overall haematological toxicity. These findings deserve further clinical evaluation.

[Clinical pharmacology of nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors]. / La farmacologia clinica degli inibitori nucleosidici e nucleotidici della transcrittasi inversa.

Options for antiretroviral therapy in patients infected with HIV continue to expand as new drugs are integrated into treatment regimens. Nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Nt/NRTIs) remain the backbone of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Although this is the oldest class of antiretrovirals, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties have been less studied as compare to protease inhibotors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). The aim of this article is to review the current status of clinical pharmacology onf Nt/NRTIs, highlighting the issues with clinical interest. Therefore, implications of intracellular pharmacokinetics on dosing schedule, potential for drug-drug interaction and pharmacodynamics is discussed.

Clinical benefit of interventions driven by therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Adequate plasma concentrations of antiretroviral drugs are key to achieving and maintaining long-term suppression of HIV replication. Multiple factors may influence drug levels, causing increases or reductions that may, respectively, result in toxicity or virological failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) might help to detect and correct such abnormalities. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of TDM in the care of HIV-infected patients in an out-patient clinical setting. METHOD: S All the requests for TDM of protease inhibitors (PIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) for patients attending our HIV out-patient clinic from October 2000 to August 2003 were analysed. Blood samples were collected before the morning dose. Drug concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography by ultraviolet waves (HPLC-UV). R:A total of 151 requests from 137 patients were assessed. The reasons for requesting TDM were drug toxicity (59%), virological failure (39%) and possible drug interactions (2%). NNRTI levels were more often requested because of toxicity, while PI levels were more often requested because of virological failure. Elevated drug levels were confirmed in 36% of patients with suspected drug toxicity, while subtherapeutic levels were found in 37% of patients failing virologically. Based on the results of TDM, dose modifications were made in 37% of patients, allowing correction of such abnormalities in 80% of cases. Moreover, adequate plasma concentrations were confirmed in 79% of patients whose levels were assessed again. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic drug monitoring may be a useful tool to identify toxic levels of NNRTI and subtherapeutic concentrations of PI. Dose adjustments following TDM may ameliorate drug-related toxicities or improve virological response rates.

Nevirapine plasma exposure affects both durability of viral suppression and selection of nevirapine primary resistance mutations in a clinical setting.

The relationship between nevirapine plasma concentrations and the durability of both viral suppression (VS) and selection of nevirapine primary resistance mutations (PRMs) was evaluated. A nevirapine trough concentration (Ctrough) of >4,300 ng/ml was found to predict longer VS. Patients with nevirapine Ctrough s ranging from 3,100 to 4,300 ng/ml had higher probabilities of developing PRMs than those with nevirapine Ctrough s below and above this concentration interval.